Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation

The optimal power flow is an important tool for power system planning and power system operation. The optimal power flow is used in a 24-hour period to find an economic dispatch of generating units considering network restrictions. The optimal power flow provides valuable information about the opera...

Full description

Autores:
Moreno-Chuquen, Ricardo
Cantillo Luna, Sergio Alejandro
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
Repositorio:
RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13288
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13288
Palabra clave:
Energía eólica
Producción de energía eléctrica
Electric power production
Generation
Optimal power flow
Wind power
Optimization
Power systems
Renewable energy
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos reservados - Praise Worthy Prize, 2020
id REPOUAO2_5cd8343dce8ecd30ac7d11cb00087f99
oai_identifier_str oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/13288
network_acronym_str REPOUAO2
network_name_str RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation
title Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation
spellingShingle Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation
Energía eólica
Producción de energía eléctrica
Electric power production
Generation
Optimal power flow
Wind power
Optimization
Power systems
Renewable energy
title_short Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation
title_full Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation
title_fullStr Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation
title_sort Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Moreno-Chuquen, Ricardo
Cantillo Luna, Sergio Alejandro
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Moreno-Chuquen, Ricardo
Cantillo Luna, Sergio Alejandro
dc.subject.armarc.spa.fl_str_mv Energía eólica
Producción de energía eléctrica
topic Energía eólica
Producción de energía eléctrica
Electric power production
Generation
Optimal power flow
Wind power
Optimization
Power systems
Renewable energy
dc.subject.armarc.eng.fl_str_mv Electric power production
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Generation
Optimal power flow
Wind power
Optimization
Power systems
Renewable energy
description The optimal power flow is an important tool for power system planning and power system operation. The optimal power flow is used in a 24-hour period to find an economic dispatch of generating units considering network restrictions. The optimal power flow provides valuable information about the operation cost, transmission flows, generation and congestion in the system. This information is used by generators, planners, operators and regulators to analyze and take decisions about the system at short and long term. At short term corresponds to information for the operation. At long term corresponds to information for the planning. This paper proposes a detailed optimal power flow formulation looking for a minimum cost of generation considering wind generation. Five solvers were used in order to compare differences between them. The solvers used are CBC, CLP, CPLEX, Gurobi and GLPK. These solvers are commonly used to solve the multiperiod DC optimal power flow. An IEEE-24 test system is used to compare the solutions provided by the solvers. The findings reveal significant differences between the solvers when they are used to solve the IEEE-24 test system. Additionally, the computing time for each solver is reported. The solvers CPLEX y Gurobi exhibits the lower computational time to find a solution
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-29T19:49:09Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-29T19:49:09Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 18276660
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13288
identifier_str_mv 18276660
url https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13288
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Volumen 15, número 6 (2020)
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 492
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Número 6
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 484
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv Volumen 15
dc.relation.cites.eng.fl_str_mv Moreno Chuquen, R., Cantillo Luna, S. (2020). Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation. International Review of Electrical Engineering. (Vol. 15 (6), pp. 484-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v15i6.18304
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv International Review of Electrical Engineering
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv [1] Al Hasibi, R., Hadi, S., Sarjiya, S., Multi-Objective Optimization of Integrated Power System Expansion Planning with Renewable Energy-Based Distributed Generation, (2019) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 14 (1), pp. 19-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v14i1.16082
[2] Sangwato, S., Oonsivilai, A., Optimal Power Flow with Interline Power Flow Controller Using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm, (2015) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 10 (6), pp. 727-733. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v10i6.7568
[3] Lakdja, F., Abdeslam, D., Gherbi, F., Optimal Location of Thyristor-Controlled Series Compensator for Optimal Power Flows, (2013) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 6 (2), pp. 465-472.
[4] R.A. Jabr. Adjustable robust OPF with renewable energy sources. IEEE Trans Power Syst, vol. 28 n. 4, 2013, pp 4742–4751.
[5] A. Castillo, X. Jiang, D.F. Gayme. Lossy DCOPF for optimizing congested grids with renewable energy and storage. Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. June 4-6, 2014, Portland, OR, United States.
[6] T. Geetha, V. Jayashankar. Generation dispatch with storage and renewables under availability-based tariff. IEEE Region 10 Annual International Conference TENCON. 2008.
