Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health

This paper intends to justify the theory of legal pluralism for studying environmental health issues. The positive law approach has made some headway, although some areas of environmental health seem to be incipient. Hard law has encountered difficulties to succeed in enforcing industrial pollution...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad de Medellín
Repositorio:
Repositorio UDEM
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/5478
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5478
https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v18n36a10
Palabra clave:
Legal positivism
Legal pluralism
Environmental health
Interlegality
Direito positivo
Pluralismo jurídico
Saúde ambiental
Interlegalidade
Derecho positivo
Pluralismo jurídico
Salud ambiental
Interlegalidad
Rights
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
id REPOUDEM2_4662b325bd55e197b8df128c5cf80efc
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/5478
network_acronym_str REPOUDEM2
network_name_str Repositorio UDEM
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Pluralismo legal como teoria para os desafios em saúde ambiental
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Pluralismo jurídico como teoría para los desafíos en salud ambiental
title Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health
spellingShingle Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health
Legal positivism
Legal pluralism
Environmental health
Interlegality
Direito positivo
Pluralismo jurídico
Saúde ambiental
Interlegalidade
Derecho positivo
Pluralismo jurídico
Salud ambiental
Interlegalidad
title_short Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health
title_full Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health
title_fullStr Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health
title_full_unstemmed Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health
title_sort Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health
dc.contributor.affiliation.none.fl_str_mv Becerra Rodríguez, Ronald Ralf; Corporación Universidad Republicana (Colombia).
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Legal positivism
Legal pluralism
Environmental health
Interlegality
topic Legal positivism
Legal pluralism
Environmental health
Interlegality
Direito positivo
Pluralismo jurídico
Saúde ambiental
Interlegalidade
Derecho positivo
Pluralismo jurídico
Salud ambiental
Interlegalidad
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito positivo
Pluralismo jurídico
Saúde ambiental
Interlegalidade
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Derecho positivo
Pluralismo jurídico
Salud ambiental
Interlegalidad
description This paper intends to justify the theory of legal pluralism for studying environmental health issues. The positive law approach has made some headway, although some areas of environmental health seem to be incipient. Hard law has encountered difficulties to succeed in enforcing industrial pollution or water contamination. Furthermore, national jurisdictions are prone to support particular economic interests. This conundrum of legal positivism encourages challenging it with the theory of pluralism. It is found that the latter might allow deliberation and active participation of non-state actors within environmental health. It is also discussed that the plurality of law allows certain flexibility due to its little hierarchization, the lack of theoretical rules and the relaxation of state sovereignty.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-15T15:38:24Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-15T15:38:24Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-16
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1692-2530
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5478
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v18n36a10
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2248-4078
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad de Medellín
identifier_str_mv 1692-2530
2248-4078
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
instname:Universidad de Medellín
url http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5478
https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v18n36a10
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/2880
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Opinión Jurídica
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv Opinión Jurídica, Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 18 Núm. 36 (2019)
dc.relation.haspart.none.fl_str_mv Opinión Jurídica; Vol. 18 Núm. 36 enero-junio 2019
dc.relation.citationvolume.none.fl_str_mv 18
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv 36
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 233
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 256
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv Ahrén, M. (2004). Indigenous People’s culture, customs, and Traditions and Customary Law- The Saami People’s Perspective. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 21(1), 63-112.
Bal, L. (2012). Le Myhte de la souveraineté en Droit International. La souveraineté des États à l’Épreuve des mutations de l’ordre juridique international. (tesis de doctorado). Strasbourg, France: University of Strasbourg.
Berman, P. S. (2013). Le nouveau pluralisme juridique. Revue internationale de droit économique, XXVII(1), 229-256. doi: 10.3917/ride.259.0229
Besson, S. (2011). Sovereignty, International Law and Democracy. The European Journal of International Law, 22(2), 373-387.
Boyd, D. (2012). The right to a Healthy Environment. Revitalizing Canada’s Constitution. Vancouver: UBC Press. Retrieved from https://www.ubcpress.ca/asset/9095/1/9780774824125.pdf
Broughton, E. (2005). The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review. Environmental Health, 4(6), 1-6. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-4-6
ull R. B. (2008). Environmental Pluralism. En Callicot, J. B. y Frodeman, R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Ehtics and Philosophy (pp. 384-387). United States: Macmillan Reference, Gale Cengage Learning.
