Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain

The importance of solid waste management is a relevant issue in supply chain management because of the accelerated increase in waste generation, pollution and the need to properly manage waste in companies in a particular way and throughout the whole supply chain in a general way. We present a model...

Full description

Autores:
Chud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena
Peña Montoya, Claudia Cecilia
Osorio Gómez, Juan Carlos
Tipo de recurso:
Part of book
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
Repositorio:
RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13921
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13921
https://red.uao.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Cadena de suministro
Residuos sólidos
AHP
Closed-loop supply chain
Decision support
Solid waste management
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021
id REPOUAO2_733a28be474896d05cc9861fe063ce6f
oai_identifier_str oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13921
network_acronym_str REPOUAO2
network_name_str RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
title Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
spellingShingle Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
Cadena de suministro
Residuos sólidos
AHP
Closed-loop supply chain
Decision support
Solid waste management
title_short Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
title_full Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
title_fullStr Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
title_full_unstemmed Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
title_sort Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Chud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena
Peña Montoya, Claudia Cecilia
Osorio Gómez, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Chud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena
Peña Montoya, Claudia Cecilia
Osorio Gómez, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.corporatename.eng.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Cadena de suministro
topic Cadena de suministro
Residuos sólidos
AHP
Closed-loop supply chain
Decision support
Solid waste management
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Residuos sólidos
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv AHP
Closed-loop supply chain
Decision support
Solid waste management
description The importance of solid waste management is a relevant issue in supply chain management because of the accelerated increase in waste generation, pollution and the need to properly manage waste in companies in a particular way and throughout the whole supply chain in a general way. We present a model that supports decision-making regarding solid waste management (particularly glass packaging), for a manufacturer, considering the perspective of the closed-loop supply chain. The model uses the AHP methodology to define the multiple criteria to be considered in the decision and for the selection of the best alternative available according to those criteria. This model was applied at a glass packaging manufacturer in Colombia. The result of the implementation of the model delivered the waste management strategy (used packaging) that best meets the objectives of the echelon under consideration
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-27T15:26:54Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-27T15:26:54Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Capítulo - Parte de Libro
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CAP_LIB
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.isbn.spa.fl_str_mv 9783030715793
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13921
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorio Educativo Digital
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://red.uao.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv 9783030715793
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
Repositorio Educativo Digital
url https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13921
https://red.uao.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 241
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 215
dc.relation.cites.eng.fl_str_mv Chud-Pantoja, V.L., Peña-Montoya, C.C., Osorio-Gómez, J.C. (2021). Decision Support Model for Solid Waste Management in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain. In: García-Alcaraz, J.L., Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Z-Flores, E. (eds) Trends in Industrial Engineering Applications to Manufacturing Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_10
dc.relation.ispartofbook.eng.fl_str_mv Trends in industrial engineering applications to manufacturing process
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv Achillas C, Moussiopoulos N, Karagiannidis A et al (2013) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tacklewastemanagement problems: a literature review.Waste ManagRes 31:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12470203
Agarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2006) Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach. Eur JOper Res 173:211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004. 12.005
Ahmadi S, Amin SH (2019) An integrated chance-constrained stochastic model for a mobile phone closed-loop supply chain network with supplier selection. J Clean Prod 226:988–1003. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.132
Akdo˘gan M¸ S, Co¸skun A (2012) Drivers of reverse logistics activities: an empirical investigation. Proc Soc Behav Sci 58:1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1130
Alidi AS (1996) A multiobjective optimization model for the waste management of the petrochemical industry. Appl Math Model 20:925–933https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(96)001 06-0
Amin SH, Zhang G (2012a) An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: multi-objective approach. Expert Syst Appl 39:6782–6791.https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eswa.2011.12.056
