Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo
Colombia ha experimentado una notable expansión económica en los últimos tiempos, pero sigue siendo un país con un alto nivel de desigualdad. Así lo demuestra el índice de Gini, que fue del 51,3% en 2019 y se encuentra entre los más altos de América Latina, particularmente en ciertas regiones. Ademá...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2022
- Institución:
- Universidad de Caldas
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/24754
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/24754
https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2023.18.2.8
- Palabra clave:
- Habilidades digitales
ecosistema digital
inclusión
desarrollo sostenible
Digital skills
digital ecosystem
inclusion
sustainable development
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
| id |
REPOUCALDA_cc2ef374cdfb38de3cc4661774ce46c0 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/24754 |
| network_acronym_str |
REPOUCALDA |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo A skills framework in the context of a digital ecosystem: an engine for social inclusion in developing countries |
| title |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo |
| spellingShingle |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo Habilidades digitales ecosistema digital inclusión desarrollo sostenible Digital skills digital ecosystem inclusion sustainable development |
| title_short |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo |
| title_full |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo |
| title_fullStr |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo |
| title_sort |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrollo |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Habilidades digitales ecosistema digital inclusión desarrollo sostenible Digital skills digital ecosystem inclusion sustainable development |
| topic |
Habilidades digitales ecosistema digital inclusión desarrollo sostenible Digital skills digital ecosystem inclusion sustainable development |
| description |
Colombia ha experimentado una notable expansión económica en los últimos tiempos, pero sigue siendo un país con un alto nivel de desigualdad. Así lo demuestra el índice de Gini, que fue del 51,3% en 2019 y se encuentra entre los más altos de América Latina, particularmente en ciertas regiones. Además, en 2020, el 42,5% de la población vivía en la pobreza, lo que equivale a alrededor de 21,02 millones de personas, y esta cifra aumentó en 3,6 millones debido a la pandemia. Estos niveles son similares a los registrados hace 20 años (Balakrishnan et al., 2021). En términos de empleo, Colombia experimentó una tasa de desempleo máxima del 43 % durante el punto álgido de la pandemia en 2020. Al finalizar el año, la tasa había disminuido al 15,9 %, pero esto aún representa un aumento de 1,3 millones de personas que estaban desempleados en comparación con 2019. Colombia ha buscado la transformación de su sistema económico basado en productos básicos en activos basados en el conocimiento, para lo cual las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) son esenciales para impulsar el crecimiento económico del país, y también juegan un papel fundamental en el cumplimiento de los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible propuestos por Naciones Unidas (Bogdan-Martin, 2017; United Nations, 2018; ONU, 2015; Consejo United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2018). Se han implementado varias aplicaciones TIC para reducir las brechas entre individuos, incluido el uso de Big Data para analizar comunidades marginadas, mejorar los servicios gubernamentales, brindar información relevante a los agricultores, promover la educación, la telemedicina, facilitar la compra y venta de bienes y servicios, ofrecer servicios financieros y fomento de redes colaborativas (Bauer, 2018, p. 6; Bogdan-Martin, 2017; Nielsen et al., 2018). Como el caso colombiano, los gobiernos invierten importantes presupuestos en infraestructura como Internet y computadoras para lograr este objetivo. No obstante, algunos latinoamericanos no logran los mismos resultados que las naciones desarrolladas. Según el Índice de Desarrollo de las TIC, el país latinoamericano mejor clasificado es Uruguay en el puesto 42, seguido de Argentina (51) y Chile (56) (ITU, 2017b). En el Ranking de Competitividad Digital Mundial de IMD de 2019, de 63 economías, Chile ocupó el puesto 42, México ocupó el puesto 49, Brasil ocupó el puesto 57, Colombia ocupó el puesto 58 y Argentina ocupó el puesto 59 (Brits and Cabolis, 2019) Internet es crucial en aspectos como la adquisición de nuevas y mejores habilidades, mejores oportunidades de empleo y la expansión de actividades productivas (ITU, 2017a; OECD, 2016b, p.8; ITU, 2018a). Internet también juega un papel crucial en el apoyo a la innovación y el espíritu empresarial, al promover el intercambio de información, estimular la creación de nuevos negocios, facilitar la comercialización de nuevas ideas y explorar nuevas fuentes de ingresos (OECD, 2016b, p. 9). |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-01T00:00:00Z 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z 2022-07-01 2025-10-08T21:40:36Z 2025-10-08T21:40:36Z |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
