Substantial identity between crime and administrative violation
Sustain the legitimacy of the analogical application in bonampartem of the law and the consequent interdiction of the analogyin pejus, are debating the existence of a substantial identitybetween crimes and administrative offences, justifying theanalogical application of the law, to give fullness to...
- Autores:
-
Javier Enrique Merlano Sierra; Universidad del Norte
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2011
- Institución:
- Universidad del Norte
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Uninorte
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/3406
- Acceso en línea:
- http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/2835
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3406
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| Summary: | Sustain the legitimacy of the analogical application in bonampartem of the law and the consequent interdiction of the analogyin pejus, are debating the existence of a substantial identitybetween crimes and administrative offences, justifying theanalogical application of the law, to give fullness to colombianadministrative sanctioning law; which positive regulation isscattered, sectoral and insufficient. Therefore, we maintain theexistence of an ontological identity between the administrativeoffence and the crime, especially on principles-dogmaticcategories that built it, and that justifies the application of legalinstitutions for the beneficial effect for citizen, absent in thenational administrative sanction law, but positivised in theColombian Penal Code. An exploratory-descriptive methodology,in the base of bibliographical documents, periodical publications, and precedents of the justice, is used. |
|---|