Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu

El objetivo de este artículo es analizar el comportamiento de los participantes de la red de coopetición formada alrededor del Instituto PoloIguassu bajo la perspectiva de la cooperar por un beneficio común. Esta red es un eje que considera la existencia de recursos compartidos para el desarrollo so...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2016

Institución:: Universidad de Medellín

Repositorio:: Repositorio UDEM

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUDEM2_41b125e2e8dc921023eed2a4bcc421da
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/3087
network_acronym_str	REPOUDEM2
network_name_str	Repositorio UDEM
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu
dc.title.alternativepor.por.fl_str_mv	Coopetition uma fronteira destino turístico entre Argentina, Brasil e Paraguai: o caso Poloiguassu
dc.title.alternativeen.eng.fl_str_mv	Coopetition a tourist destination border between Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay: the case Poloiguassu
title	Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu
spellingShingle	Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu Coopetition Cooperation Touristic Competitiveness Inter-organizational networks Destination Iguassu. Coopetición cooperación competitividad turística redes inter organizativa destino Iguassu. Coopetição Cooperação Competitividade Turística Redes inter organizativa Destino Iguaçu.
title_short	Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu
title_full	Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu
title_fullStr	Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu
title_full_unstemmed	Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu
title_sort	Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Coopetition Cooperation Touristic Competitiveness Inter-organizational networks Destination Iguassu. Coopetición cooperación competitividad turística redes inter organizativa destino Iguassu. Coopetição Cooperação Competitividade Turística Redes inter organizativa Destino Iguaçu.
topic	Coopetition Cooperation Touristic Competitiveness Inter-organizational networks Destination Iguassu. Coopetición cooperación competitividad turística redes inter organizativa destino Iguassu. Coopetição Cooperação Competitividade Turística Redes inter organizativa Destino Iguaçu.
description	El objetivo de este artículo es analizar el comportamiento de los participantes de la red de coopetición formada alrededor del Instituto PoloIguassu bajo la perspectiva de la cooperar por un beneficio común. Esta red es un eje que considera la existencia de recursos compartidos para el desarrollo sostenible de la región fronteriza entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay. La investigación es cualitativa, desarrolla un estudio de caso que utiliza técnicas de análisis de contenido de informes oficiales, observación no participativa y entrevistas a profundidad. Los resultados identifican en esta red, la existencia de relaciones de competición pura, coopetición basada en competición, coopetición basada en cooperación o cooperación pura, pero prevalece la coopetición. Se verificó que la alta presencia de cooperación proporcionada por la consciencia de ubicación compartida es de vital importancia para el desarrollo sostenible de este territorio turístico.
publishDate	2016
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv	2016-09-30
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2017-03-14T12:52:02Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2017-03-14T12:52:02Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.spa.fl_str_mv	http://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/1955 10.22395/seec.v19n40a6
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0120-6346
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/11407/3087
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	http://dx.doi.org/10.22395/seec.v19n40a6
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2248-4345
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad de Medellín
url	http://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/1955 http://hdl.handle.net/11407/3087 http://dx.doi.org/10.22395/seec.v19n40a6