[7] Gourma, A., Berdai, A., Reddak, M., Tytiuk, V., Reliability and Optimization Strategy in an Interconnected Network at a Wind Farm, (2018) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 11 (2), pp. 76-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v11i2.13596
[8] Varanasi, J., Tripathi, M., Performance Comparison of Generalized Regression Network, Radial Basis Function Network and Support Vector Regression for Wind Power Forecasting, (2019) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 12 (1), pp. 16-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v12i1.15781
[9] Srivastava, A., Bajpai, R., An Efficient Maximum Power Extraction Algorithm for Wind Energy Conversion System Using Model Predictive Control, (2019) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 7 (3), pp. 93-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v7i3.17403
[10] A. Castillo, D. F. Gayme. Evaluating the effects of real power losses in optimal power flow-based storage integration. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol 5, n. 3. Sep 2018, pp 1132–1145.
[11] Sharifzadeh H, Amjady N, Zareipour H. Multi-period stochastic security-constrained OPF considering the uncertainty sources of wind power, load demand and equipment unavailability. Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 146, n. 5. May 2017, pp. 33–42.
[12] Boonchuay, K. Tomsovic, F. Li, W. Ongsakul. Robust optimization-based DC optimal power flow for managing wind generation uncertainty. AIP Conference Procedings, vol 1499, n. 1. May 2014, pp 31–35.
[13] Rahmat Azami MSJ and GH. Economic load Dispatch and DCOptimal Power Flow Problem-PSO versus LR. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, vol. 2, n. 9. Dec 2011, pp 8–13.
[14] A. Soroudi. Power System Optimization Modeling in GAMS. (Springer International Publishing, 2017).
[15] R. A. Jabr, S. Karaki, J. A. Korbane. Robust Multi-Period OPF with Storage and Renewables. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30 n. 5. Sep 2015, pp. 2790–2799.
[16] B. Eldridge, R. O’Neill, A. Castillo. An Improved Method for the DCOPF with Losses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems vol. 33, n. 4. July 2018, pp. 3779–3788.
[17] P. Maghouli, A. Soroudi, A. Keane. Robust computational framework for mid-term techno-economical assessment of energy storage. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 10 n. 3. Feb 2016, pp. 822–831.
[18] Hafez, A., AlSadi, S., Nassar, Y., Chaotic Optimization Versus Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Tuning of Static Synchronous Series Compensator Stabilizing Controller, (2019) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 14 (3), pp. 159-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v14i3.16163
[19] Mmary, E., Marungsri, B., Multiobjective Optimization of Renewable Distributed Generations in Radial Distribution Networks with Optimal Power Factor, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (4), pp. 297-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i4.15069
[20] Adam, K., Miyauchi, H., Optimization of a Photovoltaic Hybrid Energy Storage System Using Energy Storage Peak Shaving, (2019) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 14 (1), pp. 8-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v14i1.16162
[21] Oloulade, A., Moukengue, A., Vianou, A., Multi-Criteria Optimization of the Functionning of a Distribution Network in Normal Operating Regime, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (4), pp. 290-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i4.14401
[22] Hassoune, A., Khafallah, M., Mesbahi, A., Benaaouinate, L., ouragba, T., Control Strategies of a Smart Topology of EVs Charging Station Based Grid Tied RES-Battery, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (5), pp. 385-396. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i5.15520
[23] Moreno, R. Identification of Topological Vulnerabilities for Power Systems Networks. In 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), pp. 1-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2018.8586143
[24] Moreno-Chuquen, R., Obando-Ceron, J., Network Topological Notions for Power Systems Security Assessment, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (3), pp. 237-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i3.14210
[25] Khemmook, P., Khomfoi, S., Transient Stability Improvement Using Coordinated Control of Solar PVs and Solid State Transformers, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (6), pp. 486-494. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i6.15869
[26] Omar, A., Ali, Z., Abdel Aleem, S., Abou-El-Zahab, E., Sharaf, A., A Dynamic Switched Compensation Scheme for Grid- Connected Wind Energy Systems Using Cuckoo Search Algorithm, (2019) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 7 (2), pp. 64-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v7i2.16895
[27] Mauledoux, M., Valencia, A., Avilés, O., Genetic Algorithm Optimization for DC Micro Grid Design, a Case of Study, (2017) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 12 (4), pp. 318-323. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v12i4.11544