Amin SH, Zhang G (2012b) A proposed mathematical model for closed-loop network configuration based on product life cycle. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:791–801.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00 170-011-3407-2
Amin SH, Zhang G (2013) A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return. Appl Math Model 37:4165–4176. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.039
Aragonés-Beltrán P, Pastor-Ferrando JP, García-García F, Pascual-Agulló A (2010) An analytic network process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). J Environ Manag 91:1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009. 12.007
Aya˘g Z,Özdemir RG (2009)Ahybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Comput Ind Eng 56:368–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.06.011
Barker TJ, Zabinsky ZB (2011) A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega 39:558–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.002
Bollinger D, Pictet J (2008) Multiple criteria decision analysis of treatment and land-filling technologies for waste incineration residues. Omega 36:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega. 2006.07.008
Bottero M, Comino E, Riggio V (2011) Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environ Model Softw 26:1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.002
Bowen WM (1995) A Thurstonian comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and probabilistic multidimensional scaling through application to the nuclear waste site selection decision. Socioecon Plann Sci 29:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(95)00003-5
BrentAC, Rogers DEC, Ramabitsa-Siimane TSM, RohwerMB(2007) Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health carewaste management systems thatminimise infection risks in developing countries. Eur J Oper Res 181:403–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.015
Büyüközkan G, Berkol Ç (2011) Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 38:13731–13748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.171
Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39:3000–3011. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
ChangN-B, ParvathinathanG,Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decisionmaking for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87:139–153
Charnpratheep K, Zhou Q, GarnerB(1997) Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy geographical information systems. Waste Manag Res 15:197–215. https://doi.org/10.1006/wmre.1996. 0076
Chen H-W, Chang N-B, Chen J-C, Tsai S-J (2010) Environmental performance evaluation of largescalemunicipal solidwaste incinerators using data envelopment analysis.WasteManag 30:1371– 1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.002
Chiou CY, Chen HC, Yu CT, Yeh CY (2012) Consideration factors of reverse logistics implementation— a case study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. Proc Soc Behav Sci 40:375–381https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.203
Chud VL (2015) Modelo multicriterio soporte a la tomma de decisiones para la gestión de residuos sólidos en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Universidad del Valle
Chud VL, Osorio JC, Peña CC (2018) Modelo multicriterio como soporte la gestión de residuos de vidrio en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Rev Espac 39:20–35
Coban A, Ertis IF, Cavdaroglu NA (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.130
Contreras F, Hanaki K, Aramaki T, Connors S (2008) Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:979–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.003
Corum A (2020) Remanufacturing, an added value product recovery strategy: In: Waste management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, pp 1432–1452
Cram S, Sommer I, Morales L-M, et al (2006) Suitability of the vegetation types in Mexico’s Tamaulipas state for the siting of hazardous waste treatment plants. J Environ Manag 80:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.013
Cruz JM (2009) The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Decis Support Syst 48:224–236
da Silva L,Marques Prietto PD, Pavan Korf E (2019) Sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management in large and medium-sized worldwide cities. J Clean Prod 237:117802. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117802
Das S, Lee SH, Kumar P et al (2019) Solid waste management: scope and the challenge of sustainability. J Clean Prod 228:658–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.323
De Brito M, Dekker R (2004) A framework for reverse logistics. Reverse Logist 3–27
De FeoG,DeGisi S (2010) Using an innovative criteriaweighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP. Waste Manag 30:2370–2382. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.wasman.2010.04.010
Departamento Nacional de Planeación (2016a) Informe nacional de aprovechamiento
Departamento Nacional de Planeación D (2016b) Documento CONPES Social 3874. Política Nacional Para La Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos. Bogotá D.C
Dhouib D, Elloumi S (2011) A new multi-criteria approach dealing with dependent and heterogeneous criteria for end-of-life product strategy. Appl Math Comput 218:1668–1681. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.046
Divahar SR, Sudhahar C (2012) Selection of reverse logistics provider using AHP. Proc Eng 38:2005–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.242
Efendigil T,Önüt S,Kongar E (2008)Aholistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness. Comput Ind Eng 54:269–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cie.2007.07.009
Ekmekçio˘gluM,Kaya T,Kahraman C (2010) Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 30:1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010. 02.031
Erol I, Sencer S, Sari R (2011) A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecol Econ 70:1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2011.01.001
Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R et al (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17
García JO, Bermeo JA (2017) Logística emprearial. Primer, Machala-Ecuador Garfì M, Tondelli S, Bonoli A (2009) Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps. Waste Manag 29:2729–2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009. 05.019
Gemitzi A, Tsihrintzis VA, Voudrias E et al (2007) Combining geographic information system, multicriteria evaluation techniques and fuzzy logic in sitingMSWlandfills. EnvironGeol 51:797– 811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0359-1
Gomes CFS, Nunes KRA, Xavier LH et al (2008) Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil. Omega 36:395–404
Govindan K, Mina H, Esmaeili A, Gholami-Zanjani SM (2020) An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under ncertainty. J Clean Prod 242:118317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317
Hanandeh A, El-Zein A (2009) Strategies for the municipal waste management system to take advantage of carbon trading under competing policies: the role of energy from waste in Sydney. Waste Manag 29:2188–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.002
Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Moradi M, Kangi F (2013) A fuzzy group electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Saf Sci 51:414–426. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.015
Hekkert MP, Joosten LA., Worrell E, Turkenburg WC (2000a) Reduction of CO2 emissions by improved management of material and product use: the case of primary packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 29:33–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00056-7
HekkertMP, JoostenLAJ,WorrellE(2000b) Reduction ofCO2 emissions by improvedmanagement of material and product use: The case of transport packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 30:1– 27.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00046-X
Herva M, Roca E (2013) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis. Ecol Indic 25:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012. 09.005
Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009. 05.009
Hung ML,MaHW,YangWF(2007)Anovel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag 27:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.008
Iakovou E, Moussiopoulos N, Xanthopoulos A et al (2009) A methodological framework for endof- life management of electronic products. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:329–339
Jayant A, Gupta O, Garg S, Khan M (2014) TOPSIS-AHP based approach for selection of reverse logistics service provider: a case study of mobile phone industry. Proc Eng 97:2147–2156
Kainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.010
Khan S, Faisal MN (2008) An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag 28:1500–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.015
Ko YD, Noh I, Hwang H (2012) Cost benefits from standardization of the packaging glass bottles. Comput Ind Eng 62:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.026
LiamsanguanC,Gheewala SH(2008) LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems. J Environ Manage 87:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman. 2007.01.003
Liao C-H, Chiu ASF (2011) Evaluate municipal solid waste management problems using hierarchical framework. Proc Soc Behav Sci 25:353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011. 10.554
Lin R-J (2013) Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J Clean Prod 40:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010
Liu A, Xiao Y, Lu H, et al (2019) A fuzzy three-stage multi-attribute decision-making approach based on customer needs for sustainable supplier selection. J Clean Prod 239:118043. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118043
Lourenço J, Barbosa M, Cirne L (2016) A logística reversa aplicada a gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos no Município de Campina Grande-PB. Espacios 37:13
Lu LYYY, Wu CHH, Kuo T-CC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45:4317–4331. https://doi. org/10.1080/00207540701472694
MAVDT (2007) Gestión Integral de residuos o desechos peligrosos. Bases Conceptuales, República de Colombia MAVDT (2010) Politica Nacional de Producción y Consumo Sostenible
Monroy N, Ahumada M (2006) Logística reversa: Retos para la Ingeniería Industrial. Rev Ing 23. Doi: 10.16924%2Friua.v0i23.349
Nagurney A, Toyasaki F (2003) Supply chain supernetworks and environmental criteria. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 8:185–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00049-4
Nas B, Cay T, Iscan F, Berktay A (2010) Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environ Monit Assess 160:491
Nasiri F, Huang G (2008) A fuzzy decision aid model for environmental performance assessment in waste recycling. Environ Model Softw 23:677–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007. 04.009
Olugu EU, Wong KY (2012) An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Syst Appl 39:375–384. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.026
PGIRS (2019) Plan de Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos de Santiago de Cali, Colombia. https:// www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/32970/plan_de_gestin_integral_de_residuos_sli dos_pgirs/
Pochampally K, Gupta S, Govindan K (2009a) Metrics for performance measurement of a reverse/closed-loop supply chain. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 1:8–32.https://doi. org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2009.026263
Pochampally K, Nukala S, Gupta S (2009b) Strategic planning models for reverse and closed loop supply chains. Londres
Quintero P, Galvis A, Marmolejo LF, Collazos H (2007) Modelo conceptual de la selección de tecnologías para el manejo integral de residuos sólidos en localidades colombianas con menos de 50000 habitantes. In: Conferencia Latinoamericana de Saneamiento, Seminario Gestión de Residuos Sólidos. Cali