identifier_str_mv	10.22395/seec.v19n40a6 0120-6346 2248-4345 reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín instname:Universidad de Medellín
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv	http://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/1955/1773
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv	Semestre Económico; Vol. 19, núm. 40 (2016)
dc.relation.haspart.spa.fl_str_mv	Semestre Económico; Vol. 18, núm. 38 - julio/diciembre 2015
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	19
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	40
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv	145
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv	174
dc.relation.ispartofes.spa.fl_str_mv	Semestre Económico
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Bathelt, Harald (2006). Geographies of production: Growth regimes in spatial perspective 3 – toward a relational view of economic action and policy. En: Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 30, No. 2, p. 223–236. Becker, Howard S. (1977). Uma teoria de ação coletiva. Editora Zahar, Rio de Janeiro, 225p. Bengtsson, Maria y Kock, Sören (2000). Coopetition in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. En: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 29, N° 5, p. 411-426. Bengtsson, Maria y Kock, Sören (2014). Coopetition—Quo vadis? past accomplishments and future challenges. En: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 43, No. 2, p. 180-188. Brandenburger, Adam y Nalebuff, Barry (1996). Co-opetition. Editora Harper Collins Business, London, 287p. Camagni, Roberto (1991). Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. Belhaven-Pinter, London, 224p. Camarinha-Matos, Luis. M. y Afsarmanesh, Hamideh (2006). Collaborative networks: Value creation in a knowledge society. En: Knowledge Enterprise, IFIP, Vol. 207, p. 26-40. Ceglie, Giovanna y Dini, Marco (1999). SME cluster and network development in developing countries: the experience of UNIDO. Geneva: UNIDO, 24p. Cheng, Eddie. W.; Li, Heng y Love, P. E. D. (2000). Establishment of critical success factors for construction partnering. En: Journal of management in engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 84-92. Cherington, P. T. (1913). Advertising as a business force. Boston: The Associated advertising clubs of America, 569p. Chim-Miki, Adriana F.; Batista-Canino, Rosa. M. y Gândara, José M (2015). Analizando el factor Coopetición en los Monitores de competitividad: Una comparación entre Brasil, España y TTCI. En: XII Seminário da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo (ANPTUR), Natal/RN, Brasil, 15p. Crowley, Larry. G. y Karim, Ariful (1995). Conceptual model of partnering. En: Journal of management in engineering, ASCE, Vol. 11, No. 5, p. 33-39. Dagnino, Giovanni y Padula, Giovanna (2002). Coopetition strategy. En: Second European Academy of Management Annual Conference, Stockholm, p. 9-11. Della Corte, Valentina (2000). La gestione dei sistemi locali di oferta turistica. Ed. CEDAM, Padova, 415p. Della Corte, Valentina (2004). La gestione strategica e le scelte di governo di un’impresa tour operator. Ed. CEDAM, Padova, 329p. Della Corte, Valentina y Sciarelli Mauro (2003). Evoluzione del marketing nella filiera turistica: Il ruolo dell’Information & Communication Technology. Congresso Internazionale sulle Tendenze di Marketing, 28-29 de noviembre, Venecia, Italia, 23p. Della Corte, Valentina y Sciarelli, Mauro (2012). Can coopetition be source of competitive advantage for strategic networks? En: Corporate Ownership and Control, Vol. 12, No. 1, D-CONT3, p. 363-379. De Olivieri, Maria Antonia C (2007). Estrategias para el desarrollo empresarial: Asociatividad en el sector plástico venezolano. