Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape

Abstract Focusing on the presence of Nature, regardless of scale or dimension (a park, a small garden, or a tree), and regarding the individual inhabiting a house or a room, his dwelling, we intend to discuss how landscape implies in architecture the assumption of space as simultaneously ‘outside’ a...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad de Caldas
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/13662
Acceso en línea:
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/511
Palabra clave:
Architecture
Chiasmus
invisible – visible
landscape
Architecture
Chiasmus
invisible – visible
landscape.
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2015 Revista Kepes
id REPOUCALDA_907533bc67acb510952422bcb534011d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/13662
network_acronym_str REPOUCALDA
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
title Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
spellingShingle Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
Architecture
Chiasmus
invisible – visible
landscape
Architecture
Chiasmus
invisible – visible
landscape.
title_short Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
title_full Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
title_fullStr Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
title_full_unstemmed Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
title_sort Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Architecture
Chiasmus
invisible – visible
landscape
Architecture
Chiasmus
invisible – visible
landscape.
topic Architecture
Chiasmus
invisible – visible
landscape
Architecture
Chiasmus
invisible – visible
landscape.
description Abstract Focusing on the presence of Nature, regardless of scale or dimension (a park, a small garden, or a tree), and regarding the individual inhabiting a house or a room, his dwelling, we intend to discuss how landscape implies in architecture the assumption of space as simultaneously ‘outside’ and ‘inside’. The theoretical framework we rely upon in this issue is Phenomenology, namely based on Merleau-Ponty‘s approach to perception (Phénoménologie de la Perception [The Phenomenology of Perception], L’Oeil et l’Esprit [Eye and Mind], Le Visible et l’Invisible [The Visible and the Invisible]), and the phenomenological understanding of architecture (through Steven Holl, Peter Zumthor, Juhani Pallasmaa, David Seamon). Within this scope, we debate to what extent Merleau-Ponty’s L’Entre-deux (In-Between), and subsequent ontology of the sensible, deals with landscape as a category towards the constitution of a subjective experience of space and time. The ‘outside’ is not the world exercising the ego possibilities, but the primordial experience involving the individual and the world. Iconic examples as the Fallingwater House (Frank Lloyd Wright), the Glass House (Lina Bo Bardi), and the Farnsworth House (Mies van der Rohe) are employed to interpret landscape’s contribution towards the understanding of a descriptive ontology of the visible-invisible, and to unfold the meaning of Chiasmus.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-14 00:00:00
2015-10-14 00:00:00
2015-10-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
Sección Artículos
Journal Article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Text
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 1794-7111
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/511
2462-8115
identifier_str_mv 1794-7111
2462-8115
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/511
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 198
9
183
10
Kepes
Benediktsson, K. & Lund, Katrín A. (Eds.). (2010). Conversations with Landscape,Surrey and Burlington. Ashgate Publishing.
Bo B., Lina & Carvalho Feraz, M. Casa de Vidro/The Glass House. Unpaged.
Caruso, A. (2008). The feeling of things. Barcelona: Ediciones Polígrafa.
Deleuze, Giles & Parnet, Claire. (1996). Dialogues. Paris: Flammarion.
Edensor, T. (2010). “Aurora landscapes: affective atmospheres of light and dark”. In: Karl Benediktsson and Katrín Anna Lund (Eds.). Conversations with Landscape.Farnham: Ashgate.
Guedes, J. (1992). “Lembranças de Lina Bo Bardi”. In: Revista Caramelo, No. 4. São Paulo.
Holl, S. et al. (2008). Questions of perception. Phenomenology of Architecture.San Francisco: William Stout San Francisco: William Stout Publishers.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
________. (1964). L’Oeil et l’Esprit. Paris: Gallimard.
________. (1988). Le Visible et l’Invisible. Paris:Gallimard.
Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin. Architecture and the senses. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Reed, C. (Ed.). (1996). Not at Home. The suppression of domesticity in modern Art and Architecture. London: Thames and Hudson.
Von Fennig Wrobleski, D. (2009). “A little house in the country. The farnsworth house”. In: The Chicago Literary Club, February 23.
Zumthor, P. (2010a). Atmospheres: architectural environments, surrounding objects. Basel: Birkhäuser.
