Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain
The importance of solid waste management is a relevant issue in supply chain management because of the accelerated increase in waste generation, pollution and the need to properly manage waste in companies in a particular way and throughout the whole supply chain in a general way. We present a model...
- Autores:
-
Chud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena
Peña Montoya, Claudia Cecilia
Osorio Gómez, Juan Carlos
- Tipo de recurso:
- Part of book
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
- Repositorio:
- RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13921
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13921
https://red.uao.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Cadena de suministro
Residuos sólidos
AHP
Closed-loop supply chain
Decision support
Solid waste management
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021
id |
REPOUAO2_733a28be474896d05cc9861fe063ce6f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13921 |
network_acronym_str |
REPOUAO2 |
network_name_str |
RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain |
title |
Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain |
spellingShingle |
Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain Cadena de suministro Residuos sólidos AHP Closed-loop supply chain Decision support Solid waste management |
title_short |
Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain |
title_full |
Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain |
title_fullStr |
Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain |
title_sort |
Decision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chain |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Chud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena Peña Montoya, Claudia Cecilia Osorio Gómez, Juan Carlos |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Chud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena Peña Montoya, Claudia Cecilia Osorio Gómez, Juan Carlos |
dc.contributor.corporatename.eng.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cadena de suministro |
topic |
Cadena de suministro Residuos sólidos AHP Closed-loop supply chain Decision support Solid waste management |
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Residuos sólidos |
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
AHP Closed-loop supply chain Decision support Solid waste management |
description |
The importance of solid waste management is a relevant issue in supply chain management because of the accelerated increase in waste generation, pollution and the need to properly manage waste in companies in a particular way and throughout the whole supply chain in a general way. We present a model that supports decision-making regarding solid waste management (particularly glass packaging), for a manufacturer, considering the perspective of the closed-loop supply chain. The model uses the AHP methodology to define the multiple criteria to be considered in the decision and for the selection of the best alternative available according to those criteria. This model was applied at a glass packaging manufacturer in Colombia. The result of the implementation of the model delivered the waste management strategy (used packaging) that best meets the objectives of the echelon under consideration |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-27T15:26:54Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-27T15:26:54Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Capítulo - Parte de Libro |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248 |
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart |
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CAP_LIB |
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.isbn.spa.fl_str_mv |
9783030715793 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13921 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Educativo Digital |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://red.uao.edu.co/ |
identifier_str_mv |
9783030715793 Universidad Autónoma de Occidente Repositorio Educativo Digital |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13921 https://red.uao.edu.co/ |
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv |
241 |
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv |
215 |
dc.relation.cites.eng.fl_str_mv |
Chud-Pantoja, V.L., Peña-Montoya, C.C., Osorio-Gómez, J.C. (2021). Decision Support Model for Solid Waste Management in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain. In: García-Alcaraz, J.L., Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Z-Flores, E. (eds) Trends in Industrial Engineering Applications to Manufacturing Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_10 |
dc.relation.ispartofbook.eng.fl_str_mv |
Trends in industrial engineering applications to manufacturing process |
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv |
Achillas C, Moussiopoulos N, Karagiannidis A et al (2013) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tacklewastemanagement problems: a literature review.Waste ManagRes 31:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12470203 Agarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2006) Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach. Eur JOper Res 173:211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004. 12.005 Ahmadi S, Amin SH (2019) An integrated chance-constrained stochastic model for a mobile phone closed-loop supply chain network with supplier selection. J Clean Prod 226:988–1003. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.132 Akdo˘gan M¸ S, Co¸skun A (2012) Drivers of reverse logistics activities: an empirical investigation. Proc Soc Behav Sci 58:1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1130 Alidi AS (1996) A multiobjective optimization model for the waste management of the petrochemical industry. Appl Math Model 20:925–933https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(96)001 06-0 Amin SH, Zhang G (2012a) An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: multi-objective approach. Expert Syst Appl 39:6782–6791.https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eswa.2011.12.056 Amin SH, Zhang G (2012b) A proposed mathematical model for closed-loop network configuration based on product life cycle. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:791–801.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00 170-011-3407-2 Amin SH, Zhang G (2013) A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return. Appl Math Model 37:4165–4176. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.039 Aragonés-Beltrán P, Pastor-Ferrando JP, García-García F, Pascual-Agulló A (2010) An analytic network process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). J Environ Manag 91:1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009. 12.007 Aya˘g Z,Özdemir RG (2009)Ahybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Comput Ind Eng 56:368–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.06.011 Barker TJ, Zabinsky ZB (2011) A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega 39:558–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.002 Bollinger D, Pictet J (2008) Multiple criteria decision analysis of treatment and land-filling technologies for waste incineration residues. Omega 36:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega. 2006.07.008 Bottero M, Comino E, Riggio V (2011) Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environ Model Softw 26:1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.002 Bowen WM (1995) A Thurstonian comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and probabilistic multidimensional scaling through application to the nuclear waste site selection decision. Socioecon Plann Sci 29:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(95)00003-5 BrentAC, Rogers DEC, Ramabitsa-Siimane TSM, RohwerMB(2007) Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health carewaste management systems thatminimise infection risks in developing countries. Eur J Oper Res 181:403–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.015 Büyüközkan G, Berkol Ç (2011) Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 38:13731–13748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.171 Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39:3000–3011. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162 ChangN-B, ParvathinathanG,Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decisionmaking for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87:139–153 Charnpratheep K, Zhou Q, GarnerB(1997) Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy geographical information systems. Waste Manag Res 15:197–215. https://doi.org/10.1006/wmre.1996. 0076 Chen H-W, Chang N-B, Chen J-C, Tsai S-J (2010) Environmental performance evaluation of largescalemunicipal solidwaste incinerators using data envelopment analysis.WasteManag 30:1371– 1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.002 Chiou CY, Chen HC, Yu CT, Yeh CY (2012) Consideration factors of reverse logistics implementation— a case study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. Proc Soc Behav Sci 40:375–381https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.203 Chud VL (2015) Modelo multicriterio soporte a la tomma de decisiones para la gestión de residuos sólidos en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Universidad del Valle Chud VL, Osorio JC, Peña CC (2018) Modelo multicriterio como soporte la gestión de residuos de vidrio en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Rev Espac 39:20–35 Coban A, Ertis IF, Cavdaroglu NA (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.130 Contreras F, Hanaki K, Aramaki T, Connors S (2008) Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:979–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.003 Corum A (2020) Remanufacturing, an added value product recovery strategy: In: Waste management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, pp 1432–1452 Cram S, Sommer I, Morales L-M, et al (2006) Suitability of the vegetation types in Mexico’s Tamaulipas state for the siting of hazardous waste treatment plants. J Environ Manag 80:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.013 Cruz JM (2009) The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Decis Support Syst 48:224–236 da Silva L,Marques Prietto PD, Pavan Korf E (2019) Sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management in large and medium-sized worldwide cities. J Clean Prod 237:117802. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117802 Das S, Lee SH, Kumar P et al (2019) Solid waste management: scope and the challenge of sustainability. J Clean Prod 228:658–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.323 De Brito M, Dekker R (2004) A framework for reverse logistics. Reverse Logist 3–27 De FeoG,DeGisi S (2010) Using an innovative criteriaweighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP. Waste Manag 30:2370–2382. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.wasman.2010.04.010 Departamento Nacional de Planeación (2016a) Informe nacional de aprovechamiento Departamento Nacional de Planeación D (2016b) Documento CONPES Social 3874. Política Nacional Para La Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos. Bogotá D.C Dhouib D, Elloumi S (2011) A new multi-criteria approach dealing with dependent and heterogeneous criteria for end-of-life product strategy. Appl Math Comput 218:1668–1681. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.046 Divahar SR, Sudhahar C (2012) Selection of reverse logistics provider using AHP. Proc Eng 38:2005–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.242 Efendigil T,Önüt S,Kongar E (2008)Aholistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness. Comput Ind Eng 54:269–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cie.2007.07.009 Ekmekçio˘gluM,Kaya T,Kahraman C (2010) Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 30:1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010. 