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 230-248. Domareski, Thays Cristina (2011). A Competitividade das Destinações Turísticas: O caso de Fozdo Iguaçu (PR), BRASIL. Balneário Camboriú, Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Do Vale Do Itajai (UNIVALI), 182p. Dwyer, Larry y Kim, Chulwon (2003). Destination competitiveness: determinants and indicators. En: Current issues in tourism, Vol. 6, No. 5, p. 369-414. Edgell, D. L. y Haenisch, T. R. (1995). Coopetition: Global tourism beyond the millennium: Charting the course for education, government, and commerce. International Policy Publishing, USA, 148p. Eriksson, Per Erik (2008). Achieving suitable coopetition in Buyer–Supplier relationships: The case of AstraZeneca. En: Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 4, p. 425-454. Esser, Klaus; Hillebrand, Wolfgang; Messner, Dirk y Meyer-Stamer, Jörg (1996). Competitividad sistémica: nuevo desafío para las empresas y la política. En: Revista de la CEPAL, Vol. 59, No. 8, p. 39-52. Fyall, Alan; Garrod, Brian y Wang, Youcheng (2012). Destination collaboration: A critical review of theoretical approaches to a multi-dimensional phenomenon. En: Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, Vol.1, No. 1, p. 10-26. Guillén-Parra, Manuel; Lleó de Nalda, Álvaro y Santiago Marco Perles, Ginés (2011). Towards a more humanistic understanding of organizational trust. En: Journal of management development, Vol. 30, No. 6, p.605-614. Gnyawali, Devi R. y Madhavan, Ravindranath (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. En: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, p. 431–445. Hammersley, Martyn y Atkinson, Paul (1995). Ethnography. Principles in practice. Ed. Routledge, London, 309p. Jensen, Michael C. y Meckling, William H (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. En: Journal of financial economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, p. 305-360. Kylänen, Mika y Mariani, Marcello M (2012). Unpacking the temporal dimension of coopetition in tourism destinations: Evidence from Finnish and Italian theme parks. En: Anatolia, Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 61-74. Kylänen, Mika, y Rusko, Rauno (2011). Unintentional coopetition in the service industries: The case of Pyhä-luosto tourism destination in the Finnish Lapland. En: European Management Journal, Vol.29, No. 3, p. 193-205. Lado, Augustine A.; Boyd, Nancy G. y Hanlon, Susan C. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. En: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 110-141. Luo, Yadong (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. En: Journal of World Business, Vol. 42, No. 2, p. 129-144. Lynch, Robert. P. (1990). Building alliances to penetrate European markets. En: Journal Business Strategy, Vol. 11, No. 2, marzo/abril, p. 4-8. Miles, Matthew B. y Huberman, Michael (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage publications, 263p. Mohr, Jakki y Spekman, Robert (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. En: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 135-152. Nadvi, Khalid (1999). Collective Efficiency and Collective Failure: The Response of the Sialkot Surgical Instrument Cluster to Global Quality Pressures. En: World Development, Vol. 27, No. 9, p. 1605-1626. Newall, J. Edward (1992). The challenge of competitiveness. En: Business quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 4, p. 94-100. PoloIguassu (2010). Balanço Social. Foz do Iguaçu, Ed. Instituto para Desenvolvimento da Região trinacional, 34p. PoloIguassu (2011). Balanço Social. Foz do Iguaçu, Ed. Instituto para Desenvolvimento da Região trinacional, 34p. PoloIguassu (2014). Balanço Social. Foz do Iguaçu, Ed. Instituto para Desenvolvimento da Região trinacional, 34p Rispoli Maurizio y Tamma Michele (1995). Le Risposte Strategiche alla Complessità: le forme di offerta dei prodotti alberghieri, Giappichelli, Torino, 362p. Schmitz, Hubert (1999). Collective efficiency and increasing returns. En: Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, No. 4, p. 465-483. Secretaria Municipal de Turismo. (2014). Inventario Turístico de Foz do Iguaçu 2015. Prefeitura Municipal. Foz do Iguaçu, 20p. Ritchie, JR Brent y Crouch, Geoffrey Ian (2003). The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism perspective. Oxon, Ed. CABI Publishing, 267p. Wang, Youcheng y Krakover, Shaul (2008). Destination marketing: Competition, cooperation or coopetition? En: International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, p.126-141. Williamson, Oliver (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Ed. The Free Press. 286p. Wood, Donna J. y Gray, Barbara (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. En: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 27, No. 2, p. 139-162.