[28] Jabri, M., Aloui, H., Genetic Lagrangian Relaxation Selection Method for the Solution of Unit Commitment Problem, (2019) International Journal on Engineering Applications (IREA), 7 (2), pp. 59-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irea.v7i2.17022
[29] Prodromidis, G., Tsiaras, E., Coutelieris, F., Autonomous Buildings with Electricity by Renewables, (2018) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 6 (5), pp. 153-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v6i5.15919
[30] Rizk-Allah, R., Abdel Mageed, H., El-Sehiemy, R., Abdel Aleem, S., El Shahat, A., A New Sine Cosine Optimization Algorithm for Solving Combined Non-Convex Economic and Emission Power Dispatch Problems, (2017) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 5 (6), pp. 180-192. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v5i6.14291
[31] Syahputra, R., Robandi, I., Ashari, M., Performance Improvement of Radial Distribution Network with Distributed Generation Integration Using Extended Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, (2015) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 10 (2), pp. 293-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v10i2.5410
[32] Muthukumar, K., Jayalalitha, S., Ramaswamy, M., PSO Embedded Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Optimal Shunt Capacitor Allocation and Sizing in Radial Distribution Networks with Voltage Dependent Load Models, (2015) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 10 (2), pp. 305-320. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v10i2.5481
[33] Moreno, R., Obando, J., Gonzalez, G., An integrated OPF dispatching model with wind power and demand response for day-ahead markets, (2019) International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 4 (4), pp. 2794-2802. doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i4.pp2794-2802
[34] Wongdet, P., Leeton, U., Marungsri, B., Line Loss Reduction by Optimal Location of Battery Energy Storage System for the Daily Operation in Microgrid with Distributed Generations, (2018) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 6 (3), pp. 83-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v6i3.15095
[35] Obando, J., Gonzalez, G., Moreno, R., Quantification of operating reserves with high penetration of wind power considering extreme values, (2020) International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10 (2), pp. 1693-1700. doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i2.pp1693-1700
[36] J. Yi-Xiong, C. Hao-Zhong, Y. Jian-yong, Z. Li, New discrete method for particle swarm optimization and its application in transmission network expansion planning, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 77 n. 3-4, 2007, pp. 227-233. doi. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2006.02.016
[37] COIN-OR Branch and Cut Interface Julia package. Accessed on Aug. 4, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/JuliaOpt/Cbc.jl
[38] COIN-OR Linear Programming Interface Julia package. Accessed on Aug. 5, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/JuliaOpt/Clp.jl
[39] IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio V12.9.0 documentation. Accessed on Aug. 4, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSSA5P_12.9.0/i log.odms.studio.help/Optimization_Studio/topics/COS_home.html
[40] The GUROBI Manual. Accessed on August 5, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.gurobi.com/documentation/8.1/refman/index.html
[41] Julia GNU Linear Programming Kit (GLPK) package. Accessed on August 5, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/JuliaOpt/GLPK.jl
[42] Julia for Mathematical Optimization (JuMP) package. Accessed on Aug. 4, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.juliaopt.org/JuMP.jl/v0.19.0
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Derechos reservados - Praise Worthy Prize, 2020
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos reservados - Praise Worthy Prize, 2020
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 9 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Praise Worthy Prize
institution Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com/bitstreams/7ba53572-a890-4705-b859-85c9f6d1d754/download
https://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com/bitstreams/2fcc8034-1141-464b-97d4-36159442281b/download
https://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com/bitstreams/bd9fe9d1-152f-410e-a722-5397bf9e838b/download
https://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com/bitstreams/48b56cf2-180d-461a-b72f-e310b8db2611/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560
98b97e693141decfb1f341ebc9e7b74b
c2a3ec6861509b36f00fdfd623af9e56
ef5d991e45da4e0347ca51524844ca0d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio UAO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@uao.edu.co
_version_ 1814260057900056576
