Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish]
The problem of incommensurability and, particulary, the one of the scientific progress, is associated two names: Kuhn and Feyerabend, whose proposals caused than many put in doubt the apparent evidence of the call scientific progress, relativizing its validity to each school or paradigm. In this wri...
- Autores:
-
Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe; Universidad del Valle. Universidad de Caldas
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2006
- Institución:
- Universidad del Norte
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Uninorte
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/2778
- Acceso en línea:
- http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/1495
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2778
- Palabra clave:
- Incommensurability; scientific progress; relation of approach; statment view; non-statement view;
Inconmensurabilidad; progreso científico; reducción aproximativa; concepción enunciativista; concepción no-enunciativista;
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
REPOUNORT2_2c1d32dda484be46240bfcb5dfd6ba9d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/2778 |
| network_acronym_str |
REPOUNORT2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Uninorte |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish] ¿Es compatible la idea de inconmensurabilidad no trivial con la de progreso científico? Algunas razones a favor de su compatibilidad. |
| title |
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish] |
| spellingShingle |
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish] Incommensurability; scientific progress; relation of approach; statment view; non-statement view; Inconmensurabilidad; progreso científico; reducción aproximativa; concepción enunciativista; concepción no-enunciativista; |
| title_short |
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish] |
| title_full |
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish] |
| title_fullStr |
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish] |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish] |
| title_sort |
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish] |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe; Universidad del Valle. Universidad de Caldas |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe; Universidad del Valle. Universidad de Caldas |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Incommensurability; scientific progress; relation of approach; statment view; non-statement view; Inconmensurabilidad; progreso científico; reducción aproximativa; concepción enunciativista; concepción no-enunciativista; |
| topic |
Incommensurability; scientific progress; relation of approach; statment view; non-statement view; Inconmensurabilidad; progreso científico; reducción aproximativa; concepción enunciativista; concepción no-enunciativista; |
| description |
The problem of incommensurability and, particulary, the one of the scientific progress, is associated two names: Kuhn and Feyerabend, whose proposals caused than many put in doubt the apparent evidence of the call scientific progress, relativizing its validity to each school or paradigm. In this writing we will show that this type of epistemic relativism —just as convergentist theory of the truth— they lack of philosophical validity and historical and how the idea of scientific progress is compatible with the thesis of the incommensurability beyond the ontosemantics difficulties that it implies. This suppose to leave the the call statement view of the scientific theories and adopt a non-statement view where the intertheoretical relation of approach allows to subsink different non trivial incommensurability and to validate in them the notion of scientific progress. |
| publishDate |
2006 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-20 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-31T23:00:02Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-31T23:00:02Z |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
article |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv |
http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/1495 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2778 |
| url |
http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/1495 http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2778 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Eidos; No 5: Jul-Dec, 2006; 10-49 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv |
Colombia |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Norte |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Norte |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Norte reponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte |
| instname_str |
Universidad del Norte |
| institution |
Universidad del Norte |
| reponame_str |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mauribe@uninorte.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1812183127827677184 |
| spelling |
Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe; Universidad del Valle. Universidad de CaldasColombia2013-08-31T23:00:02Z2013-08-31T23:00:02Z2006-12-20http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/1495http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2778The problem of incommensurability and, particulary, the one of the scientific progress, is associated two names: Kuhn and Feyerabend, whose proposals caused than many put in doubt the apparent evidence of the call scientific progress, relativizing its validity to each school or paradigm. In this writing we will show that this type of epistemic relativism —just as convergentist theory of the truth— they lack of philosophical validity and historical and how the idea of scientific progress is compatible with the thesis of the incommensurability beyond the ontosemantics difficulties that it implies. This suppose to leave the the call statement view of the scientific theories and adopt a non-statement view where the intertheoretical relation of approach allows to subsink different non trivial incommensurability and to validate in them the notion of scientific progress.El problema de la inconmensurabilidad y, en particular, el del progreso científico, está asociado a -dos nombres: Kuhn y Feyerabend, cuyas propuestas hicieron que muchos pusieran en duda la aparente evidencia del llamado “progreso científico, relativizando su validez a cada escuela o paradigma. En este escrito mostraremos que este tipo de relativismo epistémico —al igual que la teoría convergentista de la verdad— carecen de validez filosófica e histórica y de qué modo la idea de “progreso científico es compatible con la tesis de la inconmensurabilidad más allá de las dificultades onto-semánticas que ella implica. Esto supone abandonar el llamado punto de vista enunciativo de las teorías científicas (centrado sobre sentencias o enunciados) y adoptar un punto de vista no-enunciativista (centrado sobre estructuras o sistemas donde la relación interteórica de aproximación permite subsumir diferentes casos de inconmensurablidad no triviales y validar en ellos la noción de progreso científico.application/pdfspaUniversidad del NorteEidos; No 5: Jul-Dec, 2006; 10-49Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.Los autores que publican en Eidos acuerdan los siguientes términos:1. El Autor retiene el copyright del "Artículo", por el cual se entiende todos los objetos digitales que pueden resultar de la subsiguiente publicación o distribución electrónica.2. En conformidad con los términos de este acuerdo, el autor garantizará a Eidos como Editor el derecho de la primera publicación del artículo.3. El Autor le concederá al Editor un derecho perpetuo y no-exclusivo, así como una licencia de la misma clase, de publicar, archivar y hacer accesible el Artículo parcial o totalmente en todos los medios conocidos o por conocerse, derecho y licencia que se conocen como Creative Commons License Deed. Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0 o su equivalente que para efectos de eliminar toda duda, le permite a otros copiar, distribuir, y transmitir el Artículo bajo las siguientes condiciones: (a) Atribución: Se deben reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el Autor a Eidos, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra. (b) No Comercial: No se puede utilizar el Artículo para fines comerciales.4. El Autor puede realizar otros acuerdos contractuales no comerciales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión publicada del Artículo (v. gr. ponerlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) con la condición de que haga el debido reconocimiento de su publicación original en Eidos.5. A los Autores se les permite y Eidos promueve publicar en línea (online) la versión pre-impresa del Artículo en repositorios institucionales o en sus páginas web, antes y durante la publicación, por cuanto que puede producir intercambios académicos productivos, así como una mayor citación del Artículo publicado (ver The Effect of Open Access). Dicha publicación durante el proceso de producción y en la publicación del Artículo se espera que se actualice al momento de salir la versión final, incluyendo una referencia a la URL de Eidos.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Nortereponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del NorteIncommensurability; scientific progress; relation of approach; statment view; non-statement view;Inconmensurabilidad; progreso científico; reducción aproximativa; concepción enunciativista; concepción no-enunciativista;Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility. [Spanish]¿Es compatible la idea de inconmensurabilidad no trivial con la de progreso científico? Algunas razones a favor de su compatibilidad.articlepublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_650110584/2778oai:172.16.14.36:10584/27782015-10-07 01:48:42.124Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Nortemauribe@uninorte.edu.co |