Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]

On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Universidad de Medellín

Repositorio:: Repositorio UDEM

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUDEM2_0b3799951a867fb1ccedbd5bdf7d27e0
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/5785
network_acronym_str	REPOUDEM2
network_name_str	Repositorio UDEM
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]
title	Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]
spellingShingle	Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo] Antitrust Chicago Harvard Neoin-stitutional school
title_short	Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]
title_full	Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]
title_fullStr	Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]
title_full_unstemmed	Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]
title_sort	Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Antitrust Chicago Harvard Neoin-stitutional school
topic	Antitrust Chicago Harvard Neoin-stitutional school
description	On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them. © 2019, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.
publishDate	2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2020-04-29T14:54:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2020-04-29T14:54:00Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2019
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv	Article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	418633
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5785
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138
identifier_str_mv	418633 10.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138
url	http://hdl.handle.net/11407/5785
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.isversionof.none.fl_str_mv	https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075888414&doi=10.22201%2fiij.24484873e.2019.154.14138&partnerID=40&md5=f139e9eb1780174dd086a273c6ed321c
dc.relation.citationvolume.none.fl_str_mv	51
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv	154
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	77
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	106
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv	Amato, G., (1997) Antitrust and the Bounds of Power. the Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market, , Oxford, Hart Publishing Armengol, I., Gasul, O., Derecho de la competencia en tiem-pos de crisis (2009) Gaceta Jurídica De La Competencia Y De La Unión Europea Bain, J., (1956) Barriers to New Competition, , Their Carácter and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge, Sage Publications Bain, J., (1959), Industrial Organization, Nueva York, Wiley Böge, U., (2006) State Imposed Restrictions of Competition and Competition Advocacy, , Challenges of Addressing State Imposed or Facilitated Restraints, ABA Spring Meeting Bork, R., Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act (1966) Journal of Law and Economics, 9 Brousseau, E., Glachant, J.-M., The Economics of Contracts and the Renewal of Economics (2002) The Economics of Contracts: Theory and Applications, , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Carlton, Dennis, W., Does Antitrust Need to Be Moderni-zed? (2007) American Economic Association, p. 21 Cavanagh, E., Antitrust Remedies Revisited (2005) Oregon Law Review Church, J., Ware, R., (2000) Industrial Organization, , Boston, McGraw-Hill Coase, R.H., La naturaleza de la empresa (1996) La Naturaleza De La Empresa: orígenes, evolución Y Desarrollo, , en Williamson Oliver, E. y Winter Sidney, G. (eds.), México, Fondo de Cultura Económica Cooter, R., Ulen, T., (1998) Derecho Y economía, , México, Fondo de Cultura Económica Antoine Augustin, C., (1897) Researchers into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, , Nueva York, MacMillan Crane, D., (2008) Antitrust Enforcement during National Crises: An Unhappy History , GCP the Online Magazine for Global Competition Policy Katalin Judit, C., (2005) Competition Law and Consumer Protection, La Haya, , Kluwer Law International Cseres, K.J., What Has Competition Done for Consumers in Liberalised Markets? (2008) The Competition Law Review, p. 4 Fernando, D.E., (2003) Los Objetivos Del Derecho Antitrust, , Gaceta Jurídica de la Unión Europea y de la Competencia Elzinga, K., The Goal