The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria

The text deals with the problem of moral reasoning or the criteria that allows to judge the correct from the incorrect action in the scope of ethical consequentialism and deontological morality. Once the two terms are defined, ethical utilitarianism will be taken as a classic example of moral conseq...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad de Caldas
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/15475
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.33.3
Palabra clave:
Consequentialism
deontologism
intention
utilitarianism
moral obligation
Consequencialismo
deontologismo
intenção
utilitarismo
obrigação moral
Rights
openAccess
License
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2018
id REPOUCALDA_e2c430d7d0561238f481ef7e3a9eca81
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/15475
network_acronym_str REPOUCALDA
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
spelling The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteriaO problema da fundamentação moral: critérios consequencialistas e Deontológicos.Consequentialismdeontologismintentionutilitarianismmoral obligationConsequencialismodeontologismointençãoutilitarismoobrigação moralThe text deals with the problem of moral reasoning or the criteria that allows to judge the correct from the incorrect action in the scope of ethical consequentialism and deontological morality. Once the two terms are defined, ethical utilitarianism will be taken as a classic example of moral consequentialism opposing to this perspective the Kantian deontological ethics. With these two theoretical parameters of morality, the discussion will focus on the assessment of problem cases, exploring the ethical issues they raise, evidencing the insufficiency of elucidating them only based on consequentialist principles and the moral of duty.O texto trata o problema da fundamentação moral ou dos critérios que permitem julgar a ação correta da incorreta no âmbito do consequencialismo ético e da moral deontológica. Definidos os dois termos, se tomará o utilitarismo ético como exemplo clássico do consequencialismo moral opondo a essa perspectiva a ética deontológica kantiana. Postos esses dois parâmetros teóricos de moralidade, a discussão se deterá na apreciação de casos problemas, explorando questões éticas que eles suscitam, evidenciando a insuficiência de elucida-las tão somente com base em princípios consequencialistas e da moral do dever.Universidad de Caldas2018-07-01T00:00:00Z2018-07-01T00:00:00Z2018-07-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf0124-612710.17151/difil.2018.19.33.32462-9596https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.33.3https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2822eng37333119Discusiones FilosóficasAnscombe, Gertrudi Elizabeth. “Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy 33. 124 Jan. 1958: Print.Azevedo, M.A.O. “Responsabilidade moral e ressentimento”. GT - Ética / Anpof. Florianópolis. 8, 3. Maio. 2009: 25-46.Foot, Philippa (1967). “The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect”. Oxford Review, 5. Reimpresso em Woodward, 2001: 134-55. Print.Kant, Immanuel. Fundamentação da Metafísica dos costumes e outros escritos.São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2002. Impresso.---. “Sobre um suposto direito de mentir por amor à humanidade”. A paz perpétua e outros opúsculos. Trad. Artur Morão. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1995. Impresso.Madeira, Pedro. Prefácio. In. Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarismo. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2005. Impresso.Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarismo. Trad. Pedro Madeira. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2005. Impresso.Rackels, James. The end of life. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986. Print.Singer, Peter. Ética prática. Trad. Álvaro Augusto Fernandes. Lisboa. Gradativa, 2000. Impresso.Thomson, J.J. “The trolley problem”. The Yale Law Journal. 94. 1985: 1395- 415. Reimpresso em Fischer e Ravizza (1992, pp. 281-92). Print.Núm. 33 , Año 2018 : Julio - Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2822/2606Discusiones Filosóficas - 2018https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Da Cruz, Daniel Neryoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/154752025-10-08T21:20:57Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria
O problema da fundamentação moral: critérios consequencialistas e Deontológicos.
title The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria
spellingShingle The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria
Consequentialism
deontologism
intention
utilitarianism
moral obligation
Consequencialismo
deontologismo
intenção
utilitarismo
obrigação moral
title_short The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria
title_full The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria
title_fullStr The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria
title_full_unstemmed The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria
title_sort The problem of moral reasoning: consequentialist and deontological criteria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Consequentialism
deontologism
intention
utilitarianism
moral obligation
Consequencialismo
deontologismo
intenção
utilitarismo
obrigação moral
topic Consequentialism
deontologism
intention
utilitarianism
moral obligation
Consequencialismo
deontologismo
intenção
utilitarismo
obrigação moral
description The text deals with the problem of moral reasoning or the criteria that allows to judge the correct from the incorrect action in the scope of ethical consequentialism and deontological morality. Once the two terms are defined, ethical utilitarianism will be taken as a classic example of moral consequentialism opposing to this perspective the Kantian deontological ethics. With these two theoretical parameters of morality, the discussion will focus on the assessment of problem cases, exploring the ethical issues they raise, evidencing the insufficiency of elucidating them only based on consequentialist principles and the moral of duty.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
2018-07-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Text
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 0124-6127
10.17151/difil.2018.19.33.3
2462-9596
https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.33.3
identifier_str_mv 0124-6127
10.17151/difil.2018.19.33.3
2462-9596
url https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.33.3
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 37
33
31
19
Discusiones Filosóficas
Anscombe, Gertrudi Elizabeth. “Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy 33. 124 Jan. 1958: Print.
Azevedo, M.A.O. “Responsabilidade moral e ressentimento”. GT - Ética / Anpof. Florianópolis. 8, 3. Maio. 2009: 25-46.Foot, Philippa (1967). “The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect”. Oxford Review, 5. Reimpresso em Woodward, 2001: 134-55. Print.
Kant, Immanuel. Fundamentação da Metafísica dos costumes e outros escritos.
São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2002. Impresso.
---. “Sobre um suposto direito de mentir por amor à humanidade”. A paz perpétua e outros opúsculos. Trad. Artur Morão. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1995. Impresso.
Madeira, Pedro. Prefácio. In. Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarismo. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2005. Impresso.
Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarismo. Trad. Pedro Madeira. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2005. Impresso.
Rackels, James. The end of life. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986. Print.
Singer, Peter. Ética prática. Trad. Álvaro Augusto Fernandes. Lisboa. Gradativa, 2000. Impresso.
Thomson, J.J. “The trolley problem”. The Yale Law Journal. 94. 1985: 1395- 415. Reimpresso em Fischer e Ravizza (1992, pp. 281-92). Print.
Núm. 33 , Año 2018 : Julio - Diciembre
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2822/2606
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Discusiones Filosóficas - 2018
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Discusiones Filosóficas - 2018
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2822
institution Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1855532622037385216