02.031 Erol I, Sencer S, Sari R (2011) A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecol Econ 70:1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2011.01.001 Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R et al (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17 García JO, Bermeo JA (2017) Logística emprearial. Primer, Machala-Ecuador Garfì M, Tondelli S, Bonoli A (2009) Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps. Waste Manag 29:2729–2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009. 05.019 Gemitzi A, Tsihrintzis VA, Voudrias E et al (2007) Combining geographic information system, multicriteria evaluation techniques and fuzzy logic in sitingMSWlandfills. EnvironGeol 51:797– 811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0359-1 Gomes CFS, Nunes KRA, Xavier LH et al (2008) Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil. Omega 36:395–404 Govindan K, Mina H, Esmaeili A, Gholami-Zanjani SM (2020) An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under ncertainty. J Clean Prod 242:118317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317 Hanandeh A, El-Zein A (2009) Strategies for the municipal waste management system to take advantage of carbon trading under competing policies: the role of energy from waste in Sydney. Waste Manag 29:2188–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.002 Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Moradi M, Kangi F (2013) A fuzzy group electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Saf Sci 51:414–426. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.015 Hekkert MP, Joosten LA., Worrell E, Turkenburg WC (2000a) Reduction of CO2 emissions by improved management of material and product use: the case of primary packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 29:33–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00056-7 HekkertMP, JoostenLAJ,WorrellE(2000b) Reduction ofCO2 emissions by improvedmanagement of material and product use: The case of transport packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 30:1– 27.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00046-X Herva M, Roca E (2013) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis. Ecol Indic 25:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012. 09.005 Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009. 05.009 Hung ML,MaHW,YangWF(2007)Anovel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag 27:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.008 Iakovou E, Moussiopoulos N, Xanthopoulos A et al (2009) A methodological framework for endof- life management of electronic products. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:329–339 Jayant A, Gupta O, Garg S, Khan M (2014) TOPSIS-AHP based approach for selection of reverse logistics service provider: a case study of mobile phone industry. Proc Eng 97:2147–2156 Kainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.010 Khan S, Faisal MN (2008) An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag 28:1500–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.015 Ko YD, Noh I, Hwang H (2012) Cost benefits from standardization of the packaging glass bottles. Comput Ind Eng 62:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.026 LiamsanguanC,Gheewala SH(2008) LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems. J Environ Manage 87:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman. 2007.01.003 Liao C-H, Chiu ASF (2011) Evaluate municipal solid waste management problems using hierarchical framework. Proc Soc Behav Sci 25:353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011. 10.554 Lin R-J (2013) Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J Clean Prod 40:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010 Liu A, Xiao Y, Lu H, et al (2019) A fuzzy three-stage multi-attribute decision-making approach based on customer needs for sustainable supplier selection. J Clean Prod 239:118043. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118043 Lourenço J, Barbosa M, Cirne L (2016) A logística reversa aplicada a gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos no Município de Campina Grande-PB. Espacios 37:13 Lu LYYY, Wu CHH, Kuo T-CC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45:4317–4331. https://doi. org/10.1080/00207540701472694 MAVDT (2007) Gestión Integral de residuos o desechos peligrosos. Bases Conceptuales, República de Colombia MAVDT (2010) Politica Nacional de Producción y Consumo Sostenible Monroy N, Ahumada M (2006) Logística reversa: Retos para la Ingeniería Industrial. Rev Ing 23. Doi: 10.16924%2Friua.v0i23.349 Nagurney A, Toyasaki F (2003) Supply chain supernetworks and environmental criteria. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 8:185–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00049-4 Nas B, Cay T, Iscan F, Berktay A (2010) Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environ Monit Assess 160:491 Nasiri F, Huang G (2008) A fuzzy decision aid model for environmental performance assessment in waste recycling. Environ Model Softw 23:677–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007. 04.009 Olugu EU, Wong KY (2012) An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Syst Appl 39:375–384. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.026 PGIRS (2019) Plan de Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos de Santiago de Cali, Colombia. https:// www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/32970/plan_de_gestin_integral_de_residuos_sli dos_pgirs/ Pochampally K, Gupta S, Govindan K (2009a) Metrics for performance measurement of a reverse/closed-loop supply chain. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 1:8–32.https://doi. org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2009.026263 Pochampally K, Nukala S, Gupta S (2009b) Strategic planning models for reverse and closed loop supply chains. Londres Quintero P, Galvis A, Marmolejo LF, Collazos H (2007) Modelo conceptual de la selección de tecnologías para el manejo integral de residuos sólidos en localidades colombianas con menos de 50000 habitantes. In: Conferencia Latinoamericana de Saneamiento, Seminario Gestión de Residuos Sólidos. Cali Ravi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2005) Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 48:327–356. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.017 Realff MJ, Ammons JC, Newton D (2000) Strategic design of reverse production systems. Comput Chem Eng 24:991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00418-X Roussat N, Dujet C, Méhu J (2009) Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.Waste Manag 29:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman. 2008.04.010 Rubio S, Miranda FJ, Chamorro A, Valero V (2007) A reverse logistics system at grupo industrial alfonso gallardo. Universia Bus Rev 88–99 Saaty TL, Gholamnezhad H (1982) High-level nuclear waste management: analysis of options. Environ Plan B Plan Des 9:181–196 Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma R (1998) Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. Eur J Oper Res 104:485–496 Senthil S, Srirangacharyulu B, Ramesh A (2012) A decision making methodology for the selection of reverse logistics operating channels. Prorc Eng 38:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng. 2012.06.052 Shiue Y-C, Lin C-Y (2012) Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry. Energy Build 54:266–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enbuild.2012.07.032 Siddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122:515–523 Taji K, Levy JK, Hartmann J et al (2005) Identifying potential repositories for radioactive waste: multiple criteria decision analysis and critical infrastructure systems. Int J Crit Infrastructures 1:404–422 Tavares G, Zsigraiová, Semiao V (2011) Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 31:1960–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011. 04.013 ThierryM, Salomon M,VanNunen J,VanWassenhove L (1995) Strategic issues in product recovery managemen . Calif Manag Rev 37:114–136 Tsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, et al (2020a) A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach. J Clean Prod 251:119740.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119740 Tsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, Wu KJ (2020b) A causal municipal solid waste management model for sustainable cities in Vietnam under uncertainty: a comparison. Resour Conserv Recycl 154:104599.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104599 Tseng M-L, Chiu ASF (2013) Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. J Clean Prod 40:22–31 Tseng M-L, Lin YH (2009) Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ Monit Assess 158:519 Tseng M-L, Tan K-H, Lina R-J, Gengb Y (2012) WITHDRAWN: multicriteria analysis of green supply chain management using interval-valued fuzzy TODIM United Nations Development Program (2015) United nations program for the sustainable development goals. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/es/home/sustainable-development-goals.html Vego G, Kuˇcar-Dragiˇcevi´c S,KoprivanacN(2008) Application ofmulti-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia. Waste Manag 28:2192–2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.002 Wang D, Tang YT, Long G et al (2020) Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive drivenmunicipal solid wastemanagement for a city in England.WasteManag 102:452– 463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.009 Xi BD, Su J,HuangGHet al (2010) An integrated optimization approach andmulti-criteria decision analysis for supporting the waste-management system of the City of Beijing, China. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:620–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.002 Yeh C-H, Xu Y (2013) Sustainable planning of e-waste recycling activities using fuzzy multicriteria decision making. J Clean Prod 52:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.003 |
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
27 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3.pdf |
institution |
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/a3a5f471-d4a4-4c6b-8f22-e006ea5388d5/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidente |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@uao.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814259768567529472 |
spelling |
Chud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena309752aa1ed7e410b0809ef47b86e8b3Peña Montoya, Claudia Ceciliavirtual::4075-1Osorio Gómez, Juan Carlos939a5c64815f2f13b9b85b9418898d94Springer2022-05-27T15:26:54Z2022-05-27T15:26:54Z20219783030715793https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13921Universidad Autónoma de OccidenteRepositorio Educativo Digitalhttps://red.uao.edu.co/The importance of solid waste management is a relevant issue in supply chain management because of the accelerated increase in waste generation, pollution and the need to properly manage waste in companies in a particular way and throughout the whole supply chain in a general way. We present a model that supports decision-making regarding solid waste management (particularly glass packaging), for a manufacturer, considering the perspective of the closed-loop supply chain. The model uses the AHP methodology to define the multiple criteria to be considered in the decision and for the selection of the best alternative available according to those criteria. This model was applied at a glass packaging manufacturer in Colombia. The result of the implementation of the model delivered the waste management strategy (used packaging) that best meets the objectives of the echelon under consideration27 páginasapplication/pdfengSpringerDerechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3.pdfCadena de suministroResiduos sólidosAHPClosed-loop supply chainDecision supportSolid waste managementDecision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chainCapítulo - Parte de Librohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CAP_LIBinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85241215Chud-Pantoja, V.L., Peña-Montoya, C.C., Osorio-Gómez, J.C. (2021). Decision Support Model for Solid Waste Management in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain. In: García-Alcaraz, J.L., Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Z-Flores, E. (eds) Trends in Industrial Engineering Applications to Manufacturing Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_10Trends in industrial engineering applications to manufacturing processAchillas C, Moussiopoulos N, Karagiannidis A et al (2013) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tacklewastemanagement problems: a literature review.Waste ManagRes 31:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12470203Agarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2006) Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach. Eur JOper Res 173:211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004. 