Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización]
Organizations that implement improvement processes to develop quality software usually appeal to SCAMPl-like evaluation methods in order to diagnose, plan and certify themselves. However, nowadays there is a need that goes beyond the evaluation, and it is the need to diagnose the processes maturity...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad de Medellín
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UDEM
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/4330
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/11407/4330
- Palabra clave:
- Models
Multimodel environment
Software engineering
Software process improvement
Standars
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
id |
REPOUDEM2_9f4d44430bc44b955ed58178f3f51f33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/4330 |
network_acronym_str |
REPOUDEM2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UDEM |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] |
title |
Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] |
spellingShingle |
Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] Models Multimodel environment Software engineering Software process improvement Standars |
title_short |
Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] |
title_full |
Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] |
title_fullStr |
Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] |
title_sort |
Software process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización] |
dc.contributor.affiliation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, UDEM, Medellín, Colombia Hincapie, J.A., Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, UDEM, Medellín, Colombia Munoz, M., Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT A.C, Av. Universidad No. 222, Fracc. La Loma, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico |
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv |
Models Multimodel environment Software engineering Software process improvement Standars |
topic |
Models Multimodel environment Software engineering Software process improvement Standars |
description |
Organizations that implement improvement processes to develop quality software usually appeal to SCAMPl-like evaluation methods in order to diagnose, plan and certify themselves. However, nowadays there is a need that goes beyond the evaluation, and it is the need to diagnose the processes maturity of the software development organizations that use more than one process improvement model or standard, i.e. a multi-model environment. lmplementing a multi-model environment for software process improvement is not an easy task since it demands the harmonization of models or standards with dissimilar structures, hence diagnosing the maturity of an organization that defines and implements a multi-model environment it not an easy task either. This work depicts a software tool to accomplish a diagnostic of an organization that uses or pretends to define a software process improvement multi-model environment that includes both traditional and agile models and standards. Such diagnostic determines the processes maturity level of an organization and allows us to define a methodology for recommending tools and techniques for software process improvement. © 2017 AISTI. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-19T19:36:48Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-19T19:36:48Z |
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
Conference Paper |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
dc.identifier.isbn.none.fl_str_mv |
9789899843479 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
21660727 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11407/4330 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975701 |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad de Medellín |
identifier_str_mv |
9789899843479 21660727 10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975701 reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín instname:Universidad de Medellín |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11407/4330 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.isversionof.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85027080476&doi=10.23919%2fCISTI.2017.7975701&partnerID=40&md5=1d19873372e5e081b81ede7158acb838 |
dc.relation.ispartofes.spa.fl_str_mv |
Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI |
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Marino, L., Morley, J., Process improvement in a multi-model environment builds resilient organizations (2009) NEWS at SEI, Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Salinas, C.J.T., Escalona, M.J., Mejías, M., A scrum-based approach to CMMI maturity level 2 in web development environments (2012) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services-IIWAS '12, p. 282 Monteiro, P., Borges, P., Machado, R.J., Ribeiro, P., A reduced set of RUP roles to small software development teams (2012) 2012 International Conference on Software and System Process, ICSSP 2012-Proceedings, pp. 190-199 Tuan, N., Thang, H., Combining maturity with agility: Lessons learnt from a case study (2013) Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 267-274 Salviano, C., A multi-model process improvement methodology driven by capability profiles (2009) Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2009. COMPSAC'09. 