Knowledge network for sustainable local development

This article aims to build a network for the exchange of knowledge between the government and production, community and university sectors for sustainable local development. To achieve this, the authors relied on the concepts of sustainable local development, social capital, the relationship between...

Full description

Autores:
Marín-González, Freddy
Senior, Alexa Angélica
Narváez Castro, Mercy
Inciarte González, Alicia
Paredes Chacín, Ana Judith
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
Repositorio:
RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13872
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13872
https://red.uao.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Desarrollo urbano sostenible
Sustainable local development social capital
Knowledge networks
Intersectorality
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos reservados - MDPI, 2021
id REPOUAO2_9b80e9a119bd83453d96c3fbc77cbde7
oai_identifier_str oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13872
network_acronym_str REPOUAO2
network_name_str RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Knowledge network for sustainable local development
title Knowledge network for sustainable local development
spellingShingle Knowledge network for sustainable local development
Desarrollo urbano sostenible
Sustainable local development social capital
Knowledge networks
Intersectorality
title_short Knowledge network for sustainable local development
title_full Knowledge network for sustainable local development
title_fullStr Knowledge network for sustainable local development
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge network for sustainable local development
title_sort Knowledge network for sustainable local development
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Marín-González, Freddy
Senior, Alexa Angélica
Narváez Castro, Mercy
Inciarte González, Alicia
Paredes Chacín, Ana Judith
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Marín-González, Freddy
Senior, Alexa Angélica
Narváez Castro, Mercy
Inciarte González, Alicia
Paredes Chacín, Ana Judith
dc.subject.armarc.spa.fl_str_mv Desarrollo urbano sostenible
topic Desarrollo urbano sostenible
Sustainable local development social capital
Knowledge networks
Intersectorality
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Sustainable local development social capital
Knowledge networks
Intersectorality
description This article aims to build a network for the exchange of knowledge between the government and production, community and university sectors for sustainable local development. To achieve this, the authors relied on the concepts of sustainable local development, social capital, the relationship between sectors or intersectorality, networks and interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary knowledge. Regarding the methodology, the abductive method was used. Under a documentary design, the research techniques were a content analysis of theoretical documents and the deductive inference technique. The construction of a knowledge exchange network for sustainable local development stands out as the result. It is concluded that knowledge networks for sustainable local development have positive implications in the establishment of alliances and links between the sectors that make up society
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-21
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-16T15:55:19Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-16T15:55:19Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 20711050
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13872
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorio Educativo Digital
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://red.uao.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv 20711050
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
Repositorio Educativo Digital
url https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13872
https://red.uao.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 16
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 3
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 13
dc.relation.cites.eng.fl_str_mv Marín González, F., Senior, A.A., Narváez Castro, M., Inciarte González, A., Paredes Chacín, A. J. (2021). Knowledge Network for Sustainable Local Development. Sustainability. Vol. 13 (3), pp. 1-16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348668617_Knowledge_Network_for_Sustainable_Local_Development
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv Sustainability
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv 1. Tovey, H. Sustainability: A Platform for Debate. Sustainability 2009, 1, 14–18. [CrossRef]
2. Wilbanks, J.; Wilbanks, T.J. Science, Open Communication and Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2010, 2, 993–1015. [CrossRef]
3. Cummings, S.; Seferiadis, A.A.; Maas, J.; Bunders, J.F.; Zweekhorst, M.B. Knowledge, Social Capital, and Grassroots Development: Insights from Rural Bangladesh. J. Dev. Stud. 2018, 55, 161–176. [CrossRef]
4. Pesch, U.; Spekkink,W.; Quist, J. Local sustainability initiatives: Innovation and civic engagement in societal experiments. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 27, 300–317. [CrossRef]