1900-9895 https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/24754 10.17151/rlee.2023.18.2.8 2500-5324 https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2023.18.2.8 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1900-9895 10.17151/rlee.2023.18.2.8 2500-5324 |
| url |
https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/24754 https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2023.18.2.8 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
196 2 175 18 Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos Alarcón, P., Álvarez, X., Hernández, D., & Maldonado, D. (2013). Matriz_Habilidades_TIC_para_el_Aprendizaje. Ministerio de Educación de Chile. Assante, D., Caforio, A., Flamini, M., & Romano, E. (2019). Smart education in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, April-2019, 1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725057 Bagaeva, I., & Voronova, O. (2019). Formation of Requirements to the Competency Model for a University Graduate in the Digital Economy. Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Technologies in Logistics and Infrastructure (ICDTLI 2019), 1, 333–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/icdtli-19.2019.58 Balakrishnan, R., Lizarazo, S., & Santoro, M. (2021). 2021 Commodity Cycles, Inequality and Poverty in Latin America (Issue 21). Bauer, J. M. (2018). The Internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society. Telecommunications Policy, 42(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.009 Berger, T., & Frey, C. B. (2016). Digitalization, Jobs, and Convergence in Europe: Strategies for Closing the Skills Gap. In Oxford - Prepared for the European Commission DG Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (Issue January). https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/reports/SCALE_Digitalisation_Final.pdf Bogdan-Martin, D. (2017). The role of ICTS in accelerating the achievement of the SDGS. New innovation approaches to support the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/cstd2016_p06_DoreenBogdan_ITU_en.pdf Brits, A., & Cabolis, C. (2019). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2019. IMD World Competitiveness Center. https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/reports/imd-world-digital-competitiveness-ranking-2019/ Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2016). Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five country study of social differences in Internet use. New Media and Society, 18(11), 2703–2722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604154 Canada. (2019). The ICTC Digital Skills Roadmap Navigator. https://roadmap.digitalyouth.ca/ Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: the digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/s/yCQU Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy (Issue 1). Oxford University Press. Chen, C. C. (2015). Assessing the Activeness of Online Economic Activity of Taiwan’s Internet Users: An Application of the Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Model. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0690-y Chetty, K., Aneja, U., Mishra, V., Gcora, N., & Josie, J. (2018). Bridging the digital divide in the G20: Skills for the new age. Economics, 12(1), 20180024. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-24 Civilcharran, S., & Maharaj, M. S. (2019). A framework to determine the digital skills preparedness of graduates for industry. 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, ICONIC 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONIC.2018.8601250 National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE). (2017). Primera gran encuesta TIC 2017. DiMaggio, P.; Hargittai, E.; Neuman, R.; Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336. http://webuse.org/p/a07/ Economou, A. (2016). Research report on transversal skills frameworks. European Union. http://www.ats2020.eu/images/deliverables/D1.1_TransversalSkillsFrameworks_CP.pdf Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances En Medición, 6, 27–36. Escurra, L.M. (1988). Cuantificación de la validez de contenido por criterio de jueces. Revista de Psicología, 6(1–2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.198801-02.008 European Comission. (2019). High-Tech skills industry: increasing EU’s talent pool and promoting the highest quality standards in support of digital transformation. Publications Office of the European Union https://doi.org/10.2826/879267 European Commission. (2018). Digital skills accelerator. 1–59. https://www.digitalskillsaccelerator.eu/ European Union. (2017). Digital skills for life and work (UNESCO 2017). Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2016). The digital skills paradox: how do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the Internet? Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845 Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Technical Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/82116 Ferro, E., Helbig, N. C., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2011). The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.007 Grundke, R., Marcolin, L., Nguyen, T. L. B., & Squicciarini, M. (2018). Which skills for the digital era? OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, (9). https://doi.org/10.1787/9A9479B5-EN Hanna, N. K. (2020). Assessing the digital economy: aims, frameworks, pilots, results, and lessons. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00129-1 Hargittai, E. (2014). Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’ s Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4),1–17. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942 Helsper, E. J., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Eynon, R. (2015). Tangible Outcomes of Internet Use. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes project report. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1117.6722 International Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2017a). ICT-centric economic growth, innovation and job creation. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Pages/IMPACT-STUDY.aspx International Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2017b). Measuring the Information Society Report 2017. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2017.aspx International Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2019). Digital Skills Insights 2019. https://academy.itu.int/itu-d/projects-activities/research-publications/digital-skills-insights/digital-skills-insights-2019 International Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2018a). Report on the WSIS Stocktaking 2018. http://handle.itu.int/11.1002/pub/8111ea61-en International Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2018b). Digital Skills Toolkit. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Digital-Inclusion/Youth-and-Children/Pages/Digital-Skills-Toolkit.aspx Iordache, C., Mariën, I., & Baelden, D. (2017). Developing digital skills and competences: A quick-scan analysis of 13 digital literacy models. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(1), 6–30.https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2017-1-2 Klimczuk, A., Jasiewicz, J., Filiciak, M., Mierzecka, A., Liwowski, K. K., Kisilowska, M., Tarkowski, A., & Zadrożny, J. (2015). Framework directory of digital skills [SSRN Scholarly Paper]. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2696339 Law, N., Woo, D., Tore, J. de la, & Gary, W. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO. https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/QB69UIDS Leahy, D., & Wilson, D. (2014). Digital skills for employment. En D. Passey & A. Tatnall (Eds.), Key Competencies in ICT and Informatics. Implications and Issues for Educational Professionals and Management (pp. 178-189). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45770-2_16 Martínez-Cantos, J. L. (2017). Digital skills gaps: A pending subject for gender digital inclusion in the European Union. European Journal of Communication, 32(5), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117718464 Mendonça, S., Crespo, N., & Simões, N. (2015). Inequality in the network society: An integrated approach to ICT access, basic skills, and complex capabilities. Telecommunications Policy, 39(3–4), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.010 Merino-Soto, C. (2018). Confidence interval for difference between coefficients of content validity (Aiken’s V): A SPSS syntax. Anales de Psicologia, 34(3), 587–590. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.3.283481 MINTIC. (2015). Panorama TIC: Comportamiento del Sector TIC en Colombia (p. 37). Ministerio de las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. http://colombiatic.mintic.gov.co/602/articles-8917_panoranatic.pdf Nie, P., Sousa-Poza, A., & Nimrod, G. (2017). Internet Use and Subjective Well-Being in China. Social Indicators Research, 132(1), 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1227-8 Nielsen, M. M., Rohman, I. K., & Lopes, N. V. (2018). Empirical analysis of the current digital divides since 2010. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance – ICEGOV,18, 616-625. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209493 Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD. (2019). OECD Skills Outlook 2019. OECD Skills Outlook. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016a). Broadband policies for Latin America and the Caribbean: A digital economy toolkit. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264251823-en Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016b). Economic and Social Benefits of Internet Openness. OECD Digital Economy Papers, (257). https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwqf2r97g5-en Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016c). New Skills for the Digital Economy: Measuring the demand and supply of ICT skills at work. OECD Digital Economy Papers, (258). https://doi.org/10.1787/20716826 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2015). Skills for a Digital World. Working Party on Measurement and Analysis of the Digital Economy. https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Skills-for-a-Digital-World.pdf Organista-Sandoval, J., Lavigne, G., Serrano-Santoyo, A., & Sandoval-Silva, M. (2017). Development of a questionnaire to estimate undergraduate digital skills. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 28(1), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2017.v28.n1.49802 Park, Y. (Ed.). (2019). DQ Global Standards Report 2019: Common Framework for Digital Literacy, Skills and Readiness. Digital Intelligence Institute. https://www.dqinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DQGlobalStandardsReport2019.pdf Pick, J. B., & Sarkar, A. (2015). The Global Digital Divides. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46602-5 Pawlowski, J. M., De Fries, T., & Smyrnaiou, Z. (2018). An adaptable innovation competence framework - the play4guidance framework and its application. MKWI 2018 - Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2018-March(April), 1899–1910. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., & Addeo, F. (2019). Measuring Digital Capital: An empirical investigation. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869604 Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (Eds.). (2013). The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069769 Ratcheva, V., Zahidi, S., Chan, Q., & Jesuthasan, R. (2019). Strategies for the New Economy Skills as the Currency of the Labour Market. World Economic Forum. https://www.ravinjesuthasan.com/strategies-for-the-new-economy-skills-as-the-currency-of-the-labour-market/ Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007 Stern, M. J., Adams, A. E., & Elsasser, S. (2009). Digital inequality and place: The effects of technological diffusion on internet proficiency and usage across rural, Suburban, and Urban Counties. Sociological Inquiry, 79(4), 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00302.x Ministry of Communications and Transportation Mexico (MCT). (2019 Mar.). Proyecto Marco de Habilidades Digitales. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/444450/Marco_de_habilidades_digitales_vf.pdf United Nations. (2018 Jul.). Mainstreaming Inclusive Technology and Innovation Policies That Leave No One Behind. 00816(June), 1-20. United Nations (2018). Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40155/24/S1801141_es.pdf United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNCTAD. (2019). Digital Economy Report 2019. Value creation and capture: Implications for developing countries. https://unctad.org/publication/digital-economy-report-2019 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNCTAD (2018). Creación de competencias digitales para aprovechar las tecnologías existentes y emergentes, prestando especial atención a las dimensiones de género y juventud. Van Deursen, A.J.A.M. & Helsper, E.J. (2015), «The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?», Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Studies in Media and Communications, 10. Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002 Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2016). Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information Communication and Society, 19(6), 804-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834 Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media and Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959 Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001 Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 13(6), 893–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774 Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2018). 21st-century digital skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2184–2200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.08.006 Vicente, M. R., & López, A. J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for internet use. Information Society, 26(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440903423245 Wedlake, S., Keyes, D., & Lothian, K. (2019). Digital skill sets for diverse users: A comparison framework for curriculum and competencies [SSRN Scholarly Paper]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3427252 Wilkin, S., Davies, H., & Eynon, R. (2017). Addressing digital inequalities amongst young people: conflicting discourses and complex outcomes. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1305058 Núm. 2 , Año 2022 : Julio - Diciembre https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/latinoamericana/article/download/8370/6964 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Caldas |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Caldas |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/latinoamericana/article/view/8370 |
| institution |
Universidad de Caldas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1860877913392414720 |
| spelling |