Cicolella, A. (2013). Toxique Planète: Le scandale invisible des maladies chroniques. Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil.
Departamento Nacional de Planeación (2008). Documento Conpes 3550. Lineamientos para la formulación de la política integral de salud ambiental con énfasis en los componentes de aire, calidad de agua y seguridad química. Retrieved from: http://www.minambiente.gov.co.
Dilwyn, A. (2015). Legal pluralism and Human Rights in the idea of Climate Justice. Oslo Law Review, (3), 200-224. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/oslaw2766
Dunn, R. (2012). In retrospect: Silent Spring. Nature 485, 578-579. doi: 10.1038/485578ª
Gauthier-Clerc, M. & Thomas, F. (2010). Écologie de la Santé et biodiversité. Brussels: Éditions De Boeck.
Gawel, A. (2017). Pollution is a silent killer. Here’s how we can stop it. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/pollution-how-to-stop-the-silent-killer/.
Gruby R, Campbell L, Fairbanks L y Gray N. (2017). To succeed, Large Ocean Sanctuaries Need to Benefit Both Sea Life and People. Santa Cruz, California, United States: Island Conservation. Retrieved from: https://www.islandconservation.org/ocean-sanctuaries-benefit-palau-people/
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18 (24). 1-55. doi: 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Harrison, J. (2006). Significant International Environmental Law Cases. Journal of Environmental Law, 18 (3), 505-516.
Hertogh, M. (2007). What is Non-State Law? Mapping the Other Hemisphere of the Legal World. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1008451
Hsiao, E. (2012). Whanganui River Agreement –Indigenous Right and Rights of Nature-. Environmental Policy and Law 42(6), 371-375.
Idechong, N. (n. d.). Micronesian Sea Traditions-Palau’s Marine Protected Areas. United States: United Nations. Retrieved from:http://www.un.org/Depts/los/consultative_process/documents/7abstract_idechong.pdf
Institute of Medicine. (2007). Global Environmental Health in the 21st Century: From Governmental Regulation to Corporate Social Responsibility: Workshop Summary. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/11833.
Jackson, S. (2005). Legal pluralism and the Nation State: Romantic Medievalism or Pragmatic Modernity. Fordham International Law Journal, 30(1), 158-176.
Johannes, R. E. (1978). Traditional Marine Conservation Methods in Oceania and their Demise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 9, 349-364.
Kelsen, H. (1962) Théorie pure du droit. Traduction française de la 2e édition de la «Reine Rechtslehre» par Charles Eisenmann. Paris: Dalloz.
Koivurova, T. (2014) Introduction to international environmental law. New York: Routledge.
Kothari, A., Margil, M. & Bajpai, S. (2017). Now rivers have the same legal status as people, we must uphold their rights. London: The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/apr/21/rivers-legal-human-rights-ganges-whanganui
Landringan P., Fuller R. Acosta N., Adeyi O., Arnold R., Basu N., …. Zhong M. (2018). The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 2018, 391, 462-512. Retrieved from: https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(17)32345-0.pdf.
Maguire, R., Lewis, B. & Sampford, C. (2013). Shifting global powers and International Law. Challenges and Opportunities. London and New York: Routledge.
Mc Arthur, J. (2013). International Environmental Law: Can it overcome its Weaknesses to Create an Effective Remedy for Global Warming? Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 10(2), 253-282.
McGuire, Ch. J. (2014). Environmental Law from the Policy Perspective: Understanding How Legal Frameworks Influence Environmental Problem Solving. Boca Raton, United States: CRC Press.
Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869-896.
Menski, W. (2006). Comparative law in a global context: the legal systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Moeller, D.W. (2011). Environmental Health. Cambridge, United States: Harvard University Press.
Mol, A. P. J. (2016). The environment nation state in decline. Environmental Politics, 25 (1), 48-68. doi : 10.1080/09644016.2015.1074385
Morrison, D. & Tyree, C. (2017). Invisibles. El plástico dentro de nosotros. Washington: Orb Media. Retrieved from: https://orbmedia.org/stories/El_pl%C3%A1stico/data
Ozone Secretariat, (2015). Montreal Protocol- Achievements to date and challenges ahead. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP. Retrieved from: http://42functions.net/en/MP_achievements_challenges.php.