_______ (2010b). Thinking architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Núm. 9 , Año 10 : Enero - Diciembre 2013
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/511/436
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2015 Revista Kepes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2015 Revista Kepes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/511
institution Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1836144992394936320
spelling Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscapeArchitecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscapeArchitectureChiasmusinvisible – visiblelandscapeArchitectureChiasmusinvisible – visiblelandscape.Abstract Focusing on the presence of Nature, regardless of scale or dimension (a park, a small garden, or a tree), and regarding the individual inhabiting a house or a room, his dwelling, we intend to discuss how landscape implies in architecture the assumption of space as simultaneously ‘outside’ and ‘inside’. The theoretical framework we rely upon in this issue is Phenomenology, namely based on Merleau-Ponty‘s approach to perception (Phénoménologie de la Perception [The Phenomenology of Perception], L’Oeil et l’Esprit [Eye and Mind], Le Visible et l’Invisible [The Visible and the Invisible]), and the phenomenological understanding of architecture (through Steven Holl, Peter Zumthor, Juhani Pallasmaa, David Seamon). Within this scope, we debate to what extent Merleau-Ponty’s L’Entre-deux (In-Between), and subsequent ontology of the sensible, deals with landscape as a category towards the constitution of a subjective experience of space and time. The ‘outside’ is not the world exercising the ego possibilities, but the primordial experience involving the individual and the world. Iconic examples as the Fallingwater House (Frank Lloyd Wright), the Glass House (Lina Bo Bardi), and the Farnsworth House (Mies van der Rohe) are employed to interpret landscape’s contribution towards the understanding of a descriptive ontology of the visible-invisible, and to unfold the meaning of Chiasmus.Abstract Focusing on the presence of Nature, regardless of scale or dimension (a park, a small garden, or a tree), and regarding the individual inhabiting a house or a room, his dwelling, we intend to discuss how landscape implies in architecture the assumption of space as simultaneously ‘outside’ and ‘inside’. The theoretical framework we rely upon in this issue is Phenomenology, namely based on Merleau-Ponty‘s approach to perception (Phénoménologie de la Perception [The Phenomenology of Perception], L’Oeil et l’Esprit [Eye and Mind], Le Visible et l’Invisible [The Visible and the Invisible]), and the phenomenological understanding of architecture (through Steven Holl, Peter Zumthor, Juhani Pallasmaa, David Seamon). Within this scope, we debate to what extent Merleau-Ponty’s L’Entre-deux (In-Between), and subsequent ontology of the sensible, deals with landscape as a category towards the constitution of a subjective experience of space and time. The ‘outside’ is not the world exercising the ego possibilities, but the primordial experience involving the individual and the world. Iconic examples as the Fallingwater House (Frank Lloyd Wright), the Glass House (Lina Bo Bardi), and the Farnsworth House (Mies van der Rohe) are employed to interpret landscape’s contribution towards the understanding of a descriptive ontology of the visible-invisible, and to unfold the meaning of Chiasmus.universidad de Caldas2015-10-14 00:00:002015-10-14 00:00:002015-10-14Artículo de revistaSección ArtículosJournal Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf1794-7111https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/5112462-8115https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/511eng198918310KepesBenediktsson, K. & Lund, Katrín A. (Eds.). (2010). Conversations with Landscape,Surrey and Burlington. Ashgate Publishing.Bo B., Lina & Carvalho Feraz, M. Casa de Vidro/The Glass House. Unpaged.Caruso, A. (2008). The feeling of things. Barcelona: Ediciones Polígrafa.Deleuze, Giles & Parnet, Claire. (1996). Dialogues. Paris: Flammarion.Edensor, T. (2010). “Aurora landscapes: affective atmospheres of light and dark”. In: Karl Benediktsson and Katrín Anna Lund (Eds.). Conversations with Landscape.Farnham: Ashgate.Guedes, J. (1992). “Lembranças de Lina Bo Bardi”. In: Revista Caramelo, No. 4. São Paulo.Holl, S. et al. (2008). Questions of perception. Phenomenology of Architecture.San Francisco: William Stout San Francisco: William Stout Publishers.Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.________. (1964). L’Oeil et l’Esprit. Paris: Gallimard.________. (1988). Le Visible et l’Invisible. Paris:Gallimard.Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin. Architecture and the senses. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Reed, C. (Ed.). (1996). Not at Home. The suppression of domesticity in modern Art and Architecture. London: Thames and Hudson.Von Fennig Wrobleski, D. (2009). “A little house in the country. The farnsworth house”. In: The Chicago Literary Club, February 23.Zumthor, P. (2010a). Atmospheres: architectural environments, surrounding objects. Basel: Birkhäuser._______ (2010b). Thinking architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser.Núm. 9 , Año 10 : Enero - Diciembre 2013https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/511/436Derechos de autor 2015 Revista Kepeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Pombo, Fátima .oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/136622024-07-16T21:37:19Z