5. Mauser,W.; Klepper, G.; Rice, M.; Schmalzbauer, B.S.; Hackmann, H.; Leemans, R.; Moore, H. Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5, 420–431. [CrossRef]
6. Giedr˙ e, A.; Baranauskait˙ e, L. Investigating Complexity of Intersectoral. Collaboration: Contextual Framework for Research. In Contemporary Research on Organization Management and Administration; Academic Association of Management and Administration: Riga, Latvia, 2018; Volume 6. Available online: http://journal.avada.lt/images/dokumentai/2018/CROMA_2018_6_1_79-89.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
7. Berkes, F.; Seixas, C.; Fernandes, D.; Medeiros, D.; Maurice, S.; Shukla, S. Lessons from Community Self-Organization and Cross-Scale Linkages in Four Equator Initiative Projects; Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2007; pp. 1–30. Available online: https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/31457/123949.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
8. Montalbán-Domingo, L.; Aguilar-Morocho, M.; García-Segura, T.; Pellicer, E. Study of Social and Environmental Needs for the Selection of Sustainable Criteria in the Procurement of Public Works. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7756. [CrossRef]
9. Jerneck, A.; Olsson, L.; Ness, B.; Anderberg, S.; Baier, M.; Clark, E.; Hickler, T.; Hornborg, A.; Kronsell, A.; Lövbrand, E.; et al. Structuring sustainability science. Sustain. Sci. 2010, 6, 69–82. [CrossRef]
10. Maher, R.; Maher, M.; Mann, S.; McAlpine, C.A. Integrating design thinking with sustainability science: A Researchv through Design approach. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 1565–1587. [CrossRef]
11. Mukhopadhyay, P.; Nepal, M.; Shyamsundar, P. Building skills for sustainability: A role for regional research networks. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 45. [CrossRef]
12. Cunill-Grau, N. La intersectorialidad en las nuevas políticas sociales. Un acercamiento análitico-conceptual. Gest. Polit. Pública. 2014, 23, 5–46.
13. Wuelser, G.; Pohl, C. How researchers frame scientific contributions to sustainable development: A typology based on grounded theory. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 789–800. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Weichselgartner, J.; Kasperson, R. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2010, 20, 266–277. [CrossRef]
15. Muñoz-Erickson, T. How Cities Think: Knowledge-Action Systems Analysis for Urban Sustainability in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Ph.D. Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA, 2012. Available online: https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/94135/ content//tmp/package-zUBFpT/MunozErickson_asu_0010E_11592.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
16. Ayala-Orozco, B.; Rosell, J.A.; Merçon, J.; Bueno, I.; Alatorre-Frenk, G.; Langle-Flores, A.; Lobato, A. Challenges and Strategies in Place-Based Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration for Sustainability: Learning from Experiences in the Global South. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3217. [CrossRef]
17. Shi, Q.; Deng, X.; Shi, C.; Chen, S. Exploration of the Intersectoral Relations Based on Input-Output Tables in the Inland River Basin of China. Sustainability 2015, 7, 4323–4340. [CrossRef]
18. Ziuzya, E.V.; Voronkova, O.Y.; Umirzakova, D.K.; Rakovskiy, V.I.; Qurbanov, P.A.; Kazakov, A.V. A Methodological Approach to Assessing the Efficiency of the Economic Mechanism for Formation and Development of Intersectoral Linkages. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 2019, 10, 920–925.
19. Scheunemann-De Souza, I.S. Política y Gestión de las Redes. In Redes de Conocimiento Construcción, Dinámica y Gestión, 1st ed.; Albornoz, M., Alfaraz, C., Eds.; Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología (RICYT) del Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (CYTED) y la Oficina Regional de Ciencia para América Latina y el Caribe de la UNESCO: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2006; pp. 215–218. Available online: http://repositorio.minciencias.gov.co: 8080/bitstream/handle/11146/468/1669-ALBORNOZ_2006_REDES_DE_CONO.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 4 November 2020).
20. Kaiser, D.B.;Weith, T.; Gaasch, N. Co-Production of Knowledge: A Conceptual Approach for Integrative Knowledge Management in Planning. Trans. Assoc. Eur. Sch. Plan. 2017, 1, 18–32. [CrossRef]
21. Pohl, C.; Rist, S.; Zimmermann, A.; Fry, P.; Gurung, G.S.; Schneider, F.; Speranza, C.I.; Kiteme, B.; Boillat, S.; Serrano, E.; et al. Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci. Public Policy 2010, 37, 267–281. [CrossRef]
22. McNie, E.C. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: An analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10, 17–38. [CrossRef]
23. Ruiz-Real, J.L.; Uribe-Toril, J.; Valenciano, J.D.P.; Manso, J.P. Ibero-American Research on Local Development. An Analysis of Its Evolution and New Trends. Resources 2019, 8, 124. [CrossRef]
24. Becker, E. Social-Ecological Systems as Epistemic Objects. In Human-Nature Interactions in the Anthropocene: Potentials of Social Ecological Systems Analysis; Marion, G.G.K., Beate, R.M., Eds.; Welp Routledge: London, UK, 2011; pp. 37–59. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256259334_Social-Ecological_Systems_as_Epistemic_Objects (accessed on 4 November 2020).
