Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle

Within the philosophy of contemporary democracy it is common to findpositions that understand the dawn of modern constitutionalism as thetwilight of democracy and the return to an elitist and aristocratic model ofin which the last word will always be held by a select group of lawyers, eventhough the...

Full description

Autores:
Daniel E. Florez Muñoz; Universidad de Cartagena.
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2011
Institución:
Universidad del Norte
Repositorio:
Repositorio Uninorte
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/3459
Acceso en línea:
http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/1414
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3459
Palabra clave:
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id REPOUNORT2_142563fa333f721f3de3a9638f69ab6a
oai_identifier_str oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/3459
network_acronym_str REPOUNORT2
network_name_str Repositorio Uninorte
repository_id_str
spelling Daniel E. Florez Muñoz; Universidad de Cartagena.Colombia2013-08-31T23:04:05Z2013-08-31T23:04:05Z2011-07-07http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/1414http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3459Within the philosophy of contemporary democracy it is common to findpositions that understand the dawn of modern constitutionalism as thetwilight of democracy and the return to an elitist and aristocratic model ofin which the last word will always be held by a select group of lawyers, eventhough their decision is openly against the majority and, therefore, in hisview, anti-democratic. In that sense, this paper will aim to expose some ofthe contemporary readings in relation to the tensions between democracy ()(people) and Constitution (Constitutional Court), taking into considerationwhat today are perhaps the most influential theories in the global academy. Here will be discussed the theory of constitutional limits Elster, PopularConstitutionalism Kramer, Waldron, and Tushnet, and the theory of theOpen Society Interpreters Peter Häberle.Al interior de la filosofía de la democracia contemporánea resulta común encontrar posiciones que entienden al amanecer del constitucionalismo contemporáneo como el anochecer de la democracia y el retorno a un modelo elitista de corte aristocrático en el cual la ultima palabra siempre la tendrán un grupo de selectos juristas aún cuando su decisión sea abiertamente contra mayoritaria y, por lo tanto, –a su entender– antidemocrática. En ese sentido, el presente trabajo tendrá por objetivo exponer algunas de las lecturas contemporáneas en relación a las tensiones entre democracia (Pueblo) y Constitución (Tribunal Constitucional), tomando las que hoy en día son quizá las teorías más influyentes dentro de la academia global. Me refiero a la teoría de los límites constitucionales de Elster, el Constitucionalismo Popular de Kramer, Waldron y Tushnet, y la teoría de la Sociedad Abierta a los Intérpretes de Peter Häberle.application/pdfspaUniversidad del NorteRevista de Derecho; No 35: Ene - Jun 2011instname:Universidad del Nortereponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del NorteLaw and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. HaberleDerecho y sociedad en el estado constitucional: una introducción desde J. Elster, L. Kramer Y P. HäberlearticlepublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf210584/3459oai:172.16.14.36:10584/34592015-10-07 01:47:24.044Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Nortemauribe@uninorte.edu.co
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle
Derecho y sociedad en el estado constitucional: una introducción desde J. Elster, L. Kramer Y P. Häberle
title Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle
spellingShingle Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle
title_short Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle
title_full Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle
title_fullStr Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle
title_full_unstemmed Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle
title_sort Law and Society in the Constitutional State: An introduction from J. Elster, L. Kramer and P. Haberle
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Daniel E. Florez Muñoz; Universidad de Cartagena.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Daniel E. Florez Muñoz; Universidad de Cartagena.
description Within the philosophy of contemporary democracy it is common to findpositions that understand the dawn of modern constitutionalism as thetwilight of democracy and the return to an elitist and aristocratic model ofin which the last word will always be held by a select group of lawyers, eventhough their decision is openly against the majority and, therefore, in hisview, anti-democratic. In that sense, this paper will aim to expose some ofthe contemporary readings in relation to the tensions between democracy ()(people) and Constitution (Constitutional Court), taking into considerationwhat today are perhaps the most influential theories in the global academy. Here will be discussed the theory of constitutional limits Elster, PopularConstitutionalism Kramer, Waldron, and Tushnet, and the theory of theOpen Society Interpreters Peter Häberle.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2011-07-07
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-31T23:04:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-31T23:04:05Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv publishedVersion
dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/1414
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3459
url http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/1414
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3459
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; No 35: Ene - Jun 2011
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv Colombia
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Norte
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Norte
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Norte
reponame:Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
instname_str Universidad del Norte
institution Universidad del Norte
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital de la Universidad del Norte
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mauribe@uninorte.edu.co
_version_ 1828169931111268352

Publicaciones similares