of Antitrust: Other Than Competition and Efficiency, What Else Counts? (1977) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 125 Elzinga, K., The Goal of Antitrust: Other Than Competition and Efficiency (1977) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, p. 6 Fox, E., The Battle for the Soul of Antitrust (1987) California Law Review, 75 Furse, M., The Role of Competition Policy: A Survey (1996) European Competition Law Review, p. 17 Gerber, D., (1998) Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus, , J, Nueva York, Oxford University Press Gerber, D., (2004) Fairness in Competition Law: European and U,S, Experience, , Conference on Fairness and Asian Competition Laws Ibañez, G., Luis, J., La comisión y la aplicación del derecho comunitario de la competencia (2005) La Defensa De La Competencia Por Los órganos Judiciales: El Reglamento CE 1/2003, Madrid, , Garrido Espá, Luis (ed.), Consejo General del Poder Judicial Ginsburg, D., An Introduction to Bork (1966) (2006) Competition Policy International, p. 2 Mejía, G., Felipe, J., Aguilar, R., Lauren, M., Análisis de estructura, conducta y desempeño del subsector de La Con-fitería, en el área metropolitana de Cali, 2002-2010 (2011) Entramado, p. 7 Hagen, E., An Economic Justification of Protectionism (1958) Quaterly Journal of Economics, 72 Hawk, B., Giuliano Amato, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power (1997) Fordham International Law Journal, p. 21 Hovenkamp, H., Antitrust after Chicago (1985) Michigan Law Review Association, p. 84 Hovenkamp, H., Post-Chicago Antitrust: A Review and Critique (2001) Columbia Business Law Review Hovenkamp, H., The Rationalization of Antitrust (2003) Harvard Law Review, 116 Jones, A., Sufrin, B., (2008) EC Competition Law, , Text, Cases and Materials, Nueva York, Oxford University Press Joskow, P., La especificidad de los activos y la estructura de las relaciones verticales: Pruebas empíricas (1996) La Naturaleza De La Empresa: orígenes, evolución Y Desarrollo, México, Fondo De Cultura Económica, , Williamson, Oliver y Winter, Sidney (eds.) Kaplow, L., Antitrust, Law & Economics, and the Courts, Law and Contemporary Problems (1987) Duke University School of Law, p. 50 Kyung-Hoon, K., Rising Protectionism in Emerging Coun-tries (2012) SERI Quarterly Kirkwood, J., Lande, R., The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency (2008) Notre Dame Law Review, p. 84 Kolasky, W., (2004) What is Competition? A Comparison of US and EU Perspective, , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr Antitrust Series Korah, V., EEC Competition Policy, Legal Form or Economic Efficiency (1986) Current Legal Problems, 39 Korah, V., (1994) An Introductory Guide to EC Law and Practice, , Londres, Sweet & Maxwell Korah, V., (2004) An Introductory Guide to EC Law and Practice, , Oxford, Hart Publishing Kovacic, E., Williamshapiro, C., (2000) Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking, , Minneapolis Kovacic, E., Williamshapiro, C., The Antitrust Paradox Revisted: Robert Bork and the Transformation of Modern Antitrust Policy (1990) Wayne Law Journal Philip Louis, L., (2006) Modernised EC Competition Law in International Arbitration, La Haya, , Kluwer Law International van Lennep, E., (1982) Protectionism Vs. Economic Policy, , The OECD Observer Marcos, F., Sánchezgraells, A., Damages for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules: Harmonising Tort Law through the Back Door? (2008) Indret: Revista Para El Análisis Del Derecho Marcos, F., Sánchez Graells, A., En defensa de la competencia pero en contra del mercado: La paradoja antitrust en latinoamérica. Notas a propósito de De León, I (2010) Revista De Derecho De La Competencia Y La Distribución, 7 Mason, E., (1964) Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem, , Cambridge, Harvard University Press Robert, M., An Economic Analysis of Protectionism in the United States with Implications for International Trade in Europe (1993) The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, p. 26 Miranda Londoño, A., Rodrígez, G., David, J., Fundamentos económicos del derecho de la competencia: Los beneficios del monopolios vs. los de beneficios de la competencia (2006) Derecho De La Competencia, p. 2 Massimo, M., (2004) Competition Policy, Theory and Practice, Nueva York, , Cambridge University Press Ramón, M.B., El arbitraje y el derecho