Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?

This paper is concerned with the problem of particularistic and objective approach to morals in the debate on global justice. The former one is usually defended by the communitarian philosophy and moderate liberal nationalism that claim for moral significance of national borders. Within this approac...

Full description

Autores:: Marta Soniewicka; Jagiellonian University, Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Ethics.

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2011

Institución:: Universidad del Norte

Repositorio:: Repositorio Uninorte

Idioma:: eng

id	REPOUNORT2_5b5511b6ed847bfcca40501dd68cf94f
oai_identifier_str	oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/2812
network_acronym_str	REPOUNORT2
network_name_str	Repositorio Uninorte
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues? Patriotismo y justicia en la dimensión global ¿Conflicto de virtudes? [Inglés]
title	Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?
spellingShingle	Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues? Philosophy Communitarism; cosmopolitism; patriotism; global justice; John Rawls; Alasdair MacIntyre; Political philosophy, global justice. Filosofía Comunitarismo; cosmopolitismo; patriotismo; justicia global; John Rawls; Alasdair MacIntyre;
title_short	Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?
title_full	Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?
title_fullStr	Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?
title_full_unstemmed	Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?
title_sort	Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Marta Soniewicka; Jagiellonian University, Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Ethics.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Marta Soniewicka; Jagiellonian University, Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Ethics.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Philosophy Communitarism; cosmopolitism; patriotism; global justice; John Rawls; Alasdair MacIntyre; Political philosophy, global justice. Filosofía Comunitarismo; cosmopolitismo; patriotismo; justicia global; John Rawls; Alasdair MacIntyre;
topic	Philosophy Communitarism; cosmopolitism; patriotism; global justice; John Rawls; Alasdair MacIntyre; Political philosophy, global justice. Filosofía Comunitarismo; cosmopolitismo; patriotismo; justicia global; John Rawls; Alasdair MacIntyre;
description	This paper is concerned with the problem of particularistic and objective approach to morals in the debate on global justice. The former one is usually defended by the communitarian philosophy and moderate liberal nationalism that claim for moral significance of national borders. Within this approach, patriotism is a fundamental virtue. The latter approach is presented by the cosmopolitans who apply the Rawlsian justice as fairness to the world at large. They reject moral significance of national borders and claim for equal rights and obligations to all human beings regardless of their origin and nationality. This approach to global justice treats patriotism as a vice. The main aim of this essay is to analyse whether the concept of patriotism and the concept of global justice necessarily come into conflict with one other.
publishDate	2011
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2011-07-15
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2013-08-31T23:00:12Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2013-08-31T23:00:12Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv	http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/2138
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2812
url	http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/2138 http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2812
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv	Eidos; No 14: Jan-Jun, 2011; 50-71
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv	Colombia
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad del Norte
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad del Norte
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad del Norte reponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
instname_str	Universidad del Norte
institution	Universidad del Norte
reponame_str	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
collection	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	mauribe@uninorte.edu.co
_version_	1812183096335794176
spelling	Marta Soniewicka; Jagiellonian University, Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Ethics.Colombia2013-08-31T23:00:12Z2013-08-31T23:00:12Z2011-07-15http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/2138http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2812This paper is concerned with the problem of particularistic and objective approach to morals in the debate on global justice. The former one is usually defended by the communitarian philosophy and moderate liberal nationalism that claim for moral significance of national borders. Within this approach, patriotism is a fundamental virtue. The latter approach is presented by the cosmopolitans who apply the Rawlsian justice as fairness to the world at large. They reject moral significance of national borders and claim for equal rights and obligations to all human beings regardless of their origin and nationality. This approach to global justice treats patriotism as a vice. The main aim of this essay is to analyse whether the concept of patriotism and the concept of global justice necessarily come into conflict with one other.Este artículo trata el problema de los enfoques pluralista y objetivo de la moral en el debate sobre la justicia global. El primero usualmente es defendido por la filosofía comunitarista y el nacionalismo liberal moderado que promueve el significado de las fronteras nacionales. Para este enfoque, el patriotismo es una virtud fundamental. El segundo es defendido por los partidarios del cosmopolitismo que basan en la noción de justicia desarrollada por Rawls, la cual se entiende como igualdad en el mundo en general. Estos últimos rechazan el significado moral de las fronteras nacionales y reclaman derechos y obligaciones en términos de igualdad para todos los seres humanos sin importar su origen y nacionalidad. Este enfoque de la justicia global concibe el patriotismo como un vicio. El objetivo principal de este ensayo es analizar si los conceptos de patriotismo y justicia global necesariamente entran en mutuo conflicto.application/pdfengUniversidad del NorteEidos; No 14: Jan-Jun, 2011; 50-71Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.Los autores que publican en Eidos acuerdan los siguientes términos:1. El Autor retiene el copyright del "Artículo", por el cual se entiende todos los objetos digitales que pueden resultar de la subsiguiente publicación o distribución electrónica.2. En conformidad con los términos de este acuerdo, el autor garantizará a Eidos como Editor el derecho de la primera publicación del artículo.3. El Autor le concederá al Editor un derecho perpetuo y no-exclusivo, así como una licencia de la misma clase, de publicar, archivar y hacer accesible el Artículo parcial o totalmente en todos los medios conocidos o por conocerse, derecho y licencia que se conocen como Creative Commons License Deed. Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0 o su equivalente que para efectos de eliminar toda duda, le permite a otros copiar, distribuir, y transmitir el Artículo bajo las siguientes condiciones: (a) Atribución: Se deben reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el Autor a Eidos, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra. (b) No Comercial: No se puede utilizar el Artículo para fines comerciales.4. El Autor puede realizar otros acuerdos contractuales no comerciales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión publicada del Artículo (v. gr. ponerlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) con la condición de que haga el debido reconocimiento de su publicación original en Eidos.5. A los Autores se les permite y Eidos promueve publicar en línea (online) la versión pre-impresa del Artículo en repositorios institucionales o en sus páginas web, antes y durante la publicación, por cuanto que puede producir intercambios académicos productivos, así como una mayor citación del Artículo publicado (ver The Effect of Open Access). Dicha publicación durante el proceso de producción y en la publicación del Artículo se espera que se actualice al momento de salir la versión final, incluyendo una referencia a la URL de Eidos.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Nortereponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del NortePhilosophyCommunitarism; cosmopolitism; patriotism; global justice; John Rawls; Alasdair MacIntyre;Political philosophy, global justice.FilosofíaComunitarismo; cosmopolitismo; patriotismo; justicia global; John Rawls; Alasdair MacIntyre;Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?Patriotismo y justicia en la dimensión global ¿Conflicto de virtudes? [Inglés]articlepublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_650110584/2812oai:172.16.14.36:10584/28122015-10-07 01:48:42.272Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Nortemauribe@uninorte.edu.co

Patriotism and Justice in the Global Dimension. A Conflict of Virtues?

Publicaciones similares