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	p.145-174
dc.format.medium.spa.fl_str_mv	Electrónico
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf PDF
dc.coverage.spa.fl_str_mv	Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Medellín Universidad de Medellín
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	Semestre Económico Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 19, núm. 40 (2016); 145-174 2248-4345 0120-6346
institution	Universidad de Medellín
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	http://repository.udem.edu.co/bitstream/11407/3087/3/Semestre_Economico_301.pdf.jpg http://repository.udem.edu.co/bitstream/11407/3087/2/Semestre_Economico_301.pdf http://repository.udem.edu.co/bitstream/11407/3087/1/Articulo.html
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	72a7ceb219fc71bdbf31390c18bb0c31 4d459cdb371ee2fa47fb8c84dfbf3275 f4429782605dbd9d9d458376b74e7f98
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellin
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio@udem.edu.co
_version_	1808481170446352384
spelling	2017-03-14T12:52:02Z2017-03-14T12:52:02Z2016-09-30http://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/195510.22395/seec.v19n40a60120-6346http://hdl.handle.net/11407/3087http://dx.doi.org/10.22395/seec.v19n40a62248-4345reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellíninstname:Universidad de MedellínEl objetivo de este artículo es analizar el comportamiento de los participantes de la red de coopetición formada alrededor del Instituto PoloIguassu bajo la perspectiva de la cooperar por un beneficio común. Esta red es un eje que considera la existencia de recursos compartidos para el desarrollo sostenible de la región fronteriza entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay. La investigación es cualitativa, desarrolla un estudio de caso que utiliza técnicas de análisis de contenido de informes oficiales, observación no participativa y entrevistas a profundidad. Los resultados identifican en esta red, la existencia de relaciones de competición pura, coopetición basada en competición, coopetición basada en cooperación o cooperación pura, pero prevalece la coopetición. Se verificó que la alta presencia de cooperación proporcionada por la consciencia de ubicación compartida es de vital importancia para el desarrollo sostenible de este territorio turístico.The objective of this article is to analyze the behavior of the participants of the coopetition network generated around the Poloiguassu Institute under the premise of cooperating in order to achieve common benefits. This network is an axis that considers the existence of shared resources for the sustainable development of the border regions between Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay. In is a qualitative research, a case study that uses analysis techniques based on official reports, non-participative and in-depth interviews. Results prove that in this network there is relations between companies based on; pure competition, coopetition based on competition, coopetition based on cooperation or pure cooperation, even though coopetition prevails. It was verified that the high presence of coopetition due to the awareness of a shared location is of vital importance for the sustainable development of this touristic sector.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o comportamento dos participantes da rede de coopetição formada ao redor do Instituto PoloIguassu sob a perspectiva da cooperar por um benefício comum. Esta rede é um eixo que considera a existência de recursos compartilhados para o desenvolvimento sustentável da região fronteiriça entre Argentina, Brasil e Paraguai. A investigação é qualitativa, desenvolve um estudo de caso que utiliza técnicas de análise de conteúdo de informes oficiais, observação não participativa e entrevistas a profundidade. Os resultados identificam nesta rede, a existência de relações de competição pura, coopetição baseada em competição, coopetição baseada em cooperação ou cooperação pura, mas prevalece a coopetição. Se verificou que a alta presença de cooperação proporcionada pela consciência de localização compartilhada é de vital importância para o desenvolvimento sustentável deste território turístico.p.145-174Electrónicoapplication/pdfPDFspaUniversidad de MedellínUniversidad de MedellínFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativashttp://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/1955/1773Semestre Económico; Vol. 19, núm. 40 (2016)Semestre Económico; Vol. 18, núm. 38 - julio/diciembre 20151940145174Semestre EconómicoBathelt, Harald (2006). Geographies of production: Growth regimes in spatial perspective 3 – toward a relational view of economic action and policy. En: Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 30, No. 2, p. 223–236.Becker, Howard S. (1977). Uma teoria de ação coletiva. Editora Zahar, Rio de Janeiro, 225p.Bengtsson, Maria y Kock, Sören (2000). Coopetition in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. En: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 29, N° 5, p. 411-426.Bengtsson, Maria y Kock, Sören (2014). Coopetition—Quo vadis? past accomplishments and future challenges. En: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 43, No. 2, p. 180-188.Brandenburger, Adam y Nalebuff, Barry (1996). Co-opetition. Editora Harper Collins Business, London, 287p.Camagni, Roberto (1991). Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. Belhaven-Pinter, London, 224p.Camarinha-Matos, Luis. M. y Afsarmanesh, Hamideh (2006). Collaborative networks: Value creation in a knowledge society. En: Knowledge Enterprise, IFIP, Vol. 207, p. 26-40.Ceglie, Giovanna y Dini, Marco (1999). SME cluster and network development in developing countries: the experience of UNIDO. Geneva: UNIDO, 24p.Cheng, Eddie. W.; Li, Heng y Love, P. E. D. (2000). Establishment of critical success factors for construction partnering. En: Journal of management in engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 84-92.Cherington, P. T. (1913). Advertising as a business force. Boston: The Associated advertising clubs of America, 569p.Chim-Miki, Adriana F.; Batista-Canino, Rosa. M. y Gândara, José M (2015). Analizando el factor Coopetición en los Monitores de competitividad: Una comparación entre Brasil, España y TTCI. En: XII Seminário da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo (ANPTUR), Natal/RN, Brasil, 15p.Crowley, Larry. G. y Karim, Ariful (1995). Conceptual model of partnering. En: Journal of management in engineering, ASCE, Vol. 11, No. 5, p. 33-39.Dagnino, Giovanni y Padula, Giovanna (2002). Coopetition strategy. En: Second European Academy of Management Annual Conference, Stockholm, p. 9-11.Della Corte, Valentina (2000). La gestione dei sistemi locali di oferta turistica. Ed. CEDAM, Padova, 415p.Della Corte, Valentina (2004). La gestione strategica e le scelte di governo di un’impresa tour operator. Ed. CEDAM, Padova, 329p.Della Corte, Valentina y Sciarelli Mauro (2003). Evoluzione del marketing nella filiera turistica: Il ruolo dell’Information & Communication Technology. Congresso Internazionale sulle Tendenze di Marketing, 28-29 de noviembre, Venecia, Italia, 23p.Della Corte, Valentina y Sciarelli, Mauro (2012). Can coopetition be source of competitive advantage for strategic networks? En: Corporate Ownership and Control, Vol. 12, No. 1, D-CONT3, p. 363-379.De Olivieri, Maria Antonia C (2007). Estrategias para el desarrollo empresarial: Asociatividad en el sector plástico venezolano. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 230-248.Domareski, Thays Cristina (2011). A Competitividade das Destinações Turísticas: O caso de Fozdo Iguaçu (PR), BRASIL. Balneário Camboriú, Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Do Vale Do Itajai (UNIVALI), 182p.Dwyer, Larry y Kim, Chulwon (2003). Destination competitiveness: determinants and indicators. En: Current issues in tourism, Vol. 6, No. 5, p. 369-414.Edgell, D. L. y Haenisch, T. R. (1995). Coopetition: Global tourism beyond the millennium: Charting the course for education, government, and commerce. International Policy Publishing, USA, 148p.Eriksson, Per Erik (2008). Achieving suitable coopetition in Buyer–Supplier relationships: The case of AstraZeneca. En: Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 4, p. 425-454.Esser, Klaus; Hillebrand, Wolfgang; Messner, Dirk y Meyer-Stamer, Jörg (1996). Competitividad sistémica: nuevo desafío para las empresas y la política. En: Revista de la CEPAL, Vol. 59, No. 8, p. 39-52.Fyall, Alan; Garrod, Brian y Wang, Youcheng (2012). Destination collaboration: A critical review of theoretical approaches to a multi-dimensional phenomenon. En: Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, Vol.1, No. 1, p. 10-26.Guillén-Parra, Manuel; Lleó de Nalda, Álvaro y Santiago Marco Perles, Ginés (2011). Towards a more humanistic understanding of organizational trust. En: Journal of management development, Vol. 30, No. 6, p.605-614.Gnyawali, Devi R. y Madhavan, Ravindranath (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. En: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, p. 431–445.Hammersley, Martyn y Atkinson, Paul (1995). Ethnography. Principles in practice. Ed. Routledge, London, 309p.Jensen, Michael C. y Meckling, William H (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. En: Journal of financial economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, p. 305-360.Kylänen, Mika y Mariani, Marcello M (2012). Unpacking the temporal dimension of coopetition in tourism destinations: Evidence from Finnish and Italian theme parks. En: Anatolia, Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 61-74.Kylänen, Mika, y Rusko, Rauno (2011). Unintentional coopetition in the service industries: The case of Pyhä-luosto tourism destination in the Finnish Lapland. En: European Management Journal, Vol.29, No. 3, p. 193-205.Lado, Augustine A.; Boyd, Nancy G. y Hanlon, Susan C. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. En: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 110-141.Luo, Yadong (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. En: Journal of World Business, Vol. 42, No. 2, p. 129-144.Lynch, Robert. P. (1990). Building alliances to penetrate European markets. En: Journal Business Strategy, Vol. 11, No. 2, marzo/abril, p. 4-8.Miles, Matthew B. y Huberman, Michael (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage publications, 263p.Mohr, Jakki y Spekman, Robert (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. En: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 135-152.Nadvi, Khalid (1999). Collective Efficiency and Collective Failure: The Response of the Sialkot Surgical Instrument Cluster to Global Quality Pressures. En: World Development, Vol. 27, No. 9, p. 1605-1626.Newall, J. Edward (1992). The challenge of competitiveness. En: Business quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 4, p. 94-100.PoloIguassu (2010). Balanço Social. Foz do Iguaçu, Ed. Instituto para Desenvolvimento da Região trinacional, 34p.PoloIguassu (2011). Balanço Social. Foz do Iguaçu, Ed. Instituto para Desenvolvimento da Região trinacional, 34p.PoloIguassu (2014). Balanço Social. Foz do Iguaçu, Ed. Instituto para Desenvolvimento da Região trinacional, 34pRispoli Maurizio y Tamma Michele (1995). Le Risposte Strategiche alla Complessità: le forme di offerta dei prodotti alberghieri, Giappichelli, Torino, 362p.Schmitz, Hubert (1999). Collective efficiency and increasing returns. En: Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, No. 4, p. 465-483.Secretaria Municipal de Turismo. (2014). Inventario Turístico de Foz do Iguaçu 2015. Prefeitura Municipal. Foz do Iguaçu, 20p.Ritchie, JR Brent y Crouch, Geoffrey Ian (2003). The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism perspective. Oxon, Ed. CABI Publishing, 267p.Wang, Youcheng y Krakover, Shaul (2008). Destination marketing: Competition, cooperation or coopetition? En: International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, p.126-141.Williamson, Oliver (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Ed. The Free Press. 286p.Wood, Donna J. y Gray, Barbara (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. En: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 27, No. 2, p. 139-162.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Semestre Económico Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 19, núm. 40 (2016); 145-1742248-43450120-6346CoopetitionCooperationTouristic CompetitivenessInter-organizational networksDestination Iguassu.Coopeticióncooperacióncompetitividad turísticaredes inter organizativadestino Iguassu.CoopetiçãoCooperaçãoCompetitividade TurísticaRedes inter organizativaDestino Iguaçu.Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso PoloiguassuCoopetition uma fronteira destino turístico entre Argentina, Brasil e Paraguai: o caso PoloiguassuCoopetition a tourist destination border between Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay: the case PoloiguassuComunidad Universidad de MedellínLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degreesMedellíninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Chim-Miki, Adriana FumiBatista-Canino, Rosa María; Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaMedina-Brito, Pino; Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaTHUMBNAILSemestre_Economico_301.pdf.jpgSemestre_Economico_301.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8040http://repository.udem.edu.co/bitstream/11407/3087/3/Semestre_Economico_301.pdf.jpg72a7ceb219fc71bdbf31390c18bb0c31MD53ORIGINALSemestre_Economico_301.pdfSemestre_Economico_301.pdfapplication/pdf1668580http://repository.udem.edu.co/bitstream/11407/3087/2/Semestre_Economico_301.pdf4d459cdb371ee2fa47fb8c84dfbf3275MD52Articulo.htmlArticulo.htmltext/html493http://repository.udem.edu.co/bitstream/11407/3087/1/Articulo.htmlf4429782605dbd9d9d458376b74e7f98MD5111407/3087oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/30872020-05-27 17:46:17.117Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellinrepositorio@udem.edu.co

Coopetición en un destino turístico de frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay: el caso Poloiguassu

Publicaciones similares