25. Díaz, A.L.; Chan, A.; Harley, K.; Matus, S.; Suerie Moon, W.C.; Murthy, C.W. Making Technological Innovation Work for Sustainable Development. Harvard Kennedy School University Faculty Research Working Paper Series; London, UK, 2015; pp. 15–79. Available online: https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1294 (accessed on 4 November 2020).
26. Lang, D.;Wiek, A.; Bergmann, M.; Stauffacher, M.; Martens, P.; Moll, P.; Swilling, M.; Thomas, C.J. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7, 25–43. [CrossRef]
27. Safak, B. The Relation between Social Capital and Trust with Social Network AnalysisWorld Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. IJCTE 2016, 10, 28. [CrossRef]
28. Holmes, L.; LaHurd, A.; Wasson, E.; McClarin, L.; Dabney, K.W. Racial and Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Association Between Total Cholesterol and Pediatric Obesity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 13, 19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Newman, L.; Dale, A. Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2007, 9, 79–90. [CrossRef]
30. Putnam, H. Realism without absolutes. Int. J. Philos. Stud. 1993, 1, 179–192. [CrossRef]
31. Yu-Bing, W.; Ching-Wei, H. No Money? No Problem! The Value of Sustainability: Social Capital Drives the Relationship among Customer Identification and Citizenship Behavior in Sharing Economy. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1400. [CrossRef]
32. Juhola, S.; Westerhoff, L. Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 239–247. [CrossRef]
33. Kim, H.; Yang, S. Neighborhood Walking and Social Capital: The Correlation between Walking Experience and Individual Perception of Social Capital. Sustainability 2017, 9, 680. [CrossRef]
34. Abdol Aziz, S. Sustainable regional development through knowledge networks: Review of case studies. Front. Archit. Res. 2019, 8, 471–482.
35. Staat,W. On abduction, deduction, induction and categories. Trans. Charles S Peirce Soc. 1993, 29, 225–237.
36. Abbott, A. Basic debates and methodological practices. Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. Chapter 2. 2004, pp. 19–39. Available online: https://www.humanscience.org/docs/Abbott%20(2004)%20Methods%20of%20Discovery%202.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
37. Mirza, N. Effects of abductive reasoning training on hypothesis generation abilities of first and second year baccalaureate nursing students. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, McMaster University. Copyright by Noeman Ahmad Mirza. 2015. Available online: https: //macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/18113/2/Noeman%20Mirza%20FINAL%20Thesis%20D29M06Y2015.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
38. Burawoy, M. The Extended Case Method Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition. 2008, pp. 192–219. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285934790_The_extended_case_method_Four_countries_four_decades_four_great_transformations_and_one_theoretical_tradition(accessed on 4 November 2020).
39. Quaranta, G.; Citro, E.; Salvia, R. Economic and Social Sustainable Synergies to Promote Innovations in Rural Tourism and Local Development. Sustainability 2016, 8, 668. [CrossRef]
40. Mensah, J. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2019, 5, 1653531. [CrossRef]
41. Antonescu, D. Theoretical Approaches of Endogenous Regional Development; Institute of National Economy: Bucharest, Romania, 2015; MPRA is a RePEc Service Hosted by the Munich University Library in Germany. Available online: https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen. de/64679/ (accessed on 4 November 2020).