Perez, O. (2004). Ecological sensitivity and global legal pluralism. Rethinking the Trade and Environment Conflict. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.
Pomade, A. (2012). Penser l’interdisciplinarité par l’internormativité. Illustration en droit de l’environnement. Revue Interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques, 68 (1), 85-106.
Pring, G. & Pring, K. (2016). Environmental Courts & Tribunals: A guide for policy makers. United States: Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide. Retrieved from: https://www.elaw.org/environmental-courts-tribunals-guide-policy-makers-unep
Rae, I. & Gabriel, A. (2012). Saving the ozone layer: why the Montreal Protocol worked. Melbourne, Australia. The Conversation. Retrieved from: https://theconversation.com/saving-the-ozone-layer-why-the-montreal-protocol-worked-9249
Rahim, M. (2013). Legal Regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta- Regulation Approach of Law for Raising CSR in a Weak Economy. New York, United States: Springer.
Richardson, B. J. (2008). The Ties that Bind: Indigenous Peoples and Environmental Governance. Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy, 4(5), 1-47. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/clpe/197
Rodríguez, G. A. (2014). El Sistema Nacional Ambiental quedó reducido a una utopía. La Silla Vacía. Retrieved from: https://lasillavacia.com/elblogueo/blog/el-sistema-nacional-ambiental-quedo-reducido-una-utopia-47232
Rouland, N. (1994). Legal Anthropology. London: A&C Black.
Sievers, J. M. (2015). A Philosophical Reading of Legal Positivism. (tesis de doctorado). Lille: Université de Lille 3.
Tamanaha, B. (2008). Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law Review, 30(3), 374-411.
Tamanaha, B. (1993). The folly of the “social scientific’ concept of legal pluralism. Journal of Law and Society, 20(2), 192-217.
Taylor, A. L. (2008). International Law and Public Health Policy. In Heggenhougenand, K. & Quah, S. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Public Health, 3. (pp. 667-678). San Diego, United States: Academic Press. Retrieved from: http://oneill.law.georgetown.edu/media/2008_International-Law-and-Public-Health-Policy.pdf/
Techera, E. (2010). Legal Pluralism, Customary Law and Environmental Management: The Role of International Law for the South Pacific. Macquarie University Law School Legal Studies. Working Paper No. 2010-01. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1545527.
Teubner, G. (2012). Constitutional fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644674.001.0001.
Teubner, G. (1997). Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society. En Teubner, G. (Ed.) Global Law without a State. (pp. 3-28). Darmouth: Aldershot. Retrieved from: https://is.muni.cz/el/1422/podzim2008/MP504Z/um/Bukowina_english.pdf.
Teubner, G. (1991). The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 1443–1462
Vanderlinden, J. (1989). Return to legal pluralism: Twenty years later. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 21(28), 149-157.
Ventsel, A. (2008). Punx and Skins United: One Law for Us One Law for Them. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 40 (57), 45-100. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2008.10756618
Vick, D. (2004). Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law. Journal of Law and Society, 31 (2). 163-193.
Von Schirnding, Y., Onzivu, W. y Adede A. (2002). International environmental law and global public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80 (12), 970-974.