de la competencia (2011) Revista Derecho De Los Negocios, p. 248 Lorenzo Federico, P., (2007) Derecho Europeo De La Competencia, Prohibiciones Antitrust, Control De Concentraciones Y Procedimientos De aplicación, , Madrid, Barcelona, Marcial Pons Parikh, J., Majumdar, K., Competition Law and the Consumer Law: Identifying the Contours in Light of the Case of Belaire Owners Association vs. DLF (2012) Nujs Law Review. Piraino, T., Reconciling the Harvard and Chicago Schools: A New Antitrust Approach for the 21st Century (2007) Indiana Law Journal, p. 82 Richard, P., The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis (1979) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 27 Posner, R., (2001), Antitrust Law, The University of Chicago Press Rodríguezcuriel, W., Las ayudas públicas en la ley de defensa de la competencia (2002) El Nuevo Derecho Comunitario Y español De La Competencia: descentralización, análisis económico Y cooperación Internacional, , González-Orús, Jerónimo Maillo y Beneyto Pérez, José María (coords.), Madrid, Bosch Rubinfeld, D., Evaluating Antitrust Enforcement: Economic Foundations (2009) Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Competition Law Institute, , International Antitrust Law & Policy, Nueva York, Juris Publishing Scherer, F.M., Ross, D.R., (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, , Boston, Houghton Mifflin Schinkel, M.P., Effective Cartel Enforcement in Euro-pe (2007) Law and Economics Review, p. 30 Schinkel, M.P., Tuinstra, J., (2004) Imperfect Competition Law Enforcement, , CeNDEF Signes de Mesa, J.I., (2013) Derecho De La Competencia, , Madrid, Thomson Reuters Pineda, S., Alfonso, J., La protección al consumidor como finalidad primordial de la defensa de la competencia: La experiencia de Estados Unidos, la Unión Europea y Colombia (2014) Díkaion, 23 Takacs, W., Pressures for Protectionism: An Empirical Analysis (1981) Economic Inquiry, p. 19 van Bael, I., Bellis, J.-F., (2010) Competition Law of the European Community, , Holanda, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn Vide, A., (2008) Derecho español De La Competencia, , comentarios a la Ley 15/2007, Real Decreto 261/2008 y Ley 1/2002, t. II, en Odriozola, Miguel (dir.) e Irissarry, Belén (coord.), Barcelona, Bosch Whish, R., (2008), Competition Law, Londres, Oxford University Press Williamson, O., (1989) Las Instituciones económicas Del Capitalismo, , México, Fondo de Cultura Económica Wilswouter, P.J., The Relationship between Public Antitrust Enforcement and Private Actions for Damages (2009) World Competition: Law and Economics Review, p. 32
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv	Derecho
dc.publisher.faculty.none.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Derecho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
institution	Universidad de Medellín
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellin
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio@udem.edu.co
_version_	1814159210649223168
spelling	20192020-04-29T14:54:00Z2020-04-29T14:54:00Z418633http://hdl.handle.net/11407/578510.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them. © 2019, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.spaUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de MexicoDerechoFacultad de Derechohttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075888414&doi=10.22201%2fiij.24484873e.2019.154.14138&partnerID=40&md5=f139e9eb1780174dd086a273c6ed321c5115477106Amato, G., (1997) Antitrust and the Bounds of Power. the Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market, , Oxford, Hart PublishingArmengol, I., Gasul, O., Derecho de la competencia en tiem-pos de crisis (2009) Gaceta Jurídica De La Competencia Y De La Unión EuropeaBain, J., (1956) Barriers to New Competition, , Their Carácter and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge, Sage PublicationsBain, J., (1959), Industrial Organization, Nueva York, WileyBöge, U., (2006) State Imposed Restrictions of Competition and Competition Advocacy, , Challenges of Addressing State Imposed or Facilitated Restraints, ABA Spring MeetingBork, R., Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act (1966) Journal of Law and Economics, 9Brousseau, E., Glachant, J.