42. Meisert, A.; Böttcher, F. Towards a Discourse-Based Understanding of Sustainability Education and Decision Making. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5902. [CrossRef]
43. Thorén, H. The Hammer and the Nail: Interdisciplinary and Problem Solving in Sustainability Science. Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2015. Available online: https://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/6044493/5048299.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
44. Walker, B.H.; Carpenter, S.R.; Anderies, J.M.; Abel, N.; Cumming, G.S.; Janssen, M.A.; Lebel, L.; Norberg, J.; Peterson, G.; Pritchard, R. Resilience Management in Social-ecological Systems: A Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach. Conserv. Ecol. 2002, 6, 1–14. [CrossRef]
45. Fritz, L.; Binder, C. Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2853. [CrossRef]
46. Ziervogel, G.; Archer, E.; Price, P. Strengthening the knowledge–policy interface through co-production of a climate adaptation plan: Leveraging opportunities in Bergrivier Municipality, South Africa. Environ. Urban. 2016, 28, 455–474. [CrossRef]
47. Thorén, H.; Persson, J. The Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity: Sustainability Science and Problem-Feeding. J. Gen. Philos. Sci. 2013, 44, 337–355. [CrossRef]
48. Righi, A. Measuring Social Capital: Official Statistics Initiatives in Italy. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 72, 4–22. [CrossRef]
49. Nahapiet, J.; Ghoshal, S. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1998, 23, 242–266. [CrossRef]
50. Blasco-Bocigas, P.; Navas-López, E.; López-Sáez, P. El efecto mediador del capital social sobre los beneficios de la empresa: Una aproximación teórica. Cuad. Estud. Empresariales 2010, 20, 11–34.
51. Brink, E.; Wamsler, C.; Adolfsson, M.; Axelsson, M.; Beery, T.; Björn, H.; Bramryd, T.; Ekelund, N.; Jephson, T.; Narvelo, W.; et al. On the road to ‘research municipalities’: Analysing transdisciplinarity in municipal ecosystem services and adaptation planning. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 765–784. [CrossRef]
52. Ortiz, B.; Donate, M.J.; Guadamillas, F. Relational and Cognitive Social Capital: Their Influence on Strategies of External Knowledge Acquisition. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 99, 91–100. [CrossRef]
53. Borgatti, S.P.; Foster, P.C. The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. J. Manag. 2003, 29, 991–1013.
54. Garcia-Diez, S.G. Measurement of Social Capital with the Help of Time Use Surveys. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 72, 23–31. [CrossRef]
55. Carrillo-Álvarez, E.; Riera-Roman, J. Measuring social capital: Further insights. Gaceta Sanitari 2017, 31, 57–61. Available online: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/gs/v31n1/0213-9111-gs-31-01-00057.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
56. Chen, C.J.; Huang, J. How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management—The social interaction perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2007, 27, 104–118. [CrossRef]
57. Zou, T.; Su, Y.;Wang, Y. Examining Relationships between Social Capital, Emotion Experience and Life Satisfaction for Sustainable Community. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2651. [CrossRef]
58. Parsons, M.; Nalau, J.; Fisher, K. Perspectivas alternativas sobre la sostenibilidad: Conocimiento y metodologías indígenas. Chall. Sustain. 2017, 5, 3–14. [CrossRef]
59. Hessels, L.K.; Van Lente, H. Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Res. Policy 2008, 37, 740–760. [CrossRef]
60. Weichselgartner, J.; Kelman, I. Geographies of resilience. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2015, 39, 249–267. [CrossRef]
61. Evans, M.C.; Cvitanovic, C. An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers. Palgrave Commun. 2018, 4, 88. [CrossRef]
62. Armitage, D.R.; De Loë, R.; Plummer, R. Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conserv. Lett. 2012, 5, 245–255. [CrossRef]
63. Opdam, P.; Luque, S.; Nassauer, J.; Verburg, P.;Wu, J. How can landscape ecology contribute to sustainability science? Landsc. Ecol. 2018, 33, 1–7. [CrossRef]
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos reservados - MDPI, 2021
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos reservados - MDPI, 2021
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 16 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv MDPI
