Thinking Immanence: Gilles Deleuze and François Jullien [Spanish]
The present paper analyzes the dialogue between Gilles Deleuze and François Jullien. We focus on three axes articulated by the idea of immanence. Firstly, we shall compare the usage of the expression “absolutization of immanence”, coined by the sinologist in order to play down transcendence in Chine...
- Autores:
-
Marcelo Sebastián Antonelli; UBA, CONICET
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad del Norte
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Uninorte
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/2852
- Acceso en línea:
- http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/4740
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2852
- Palabra clave:
- Filosofía; Filosofía Contemporánea
Philosophy
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Summary: | The present paper analyzes the dialogue between Gilles Deleuze and François Jullien. We focus on three axes articulated by the idea of immanence. Firstly, we shall compare the usage of the expression “absolutization of immanence”, coined by the sinologist in order to play down transcendence in Chinese thought, which was eventually applied by Deleuze within the realm of belief in this world. Secondly, we shall examine Jullien’s critic to Deleuze on the relation between philosophy and wisdom. We sustain that even if the deleuzian description presents ambivalence in the “pre-philosophical” plane of immanence, it does not entail the superiority of philosophy. Thirdly, we shall confront the divergent perspectives on immanence: Deleuze’s treatment as plan and Jullien’s conception as fonds. Finally, we shall expose the hardship to think the idea of immanence present in the work of both authors. |
---|