-M., The Economics of Contracts and the Renewal of Economics (2002) The Economics of Contracts: Theory and Applications, , Cambridge, Cambridge University PressCarlton, Dennis, W., Does Antitrust Need to Be Moderni-zed? (2007) American Economic Association, p. 21Cavanagh, E., Antitrust Remedies Revisited (2005) Oregon Law ReviewChurch, J., Ware, R., (2000) Industrial Organization, , Boston, McGraw-HillCoase, R.H., La naturaleza de la empresa (1996) La Naturaleza De La Empresa: orígenes, evolución Y Desarrollo, , en Williamson Oliver, E. y Winter Sidney, G. (eds.), México, Fondo de Cultura EconómicaCooter, R., Ulen, T., (1998) Derecho Y economía, , México, Fondo de Cultura EconómicaAntoine Augustin, C., (1897) Researchers into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, , Nueva York, MacMillanCrane, D., (2008) Antitrust Enforcement during National Crises: An Unhappy History , GCP the Online Magazine for Global Competition PolicyKatalin Judit, C., (2005) Competition Law and Consumer Protection, La Haya, , Kluwer Law InternationalCseres, K.J., What Has Competition Done for Consumers in Liberalised Markets? (2008) The Competition Law Review, p. 4Fernando, D.E., (2003) Los Objetivos Del Derecho Antitrust, , Gaceta Jurídica de la Unión Europea y de la CompetenciaElzinga, K., The Goal of Antitrust: Other Than Competition and Efficiency, What Else Counts? (1977) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 125Elzinga, K., The Goal of Antitrust: Other Than Competition and Efficiency (1977) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, p. 6Fox, E., The Battle for the Soul of Antitrust (1987) California Law Review, 75Furse, M., The Role of Competition Policy: A Survey (1996) European Competition Law Review, p. 17Gerber, D., (1998) Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus, , J, Nueva York, Oxford University PressGerber, D., (2004) Fairness in Competition Law: European and U,S, Experience, , Conference on Fairness and Asian Competition LawsIbañez, G., Luis, J., La comisión y la aplicación del derecho comunitario de la competencia (2005) La Defensa De La Competencia Por Los órganos Judiciales: El Reglamento CE 1/2003, Madrid, , Garrido Espá, Luis (ed.), Consejo General del Poder JudicialGinsburg, D., An Introduction to Bork (1966) (2006) Competition Policy International, p. 2Mejía, G., Felipe, J., Aguilar, R., Lauren, M., Análisis de estructura, conducta y desempeño del subsector de La Con-fitería, en el área metropolitana de Cali, 2002-2010 (2011) Entramado, p. 7Hagen, E., An Economic Justification of Protectionism (1958) Quaterly Journal of Economics, 72Hawk, B., Giuliano Amato, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power (1997) Fordham International Law Journal, p. 21Hovenkamp, H., Antitrust after Chicago (1985) Michigan Law Review Association, p. 84Hovenkamp, H., Post-Chicago Antitrust: A Review and Critique (2001) Columbia Business Law ReviewHovenkamp, H., The Rationalization of Antitrust (2003) Harvard Law Review, 116Jones, A., Sufrin, B., (2008) EC Competition Law, , Text, Cases and Materials, Nueva York, Oxford University PressJoskow, P., La especificidad de los activos y la estructura de las relaciones verticales: Pruebas empíricas (1996) La Naturaleza De La Empresa: orígenes, evolución Y Desarrollo, México, Fondo De Cultura Económica, , Williamson, Oliver y Winter, Sidney (eds.)Kaplow, L., Antitrust, Law & Economics, and the Courts, Law and Contemporary Problems (1987) Duke University School of Law, p. 50Kyung-Hoon, K., Rising Protectionism in Emerging Coun-tries (2012) SERI QuarterlyKirkwood, J., Lande, R., The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency (2008) Notre Dame Law Review, p. 84Kolasky, W., (2004) What is Competition? A Comparison of US and EU Perspective, , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr Antitrust SeriesKorah, V., EEC Competition Policy, Legal Form or Economic Efficiency (1986) Current Legal Problems, 39Korah, V., (1994) An Introductory Guide to EC Law and Practice, , Londres, Sweet & MaxwellKorah, V., (2004) An Introductory Guide to EC Law and Practice, , Oxford, Hart PublishingKovacic, E., Williamshapiro, C., (2000) Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking, , MinneapolisKovacic, E., Williamshapiro, C., The Antitrust Paradox Revisted: Robert Bork and the Transformation of Modern Antitrust Policy (1990) Wayne Law JournalPhilip Louis, L., (2006) Modernised EC Competition Law in International Arbitration, La Haya, , Kluwer Law Internationalvan