institution Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/3d90a70e-a18f-4348-9d3c-506002be1987/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/d5f8131a-072b-4d34-88d8-81cfb222e0da/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/fce9d210-34f8-4032-a401-015aaa623ae0/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/9a51f445-ebc3-4a73-b067-7f4bf29f2155/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560
7a9fb1fcfbbc705b0df5ecc330ee7f61
eb2b23ccf780b07dd4780aa02d1a6d72
f3f61afd9d4dcc8b062cb3505e5e6da4
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidente
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@uao.edu.co
_version_ 1814259909788696576
spelling Marín-González, Freddy419134a5e750983a026da0264a1f553cSenior, Alexa Angélica9b31d33cb7486f11bec43a97c6768ad8Narváez Castro, Mercy454144e9fa24c5902ee20a096d720b9fInciarte González, Alicia53c72cb39d1ca0c0cba428cab7073937Paredes Chacín, Ana Judithvirtual::3933-12022-05-16T15:55:19Z2022-05-16T15:55:19Z2021-01-2120711050https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13872Universidad Autónoma de OccidenteRepositorio Educativo Digitalhttps://red.uao.edu.co/This article aims to build a network for the exchange of knowledge between the government and production, community and university sectors for sustainable local development. To achieve this, the authors relied on the concepts of sustainable local development, social capital, the relationship between sectors or intersectorality, networks and interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary knowledge. Regarding the methodology, the abductive method was used. Under a documentary design, the research techniques were a content analysis of theoretical documents and the deductive inference technique. The construction of a knowledge exchange network for sustainable local development stands out as the result. It is concluded that knowledge networks for sustainable local development have positive implications in the establishment of alliances and links between the sectors that make up society16 páginasapplication/pdfengMDPIDerechos reservados - MDPI, 2021https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Knowledge network for sustainable local developmentArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Desarrollo urbano sostenibleSustainable local development social capitalKnowledge networksIntersectorality163113Marín González, F., Senior, A.A., Narváez Castro, M., Inciarte González, A., Paredes Chacín, A. J. (2021). Knowledge Network for Sustainable Local Development. Sustainability. Vol. 13 (3), pp. 1-16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348668617_Knowledge_Network_for_Sustainable_Local_DevelopmentSustainability1. Tovey, H. Sustainability: A Platform for Debate. Sustainability 2009, 1, 14–18. [CrossRef]2. Wilbanks, J.; Wilbanks, T.J. Science, Open Communication and Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2010, 2, 993–1015. [CrossRef]3. Cummings, S.; Seferiadis, A.A.; Maas, J.; Bunders, J.F.; Zweekhorst, M.B. Knowledge, Social Capital, and Grassroots Development: Insights from Rural Bangladesh. J. Dev. Stud. 2018, 55, 161–176. [CrossRef]4. Pesch, U.; Spekkink,W.; Quist, J. Local sustainability initiatives: Innovation and civic engagement in societal experiments. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 27, 300–317. [CrossRef]5. Mauser,W.; Klepper, G.; Rice, M.; Schmalzbauer, B.S.; Hackmann, H.; Leemans, R.; Moore, H. Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5, 420–431. [CrossRef]6. Giedr˙ e, A.; Baranauskait˙ e, L. Investigating Complexity of Intersectoral. Collaboration: Contextual Framework for Research. In Contemporary Research on Organization Management and Administration; Academic Association of Management and Administration: Riga, Latvia, 2018; Volume 6. Available online: http://journal.avada.lt/images/dokumentai/2018/CROMA_2018_6_1_79-89.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).7. Berkes, F.; Seixas, C.; Fernandes, D.; Medeiros, D.; Maurice, S.; Shukla, S. Lessons from Community Self-Organization and Cross-Scale Linkages in Four Equator Initiative Projects; Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2007; pp. 1–30. Available online: https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/31457/123949.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).8. Montalbán-Domingo, L.; Aguilar-Morocho, M.; García-Segura, T.; Pellicer, E. Study of Social and Environmental Needs for the Selection of Sustainable Criteria in the Procurement of Public Works. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7756. [CrossRef]9. Jerneck, A.; Olsson, L.; Ness, B.; Anderberg, S.; Baier, M.; Clark, E.; Hickler, T.; Hornborg, A.; Kronsell, A.; Lövbrand, E.; et al. Structuring sustainability science. Sustain. Sci. 2010, 6, 69–82. [CrossRef]10. Maher, R.; Maher, M.; Mann, S.; McAlpine, C.A. Integrating design thinking with sustainability science: A Researchv through Design approach. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 1565–1587. [CrossRef]11. Mukhopadhyay, P.; Nepal, M.; Shyamsundar, P. Building skills for sustainability: A role for regional research networks. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 45. [CrossRef]12. Cunill-Grau, N. La intersectorialidad en las nuevas políticas sociales. Un acercamiento análitico-conceptual. Gest. Polit. Pública. 2014, 23, 5–46.13. Wuelser, G.; Pohl, C. How researchers frame scientific contributions to sustainable development: A typology based on grounded theory. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 789–800. [CrossRef] [PubMed]14. Weichselgartner, J.; Kasperson, R. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2010, 20, 266–277. [CrossRef]15. Muñoz-Erickson, T. How Cities Think: Knowledge-Action Systems Analysis for Urban Sustainability in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Ph.D. Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA, 2012. Available online: https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/94135/ content//tmp/package-zUBFpT/MunozErickson_asu_0010E_11592.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).16. Ayala-Orozco, B.; Rosell, J.A.; Merçon, J.; Bueno, I.; Alatorre-Frenk, G.; Langle-Flores, A.; Lobato, A. Challenges and Strategies in Place-Based Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration for Sustainability: Learning from Experiences in the Global South. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3217. [CrossRef]17. Shi, Q.; Deng, X.; Shi, C.; Chen, S. Exploration of the Intersectoral Relations Based on Input-Output Tables in the Inland River Basin of China. Sustainability 2015, 7, 4323–4340. [CrossRef]18. Ziuzya, E.V.; Voronkova, O.Y.; Umirzakova, D.K.; Rakovskiy, V.I.; Qurbanov, P.A.; Kazakov, A.V. A Methodological Approach to Assessing the Efficiency of the Economic Mechanism for Formation and Development of Intersectoral Linkages. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 2019, 10, 920–925.19. Scheunemann-De Souza, I.S. Política y Gestión de las Redes. In Redes de Conocimiento Construcción, Dinámica y Gestión, 1st ed.; Albornoz, M., Alfaraz, C., Eds.; Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología (RICYT) del Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (CYTED) y la Oficina Regional de Ciencia para América Latina y el Caribe de la UNESCO: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2006; pp. 215–218. Available online: http://repositorio.minciencias.gov.co: 8080/bitstream/handle/11146/468/1669-ALBORNOZ_2006_REDES_DE_CONO.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 4 November 2020).20. Kaiser, D.B.;Weith, T.; Gaasch, N. Co-Production of Knowledge: A Conceptual Approach for Integrative Knowledge Management in Planning. Trans. Assoc. Eur. Sch. Plan. 2017, 1, 18–32. [CrossRef]21. Pohl, C.; Rist, S.; Zimmermann, A.; Fry, P.; Gurung, G.S.; Schneider, F.; Speranza, C.I.; Kiteme, B.; Boillat, S.; Serrano, E.; et al. Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci. Public Policy 2010, 37, 267–281. [CrossRef]22. McNie, E.C. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: An analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10, 17–38. [CrossRef]23. Ruiz-Real, J.L.; Uribe-Toril, J.; Valenciano, J.D.P.; Manso, J.P. Ibero-American Research on Local Development. An Analysis of Its Evolution and New Trends. Resources 2019, 8, 124. [CrossRef]24. Becker, E. Social-Ecological Systems as Epistemic Objects. In Human-Nature Interactions in the Anthropocene: Potentials of Social Ecological Systems Analysis; Marion, G.G.K., Beate, R.M., Eds.; Welp Routledge: London, UK, 2011; pp. 37–59. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256259334_Social-Ecological_Systems_as_Epistemic_Objects (accessed on 4 November 2020).25. Díaz, A.L.; Chan, A.; Harley, K.; Matus, S.; Suerie Moon, W.C.; Murthy, C.W. Making Technological Innovation Work for Sustainable Development. Harvard Kennedy School University Faculty Research Working Paper Series; London, UK, 2015; pp. 15–79. Available online: https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1294 (accessed on 4 November 2020).26. Lang, D.;Wiek, A.; Bergmann, M.; Stauffacher, M.; Martens, P.; Moll, P.; Swilling, M.; Thomas, C.J. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7, 25–43. [CrossRef]27. Safak, B. The Relation between Social Capital and Trust with Social Network AnalysisWorld Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. IJCTE 2016, 10, 28. [CrossRef]28. Holmes, L.; LaHurd, A.; Wasson, E.; McClarin, L.; Dabney, K.W. Racial and Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Association Between Total Cholesterol and Pediatric Obesity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 13, 19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]29. Newman, L.; Dale, A. Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2007, 9, 79–90. [CrossRef]30. Putnam, H. Realism without absolutes. Int. J. Philos. Stud. 1993, 1, 179–192. [CrossRef]31. Yu-Bing, W.; Ching-Wei, H. No Money? No Problem! The Value of Sustainability: Social Capital Drives the Relationship among Customer Identification and Citizenship Behavior in Sharing Economy. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1400. [CrossRef]32. Juhola, S.; Westerhoff, L. Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 239–247. [CrossRef]33. Kim, H.; Yang, S. Neighborhood Walking and Social Capital: The Correlation between Walking Experience and Individual Perception of Social Capital. Sustainability 2017, 9, 680. [CrossRef]34. Abdol Aziz, S. Sustainable regional development through knowledge networks: Review of case studies. Front. Archit. Res. 2019, 8, 471–482.35. Staat,W. On abduction, deduction, induction and categories. Trans. Charles S Peirce Soc. 1993, 29, 225–237.36. Abbott, A. Basic debates and methodological practices. Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. Chapter 2. 2004, pp. 19–39. Available online: https://www.humanscience.org/docs/Abbott%20(2004)%20Methods%20of%20Discovery%202.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).37. Mirza, N. Effects of abductive reasoning training on hypothesis generation abilities of first and second year baccalaureate nursing students. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, McMaster University. Copyright by Noeman Ahmad Mirza. 2015. Available online: https: //macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/18113/2/Noeman%20Mirza%20FINAL%20Thesis%20D29M06Y2015.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).38. Burawoy, M. The Extended Case Method Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition. 2008, pp. 192–219. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285934790_The_extended_case_method_Four_countries_four_decades_four_great_transformations_and_one_theoretical_tradition(accessed on 4 November 2020).39. Quaranta, G.; Citro, E.; Salvia, R. Economic and Social Sustainable Synergies to Promote Innovations in Rural Tourism and Local Development. Sustainability 2016, 8, 668. [CrossRef]40. Mensah, J. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2019, 5, 1653531. [CrossRef]41. Antonescu, D. Theoretical Approaches of Endogenous Regional Development; Institute of National Economy: Bucharest, Romania, 2015; MPRA is a RePEc Service Hosted by the Munich University Library in Germany. Available online: https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen. de/64679/ (accessed on 4 November 2020).42. Meisert, A.; Böttcher, F. Towards a Discourse-Based Understanding of Sustainability Education and Decision Making. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5902. [CrossRef]43. Thorén, H. The Hammer and the Nail: Interdisciplinary and Problem Solving in Sustainability Science. Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2015. Available online: https://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/6044493/5048299.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).44. Walker, B.H.; Carpenter, S.R.; Anderies, J.M.; Abel, N.; Cumming, G.S.; Janssen, M.A.; Lebel, L.; Norberg, J.; Peterson, G.; Pritchard, R. Resilience Management in Social-ecological Systems: A Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach. Conserv. Ecol. 2002, 6, 1–14. [CrossRef]45. Fritz, L.; Binder, C. Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2853. [CrossRef]46. Ziervogel, G.; Archer, E.; Price, P. Strengthening the knowledge–policy interface through co-production of a climate adaptation plan: Leveraging opportunities in Bergrivier Municipality, South Africa. Environ. Urban. 2016, 28, 455–474. [CrossRef]47. Thorén, H.; Persson, J. The Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity: Sustainability Science and Problem-Feeding. J. Gen. Philos. Sci. 2013, 44, 337–355. [CrossRef]48. Righi, A. Measuring Social Capital: Official Statistics Initiatives in Italy. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 72, 4–22. [CrossRef]49. Nahapiet, J.; Ghoshal, S. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1998, 23, 242–266. [CrossRef]50. Blasco-Bocigas, P.; Navas-López, E.; López-Sáez, P. El efecto mediador del capital social sobre los beneficios de la empresa: Una aproximación teórica. Cuad. Estud. Empresariales 2010, 20, 11–34.51. Brink, E.; Wamsler, C.; Adolfsson, M.; Axelsson, M.; Beery, T.; Björn, H.; Bramryd, T.; Ekelund, N.; Jephson, T.; Narvelo, W.; et al. On the road to ‘research municipalities’: Analysing transdisciplinarity in municipal ecosystem services and adaptation planning. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 765–784. [CrossRef]52. Ortiz, B.; Donate, M.J.; Guadamillas, F. Relational and Cognitive Social Capital: Their Influence on Strategies of External Knowledge Acquisition. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 99, 91–100. [CrossRef]53. Borgatti, S.P.; Foster, P.C. The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. J. Manag. 2003, 29, 991–1013.54. Garcia-Diez, S.G. Measurement of Social Capital with the Help of Time Use Surveys. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 72, 23–31. [CrossRef]55. Carrillo-Álvarez, E.; Riera-Roman, J. Measuring social capital: Further insights. Gaceta Sanitari 2017, 31, 57–61. Available online: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/gs/v31n1/0213-9111-gs-31-01-00057.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).56. Chen, C.J.; Huang, J. How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management—The social interaction perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2007, 27, 104–118. [CrossRef]57. Zou, T.; Su, Y.;Wang, Y. Examining Relationships between Social Capital, Emotion Experience and Life Satisfaction for Sustainable Community. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2651. [CrossRef]58. Parsons, M.; Nalau, J.; Fisher, K. Perspectivas alternativas sobre la sostenibilidad: Conocimiento y metodologías indígenas. Chall. Sustain. 2017, 5, 3–14. [CrossRef]59. Hessels, L.K.; Van Lente, H. Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Res. Policy 2008, 37, 740–760. [CrossRef]60. Weichselgartner, J.; Kelman, I. Geographies of resilience. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2015, 39, 249–267. [CrossRef]61. Evans, M.C.; Cvitanovic, C. An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers. Palgrave Commun. 2018, 4, 88. [CrossRef]62. Armitage, D.R.; De Loë, R.; Plummer, R. Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conserv. Lett. 2012, 5, 245–255. [CrossRef]63. Opdam, P.; Luque, S.; Nassauer, J.; Verburg, P.;Wu, J. How can landscape ecology contribute to sustainability science? Landsc. Ecol. 2018, 33, 1–7. [CrossRef]Comunidad generalPublication73e25f1b-729a-4fd8-bf25-0b38a1b401e6virtual::3933-173e25f1b-729a-4fd8-bf25-0b38a1b401e6virtual::3933-1https://scholar.google.es/citations?user=cyQHm1wAAAAJ&hl=esvirtual::3933-10000-0001-6612-8486virtual::3933-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000042889virtual::3933-1LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81665https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/3d90a70e-a18f-4348-9d3c-506002be1987/download20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560MD52ORIGINALKnowledge Network for Sustainable Local Development.pdfKnowledge Network for Sustainable Local Development.pdfTexto archivo completo del artículo de revista, PDFapplication/pdf2407138https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/d5f8131a-072b-4d34-88d8-81cfb222e0da/download7a9fb1fcfbbc705b0df5ecc330ee7f61MD53TEXTKnowledge Network for Sustainable Local Development.pdf.txtKnowledge Network for Sustainable Local Development.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain71001https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/fce9d210-34f8-4032-a401-015aaa623ae0/downloadeb2b23ccf780b07dd4780aa02d1a6d72MD54THUMBNAILKnowledge Network for Sustainable Local Development.pdf.jpgKnowledge Network for Sustainable Local Development.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg15493https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/9a51f445-ebc3-4a73-b067-7f4bf29f2155/downloadf3f61afd9d4dcc8b062cb3505e5e6da4MD5510614/13872oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/138722024-03-12 11:25:40.29https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos reservados - MDPI, 2021open.accesshttps://red.uao.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidenterepositorio@uao.edu.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

Publicaciones similares