Ravi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2005) Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 48:327–356. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.017
Realff MJ, Ammons JC, Newton D (2000) Strategic design of reverse production systems. Comput Chem Eng 24:991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00418-X
Roussat N, Dujet C, Méhu J (2009) Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.Waste Manag 29:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman. 2008.04.010
Rubio S, Miranda FJ, Chamorro A, Valero V (2007) A reverse logistics system at grupo industrial alfonso gallardo. Universia Bus Rev 88–99
Saaty TL, Gholamnezhad H (1982) High-level nuclear waste management: analysis of options. Environ Plan B Plan Des 9:181–196
Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma R (1998) Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. Eur J Oper Res 104:485–496
Senthil S, Srirangacharyulu B, Ramesh A (2012) A decision making methodology for the selection of reverse logistics operating channels. Prorc Eng 38:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng. 2012.06.052
Shiue Y-C, Lin C-Y (2012) Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry. Energy Build 54:266–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enbuild.2012.07.032
Siddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122:515–523
Taji K, Levy JK, Hartmann J et al (2005) Identifying potential repositories for radioactive waste: multiple criteria decision analysis and critical infrastructure systems. Int J Crit Infrastructures 1:404–422
Tavares G, Zsigraiová, Semiao V (2011) Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 31:1960–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011. 04.013
ThierryM, Salomon M,VanNunen J,VanWassenhove L (1995) Strategic issues in product recovery managemen . Calif Manag Rev 37:114–136
Tsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, et al (2020a) A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach. J Clean Prod 251:119740.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119740
Tsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, Wu KJ (2020b) A causal municipal solid waste management model for sustainable cities in Vietnam under uncertainty: a comparison. Resour Conserv Recycl 154:104599.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104599
Tseng M-L, Chiu ASF (2013) Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. J Clean Prod 40:22–31
Tseng M-L, Lin YH (2009) Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ Monit Assess 158:519
Tseng M-L, Tan K-H, Lina R-J, Gengb Y (2012) WITHDRAWN: multicriteria analysis of green supply chain management using interval-valued fuzzy TODIM
United Nations Development Program (2015) United nations program for the sustainable development goals. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/es/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
Vego G, Kuˇcar-Dragiˇcevi´c S,KoprivanacN(2008) Application ofmulti-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia. Waste Manag 28:2192–2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.002
Wang D, Tang YT, Long G et al (2020) Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive drivenmunicipal solid wastemanagement for a city in England.WasteManag 102:452– 463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.009
Xi BD, Su J,HuangGHet al (2010) An integrated optimization approach andmulti-criteria decision analysis for supporting the waste-management system of the City of Beijing, China. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:620–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.002
Yeh C-H, Xu Y (2013) Sustainable planning of e-waste recycling activities using fuzzy multicriteria decision making. J Clean Prod 52:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.003
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 27 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3.pdf
institution Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/a3a5f471-d4a4-4c6b-8f22-e006ea5388d5/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidente
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@uao.edu.co
_version_ 1814259768567529472
spelling Chud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena309752aa1ed7e410b0809ef47b86e8b3Peña Montoya, Claudia Ceciliavirtual::4075-1Osorio Gómez, Juan Carlos939a5c64815f2f13b9b85b9418898d94Springer2022-05-27T15:26:54Z2022-05-27T15:26:54Z20219783030715793https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13921Universidad Autónoma de OccidenteRepositorio Educativo Digitalhttps://red.uao.edu.co/The importance of solid waste management is a relevant issue in supply chain management because of the accelerated increase in waste generation, pollution and the need to properly manage waste in companies in a particular way and throughout the whole supply chain in a general way. We present a model that supports decision-making regarding solid waste management (particularly glass packaging), for a manufacturer, considering the perspective of the closed-loop supply chain. The model uses the AHP methodology to define the multiple criteria to be considered in the decision and for the selection of the best alternative available according to those criteria. This model was applied at a glass packaging manufacturer in Colombia. The result of the implementation of the model delivered the waste management strategy (used packaging) that best meets the objectives of the echelon under consideration27 páginasapplication/pdfengSpringerDerechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3.pdfCadena de suministroResiduos sólidosAHPClosed-loop supply chainDecision supportSolid waste managementDecision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chainCapítulo - Parte de Librohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CAP_LIBinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85241215Chud-Pantoja, V.L., Peña-Montoya, C.C., Osorio-Gómez, J.C. (2021). Decision Support Model for Solid Waste Management in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain. In: García-Alcaraz, J.L., Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Z-Flores, E. (eds) Trends in Industrial Engineering Applications to Manufacturing Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_10Trends in industrial engineering applications to manufacturing processAchillas C, Moussiopoulos N, Karagiannidis A et al (2013) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tacklewastemanagement problems: a literature review.Waste ManagRes 31:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12470203Agarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2006) Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach. Eur JOper Res 173:211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004. 