Un marco de competencias en el contexto de un ecosistema digital: un motor para la inclusión social en los países en desarrolloA skills framework in the context of a digital ecosystem: an engine for social inclusion in developing countriesHabilidades digitalesecosistema digitalinclusióndesarrollo sostenibleDigital skillsdigital ecosysteminclusionsustainable developmentColombia ha experimentado una notable expansión económica en los últimos tiempos, pero sigue siendo un país con un alto nivel de desigualdad. Así lo demuestra el índice de Gini, que fue del 51,3% en 2019 y se encuentra entre los más altos de América Latina, particularmente en ciertas regiones. Además, en 2020, el 42,5% de la población vivía en la pobreza, lo que equivale a alrededor de 21,02 millones de personas, y esta cifra aumentó en 3,6 millones debido a la pandemia. Estos niveles son similares a los registrados hace 20 años (Balakrishnan et al., 2021). En términos de empleo, Colombia experimentó una tasa de desempleo máxima del 43 % durante el punto álgido de la pandemia en 2020. Al finalizar el año, la tasa había disminuido al 15,9 %, pero esto aún representa un aumento de 1,3 millones de personas que estaban desempleados en comparación con 2019. Colombia ha buscado la transformación de su sistema económico basado en productos básicos en activos basados en el conocimiento, para lo cual las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) son esenciales para impulsar el crecimiento económico del país, y también juegan un papel fundamental en el cumplimiento de los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible propuestos por Naciones Unidas (Bogdan-Martin, 2017; United Nations, 2018; ONU, 2015; Consejo United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2018). Se han implementado varias aplicaciones TIC para reducir las brechas entre individuos, incluido el uso de Big Data para analizar comunidades marginadas, mejorar los servicios gubernamentales, brindar información relevante a los agricultores, promover la educación, la telemedicina, facilitar la compra y venta de bienes y servicios, ofrecer servicios financieros y fomento de redes colaborativas (Bauer, 2018, p. 6; Bogdan-Martin, 2017; Nielsen et al., 2018). Como el caso colombiano, los gobiernos invierten importantes presupuestos en infraestructura como Internet y computadoras para lograr este objetivo. No obstante, algunos latinoamericanos no logran los mismos resultados que las naciones desarrolladas. Según el Índice de Desarrollo de las TIC, el país latinoamericano mejor clasificado es Uruguay en el puesto 42, seguido de Argentina (51) y Chile (56) (ITU, 2017b). En el Ranking de Competitividad Digital Mundial de IMD de 2019, de 63 economías, Chile ocupó el puesto 42, México ocupó el puesto 49, Brasil ocupó el puesto 57, Colombia ocupó el puesto 58 y Argentina ocupó el puesto 59 (Brits and Cabolis, 2019) Internet es crucial en aspectos como la adquisición de nuevas y mejores habilidades, mejores oportunidades de empleo y la expansión de actividades productivas (ITU, 2017a; OECD, 2016b, p.8; ITU, 2018a). Internet también juega un papel crucial en el apoyo a la innovación y el espíritu empresarial, al promover el intercambio de información, estimular la creación de nuevos negocios, facilitar la comercialización de nuevas ideas y explorar nuevas fuentes de ingresos (OECD, 2016b, p. 9).Colombia has experienced a remarkable economic expansion in recent times, but it is still a country with a high level of inequality. The Gini index evidenced that fact with 51.3% in 2019, which shows that Colombia has one of the highest levels of inequality in Latin America, particularly in certain regions. Furthermore, in 2020, 42.5% of the population lived in poverty, around 21.02 million individuals, and this figure increased by 3.6 million due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These levels are similar to those recorded 20 years ago (Balakrishnan et al., 2021). Besides, Colombia experienced a peak unemployment rate of 43% during the peak of the pandemic in 2020. By the end of that year, the rate had decreased to 15.9%, but this still represents an increase of 1.3 million people who were unemployed compared to 2019. Colombia has pursued the transformation of its commodity-based economic system to knowledge based assets; therefore, information and communication technologies (ICTs) are essential to foster the economic growth of the country and also play an essential role in meeting the sustainable development objectives proposed by the United Nations (Bogdan-Martin, 2017; United Nations, 2018; United Nations, 2015; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2018). Several ICT applications have been implemented to reduce the gaps among individuals, including the use of Big Data to analyze marginalized communities, improve government services, provide farmers with relevant information, promote education and telemedicine, facilitate the purchase and sale of goods and services, offer financial services, and foster collaborative networks (Bauer, 2018, p. 6; Bogdan-Martin, 2017; Nielsen et al., 2018). Governments invest significant budgets in infrastructure such as Internet and computers to achieve this aim. Nonetheless, some Latin American do not achieve the same outcomes as developed nations. According to the ICTs Development Index, the highest-ranked Latin American country is Uruguay at the 42nd place, followed by Argentina (51st) and Chile (56th) (International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2017b). In the IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking of 2019, out of 63 economies, Chile ranked 42nd, Mexico ranked 49th, Brazil ranked 57th, Colombia ranked 58th and Argentina ranked 59th (Brits and Cabolis, 2019) Internet is crucial in aspects such as the acquisition of new and improved skills, better employment opportunities, and the expansion of productive activities (ITU, 2017a; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2016b, p. 8; ITU, 2018a). The Internet also plays a crucial role in supporting innovation and entrepreneurship because it promotes information sharing, stimulates the creation of new businesses, facilitates the commercialization of new ideas, and explores new sources of income (OECD, 2016b, p. 9).Universidad de Caldas2022-07-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:40:36Z2022-07-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:40:36Z2022-07-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf1900-9895https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/2475410.17151/rlee.2023.18.2.82500-5324https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2023.18.2.8https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/latinoamericana/article/view/8370eng196217518Latinoamericana de Estudios EducativosAlarcón, P., Álvarez, X., Hernández, D., & Maldonado, D. (2013). Matriz_Habilidades_TIC_para_el_Aprendizaje. Ministerio de Educación de Chile.Assante, D., Caforio, A., Flamini, M., & Romano, E. (2019). Smart education in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, April-2019, 1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725057Bagaeva, I., & Voronova, O. (2019). Formation of Requirements to the Competency Model for a University Graduate in the Digital Economy. Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Technologies in Logistics and Infrastructure (ICDTLI 2019), 1, 333–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/icdtli-19.2019.58Balakrishnan, R., Lizarazo, S., & Santoro, M. (2021). 2021 Commodity Cycles, Inequality and Poverty in Latin America (Issue 21).Bauer, J. M. (2018). The Internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society. Telecommunications Policy, 42(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.009Berger, T., & Frey, C. B. (2016). Digitalization, Jobs, and Convergence in Europe: Strategies for Closing the Skills Gap. In Oxford - Prepared for the European Commission DG Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (Issue January). https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/reports/SCALE_Digitalisation_Final.pdfBogdan-Martin, D. (2017). The role of ICTS in accelerating the achievement of the SDGS. New innovation approaches to support the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/cstd2016_p06_DoreenBogdan_ITU_en.pdfBrits, A., & Cabolis, C. (2019). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2019. IMD World Competitiveness Center. https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/reports/imd-world-digital-competitiveness-ranking-2019/Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2016). Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five country study of social differences in Internet use. New Media and Society, 18(11), 2703–2722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604154Canada. (2019). The ICTC Digital Skills Roadmap Navigator. https://roadmap.digitalyouth.ca/Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: the digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/s/yCQUCastells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy (Issue 1). Oxford University Press.Chen, C. C. (2015). Assessing the Activeness of Online Economic Activity of Taiwan’s Internet Users: An Application of the Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Model. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0690-yChetty, K., Aneja, U., Mishra, V., Gcora, N., & Josie, J. (2018). Bridging the digital divide in the G20: Skills for the new age. Economics, 12(1), 20180024. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-24Civilcharran, S., & Maharaj, M. S. (2019). A framework to determine the digital skills preparedness of graduates for industry. 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, ICONIC 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONIC.2018.8601250National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE). (2017). Primera gran encuesta TIC 2017.DiMaggio, P.; Hargittai, E.; Neuman, R.; Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336. http://webuse.org/p/a07/Economou, A. (2016). Research report on transversal skills frameworks. European Union. http://www.ats2020.eu/images/deliverables/D1.1_TransversalSkillsFrameworks_CP.pdfEscobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances En Medición, 6, 27–36.Escurra, L.M. (1988). Cuantificación de la validez de contenido por criterio de jueces. Revista de Psicología, 6(1–2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.198801-02.008European Comission. (2019). High-Tech skills industry: increasing EU’s talent pool and promoting the highest quality standards in support of digital transformation. Publications Office of the European Union https://doi.org/10.2826/879267European Commission. (2018). Digital skills accelerator. 