12.005Ahmadi S, Amin SH (2019) An integrated chance-constrained stochastic model for a mobile phone closed-loop supply chain network with supplier selection. J Clean Prod 226:988–1003. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.132Akdo˘gan M¸ S, Co¸skun A (2012) Drivers of reverse logistics activities: an empirical investigation. Proc Soc Behav Sci 58:1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1130Alidi AS (1996) A multiobjective optimization model for the waste management of the petrochemical industry. Appl Math Model 20:925–933https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(96)001 06-0Amin SH, Zhang G (2012a) An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: multi-objective approach. Expert Syst Appl 39:6782–6791.https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eswa.2011.12.056Amin SH, Zhang G (2012b) A proposed mathematical model for closed-loop network configuration based on product life cycle. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:791–801.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00 170-011-3407-2Amin SH, Zhang G (2013) A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return. Appl Math Model 37:4165–4176. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.039Aragonés-Beltrán P, Pastor-Ferrando JP, García-García F, Pascual-Agulló A (2010) An analytic network process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). J Environ Manag 91:1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009. 12.007Aya˘g Z,Özdemir RG (2009)Ahybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Comput Ind Eng 56:368–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.06.011Barker TJ, Zabinsky ZB (2011) A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega 39:558–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.002Bollinger D, Pictet J (2008) Multiple criteria decision analysis of treatment and land-filling technologies for waste incineration residues. Omega 36:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega. 2006.07.008Bottero M, Comino E, Riggio V (2011) Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environ Model Softw 26:1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.002Bowen WM (1995) A Thurstonian comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and probabilistic multidimensional scaling through application to the nuclear waste site selection decision. Socioecon Plann Sci 29:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(95)00003-5BrentAC, Rogers DEC, Ramabitsa-Siimane TSM, RohwerMB(2007) Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health carewaste management systems thatminimise infection risks in developing countries. Eur J Oper Res 181:403–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.015Büyüközkan G, Berkol Ç (2011) Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 38:13731–13748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.171Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39:3000–3011. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162ChangN-B, ParvathinathanG,Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decisionmaking for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87:139–153Charnpratheep K, Zhou Q, GarnerB(1997) Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy geographical information systems. Waste Manag Res 15:197–215. https://doi.org/10.1006/wmre.1996. 0076Chen H-W, Chang N-B, Chen J-C, Tsai S-J (2010) Environmental performance evaluation of largescalemunicipal solidwaste incinerators using data envelopment analysis.WasteManag 30:1371– 1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.002Chiou CY, Chen HC, Yu CT, Yeh CY (2012) Consideration factors of reverse logistics implementation— a case study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. Proc Soc Behav Sci 40:375–381https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.203Chud VL (2015) Modelo multicriterio soporte a la tomma de decisiones para la gestión de residuos sólidos en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Universidad del ValleChud VL, Osorio JC, Peña CC (2018) Modelo multicriterio como soporte la gestión de residuos de vidrio en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Rev Espac 39:20–35Coban A, Ertis IF, Cavdaroglu NA (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.130Contreras F, Hanaki K, Aramaki T, Connors S (2008) Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:979–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.003Corum A (2020) Remanufacturing, an added value product recovery strategy: In: Waste management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, pp 1432–1452Cram S, Sommer I, Morales L-M, et al (2006) Suitability of the vegetation types in Mexico’s Tamaulipas state for the siting of hazardous waste treatment plants. J Environ Manag 80:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.013Cruz JM (2009) The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Decis Support Syst 48:224–236da Silva L,Marques Prietto PD, Pavan Korf E (2019) Sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management in large and medium-sized worldwide cities. J Clean Prod 237:117802. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117802Das S, Lee SH, Kumar P et al (2019) Solid waste management: scope and the challenge of sustainability. J Clean Prod 228:658–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.323De Brito M, Dekker R (2004) A framework for reverse logistics. Reverse Logist 3–27De FeoG,DeGisi S (2010) Using an innovative criteriaweighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP. Waste Manag 30:2370–2382. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.wasman.2010.04.010Departamento Nacional de Planeación (2016a) Informe nacional de aprovechamientoDepartamento Nacional de Planeación D (2016b) Documento CONPES Social 3874. Política Nacional Para La Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos. Bogotá D.CDhouib D, Elloumi S (2011) A new multi-criteria approach dealing with dependent and heterogeneous criteria for end-of-life product strategy. Appl Math Comput 218:1668–1681. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.046Divahar SR, Sudhahar C (2012) Selection of reverse logistics provider using AHP. Proc Eng 38:2005–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.242Efendigil T,Önüt S,Kongar E (2008)Aholistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness. Comput Ind Eng 54:269–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cie.2007.07.009Ekmekçio˘gluM,Kaya T,Kahraman C (2010) Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 30:1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010. 02.031Erol I, Sencer S, Sari R (2011) A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecol Econ 70:1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2011.01.001Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R et al (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17García JO, Bermeo JA (2017) Logística emprearial. Primer, Machala-Ecuador Garfì M, Tondelli S, Bonoli A (2009) Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps. Waste Manag 29:2729–2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009. 05.019Gemitzi A, Tsihrintzis VA, Voudrias E et al (2007) Combining geographic information system, multicriteria evaluation techniques and fuzzy logic in sitingMSWlandfills. EnvironGeol 51:797– 811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0359-1Gomes CFS, Nunes KRA, Xavier LH et al (2008) Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil. Omega 36:395–404Govindan K, Mina H, Esmaeili A, Gholami-Zanjani SM (2020) An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under ncertainty. J Clean Prod 242:118317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317Hanandeh A, El-Zein A (2009) Strategies for the municipal waste management system to take advantage of carbon trading under competing policies: the role of energy from waste in Sydney. Waste Manag 29:2188–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.002Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Moradi M, Kangi F (2013) A fuzzy group electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Saf Sci 51:414–426. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.015Hekkert MP, Joosten LA., Worrell E, Turkenburg WC (2000a) Reduction of CO2 emissions by improved management of material and product use: the case of primary packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 29:33–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00056-7HekkertMP, JoostenLAJ,WorrellE(2000b) Reduction ofCO2 emissions by improvedmanagement of material and product use: The case of transport packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 30:1– 27.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00046-XHerva M, Roca E (2013) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis. Ecol Indic 25:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012. 09.005Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009. 05.009Hung ML,MaHW,YangWF(2007)Anovel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag 27:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.008Iakovou E, Moussiopoulos N, Xanthopoulos A et al (2009) A methodological framework for endof- life management of electronic products. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:329–339Jayant A, Gupta O, Garg S, Khan M (2014) TOPSIS-AHP based approach for selection of reverse logistics service provider: a case study of mobile phone industry. Proc Eng 97:2147–2156Kainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.010Khan S, Faisal MN (2008) An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag 28:1500–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.015Ko YD, Noh I, Hwang H (2012) Cost benefits from standardization of the packaging glass bottles. Comput Ind Eng 62:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.026LiamsanguanC,Gheewala SH(2008) LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems. J Environ Manage 87:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman. 2007.01.003Liao C-H, Chiu ASF (2011) Evaluate municipal solid waste management problems using hierarchical framework. Proc Soc Behav Sci 25:353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011. 10.554Lin R-J (2013) Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J Clean Prod 40:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010Liu A, Xiao Y, Lu H, et al (2019) A fuzzy three-stage multi-attribute decision-making approach based on customer needs for sustainable supplier selection. J Clean Prod 239:118043. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118043Lourenço J, Barbosa M, Cirne L (2016) A logística reversa aplicada a gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos no Município de Campina Grande-PB. Espacios 37:13Lu LYYY, Wu CHH, Kuo T-CC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45:4317–4331. https://doi. org/10.1080/00207540701472694MAVDT (2007) Gestión Integral de residuos o desechos peligrosos. Bases Conceptuales, República de Colombia MAVDT (2010) Politica Nacional de Producción y Consumo SostenibleMonroy N, Ahumada M (2006) Logística reversa: Retos para la Ingeniería Industrial. Rev Ing 23. Doi: 10.16924%2Friua.v0i23.349Nagurney A, Toyasaki F (2003) Supply chain supernetworks and environmental criteria. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 8:185–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00049-4Nas B, Cay T, Iscan F, Berktay A (2010) Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environ Monit Assess 160:491Nasiri F, Huang G (2008) A fuzzy decision aid model for environmental performance assessment in waste recycling. Environ Model Softw 23:677–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007. 04.009Olugu EU, Wong KY (2012) An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Syst Appl 39:375–384. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.026PGIRS (2019) Plan de Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos de Santiago de Cali, Colombia. https:// www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/32970/plan_de_gestin_integral_de_residuos_sli dos_pgirs/Pochampally K, Gupta S, Govindan K (2009a) Metrics for performance measurement of a reverse/closed-loop supply chain. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 1:8–32.https://doi. org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2009.026263Pochampally K, Nukala S, Gupta S (2009b) Strategic planning models for reverse and closed loop supply chains. LondresQuintero P, Galvis A, Marmolejo LF, Collazos H (2007) Modelo conceptual de la selección de tecnologías para el manejo integral de residuos sólidos en localidades colombianas con menos de 50000 habitantes. In: Conferencia Latinoamericana de Saneamiento, Seminario Gestión de Residuos Sólidos. CaliRavi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2005) Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 48:327–356. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.017Realff MJ, Ammons JC, Newton D (2000) Strategic design of reverse production systems. Comput Chem Eng 24:991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00418-XRoussat N, Dujet C, Méhu J (2009) Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.Waste Manag 29:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman. 2008.04.010Rubio S, Miranda FJ, Chamorro A, Valero V (2007) A reverse logistics system at grupo industrial alfonso gallardo. Universia Bus Rev 88–99Saaty TL, Gholamnezhad H (1982) High-level nuclear waste management: analysis of options. Environ Plan B Plan Des 9:181–196Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma R (1998) Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. Eur J Oper Res 104:485–496Senthil S, Srirangacharyulu B, Ramesh A (2012) A decision making methodology for the selection of reverse logistics operating channels. Prorc Eng 38:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng. 2012.06.052Shiue Y-C, Lin C-Y (2012) Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry. Energy Build 54:266–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enbuild.2012.07.032Siddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122:515–523Taji K, Levy JK, Hartmann J et al (2005) Identifying potential repositories for radioactive waste: multiple criteria decision analysis and critical infrastructure systems. Int J Crit Infrastructures 1:404–422Tavares G, Zsigraiová, Semiao V (2011) Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 31:1960–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011. 04.013ThierryM, Salomon M,VanNunen J,VanWassenhove L (1995) Strategic issues in product recovery managemen . Calif Manag Rev 37:114–136Tsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, et al (2020a) A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach. J Clean Prod 251:119740.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119740Tsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, Wu KJ (2020b) A causal municipal solid waste management model for sustainable cities in Vietnam under uncertainty: a comparison. Resour Conserv Recycl 154:104599.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104599Tseng M-L, Chiu ASF (2013) Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. J Clean Prod 40:22–31Tseng M-L, Lin YH (2009) Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ Monit Assess 158:519Tseng M-L, Tan K-H, Lina R-J, Gengb Y (2012) WITHDRAWN: multicriteria analysis of green supply chain management using interval-valued fuzzy TODIMUnited Nations Development Program (2015) United nations program for the sustainable development goals. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/es/home/sustainable-development-goals.htmlVego G, Kuˇcar-Dragiˇcevi´c S,KoprivanacN(2008) Application ofmulti-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia. Waste Manag 28:2192–2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.002Wang D, Tang YT, Long G et al (2020) Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive drivenmunicipal solid wastemanagement for a city in England.WasteManag 102:452– 463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.009Xi BD, Su J,HuangGHet al (2010) An integrated optimization approach andmulti-criteria decision analysis for supporting the waste-management system of the City of Beijing, China. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:620–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.002Yeh C-H, Xu Y (2013) Sustainable planning of e-waste recycling activities using fuzzy multicriteria decision making. J Clean Prod 52:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.003Comunidad generalPublicationee46f93d-3d7d-4e63-b3a1-8bdb18060a6evirtual::4075-1ee46f93d-3d7d-4e63-b3a1-8bdb18060a6evirtual::4075-10000-0001-5167-5145virtual::4075-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001379070virtual::4075-1LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81665https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/a3a5f471-d4a4-4c6b-8f22-e006ea5388d5/download20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560MD5210614/13921oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/139212024-03-13 10:32:31.447https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021metadata.onlyhttps://red.uao.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidenterepositorio@uao.edu.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 |