33rd Annual IEEE International Kelemen, Z.D., Kusters, R., Trienekens, J., Identifying criteria for multimodel software process improvement solutions-based on a review of current problems and initiatives (2012) J. Softw. Evol. Process, 24 (8), pp. 895-909 Muñoz, M., Mejia, J., Muñoz, E., Evolving process improvement using multi-model enviroments and knowledge management [Evolucionando la mejora de procesos basada en el uso de entornos multimodelo y la gestión del conocimiento] (2014) Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI Mejia, J., Muñoz, E., Muñoz, M., Reinforcing the applicability of multi-model environments for software process improvement using knowledge management (2016) Sci. Comput. Program, 121, pp. 3-15 Hincapie, J.A., Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Bustamante, A.F., Multimodel catalogue heuristics for software project managemet (2016) 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1-6 (2011) Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, Version 1. 3: Method Definition Document, , S. Team Muñoz, M., Mejia, J., Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Cuevas, G., San Feliu, T., Evaluación de los Procesos Software de una Organización Enfocando en la Disminución de la Resistencia al Cambio (2012) Comput. Sci. Eng, 2 (4), pp. 66-73 Grambow, G., Automated software engineering process assessment: Supporting diverse models using an ontology (2013) Int'l J. Adv. Softw, 6 (1-2), pp. 213-224 Peldzius, S., Ragaisis, S., Tool for usage of multiple process assessment models (2014) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, pp. 106-117 Paganelli, F., Bianchi, G., Giuli, D., A context model for context-aware system design towards the ambient intelligence vision: Experiences in the etourism domain (2007) Univers. Access Ambient Intell. Environ, 4397, pp. 173-191 Zarour, M., Alarifi, A., Abran, A., Desharnais, J.-M., Evaluating the assessment method of the software maintenance maturity model (2012) 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and E-Services, ICITeS 2012 Leff, A., Rayfield, J.T., Web-application development using the Model/View/Controller design pattern (2001) Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 118-127 Kruchten, P.B., The 4+1 view model of architecture (1995) Software, IEEE, 12 (6), pp. 42-50 Miller, F.P., Vandome, A.F., McBrewster, J., (2010) Active Record Pattern. |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
IEEE Computer Society |
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ingenierías |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Scopus |
institution |
Universidad de Medellín |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repository.udem.edu.co/bitstream/11407/4330/1/portada.JPG |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d76b3831caf680cbfcf1272c115ab6d8 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellin |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@udem.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814159150367637504 |
spelling |
2017-12-19T19:36:48Z2017-12-19T19:36:48Z2017978989984347921660727http://hdl.handle.net/11407/433010.23919/CISTI.2017.7975701reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellíninstname:Universidad de MedellínOrganizations that implement improvement processes to develop quality software usually appeal to SCAMPl-like evaluation methods in order to diagnose, plan and certify themselves. However, nowadays there is a need that goes beyond the evaluation, and it is the need to diagnose the processes maturity of the software development organizations that use more than one process improvement model or standard, i.e. a multi-model environment. lmplementing a multi-model environment for software process improvement is not an easy task since it demands the harmonization of models or standards with dissimilar structures, hence diagnosing the maturity of an organization that defines and implements a multi-model environment it not an easy task either. This work depicts a software tool to accomplish a diagnostic of an organization that uses or pretends to define a software process improvement multi-model environment that includes both traditional and agile models and standards. Such diagnostic determines the processes maturity level of an organization and allows us to define a methodology for recommending tools and techniques for software process improvement. © 2017 AISTI.Organizations that implement improvement processes to develop quality software usually appeal to SCAMPl-like evaluation methods in order to diagnose, plan and certify themselves. However, nowadays there is a need that goes beyond the evaluation, and it is the need to diagnose the processes maturity of the software development organizations that use more than one process improvement model or standard, i.e. a multi-model environment. lmplementing a multi-model environment for software process improvement is not an easy task since it demands the harmonization of models or standards with dissimilar structures, hence diagnosing the maturity of an organization that defines and implements a multi-model environment it not an easy task either. This work depicts a software tool to accomplish