Estado de naturaleza, naturaleza del Estado

The author aims at: (1) Analyzing Hobb’s and Lock’s social-pact models, showing their defficiencies, especially their link to a political optimism, proved to be wrong through facts. (2) Proposing a criteria based upon the coexistence dynamism for the evaluation of the political legitimacy , a criteria that would serve as an approach to history and to the socialization process developed in it. (3) Describing the basic kinds of societies, making a special emphasis on the characteristics of the human kind fostered by liberal societies with a high technological development.The text is inscribed within what one might denominate as a disenchanted rationalism. Rousseau provides some of the instruments applied and developed herein.

• Fecha de publicación: 2004
• Institución: Universidad de Medellín
• Repositorio: Repositorio UDEM
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/1771
• Acceso en línea: http://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/1319; http://hdl.handle.net/11407/1771
• Palabra clave: Coacción; colectividad; estado de naturaleza / Estado social; individuación; pacto social; potencialidad; propiedad; socialización; suelo humano; utopía
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/