Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish]
This paper aims at revealing the originality of Max Weber’s conception of the logical category of “historicity”, suggesting that in his writings on the methodology of the social sciences we can find a stimulating and forerunner contribution to the analysis of some logical and formal problems concern...
- Autores:
-
Luca Mori; University of Pisa
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad del Norte
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Uninorte
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/2843
- Acceso en línea:
- http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/4529
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2843
- Palabra clave:
- Philosophy of science;epistemology;history of philosophy
chaos, event, history, Max Weber, natural sciences, observer
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
REPOUNORT2_c8983293bb2ee4ac5c174bdb43744255 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/2843 |
| network_acronym_str |
REPOUNORT2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Uninorte |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish] La noción de “evento” (ereignis) en Max Weber y las categorías lógicas de una “Ciencia del caos” |
| title |
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish] |
| spellingShingle |
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish] Philosophy of science;epistemology;history of philosophy chaos, event, history, Max Weber, natural sciences, observer |
| title_short |
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish] |
| title_full |
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish] |
| title_fullStr |
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish] |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish] |
| title_sort |
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish] |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Luca Mori; University of Pisa |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Luca Mori; University of Pisa |
| dc.contributor.other.none.fl_str_mv |
Laboratorio filosofico sulla complessità (Facoltà di Lettere e filosofia dell'Università di Pisa-Comune di Rosignano Marittimo) |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Philosophy of science;epistemology;history of philosophy chaos, event, history, Max Weber, natural sciences, observer |
| topic |
Philosophy of science;epistemology;history of philosophy chaos, event, history, Max Weber, natural sciences, observer |
| description |
This paper aims at revealing the originality of Max Weber’s conception of the logical category of “historicity”, suggesting that in his writings on the methodology of the social sciences we can find a stimulating and forerunner contribution to the analysis of some logical and formal problems concerning the relationship between human knowledge and the chaos of reality (what we might call, ante-litteram, “science of chaos”). In particular, considering that in Weber’s conception scientific knowledge finds no facts “to grasp” in the natural world, but rather a chaos of unique and infinitely divisible events, the analysis will be focused on the following aspects: (a) Weber’s separation of causal imputation from the notion of necessary (natural) law; (b) the importance attached to “probability judgments” with different degrees of certainty; (c) the proclaimed irreducibility of individual events to scientific models, laws, and (ideal)-types; (d) the effects imputed to the differentiation of the point of view of a scientific observer. |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-31T23:00:20Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-31T23:00:20Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-31 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
article |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv |
http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/4529 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2843 |
| url |
http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/4529 http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2843 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Eidos; No. 18 (2013): Jan-Jun; 100-123 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv |
Colombia |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Norte |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Norte |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Norte reponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte |
| instname_str |
Universidad del Norte |
| institution |
Universidad del Norte |
| reponame_str |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mauribe@uninorte.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1812183130156564480 |
| spelling |
Luca Mori; University of PisaLaboratorio filosofico sulla complessità (Facoltà di Lettere e filosofia dell'Università di Pisa-Comune di Rosignano Marittimo)Colombia2013-08-31T23:00:20Z2013-08-31T23:00:20Z2013-01-31http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/4529http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2843This paper aims at revealing the originality of Max Weber’s conception of the logical category of “historicity”, suggesting that in his writings on the methodology of the social sciences we can find a stimulating and forerunner contribution to the analysis of some logical and formal problems concerning the relationship between human knowledge and the chaos of reality (what we might call, ante-litteram, “science of chaos”). In particular, considering that in Weber’s conception scientific knowledge finds no facts “to grasp” in the natural world, but rather a chaos of unique and infinitely divisible events, the analysis will be focused on the following aspects: (a) Weber’s separation of causal imputation from the notion of necessary (natural) law; (b) the importance attached to “probability judgments” with different degrees of certainty; (c) the proclaimed irreducibility of individual events to scientific models, laws, and (ideal)-types; (d) the effects imputed to the differentiation of the point of view of a scientific observer.La finalidad de este artículo es mostrar la originalidad de la categoría lógica de “historicidad” propuesta por Max Weber, sugiriendo que en sus obras sobre la metodología de las ciencias histórico-sociales se puede encontrar una estimulante y precursora contribución al análisis de algunos problemas lógicos y formales referentes a la relación entre el conocimiento humano y el caos de la realidad (lo que podríamos llamar, ante litteram, “ciencia del caos”). Particularmente, considerando que en Weber el conocimiento científico no encuentra en el mundo natural “hechos" a los cuales agarrarse sino un caos de acontecimientos únicos e infinitamente divisibles, el análisis se concentra en los siguientes aspectos: (a) la separación de la imputación causal de la noción de una ley (natural) necesaria; (b) la importancia atribuida a los “juicios de probabilidad” con diferentes grados de certeza; (c) la irreductibilidad de los acontecimientos individuales a modelos, leyes y tipos-(ideales) científicos; (d) los efectos asociados a la diferenciación del punto de vista de un observador científico.application/pdfengUniversidad del NorteEidos; No. 18 (2013): Jan-Jun; 100-123Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.Los autores que publican en Eidos acuerdan los siguientes términos:1. El Autor retiene el copyright del "Artículo", por el cual se entiende todos los objetos digitales que pueden resultar de la subsiguiente publicación o distribución electrónica.2. En conformidad con los términos de este acuerdo, el autor garantizará a Eidos como Editor el derecho de la primera publicación del artículo.3. El Autor le concederá al Editor un derecho perpetuo y no-exclusivo, así como una licencia de la misma clase, de publicar, archivar y hacer accesible el Artículo parcial o totalmente en todos los medios conocidos o por conocerse, derecho y licencia que se conocen como Creative Commons License Deed. Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0 o su equivalente que para efectos de eliminar toda duda, le permite a otros copiar, distribuir, y transmitir el Artículo bajo las siguientes condiciones: (a) Atribución: Se deben reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el Autor a Eidos, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra. (b) No Comercial: No se puede utilizar el Artículo para fines comerciales.4. El Autor puede realizar otros acuerdos contractuales no comerciales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión publicada del Artículo (v. gr. ponerlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) con la condición de que haga el debido reconocimiento de su publicación original en Eidos.5. A los Autores se les permite y Eidos promueve publicar en línea (online) la versión pre-impresa del Artículo en repositorios institucionales o en sus páginas web, antes y durante la publicación, por cuanto que puede producir intercambios académicos productivos, así como una mayor citación del Artículo publicado (ver The Effect of Open Access). Dicha publicación durante el proceso de producción y en la publicación del Artículo se espera que se actualice al momento de salir la versión final, incluyendo una referencia a la URL de Eidos.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Nortereponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del NortePhilosophy of science;epistemology;history of philosophychaos, event, history, Max Weber, natural sciences, observerMax Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish]La noción de “evento” (ereignis) en Max Weber y las categorías lógicas de una “Ciencia del caos”articlepublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_650110584/2843oai:172.16.14.36:10584/28432015-10-07 01:48:42.407Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Nortemauribe@uninorte.edu.co |