Do living machines exist? On the relationship between life and technique [¿Existen las máquinas vivientes? Sobre la relación entre vida y técnica]

The industrial biotechnology calls the products of synthetic biology "living machines". As I want to demonstrate in this article, the concept of "living machine" is misleading. the products of synthetic biology are rather modified organisms. Starting from the Kantian concept of a...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad de Medellín
Repositorio:
Repositorio UDEM
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/3134
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/11407/3134
Palabra clave:
Animal
Being-for-itself
Being-for-other
Hegel
Internal purposiveness
Kant
Life
Living body
Living machines
Man
Organism
Plant
Plessner
Synthetic biology
Thing-in-itself
Whitehead
Rights
restrictedAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
Description
Summary:The industrial biotechnology calls the products of synthetic biology "living machines". As I want to demonstrate in this article, the concept of "living machine" is misleading. the products of synthetic biology are rather modified organisms. Starting from the Kantian concept of an internal finality as the main characteristic of the living, Hegel showed that all living being is not only a being-for-itself, but also a being-for-others. As Plessner pointed out, this difference is the origin of technique, which is, according to his conception, an integral part of the process of life. We find this idea also in the organic philosophy of Whitehead. the possibility of mechanization of life originates from process of life itself. © 2016 CSIC.