Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos

Este artículo analiza el feminismo como un desafío jurídico, político, social, cultural y de derechos humanos, examinando sus orígenes, alcances y su relación con la evolución de las nociones de individuo y sujeto de derecho. A partir de una metodología documental y bibliográfica con enfoque crítico...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2026

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: eng

id	REPOUCALDA_05d3e1a439b62cfe160208968e18b498
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/27031
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos Feminism: A Political, Social, Cultural and Human Rights Challenge
title	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos
spellingShingle	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos feminismo protofeminismo igualdad de género derechos de las mujeres teoría jurídica diversidad feminism proto-feminism equality women’s rights diversity
title_short	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos
title_full	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos
title_fullStr	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos
title_full_unstemmed	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos
title_sort	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	feminismo protofeminismo igualdad de género derechos de las mujeres teoría jurídica diversidad feminism proto-feminism equality women’s rights diversity
topic	feminismo protofeminismo igualdad de género derechos de las mujeres teoría jurídica diversidad feminism proto-feminism equality women’s rights diversity
description	Este artículo analiza el feminismo como un desafío jurídico, político, social, cultural y de derechos humanos, examinando sus orígenes, alcances y su relación con la evolución de las nociones de individuo y sujeto de derecho. A partir de una metodología documental y bibliográfica con enfoque crítico-analítico, el estudio reconstruye el desarrollo histórico del feminismo a través de cuatro olas identificables y examina los principales desafíos que enfrenta en la actualidad. El análisis sostiene que el feminismo ha desempeñado un papel fundamental en la transformación del pensamiento jurídico y político moderno, al poner en evidencia la brecha existente entre la igualdad formal reconocida por los ordenamientos jurídicos y las condiciones materiales necesarias para el ejercicio efectivo de los derechos. Asimismo, se destaca su contribución a la ampliación de los debates sobre ciudadanía, participación política, autonomía corporal, violencia de género e inclusión social. Se concluye que el feminismo ha impulsado una profunda —aunque aún inconclusa— reconfiguración de las estructuras jurídicas y sociales, al cuestionar los órdenes patriarcales y exigir garantías más efectivas de dignidad, igualdad sustantiva, participación y protección de los derechos de las mujeres.
publishDate	2026
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2026-05-22T12:26:55Z 2026-05-23T07:30:15Z 2026-05-22T12:26:55Z 2026-05-23T07:30:15Z 2026-05-22
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	1794-2918 https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/27031 10.17151/jurid.2025.22.2.2 2590-8928 https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2025.22.2.2
identifier_str_mv	1794-2918 10.17151/jurid.2025.22.2.2 2590-8928
url	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/27031 https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2025.22.2.2
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	49 2 19 22 Jurídicas Abrahams, J. (2017, August 14). Everything you wanted to know about fourth-wave feminism—but were afraid to ask. Prospect Magazine. https://n9.cl/h3avr Abreu, M. (2018). Materialist feminism in France: Socio-history of a reflection. Revista Estudos Feministas, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2018v26n354237 Adams, C. J. (1990). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. Bloomsbury. Adams, C. J. (2015). Eat rice. Have faith in women. In The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory (pp. 131-132). Bloomsbury Alberdi, I. (2020). History of feminism. Revista de Occidente, (466), 17-25. Aldasoro, A., & De la Fuente, I. (2022). Towards a new framework to overcome the shadows of institutional feminism. Revista Estudos Feministas, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2022V30N276957 American Civil Liberties Union. (2024). Mapping attacks on LGBTQ rights in U.S. state legislatures in 2024. https://www.aclu.org/legislative-attacks-on-lgbtq-rights-2024 Arrieta-López, M. (2023). The human right to peace: Content, challenges, and forms of realization. Justicia, 28(43), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.17081/just.28.43.6180 Arrieta-López, M. (2020). From peace and the planetary republics of the Enlightenment to the materialization of perpetual peace and universal citizenship. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25, 473-488. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4278408 Arrieta-López, M. (2019). From democracy to aretecracy: Origin, evolution, and universalization. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24, 115-132. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/29689 Beauvoir, S. (1987). The second sex (1st ed.). Siglo XX. Becerra, R. R. (2021). La médiation familiale et la violence conjugale: Une discussion sur sa pertinence par l’entremise d’une revue de littérature. Revista Republicana, 30, 179-191. https://doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a102 Beltrán Pedreira, E., Maquieira D’Angelo, V., Álvarez, S., & Sánchez Muñoz, C. (2008). Feminismos: Debates teóricos contemporáneos. Alianza Editorial. Blanco, J., Téllez, R., & Bocanegra, H. (2021). Sexual violence against women as a tactical procedure of illegal armed groups within the Colombian internal armed conflict: Problems of visibility, prevention, and assistance. Revista Republicana, (30), 125-146. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge. Campbell, B. (1980). A feminist sexual politics: Now you see it, now you don’t. Feminist Review, 5, 1-17. Ciriza, A. (2002). Pasado y presente: El dilema Wollstonecraft como herencia teórica y política In A. Boron & A. de Vita (Eds.), Teoría y filosofía política: La recuperación de los clásicos en el debate latinoamericano (pp. 217-242). Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales. Convention on Women’s Rights in the United States. (1848). Seneca Falls Declaration. https://www.amnistiacatalunya.org/edu/docs/e-hist-senecafalls-1848.html Costa, M. (2016). Feminismos jurídicos. Editorial Didot. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf Delva, J. E., & Gonzalez, I. S. (2022). Digital sexual commerce: Social media and international regulation. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 241-278. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.11 De Gouges, O. (1791). Declaration of the rights of woman and the female citizen. https://observadoresddhh.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/declaracion_derechos_mujer.pdf Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/19-1392 Forouzan, K., Guarnieri, I., Fairbanks, M., & Curhan, T. (2024, December 16). State policy trends 2024: Anti-abortion policymakers redouble attacks on bodily autonomy. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/2024/12/state-policy-trends-2024-anti-abortion-policymakers-redoubleattacks- bodily-autonomy Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. Júcar. Hernández García de Velazco, J. J., Velazco Hernández, J. C., & Blanco Valiente, S. (2022). Feminism and women’s political participation in Colombia: A retrospective of the twentieth century (1949-1991). Izquierdas, 51, 1-28. http://www.izquierdas.cl/images/pdf/2022/51/art67.pdf Grosland, T. J. (2018). A woman’s worth: Valuing self, risk, and (re)vision. In S.A. Shelton, J.E. Flynn, & T.J. Grosland (Eds.) Feminism and intersectionality in academia: Women’s narratives and experiences in higher education (pp. 85-94) Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90590-7_8 Hooks, B. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. South End Press. Jaramillo Sierra, I. C. (2022). Sex equality. In C. Hübner Mendes, R. Gargarella, & S. Guidi (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of constitutional law in Latin America (pp. 718-733). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.50 Keller, E. F., Rocha, G. R., & Rocha, L. F. da S. (2022). Ciência e gênero, feminismo e história das ciências: Entrevista com Evelyn Fox Keller. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, 29(3), 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702022000300008 Kohen, B. (2007). Gender in family justice in the city of Buenos Aires. Editorial Ad-Hoc/UBA. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Crossing Press. Mackay, F. (2015). Radical feminism: Feminist activism in movement. Palgrave Macmillan. Maffía, D. (2012, 2-3 de agosto). Hacia un lenguaje inclusivo. ¿Es posible? [conference]. Jornadas de Actualización Profesional sobre Traducción, Análisis del Discurso, Género y Lenguaje Inclusivo, Universidad de Belgrano, Buenos Aires, Argentina. http://dianamaffia.com.ar/archivos/Traducci%C3%B3n-y-lenguaje-inclusivo.pdf Martin Fiorino, V.R., Arrieta-López, M., Ávila-Hernández, F. M., & Ramos Martínez, Y. (2022). The limits of the future: Technoscience, ethics, and governance of the commons. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 11(1), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238- 8869.2022v11i1.p333-344 Mattos, P. (2022). Anticapitalist feminism: Articulating theory and practice. Revista Estudos Feministas, 30(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2022V30N172837 Mazo, W.D.J. (2019). The catholic tradition, its influence in shaping the role of women in the traditional Colombian family and its relationship with partner violence within. Ratio Juris UNAULA, 14(28), 219-252. https://doi.org/10.24142/raju.v14n28a8 Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001 Meza-Godoy, A., Arrieta-López, M., & Carrasquilla-Díaz, L. P. (2021). Analysis of parties, representatives, and limits of the officious intermeddler in extrajudicial conciliation in Colombia. Revista Republicana, 31, 191-209. https://doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v31.a113 Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. Doubleday. Noli, S., Arrieta, M., & Meza, A. (2018). Perspectives on the concertation of a bilateral integral agreement between China and Colombia. Revista Espacios, 39(42). http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n42/18394224.html Paulilo, M.I.S. (2022). The social class concept in peasant and popular feminism. Revista Estudos Feministas, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2022V30N276934 Phillips, R., & Cree, V. E. (2014). What does the “fourth wave” mean for teaching feminism in twentyfirst-century social work? Social Work Education, 33(7), 930-943. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.885007 Rousseau, J.J. (1980). Discourse on the origin and foundations of inequality among men. Alianza Editorial. (Original work published 1755) Sánchez, M. (2016). Eve expelled from paradise: some reflections on woman’s exclusion in the construction of patriarchal order. Punto Cero, 21(32), 21-35. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1815-02762016000100002&lng=es&tlng=es Scott, J. W. (2012). Women and the rights of man: Feminism and suffrage in France, 1789-1944. Siglo XXI Editores. Sommers, C.H. (2013). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men.Simon & Schuster. Sorzano Rodríguez, D. M., Galván Vela, E., Bonilla Ovallos, M. E., & Ravina-Ripoll, R. (2021). Bibliometric study of the theoretical construct “victim”: An approach based on the armed conflict in Colombia. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.05 Stuart Mill, J. (1869). The subjection of women. https://www.amnistiacatalunya.org/edu/2/fem/fem-js.mill.html Torrejano, R., & Bocanegra, H. (2022). Social characters as a key in the construction of collective identity: Middle Ages. Revista Republicana, (32), 69-92. http://ojs.urepublicana.edu.co/index.php/revistarepublicana/article/view/803 United Nations. (1948, December 10). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Resolution 217 A [III]). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/217(III) United Nations Working Group on discrimination against women and girls. (2024). Escalating backlash against gender equality and urgency of reaffirming substantive equality and the human rights of women and girls (A/HRC/56/51). United Nations. https://docs.un.org/en/a/hrc/56/51 Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. http://jzb.com.es/resources/vindicacion_derechos_mujer_1792.pdf Núm. 2 , Año 2025 : Julio - Diciembre https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/11921/8328
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	Jurídicas - 2026 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0. http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Jurídicas - 2026 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0. http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/11921
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1866404593068408832
spelling	Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanosFeminism: A Political, Social, Cultural and Human Rights Challengefeminismoprotofeminismoigualdad de géneroderechos de las mujeresteoría jurídicadiversidadfeminismproto-feminismequalitywomen’s rightsdiversityEste artículo analiza el feminismo como un desafío jurídico, político, social, cultural y de derechos humanos, examinando sus orígenes, alcances y su relación con la evolución de las nociones de individuo y sujeto de derecho. A partir de una metodología documental y bibliográfica con enfoque crítico-analítico, el estudio reconstruye el desarrollo histórico del feminismo a través de cuatro olas identificables y examina los principales desafíos que enfrenta en la actualidad. El análisis sostiene que el feminismo ha desempeñado un papel fundamental en la transformación del pensamiento jurídico y político moderno, al poner en evidencia la brecha existente entre la igualdad formal reconocida por los ordenamientos jurídicos y las condiciones materiales necesarias para el ejercicio efectivo de los derechos. Asimismo, se destaca su contribución a la ampliación de los debates sobre ciudadanía, participación política, autonomía corporal, violencia de género e inclusión social. Se concluye que el feminismo ha impulsado una profunda —aunque aún inconclusa— reconfiguración de las estructuras jurídicas y sociales, al cuestionar los órdenes patriarcales y exigir garantías más efectivas de dignidad, igualdad sustantiva, participación y protección de los derechos de las mujeres.This article examines feminism as a legal, political, social, cultural, and human rights challenge. The study analyzes its origins, scope, and relationship with the evolution of the concepts of the individual and the legal subject. Through a documentary and bibliographic methodology supported by critical analysis, the article traces the development of feminism across four identifiable waves and evaluates the principal challenges that contemporary feminist movements confront. The article argues that feminism has played a decisive role in the transformation of modern legal and political thought by exposing the persistent gap between formal equality and substantive equality. Furthermore, it demonstrates that feminist