12.005Ahmadi S, Amin SH (2019) An integrated chance-constrained stochastic model for a mobile phone closed-loop supply chain network with supplier selection. J Clean Prod 226:988–1003. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.132Akdo˘gan M¸ S, Co¸skun A (2012) Drivers of reverse logistics activities: an empirical investigation. Proc Soc Behav Sci 58:1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1130Alidi AS (1996) A multiobjective optimization model for the waste management of the petrochemical industry. Appl Math Model 20:925–933https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(96)001 06-0Amin SH, Zhang G (2012a) An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: multi-objective approach. Expert Syst Appl 39:6782–6791.https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eswa.2011.12.056Amin SH, Zhang G (2012b) A proposed mathematical model for closed-loop network configuration based on product life cycle. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:791–801.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00 170-011-3407-2Amin SH, Zhang G (2013) A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return. Appl Math Model 37:4165–4176. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.039Aragonés-Beltrán P, Pastor-Ferrando JP, García-García F, Pascual-Agulló A (2010) An analytic network process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). J Environ Manag 91:1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009. 12.007Aya˘g Z,Özdemir RG (2009)Ahybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Comput Ind Eng 56:368–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.06.011Barker TJ, Zabinsky ZB (2011) A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega 39:558–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.002Bollinger D, Pictet J (2008) Multiple criteria decision analysis of treatment and land-filling technologies for waste incineration residues. Omega 36:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega. 2006.07.008Bottero M, Comino E, Riggio V (2011) Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environ Model Softw 26:1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.002Bowen WM (1995) A Thurstonian comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and probabilistic multidimensional scaling through application to the nuclear waste site selection decision. Socioecon Plann Sci 29:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(95)00003-5BrentAC, Rogers DEC, Ramabitsa-Siimane TSM, RohwerMB(2007) Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health carewaste management systems thatminimise infection risks in developing countries. Eur J Oper Res 181:403–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.015Büyüközkan G, Berkol Ç (2011) Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 38:13731–13748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.171Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39:3000–3011. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162ChangN-B, ParvathinathanG,Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decisionmaking for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87:139–153Charnpratheep K, Zhou Q, GarnerB(1997) Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy geographical information systems. Waste Manag Res 15:197–215. https://doi.org/10.1006/wmre.1996. 0076Chen H-W, Chang N-B, Chen J-C, Tsai S-J (2010) Environmental performance evaluation of largescalemunicipal solidwaste incinerators using data envelopment analysis.WasteManag 30:1371– 1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.002Chiou CY, Chen HC, Yu CT, Yeh CY (2012) Consideration factors of reverse logistics implementation— a case study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. Proc Soc Behav Sci 40:375–381https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.203Chud VL (2015) Modelo multicriterio soporte a la tomma de decisiones para la gestión de residuos sólidos en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Universidad del ValleChud VL, Osorio JC, Peña CC (2018) Modelo multicriterio como soporte la gestión de residuos de vidrio en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Rev Espac 39:20–35Coban A, Ertis IF, Cavdaroglu NA (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.130Contreras F, Hanaki K, Aramaki T, Connors S (2008) Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:979–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.003Corum A (2020) Remanufacturing, an added value product recovery strategy: In: Waste management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, pp 1432–1452Cram S, Sommer I, Morales L-M, et al (2006) Suitability of the vegetation types in Mexico’s Tamaulipas state for the siting of hazardous waste treatment plants. J Environ Manag 80:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.013Cruz JM (2009) The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Decis Support Syst 48:224–236da Silva L,Marques Prietto PD, Pavan Korf E (2019) Sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management in large and medium-sized worldwide cities. J Clean Prod 237:117802. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117802Das S, Lee SH, Kumar P et al (2019) Solid waste management: scope and the challenge of sustainability. J Clean Prod 228:658–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.323De Brito M, Dekker R (2004) A framework for reverse logistics. Reverse Logist 3–27De FeoG,DeGisi S (2010) Using an innovative criteriaweighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP. Waste Manag 30:2370–2382. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.wasman.2010.04.010Departamento Nacional de Planeación (2016a) Informe nacional de aprovechamientoDepartamento Nacional de Planeación D (2016b) Documento CONPES Social 3874. Política Nacional Para La Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos. Bogotá D.CDhouib D, Elloumi S (2011) A new multi-criteria approach dealing with dependent and heterogeneous criteria for end-of-life product strategy. Appl Math Comput 218:1668–1681. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.046Divahar SR, Sudhahar C (2012) Selection of reverse logistics provider using AHP. Proc Eng 38:2005–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.242Efendigil T,Önüt S,Kongar E (2008)Aholistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness. Comput Ind Eng 54:269–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cie.2007.07.009Ekmekçio˘gluM,Kaya T,Kahraman C (2010) Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 30:1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010. 02.031Erol I, Sencer S, Sari R (2011) A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecol Econ 70:1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2011.01.001Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R et al (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17García JO, Bermeo JA (2017) Logística emprearial. Primer, Machala-Ecuador Garfì M, Tondelli S, Bonoli A (2009) Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps. Waste Manag 29:2729–2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009. 05.019Gemitzi A, Tsihrintzis VA, Voudrias E et al (2007) Combining geographic information system, multicriteria evaluation techniques and fuzzy logic in sitingMSWlandfills. EnvironGeol 51:797– 811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0359-1Gomes CFS, Nunes KRA, Xavier LH et al (2008) Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil. Omega 36:395–404Govindan K, Mina H, Esmaeili A, Gholami-Zanjani SM (2020) An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under ncertainty. J Clean Prod 242:118317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317Hanandeh A, El-Zein A (2009) Strategies for the municipal waste management system to take advantage of carbon trading under competing policies: the role of energy from waste in Sydney. Waste Manag 29:2188–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.002Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Moradi M, Kangi F (2013) A fuzzy group electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Saf Sci 51:414–426. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.015Hekkert MP, Joosten LA., Worrell E, Turkenburg WC (2000a) Reduction of CO2 emissions by improved management of material and product use: the case of primary packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 29:33–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00056-7HekkertMP, JoostenLAJ,WorrellE(2000b) Reduction ofCO2 emissions by improvedmanagement of material and product use: The case of transport packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 30:1– 27.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00046-XHerva M, Roca E (2013) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis. Ecol Indic 25:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012. 09.005Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009. 05.009Hung ML,MaHW,YangWF(2007)Anovel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag 27:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.008Iakovou E, Moussiopoulos N, Xanthopoulos A et al (2009) A methodological framework for endof- life management of electronic products. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:329–339Jayant A, Gupta O, Garg S, Khan M (2014) TOPSIS-AHP based approach for selection of reverse logistics service provider: a case study of mobile phone industry. Proc Eng 97:2147–2156Kainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.010Khan S, Faisal MN (2008) An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag 28:1500–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.015Ko YD, Noh I, Hwang H (2012) Cost benefits from standardization of the packaging glass bottles. Comput Ind Eng 62:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.026LiamsanguanC,Gheewala SH(2008) LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems. J Environ Manage 87:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman. 2007.01.003Liao C-H, Chiu ASF (2011) Evaluate municipal solid waste management problems using hierarchical framework. Proc Soc Behav Sci 25:353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011. 10.554Lin R-J (2013) Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J Clean Prod 40:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010Liu A, Xiao Y, Lu H, et al (2019) A fuzzy three-stage multi-attribute decision-making approach based on customer needs for sustainable supplier selection. J Clean Prod 239:118043. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118043Lourenço J, Barbosa M, Cirne L (2016) A logística reversa aplicada a gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos no Município de Campina Grande-PB. Espacios 37:13Lu LYYY, Wu CHH, Kuo T-CC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45:4317–4331. https://doi. org/10.1080/00207540701472694MAVDT (2007) Gestión Integral de residuos o desechos peligrosos. Bases Conceptuales, República de Colombia MAVDT (2010) Politica Nacional de Producción y Consumo SostenibleMonroy N, Ahumada M (2006) Logística reversa: Retos para la Ingeniería Industrial. Rev Ing 23. Doi: 10.16924%2Friua.v0i23.349Nagurney A, Toyasaki F (2003) Supply chain supernetworks and environmental criteria. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 8:185–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00049-4Nas B, Cay T, Iscan F, Berktay A (2010) Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environ Monit Assess 160:491Nasiri F, Huang G (2008) A fuzzy decision aid model for environmental performance assessment in waste recycling. Environ Model Softw 23:677–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007. 04.009Olugu EU, Wong KY (2012) An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Syst Appl 39:375–384. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.026PGIRS (2019) Plan de Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos de Santiago de Cali, Colombia. https:// www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/32970/plan_de_gestin_integral_de_residuos_sli dos_pgirs/Pochampally K, Gupta S, Govindan K (2009a) Metrics for performance measurement of a reverse/closed-loop supply chain. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 1:8–32.https://doi. org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2009.026263Pochampally K, Nukala S, Gupta S (2009b) Strategic planning models for reverse and closed loop supply chains. LondresQuintero P, Galvis A, Marmolejo LF, Collazos H (2007) Modelo conceptual de la selección de tecnologías para el manejo integral de residuos sólidos en localidades colombianas con menos de 50000 habitantes. In: Conferencia Latinoamericana de Saneamiento, Seminario Gestión de Residuos Sólidos. CaliRavi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2005) Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 48:327–356. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.017Realff MJ, Ammons JC, Newton D (2000) Strategic design of reverse production systems. Comput Chem Eng 24:991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00418-XRoussat N, Dujet C, Méhu J (2009) Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.Waste Manag 29:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman. 2008.04.010Rubio S, Miranda FJ, Chamorro A, Valero V (2007) A reverse logistics system at grupo industrial alfonso gallardo. Universia Bus Rev 88–99Saaty TL, Gholamnezhad H (1982) High-level nuclear waste management: analysis of options. Environ Plan B Plan Des 9:181–196Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma R (1998) Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. Eur J Oper Res 104:485–496Senthil S, Srirangacharyulu B, Ramesh A (2012) A decision making methodology for the selection of reverse logistics operating channels. Prorc Eng 38:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng. 2012.06.052Shiue Y-C, Lin C-Y (2012) Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry. Energy Build 54:266–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enbuild.2012.07.032Siddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122:515–523Taji K, Levy JK, Hartmann J et al (2005) Identifying potential repositories for radioactive waste: multiple criteria decision analysis and critical infrastructure systems. Int J Crit Infrastructures 1:404–422Tavares G, Zsigraiová, Semiao V (2011) Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 31:1960–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011. 04.013ThierryM, Salomon M,VanNunen J,VanWassenhove L (1995) Strategic issues in product recovery managemen . Calif Manag Rev 37:114–136Tsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, et al (2020a) A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach. J Clean Prod 251:119740.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119740Tsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, Wu KJ (2020b) A causal municipal solid waste management model for sustainable cities in Vietnam under uncertainty: a comparison. Resour Conserv Recycl 154:104599.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104599Tseng M-L, Chiu ASF (2013) Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. J Clean Prod 40:22–31Tseng M-L, Lin YH (2009) Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ Monit Assess 158:519Tseng M-L, Tan K-H, Lina R-J, Gengb Y (2012) WITHDRAWN: multicriteria analysis of green supply chain management using interval-valued fuzzy TODIMUnited Nations Development Program (2015) United nations program for the sustainable development goals. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/es/home/sustainable-development-goals.htmlVego G, Kuˇcar-Dragiˇcevi´c S,KoprivanacN(2008) Application ofmulti-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia. Waste Manag 28:2192–2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.002Wang D, Tang YT, Long G et al (2020) Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive drivenmunicipal solid wastemanagement for a city in England.WasteManag 102:452– 463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.009Xi BD, Su J,HuangGHet al (2010) An integrated optimization approach andmulti-criteria decision analysis for supporting the waste-management system of the City of Beijing, China. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:620–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.002Yeh C-H, Xu Y (2013) Sustainable planning of e-waste recycling activities using fuzzy multicriteria decision making. J Clean Prod 52:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.003Comunidad generalPublicationee46f93d-3d7d-4e63-b3a1-8bdb18060a6evirtual::4075-1ee46f93d-3d7d-4e63-b3a1-8bdb18060a6evirtual::4075-10000-0001-5167-5145virtual::4075-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001379070virtual::4075-1LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81665https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/a3a5f471-d4a4-4c6b-8f22-e006ea5388d5/download20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560MD5210614/13921oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/139212024-03-13 10:32:31.447https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021metadata.onlyhttps://red.uao.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidenterepositorio@uao.edu.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