1–59. https://www.digitalskillsaccelerator.eu/European Union. (2017). Digital skills for life and work (UNESCO 2017).Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2016). The digital skills paradox: how do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the Internet? Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Technical Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/82116Ferro, E., Helbig, N. C., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2011). The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.007Grundke, R., Marcolin, L., Nguyen, T. L. B., & Squicciarini, M. (2018). Which skills for the digital era? OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, (9). https://doi.org/10.1787/9A9479B5-ENHanna, N. K. (2020). Assessing the digital economy: aims, frameworks, pilots, results, and lessons. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00129-1Hargittai, E. (2014). Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’ s Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4),1–17. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942Helsper, E. J., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Eynon, R. (2015). Tangible Outcomes of Internet Use. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes project report. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1117.6722International Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2017a). ICT-centric economic growth, innovation and job creation. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Pages/IMPACT-STUDY.aspxInternational Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2017b). Measuring the Information Society Report 2017. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2017.aspxInternational Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2019). Digital Skills Insights 2019. https://academy.itu.int/itu-d/projects-activities/research-publications/digital-skills-insights/digital-skills-insights-2019International Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2018a). Report on the WSIS Stocktaking 2018. http://handle.itu.int/11.1002/pub/8111ea61-enInternational Telecommunication Union. ITU. (2018b). Digital Skills Toolkit. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Digital-Inclusion/Youth-and-Children/Pages/Digital-Skills-Toolkit.aspxIordache, C., Mariën, I., & Baelden, D. (2017). Developing digital skills and competences: A quick-scan analysis of 13 digital literacy models. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(1), 6–30.https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2017-1-2Klimczuk, A., Jasiewicz, J., Filiciak, M., Mierzecka, A., Liwowski, K. K., Kisilowska, M., Tarkowski, A., & Zadrożny, J. (2015). Framework directory of digital skills [SSRN Scholarly Paper]. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2696339Law, N., Woo, D., Tore, J. de la, & Gary, W. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO. https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/QB69UIDSLeahy, D., & Wilson, D. (2014). Digital skills for employment. En D. Passey & A. Tatnall (Eds.), Key Competencies in ICT and Informatics. Implications and Issues for Educational Professionals and Management (pp. 178-189). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45770-2_16Martínez-Cantos, J. L. (2017). Digital skills gaps: A pending subject for gender digital inclusion in the European Union. European Journal of Communication, 32(5), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117718464Mendonça, S., Crespo, N., & Simões, N. (2015). Inequality in the network society: An integrated approach to ICT access, basic skills, and complex capabilities. Telecommunications Policy, 39(3–4), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.010Merino-Soto, C. (2018). Confidence interval for difference between coefficients of content validity (Aiken’s V): A SPSS syntax. Anales de Psicologia, 34(3), 587–590. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.3.283481MINTIC. (2015). Panorama TIC: Comportamiento del Sector TIC en Colombia (p. 37). Ministerio de las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. http://colombiatic.mintic.gov.co/602/articles-8917_panoranatic.pdfNie, P., Sousa-Poza, A., & Nimrod, G. (2017). Internet Use and Subjective Well-Being in China. Social Indicators Research, 132(1), 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1227-8Nielsen, M. M., Rohman, I. K., & Lopes, N. V. (2018). Empirical analysis of the current digital divides since 2010. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance – ICEGOV,18, 616-625. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209493Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD. (2019). OECD Skills Outlook 2019. OECD Skills Outlook. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-enOrganization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016a). Broadband policies for Latin America and the Caribbean: A digital economy toolkit. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264251823-enOrganization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016b). Economic and Social Benefits of Internet Openness. OECD Digital Economy Papers, (257). https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwqf2r97g5-enOrganization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016c). New Skills for the Digital Economy: Measuring the demand and supply of ICT skills at work. OECD Digital Economy Papers, (258). https://doi.org/10.1787/20716826Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2015). Skills for a Digital World. Working Party on Measurement and Analysis of the Digital Economy. https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Skills-for-a-Digital-World.pdfOrganista-Sandoval, J., Lavigne, G., Serrano-Santoyo, A., & Sandoval-Silva, M. (2017). Development of a questionnaire to estimate undergraduate digital skills. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 28(1), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2017.v28.n1.49802Park, Y. (Ed.). (2019). DQ Global Standards Report 2019: Common Framework for Digital Literacy, Skills and Readiness. Digital Intelligence Institute. https://www.dqinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DQGlobalStandardsReport2019.pdfPick, J. B., & Sarkar, A. (2015). The Global Digital Divides. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46602-5Pawlowski, J. M., De Fries, T., & Smyrnaiou, Z. (2018). An adaptable innovation competence framework - the play4guidance framework and its application. MKWI 2018 - Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2018-March(April), 1899–1910.Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., & Addeo, F. (2019). Measuring Digital Capital: An empirical investigation. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869604Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (Eds.). (2013). The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069769Ratcheva, V., Zahidi, S., Chan, Q., & Jesuthasan, R. (2019). Strategies for the New Economy Skills as the Currency of the Labour Market. World Economic Forum. https://www.ravinjesuthasan.com/strategies-for-the-new-economy-skills-as-the-currency-of-the-labour-market/Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007Stern, M. J., Adams, A. E., & Elsasser, S. (2009). Digital inequality and place: The effects of technological diffusion on internet proficiency and usage across rural, Suburban, and Urban Counties. Sociological Inquiry, 79(4), 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00302.xMinistry of Communications and Transportation Mexico (MCT). (2019 Mar.). Proyecto Marco de Habilidades Digitales. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/444450/Marco_de_habilidades_digitales_vf.pdfUnited Nations. (2018 Jul.). Mainstreaming Inclusive Technology and Innovation Policies That Leave No One Behind. 00816(June), 1-20.United Nations (2018). Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40155/24/S1801141_es.pdfUnited Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agendaUnited Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNCTAD. (2019). Digital Economy Report 2019. Value creation and capture: Implications for developing countries. https://unctad.org/publication/digital-economy-report-2019United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNCTAD (2018). Creación de competencias digitales para aprovechar las tecnologías existentes y emergentes, prestando especial atención a las dimensiones de género y juventud.Van Deursen, A.J.A.M. & Helsper, E.J. (2015), «The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?», Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Studies in Media and Communications, 10. Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2016). Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information Communication and Society, 19(6), 804-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media and Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 13(6), 893–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2018). 21st-century digital skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2184–2200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.08.006Vicente, M. R., & López, A. J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for internet use. Information Society, 26(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440903423245Wedlake, S., Keyes, D., & Lothian, K. (2019). Digital skill sets for diverse users: A comparison framework for curriculum and competencies [SSRN Scholarly Paper]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3427252Wilkin, S., Davies, H., & Eynon, R. (2017). Addressing digital inequalities amongst young people: conflicting discourses and complex outcomes. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1305058Núm. 2 , Año 2022 : Julio - Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/latinoamericana/article/download/8370/6964https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Arbeláez Rendón, MauricioLotero Vélez, LauraLoaiza, Yasaldez Ederoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/247542025-10-08T21:40:36Z |