theory and activism have contributed to a profound—although still incomplete—reconfiguration of legal and social structures through sustained critique of patriarchal arrangements and demands for more effective guarantees of dignity, equality, participation, and rights for women in both public and private spheres.Universidad de Caldas2026-05-22T12:26:55Z2026-05-23T07:30:15Z2026-05-22T12:26:55Z2026-05-23T07:30:15Z2026-05-22Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf1794-2918https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/2703110.17151/jurid.2025.22.2.22590-8928https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2025.22.2.2https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/11921eng4921922JurídicasAbrahams, J. (2017, August 14). Everything you wanted to know about fourth-wave feminism—but were afraid to ask. Prospect Magazine. https://n9.cl/h3avrAbreu, M. (2018). Materialist feminism in France: Socio-history of a reflection. Revista Estudos Feministas, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2018v26n354237Adams, C. J. (1990). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. Bloomsbury.Adams, C. J. (2015). Eat rice. Have faith in women. In The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory (pp. 131-132). BloomsburyAlberdi, I. (2020). History of feminism. Revista de Occidente, (466), 17-25.Aldasoro, A., & De la Fuente, I. (2022). Towards a new framework to overcome the shadows of institutional feminism. Revista Estudos Feministas, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2022V30N276957American Civil Liberties Union. (2024). Mapping attacks on LGBTQ rights in U.S. state legislatures in 2024. https://www.aclu.org/legislative-attacks-on-lgbtq-rights-2024Arrieta-López, M. (2023). The human right to peace: Content, challenges, and forms of realization. Justicia, 28(43), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.17081/just.28.43.6180Arrieta-López, M. (2020). From peace and the planetary republics of the Enlightenment to the materialization of perpetual peace and universal citizenship. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25, 473-488. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4278408Arrieta-López, M. (2019). From democracy to aretecracy: Origin, evolution, and universalization. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24, 115-132. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/29689Beauvoir, S. (1987). The second sex (1st ed.). Siglo XX.Becerra, R. R. (2021). La médiation familiale et la violence conjugale: Une discussion sur sa pertinence par l’entremise d’une revue de littérature. Revista Republicana, 30, 179-191. https://doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a102Beltrán Pedreira, E., Maquieira D’Angelo, V., Álvarez, S., & Sánchez Muñoz, C. (2008). Feminismos: Debates teóricos contemporáneos. Alianza Editorial.Blanco, J., Téllez, R., & Bocanegra, H. (2021). Sexual violence against women as a tactical procedure of illegal armed groups within the Colombian internal armed conflict: Problems of visibility, prevention, and assistance. Revista Republicana, (30), 125-146.Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.Campbell, B. (1980). A feminist sexual politics: Now you see it, now you don’t. Feminist Review, 5, 1-17.Ciriza, A. (2002). Pasado y presente: El dilema Wollstonecraft como herencia teórica y política In A. Boron & A. de Vita (Eds.), Teoría y filosofía política: La recuperación de los clásicos en el debate latinoamericano (pp. 217-242). Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales.Convention on Women’s Rights in the United States. (1848). Seneca Falls Declaration. https://www.amnistiacatalunya.org/edu/docs/e-hist-senecafalls-1848.htmlCosta, M. (2016). Feminismos jurídicos. Editorial Didot.Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclfDelva, J. E., & Gonzalez, I. S. (2022). Digital sexual commerce: Social media and international regulation. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 241-278. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.11 De Gouges, O. (1791). Declaration of the rights of woman and the female citizen. https://observadoresddhh.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/declaracion_derechos_mujer.pdfDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/19-1392Forouzan, K., Guarnieri, I., Fairbanks, M., & Curhan, T. (2024, December 16). State policy trends 2024: Anti-abortion policymakers redouble attacks on bodily autonomy. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/2024/12/state-policy-trends-2024-anti-abortion-policymakers-redoubleattacks- bodily-autonomyFriedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. Júcar.Hernández García de Velazco, J. J., Velazco Hernández, J. C., & Blanco Valiente, S. (2022). Feminism and women’s political participation in Colombia: A retrospective of the twentieth century (1949-1991). Izquierdas, 51, 1-28. http://www.izquierdas.cl/images/pdf/2022/51/art67.pdfGrosland, T. J. (2018). A woman’s worth: Valuing self, risk, and (re)vision. In S.A. Shelton, J.E. Flynn, & T.J. Grosland (Eds.) Feminism and intersectionality in academia: Women’s narratives and experiences in higher education (pp. 85-94) Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90590-7_8Hooks, B. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. South End Press.Jaramillo Sierra, I. C. (2022). Sex equality. In C. Hübner Mendes, R. Gargarella, & S. Guidi (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of constitutional law in Latin America (pp. 718-733). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.50Keller, E. F., Rocha, G. R., & Rocha, L. F. da S. (2022). Ciência e gênero, feminismo e história das ciências: Entrevista com Evelyn Fox Keller. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, 29(3), 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702022000300008Kohen, B. (2007). Gender in family justice in the city of Buenos Aires. Editorial Ad-Hoc/UBA.Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Crossing Press.Mackay, F. (2015). Radical feminism: Feminist activism in movement. Palgrave Macmillan.Maffía, D. (2012, 2-3 de agosto). Hacia un lenguaje inclusivo. ¿Es posible? [conference]. Jornadas de Actualización Profesional sobre Traducción, Análisis del Discurso, Género y Lenguaje Inclusivo, Universidad de Belgrano, Buenos Aires, Argentina. http://dianamaffia.com.ar/archivos/Traducci%C3%B3n-y-lenguaje-inclusivo.pdfMartin Fiorino, V.R., Arrieta-López, M., Ávila-Hernández, F. M., & Ramos Martínez, Y. (2022). The limits of the future: Technoscience, ethics, and governance of the commons. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 11(1), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238- 8869.2022v11i1.p333-344Mattos, P. (2022). Anticapitalist feminism: Articulating theory and practice. Revista Estudos Feministas, 30(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2022V30N172837Mazo, W.D.J. (2019). The catholic tradition, its influence in shaping the role of women in the traditional Colombian family and its relationship with partner violence within. Ratio Juris UNAULA, 14(28), 219-252. https://doi.org/10.24142/raju.v14n28a8Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001Meza-Godoy, A., Arrieta-López, M., & Carrasquilla-Díaz, L. P. (2021). Analysis of parties, representatives, and limits of the officious intermeddler in extrajudicial conciliation in Colombia. Revista Republicana, 31, 191-209. https://doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v31.a113Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. Doubleday.Noli, S., Arrieta, M., & Meza, A. (2018). Perspectives on the concertation of a bilateral integral agreement between China and Colombia. Revista Espacios, 39(42). http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n42/18394224.htmlPaulilo, M.I.S. (2022). The social class concept in peasant and popular feminism. Revista Estudos Feministas, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2022V30N276934Phillips, R., & Cree, V. E. (2014). What does the “fourth wave” mean for teaching feminism in twentyfirst-century social work? Social Work Education, 33(7), 930-943. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.885007Rousseau, J.J. (1980). Discourse on the origin and foundations of inequality among men. Alianza Editorial. (Original work published 1755)Sánchez, M. (2016). Eve expelled from paradise: some reflections on woman’s exclusion in the construction of patriarchal order. Punto Cero, 21(32), 21-35. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1815-02762016000100002&lng=es&tlng=esScott, J. W. (2012). Women and the rights of man: Feminism and suffrage in France, 1789-1944. Siglo XXI Editores.Sommers, C.H. (2013). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men.Simon & Schuster.Sorzano Rodríguez, D. M., Galván Vela, E., Bonilla Ovallos, M. E., & Ravina-Ripoll, R. (2021). Bibliometric study of the theoretical construct “victim”: An approach based on the armed conflict in Colombia. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.05Stuart Mill, J. (1869). The subjection of women. https://www.amnistiacatalunya.org/edu/2/fem/fem-js.mill.htmlTorrejano, R., & Bocanegra, H. (2022). Social characters as a key in the construction of collective identity: Middle Ages. Revista Republicana, (32), 69-92. http://ojs.urepublicana.edu.co/index.php/revistarepublicana/article/view/803United Nations. (1948, December 10). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Resolution 217 A [III]). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/217(III)United Nations Working Group on discrimination against women and girls. (2024). Escalating backlash against gender equality and urgency of reaffirming substantive equality and the human rights of women and girls (A/HRC/56/51). United Nations. https://docs.un.org/en/a/hrc/56/51Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. http://jzb.com.es/resources/vindicacion_derechos_mujer_1792.pdfNúm. 2 , Año 2025 : Julio - Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/11921/8328Jurídicas - 2026https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Arrieta-López, MiltonMartínez-Durango, Lina MarcelaCampos Benavides, JohnD’Amato Castillo, Guissepeoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/270312026-05-23T07:30:15Z

Feminismo. Un desafío político, social, cultural y en materia de derechos humanos

Publicaciones similares