Angular velocity analysis boosted by machine learning for helping in the differential diagnosis of parkinson’s disease and essential tremor

Recent research has shown that smartphones/smartwatches have a high potential to help physicians to identify and differentiate between different movement disorders. This work aims to develop Machine Learning models to improve the differential diagnosis between patients with Parkinson’s Disease and E...

Full description

Autores:
Sanchez Egea, Antonio J.
Reeb, Theresa
González, Hernán Alberto
Loaiza Duque, Julián David
González Vargas, Andrés Mauricio
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
Repositorio:
RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13381
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13381
Palabra clave:
Diagnóstico diferencial
Giroscopios
Redes de área corporal (Electrónica)
Body area networks
Differential diagnosis
Parkinson’s disease
Essential tremor
gyroscope
Kinematic analysis
Machine learning
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos reservados - IEEE, 2020
Description
Summary:Recent research has shown that smartphones/smartwatches have a high potential to help physicians to identify and differentiate between different movement disorders. This work aims to develop Machine Learning models to improve the differential diagnosis between patients with Parkinson’s Disease and Essential Tremor. For this purpose, we use a mobile phone’s built-in gyroscope to record the angular velocity signals of two different arm positions during the patient’s follow-up, more precisely, in rest and posture positions. To develop and to find the best classification models, diverse factors were considered, such as the frequency range, the training and testing divisions, the kinematic features, and the classification method. We performed a two-stage kinematic analysis, first to differentiate between healthy and trembling subjects and then between patients with Parkinson’s Disease and Essential Tremor. The models developed reached an average accuracy of 97.2 ± 3.7% (98.5% Sensitivity, 93.3% Specificity) to differentiate between Healthy and Trembling subjects and an average accuracy of 77.8 ± 9.9% (75.7% Sensitivity, 80.0% Specificity) to discriminate between Parkinson’s Disease and Essential Tremor patients. Therefore, we conclude, that the angular velocity signal can be used to develop Machine Learning models for the differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and Essential Tremor