a diagnostic of an organization that uses or pretends to define a software process improvement multi-model environment that includes both traditional and agile models and standards. Such diagnostic determines the processes maturity level of an organization and allows us to define a methodology for recommending tools and techniques for software process improvement. © 2017 AISTI.spaIEEE Computer SocietyFacultad de Ingenieríashttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85027080476&doi=10.23919%2fCISTI.2017.7975701&partnerID=40&md5=1d19873372e5e081b81ede7158acb838Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTIMarino, L., Morley, J., Process improvement in a multi-model environment builds resilient organizations (2009) NEWS at SEI, Software Engineering Institute (SEI)Salinas, C.J.T., Escalona, M.J., Mejías, M., A scrum-based approach to CMMI maturity level 2 in web development environments (2012) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services-IIWAS '12, p. 282Monteiro, P., Borges, P., Machado, R.J., Ribeiro, P., A reduced set of RUP roles to small software development teams (2012) 2012 International Conference on Software and System Process, ICSSP 2012-Proceedings, pp. 190-199Tuan, N., Thang, H., Combining maturity with agility: Lessons learnt from a case study (2013) Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 267-274Salviano, C., A multi-model process improvement methodology driven by capability profiles (2009) Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2009. COMPSAC'09. 33rd Annual IEEE InternationalKelemen, Z.D., Kusters, R., Trienekens, J., Identifying criteria for multimodel software process improvement solutions-based on a review of current problems and initiatives (2012) J. Softw. Evol. Process, 24 (8), pp. 895-909Muñoz, M., Mejia, J., Muñoz, E., Evolving process improvement using multi-model enviroments and knowledge management [Evolucionando la mejora de procesos basada en el uso de entornos multimodelo y la gestión del conocimiento] (2014) Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTIMejia, J., Muñoz, E., Muñoz, M., Reinforcing the applicability of multi-model environments for software process improvement using knowledge management (2016) Sci. Comput. Program, 121, pp. 3-15Hincapie, J.A., Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Bustamante, A.F., Multimodel catalogue heuristics for software project managemet (2016) 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1-6(2011) Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, Version 1. 3: Method Definition Document, , S. TeamMuñoz, M., Mejia, J., Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Cuevas, G., San Feliu, T., Evaluación de los Procesos Software de una Organización Enfocando en la Disminución de la Resistencia al Cambio (2012) Comput. Sci. Eng, 2 (4), pp. 66-73Grambow, G., Automated software engineering process assessment: Supporting diverse models using an ontology (2013) Int'l J. Adv. Softw, 6 (1-2), pp. 213-224Peldzius, S., Ragaisis, S., Tool for usage of multiple process assessment models (2014) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, pp. 106-117Paganelli, F., Bianchi, G., Giuli, D., A context model for context-aware system design towards the ambient intelligence vision: Experiences in the etourism domain (2007) Univers. Access Ambient Intell. Environ, 4397, pp. 173-191Zarour, M., Alarifi, A., Abran, A., Desharnais, J.-M., Evaluating the assessment method of the software maintenance maturity model (2012) 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and E-Services, ICITeS 2012Leff, A., Rayfield, J.T., Web-application development using the Model/View/Controller design pattern (2001) Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 118-127Kruchten, P.B., The 4+1 view model of architecture (1995) Software, IEEE, 12 (6), pp. 42-50Miller, F.P., Vandome, A.F., McBrewster, J., (2010) Active Record Pattern.ScopusSoftware process improvement assesment for multimodel environment tool to diagnose an organization [Evaluación de mejora de procesos software para entornos multi-modelo Herramienta para el diagnóstico de una organización]Conference Paperinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94fGasca-Hurtado, G.P., Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, UDEM, Medellín, ColombiaHincapie, J.A., Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, UDEM, Medellín, ColombiaMunoz, M., Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT A.C, Av. Universidad No. 222, Fracc. La Loma, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, MexicoGasca-Hurtado G.P.Hincapie J.A.Munoz M.Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de Medellín, UDEM, Medellín, ColombiaCentro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT A.C, Av. Universidad No. 222, Fracc. La Loma, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, MexicoModelsMultimodel environmentSoftware engineeringSoftware process improvementStandarshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecTHUMBNAILportada.JPGportada.JPGimage/jpeg15153http://repository.udem.edu.co/bitstream/11407/4330/1/portada.JPGd76b3831caf680cbfcf1272c115ab6d8MD5111407/4330oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/43302020-05-27 16:33:27.98Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellinrepositorio@udem.edu.co |