Lennep, E., (1982) Protectionism Vs. Economic Policy, , The OECD ObserverMarcos, F., Sánchezgraells, A., Damages for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules: Harmonising Tort Law through the Back Door? (2008) Indret: Revista Para El Análisis Del DerechoMarcos, F., Sánchez Graells, A., En defensa de la competencia pero en contra del mercado: La paradoja antitrust en latinoamérica. Notas a propósito de De León, I (2010) Revista De Derecho De La Competencia Y La Distribución, 7Mason, E., (1964) Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem, , Cambridge, Harvard University PressRobert, M., An Economic Analysis of Protectionism in the United States with Implications for International Trade in Europe (1993) The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, p. 26Miranda Londoño, A., Rodrígez, G., David, J., Fundamentos económicos del derecho de la competencia: Los beneficios del monopolios vs. los de beneficios de la competencia (2006) Derecho De La Competencia, p. 2Massimo, M., (2004) Competition Policy, Theory and Practice, Nueva York, , Cambridge University PressRamón, M.B., El arbitraje y el derecho de la competencia (2011) Revista Derecho De Los Negocios, p. 248Lorenzo Federico, P., (2007) Derecho Europeo De La Competencia, Prohibiciones Antitrust, Control De Concentraciones Y Procedimientos De aplicación, , Madrid, Barcelona, Marcial PonsParikh, J., Majumdar, K., Competition Law and the Consumer Law: Identifying the Contours in Light of the Case of Belaire Owners Association vs. DLF (2012) Nujs Law Review.Piraino, T., Reconciling the Harvard and Chicago Schools: A New Antitrust Approach for the 21st Century (2007) Indiana Law Journal, p. 82Richard, P., The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis (1979) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 27Posner, R., (2001), Antitrust Law, The University of Chicago PressRodríguezcuriel, W., Las ayudas públicas en la ley de defensa de la competencia (2002) El Nuevo Derecho Comunitario Y español De La Competencia: descentralización, análisis económico Y cooperación Internacional, , González-Orús, Jerónimo Maillo y Beneyto Pérez, José María (coords.), Madrid, BoschRubinfeld, D., Evaluating Antitrust Enforcement: Economic Foundations (2009) Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Competition Law Institute, , International Antitrust Law & Policy, Nueva York, Juris PublishingScherer, F.M., Ross, D.R., (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, , Boston, Houghton MifflinSchinkel, M.P., Effective Cartel Enforcement in Euro-pe (2007) Law and Economics Review, p. 30Schinkel, M.P., Tuinstra, J., (2004) Imperfect Competition Law Enforcement, , CeNDEFSignes de Mesa, J.I., (2013) Derecho De La Competencia, , Madrid, Thomson ReutersPineda, S., Alfonso, J., La protección al consumidor como finalidad primordial de la defensa de la competencia: La experiencia de Estados Unidos, la Unión Europea y Colombia (2014) Díkaion, 23Takacs, W., Pressures for Protectionism: An Empirical Analysis (1981) Economic Inquiry, p. 19van Bael, I., Bellis, J.-F., (2010) Competition Law of the European Community, , Holanda, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den RijnVide, A., (2008) Derecho español De La Competencia, , comentarios a la Ley 15/2007, Real Decreto 261/2008 y Ley 1/2002, t. II, en Odriozola, Miguel (dir.) e Irissarry, Belén (coord.), Barcelona, BoschWhish, R., (2008), Competition Law, Londres, Oxford University PressWilliamson, O., (1989) Las Instituciones económicas Del Capitalismo, , México, Fondo de Cultura EconómicaWilswouter, P.J., The Relationship between Public Antitrust Enforcement and Private Actions for Damages (2009) World Competition: Law and Economics Review, p. 32Boletin Mexicano de Derecho ComparadoAntitrustChicagoHarvardNeoin-stitutional schoolCommon aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Pineda, J.A.S., Universidad Externado de Colombia, Colombia; de los Ríos, L.F.J., Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, Colombiahttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecPineda J.A.S.de los Ríos L.F.J.11407/5785oai:repository.udem.edu.co:11407/57852020-05-27 18:26:53.026Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellinrepositorio@udem.edu.co

Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution [Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo]

Publicaciones similares