The Art of Earth Measuring: Overlapping Scientific Styles

The aim of this paper is to point out significant and meaningful overlapping between several styles of scientific thinking, as they were proposed by Crombie (1981) and discussed by Hacking (1985; 2009). This paper is divided in four sections. First, I examine an interpretation made by Barnes (2004) about the incompatibility among scientific styles. As explained by its author, this interpretation denies any possibility of similarities between styles of scientific reasoning. In opposition, the following sections of this paper include explanations of relevant characteristics of Geometry, as stated in Euclid’s Elements (300 BC), which are also present in other three scientific styles: modeling, experimental exploration and taxonomic style (and some of the shared characteristics are even used to define such styles). By stressing out these characteristics I argue that these four styles discussed by Hacking are not so different from each other, in fact, they overlap and may even be abridged into one foundational style: geometric.

• Autores: Carlos Galindo; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
• Fecha de publicación: 2013
• Institución: Universidad del Norte
• Repositorio: Repositorio Uninorte
• Idioma: eng
• OAI Identifier: oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/2836
• Acceso en línea: http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/3864; http://hdl.handle.net/10584/2836
• Palabra clave: Philosophy of Sciencie; Scientific styles, Geometry, modeling, measuring, taxonomy; Styles of Scientific Thinking
• License: http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2