Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing

The present work studies the figure of the patrimonial responsibility ofthe Legislative State. It checks its principal precedents attending to theSpanish and French jurisprudence. It distinguishes its two principal typesor hypothesis and analyzes critically the most spread arguments that rejectits r...

Full description

Autores:
José Ignacio Núñez Leiva; Universidad Alberto Hurtado (Chile)
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2011
Institución:
Universidad del Norte
Repositorio:
Repositorio Uninorte
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/3456
Acceso en línea:
http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/1406
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3456
Palabra clave:
Derecho, Derecho Público, Derecho Constitucional
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id REPOUNORT2_85eb2be9ae628398d05b91b78bacdac7
oai_identifier_str oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/3456
network_acronym_str REPOUNORT2
network_name_str Repositorio Uninorte
repository_id_str
spelling José Ignacio Núñez Leiva; Universidad Alberto Hurtado (Chile)America Latina2013-08-31T23:04:05Z2013-08-31T23:04:05Z2011-07-07http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/1406http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3456The present work studies the figure of the patrimonial responsibility ofthe Legislative State. It checks its principal precedents attending to theSpanish and French jurisprudence. It distinguishes its two principal typesor hypothesis and analyzes critically the most spread arguments that rejectits recognition and application. It proposes that those skeptical argumentstowards the responsibility of the legislative State concern in a diverse wayits two branches.El presente trabajo estudia la figura de la responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado Legislador. Revisa sus principales antecedentes atendiendo a la jurisprudencia española y francesa. Distingue sus dos principales tipos o hipótesis y analiza críticamente los argumentos más difundidos que rechazan su reconocimiento y aplicación. Propone que aquellos argumentos escépticos hacia la responsabilidad del Estado legislador afectan de manera diversa a sus dos vertientes.application/pdfspaUniversidad del Nortehttp://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/download/1406/4394Revista de Derecho; No 35: Ene - Jun 2011instname:Universidad del Nortereponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del NorteDerecho, Derecho Público, Derecho ConstitucionalResponsibility of the legislative government: DistinguishingResponsabilidad patrimonial del Estado legislador: distinguiendo.articlepublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf210584/3456oai:172.16.14.36:10584/34562015-10-07 01:47:24.023Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Nortemauribe@uninorte.edu.co
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing
Responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado legislador: distinguiendo.
title Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing
spellingShingle Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing
Derecho, Derecho Público, Derecho Constitucional
title_short Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing
title_full Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing
title_fullStr Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing
title_full_unstemmed Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing
title_sort Responsibility of the legislative government: Distinguishing
dc.creator.fl_str_mv José Ignacio Núñez Leiva; Universidad Alberto Hurtado (Chile)
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv José Ignacio Núñez Leiva; Universidad Alberto Hurtado (Chile)
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
Derecho, Derecho Público, Derecho Constitucional
topic Derecho, Derecho Público, Derecho Constitucional
description The present work studies the figure of the patrimonial responsibility ofthe Legislative State. It checks its principal precedents attending to theSpanish and French jurisprudence. It distinguishes its two principal typesor hypothesis and analyzes critically the most spread arguments that rejectits recognition and application. It proposes that those skeptical argumentstowards the responsibility of the legislative State concern in a diverse wayits two branches.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2011-07-07
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-31T23:04:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-31T23:04:05Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv publishedVersion
dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/1406
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3456
url http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/1406
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3456
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/download/1406/4394
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; No 35: Ene - Jun 2011
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv America Latina
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Norte
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Norte
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Norte
reponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
instname_str Universidad del Norte
institution Universidad del Norte
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mauribe@uninorte.edu.co
_version_ 1812183137023688704