Weidner, H. (1997). Performance and Characteristics on German Environmental Policy. Overview and Expert Commentaries from 14 countries. Social Science Research Centre Berlin. Discussion Paper FS II 97-301. Retrieved from: https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/1997/ii97-301.pdf
World Health Organization. (2011). New WHO report : deaths form noncommunicable diseases on the rise, with developing hit hardest. New York. Retrieved from : http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2011/ncds_20110427/en/
Wijsman, K. (n.d.). State Sovereignty in a Time of global Environmental Problems: a Move towards Dynamism?” Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/14771977/State_Sovereignty_in_a_Time_of_Gl
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv PDF
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv p. 233-256
dc.format.medium.spa.fl_str_mv Electrónico
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Lat: 06 15 00 N  degrees minutes  Lat: 6.2500  decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W  degrees minutes  Long: -75.6000  decimal degrees
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Medellín
dc.publisher.faculty.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Derecho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Medellín
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Opinión Jurídica; Vol. 18 Núm. 36 (2019): Enero-junio; 233-256
institution Universidad de Medellín
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellin
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@udem.edu.co
_version_ 1814159150321500160
spelling 2019-08-162019-10-15T15:38:24Z2019-10-15T15:38:24Z1692-2530http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5478https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v18n36a102248-4078reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellíninstname:Universidad de MedellínThis paper intends to justify the theory of legal pluralism for studying environmental health issues. The positive law approach has made some headway, although some areas of environmental health seem to be incipient. Hard law has encountered difficulties to succeed in enforcing industrial pollution or water contamination. Furthermore, national jurisdictions are prone to support particular economic interests. This conundrum of legal positivism encourages challenging it with the theory of pluralism. It is found that the latter might allow deliberation and active participation of non-state actors within environmental health. It is also discussed that the plurality of law allows certain flexibility due to its little hierarchization, the lack of theoretical rules and the relaxation of state sovereignty.Este artigo pretende justificar a teoria do pluralismo jurídico para o estudo da problemática da saúde ambiental. Embora o direito positivo tenha apresentado certos avanços, existem algumas áreas da saúde ambiental que se encontram em um estado incipiente. As normas estatais manifestaram dificuldades para conseguir seu cumprimento em matéria de contaminação industrial ou da água, ao que se soma o fato de que as jurisdições nacionais tendem a privilegiar interesses econômicos particulares. Esse problema do positivismo fomenta seu confronto com a teoria do pluralismo legal e nota-se que tal aproximação teórica permite a deliberação e a participação ativa de agentes não estatais na esfera da saúde ambiental. Este documento também coloca em discussão que uma abordagem pluralista do direito poderia outorgar certa flexibilidade devido à pouca hierarquização, à falta de regras teóricas e ao abrandamento do princípio da soberania estatal.Este artículo pretende justificar la teoría del pluralismo jurídico para el estudio de la problemática de la salud ambiental. Aunque el derecho positivo ha presentado ciertos avances, existen algunas áreas de la salud ambiental que parecen encontrarse en estado incipiente. Las normas estatales han manifestado dificultades para lograr su cumplimiento en materia de contaminación industrial o del agua, a lo cual se suma el hecho de que las jurisdicciones nacionales tienden a privilegiar intereses económicos particulares. Este problema del positivismo fomenta su confrontación con la teoría del pluralismo legal, y se encuentra que dicha aproximación teórica permite la deliberación y la participación activa de actores no estatales en la esfera de la salud ambiental. Este documento también pone en discusión que un enfoque pluralista del derecho podría otorgar cierta flexibilidad debido a la poca jerarquización, la falta de reglas teóricas y la relajacióndel principio de la soberanía estatal.PDFp. 233-256Electrónicoapplication/pdfengUniversidad de MedellínFacultad de Derechohttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/2880Opinión JurídicaOpinión Jurídica, Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 18 Núm. 36 (2019)Opinión Jurídica; Vol. 18 Núm. 36 enero-junio 20191836233256Ahrén, M. (2004). Indigenous People’s culture, customs, and Traditions and Customary Law- The Saami People’s Perspective. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 21(1), 63-112.Bal, L. (2012). Le Myhte de la souveraineté en Droit International. La souveraineté des États à l’Épreuve des mutations de l’ordre juridique international. (tesis de doctorado). Strasbourg, France: University of Strasbourg.Berman, P. S. (2013). Le nouveau pluralisme juridique. Revue internationale de droit économique, XXVII(1), 229-256. doi: 10.3917/ride.259.0229Besson, S. (2011). Sovereignty, International Law and Democracy. The European Journal of International Law, 22(2), 373-387.Boyd, D. (2012). The right to a Healthy Environment. Revitalizing Canada’s Constitution. Vancouver: UBC Press. Retrieved from https://www.ubcpress.ca/asset/9095/1/9780774824125.pdfBroughton, E. (2005). The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review. Environmental Health, 4(6), 1-6. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-4-6ull R. B. (2008). Environmental Pluralism. En Callicot, J. B. y Frodeman, R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Ehtics and Philosophy (pp. 384-387). United States: Macmillan Reference, Gale Cengage Learning.Cicolella, A. (2013). Toxique Planète: Le scandale invisible des maladies chroniques. Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil.Departamento Nacional de Planeación (2008). Documento Conpes 3550. Lineamientos para la formulación de la política integral de salud ambiental con énfasis en los componentes de aire, calidad de agua y seguridad química. Retrieved from: http://www.minambiente.gov.co.Dilwyn, A. (2015). Legal pluralism and Human Rights in the idea of Climate Justice. Oslo Law Review, (3), 200-224. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/oslaw2766Dunn, R. (2012). In retrospect: Silent Spring. Nature 485, 578-579. doi: 10.1038/485578ªGauthier-Clerc, M. & Thomas, F. (2010). Écologie de la Santé et biodiversité. Brussels: Éditions De Boeck.Gawel, A. (2017). Pollution is a silent killer. Here’s how we can stop it. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/pollution-how-to-stop-the-silent-killer/.Gruby R, Campbell L, Fairbanks L y Gray N. (2017). To succeed, Large Ocean Sanctuaries Need to Benefit Both Sea Life and People. Santa Cruz, California, United States: Island Conservation. Retrieved from: https://www.islandconservation.org/ocean-sanctuaries-benefit-palau-people/Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18 (24). 1-55. doi: 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387Harrison, J. (2006). Significant International Environmental Law Cases. Journal of Environmental Law, 18 (3), 505-516.Hertogh, M. (2007). What is Non-State Law? Mapping the Other Hemisphere of the Legal World. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1008451Hsiao, E. (2012). Whanganui River Agreement –Indigenous Right and Rights of Nature-. Environmental Policy and Law 42(6), 371-375.Idechong, N. (n. d.). Micronesian Sea Traditions-Palau’s Marine Protected Areas. United States: United Nations. Retrieved from:http://www.un.org/Depts/los/consultative_process/documents/7abstract_idechong.pdfInstitute of Medicine. (2007). Global Environmental Health in the 21st Century: From Governmental Regulation to Corporate Social Responsibility: Workshop Summary. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/11833.Jackson, S. (2005). Legal pluralism and the Nation State: Romantic Medievalism or Pragmatic Modernity. Fordham International Law Journal, 30(1), 158-176.Johannes, R. E. (1978). Traditional Marine Conservation Methods in Oceania and their Demise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 9, 349-364.Kelsen, H. (1962) Théorie pure du droit. Traduction française de la 2e édition de la «Reine Rechtslehre» par Charles Eisenmann. Paris: Dalloz.Koivurova, T. (2014) Introduction to international environmental law. New York: Routledge.Kothari, A., Margil, M. & Bajpai, S. (2017). Now rivers have the same legal status as people, we must uphold their rights. London: The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/apr/21/rivers-legal-human-rights-ganges-whanganuiLandringan P., Fuller R. Acosta N., Adeyi O., Arnold R., Basu N., …. Zhong M. (2018). The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 2018, 391, 462-512. Retrieved from: https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(17)32345-0.pdf.Maguire, R., Lewis, B. & Sampford, C. (2013). Shifting global powers and International Law. Challenges and Opportunities. London and New York: Routledge.Mc Arthur, J. (2013). International Environmental Law: Can it overcome its Weaknesses to Create an Effective Remedy for Global Warming? Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 10(2), 253-282.McGuire, Ch. J. (2014). Environmental Law from the Policy Perspective: Understanding How Legal Frameworks Influence Environmental Problem Solving. Boca Raton, United States: CRC Press.Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869-896.Menski, W. (2006). Comparative law in a global context: the legal systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Moeller, D.W. (2011). Environmental Health. Cambridge, United States: Harvard University Press.Mol, A. P. J. (2016). The environment nation state in decline. Environmental Politics, 25 (1), 48-68. doi : 10.1080/09644016.2015.1074385Morrison, D. & Tyree, C. (2017). Invisibles. El plástico dentro de nosotros. Washington: Orb Media. Retrieved from: https://orbmedia.org/stories/El_pl%C3%A1stico/dataOzone Secretariat, (2015). Montreal Protocol- Achievements to date and challenges ahead. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP. Retrieved from: http://42functions.net/en/MP_achievements_challenges.php.Perez, O. (2004). Ecological sensitivity and global legal pluralism. Rethinking the Trade and Environment Conflict. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.Pomade, A. (2012). Penser l’interdisciplinarité par l’internormativité. Illustration en droit de l’environnement. Revue Interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques, 68 (1), 85-106.Pring, G. & Pring, K. (2016). Environmental Courts & Tribunals: A guide for policy makers. United States: Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide. Retrieved from: https://www.elaw.org/environmental-courts-tribunals-guide-policy-makers-unepRae, I. & Gabriel, A. (2012). Saving the ozone layer: why the Montreal Protocol worked. Melbourne, Australia. The Conversation. Retrieved from: https://theconversation.com/saving-the-ozone-layer-why-the-montreal-protocol-worked-9249Rahim, M. (2013). Legal Regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta- Regulation Approach of Law for Raising CSR in a Weak Economy. New York, United States: Springer.Richardson, B. J. (2008). The Ties that Bind: Indigenous Peoples and Environmental Governance. Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy, 4(5), 1-47. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/clpe/197Rodríguez, G. A. (2014). El Sistema Nacional Ambiental quedó reducido a una utopía. La Silla Vacía. Retrieved from: https://lasillavacia.com/elblogueo/blog/el-sistema-nacional-ambiental-quedo-reducido-una-utopia-47232Rouland, N. (1994). Legal Anthropology. London: A&C Black.Sievers, J. M. (2015). A Philosophical Reading of Legal Positivism. (tesis de doctorado). Lille: Université de Lille 3.Tamanaha, B. (2008). Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law Review, 30(3), 374-411.Tamanaha, B. (1993). The folly of the “social scientific’ concept of legal pluralism. Journal of Law and Society, 20(2), 192-217.Taylor, A. L. (2008). International Law and Public Health Policy. In Heggenhougenand, K. & Quah, S. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Public Health, 3. (pp. 667-678). San Diego, United States: Academic Press. Retrieved from: http://oneill.law.georgetown.edu/media/2008_International-Law-and-Public-Health-Policy.pdf/Techera, E. (2010). Legal Pluralism, Customary Law and Environmental Management: The Role of International Law for the South Pacific. Macquarie University Law School Legal Studies. Working Paper No. 2010-01. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1545527.Teubner, G. (2012). Constitutional fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644674.001.0001.Teubner, G. (1997). Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society. En Teubner, G. (Ed.) Global Law without a State. (pp. 3-28). Darmouth: Aldershot. Retrieved from: https://is.muni.cz/el/1422/podzim2008/MP504Z/um/Bukowina_english.pdf.Teubner, G. (1991). The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 1443–1462Vanderlinden, J. (1989). Return to legal pluralism: Twenty years later. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 21(28), 149-157.Ventsel, A. (2008). Punx and Skins United: One Law for Us One Law for Them. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 40 (57), 45-100. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2008.10756618Vick, D. (2004). Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law. Journal of Law and Society, 31 (2). 163-193.Von Schirnding, Y., Onzivu, W. y Adede A. (2002). International environmental law and global public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80 (12), 970-974.Weidner, H. (1997). Performance and Characteristics on German Environmental Policy. Overview and Expert Commentaries from 14 countries. Social Science Research Centre Berlin. Discussion Paper FS II 97-301. Retrieved from: https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/1997/ii97-301.pdfWorld Health Organization. (2011). New WHO report : deaths form noncommunicable diseases on the rise, with developing hit hardest. New York. Retrieved from : http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2011/ncds_20110427/en/Wijsman, K. (n.d.). State Sovereignty in a Time of global Environmental Problems: a Move towards Dynamism?” Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/14771977/State_Sovereignty_in_a_Time_of_Glhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Opinión Jurídica; Vol. 18 Núm. 36 (2019): Enero-junio; 233-256Legal positivismLegal pluralismEnvironmental healthInterlegalityDireito positivoPluralismo jurídicoSaúde ambientalInterlegalidadeDerecho positivoPluralismo jurídicoSalud ambientalInterlegalidadLegal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental HealthPluralismo legal como teoria para os desafios em saúde ambientalPluralismo jurídico como teoría para los desafíos en salud ambientalBecerra Rodríguez, Ronald Ralf; Corporación Universidad Republicana (Colombia).Becerra Rodríguez, Ronald RalfComunidad Universidad de MedellínLat: 06 15 00 N  degrees minutes  Lat: 6.2500  decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W  degrees minutes  Long: -75.6000  decimal degreesMedellíninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb111407/5478oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/54782019-10-15 10:38:24.414Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellinrepositorio@udem.edu.co

Publicaciones similares