spelling Moreno-Chuquen, Ricardof36efacf1d947d7410ab7d332d414753Cantillo Luna, Sergio Alejandro83f94fa4be72d6c8cf3b1410b45cfe2b2021-09-29T19:49:09Z2021-09-29T19:49:09Z2020-1118276660https://hdl.handle.net/10614/13288The optimal power flow is an important tool for power system planning and power system operation. The optimal power flow is used in a 24-hour period to find an economic dispatch of generating units considering network restrictions. The optimal power flow provides valuable information about the operation cost, transmission flows, generation and congestion in the system. This information is used by generators, planners, operators and regulators to analyze and take decisions about the system at short and long term. At short term corresponds to information for the operation. At long term corresponds to information for the planning. This paper proposes a detailed optimal power flow formulation looking for a minimum cost of generation considering wind generation. Five solvers were used in order to compare differences between them. The solvers used are CBC, CLP, CPLEX, Gurobi and GLPK. These solvers are commonly used to solve the multiperiod DC optimal power flow. An IEEE-24 test system is used to compare the solutions provided by the solvers. The findings reveal significant differences between the solvers when they are used to solve the IEEE-24 test system. Additionally, the computing time for each solver is reported. The solvers CPLEX y Gurobi exhibits the lower computational time to find a solution9 páginasapplication/pdfengPraise Worthy PrizeDerechos reservados - Praise Worthy Prize, 2020https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operationArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Energía eólicaProducción de energía eléctricaElectric power productionGenerationOptimal power flowWind powerOptimizationPower systemsRenewable energyVolumen 15, número 6 (2020)492Número 6484Volumen 15Moreno Chuquen, R., Cantillo Luna, S. (2020). Assessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation. International Review of Electrical Engineering. (Vol. 15 (6), pp. 484-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v15i6.18304International Review of Electrical Engineering[1] Al Hasibi, R., Hadi, S., Sarjiya, S., Multi-Objective Optimization of Integrated Power System Expansion Planning with Renewable Energy-Based Distributed Generation, (2019) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 14 (1), pp. 19-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v14i1.16082[2] Sangwato, S., Oonsivilai, A., Optimal Power Flow with Interline Power Flow Controller Using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm, (2015) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 10 (6), pp. 727-733. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v10i6.7568[3] Lakdja, F., Abdeslam, D., Gherbi, F., Optimal Location of Thyristor-Controlled Series Compensator for Optimal Power Flows, (2013) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 6 (2), pp. 465-472.[4] R.A. Jabr. Adjustable robust OPF with renewable energy sources. IEEE Trans Power Syst, vol. 28 n. 4, 2013, pp 4742–4751.[5] A. Castillo, X. Jiang, D.F. Gayme. Lossy DCOPF for optimizing congested grids with renewable energy and storage. Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. June 4-6, 2014, Portland, OR, United States.[6] T. Geetha, V. Jayashankar. Generation dispatch with storage and renewables under availability-based tariff. IEEE Region 10 Annual International Conference TENCON. 2008.[7] Gourma, A., Berdai, A., Reddak, M., Tytiuk, V., Reliability and Optimization Strategy in an Interconnected Network at a Wind Farm, (2018) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 11 (2), pp. 76-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v11i2.13596[8] Varanasi, J., Tripathi, M., Performance Comparison of Generalized Regression Network, Radial Basis Function Network and Support Vector Regression for Wind Power Forecasting, (2019) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 12 (1), pp. 16-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v12i1.15781[9] Srivastava, A., Bajpai, R., An Efficient Maximum Power Extraction Algorithm for Wind Energy Conversion System Using Model Predictive Control, (2019) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 7 (3), pp. 93-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v7i3.17403[10] A. Castillo, D. F. Gayme. Evaluating the effects of real power losses in optimal power flow-based storage integration. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol 5, n. 3. Sep 2018, pp 1132–1145.[11] Sharifzadeh H, Amjady N, Zareipour H. Multi-period stochastic security-constrained OPF considering the uncertainty sources of wind power, load demand and equipment unavailability. Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 146, n. 5. May 2017, pp. 33–42.[12] Boonchuay, K. Tomsovic, F. Li, W. Ongsakul. Robust optimization-based DC optimal power flow for managing wind generation uncertainty. AIP Conference Procedings, vol 1499, n. 1. May 2014, pp 31–35.[13] Rahmat Azami MSJ and GH. Economic load Dispatch and DCOptimal Power Flow Problem-PSO versus LR. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, vol. 2, n. 9. Dec 2011, pp 8–13.[14] A. Soroudi. Power System Optimization Modeling in GAMS. (Springer International Publishing, 2017).[15] R. A. Jabr, S. Karaki, J. A. Korbane. Robust Multi-Period OPF with Storage and Renewables. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30 n. 5. Sep 2015, pp. 2790–2799.[16] B. Eldridge, R. O’Neill, A. Castillo. An Improved Method for the DCOPF with Losses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems vol. 33, n. 4. July 2018, pp. 3779–3788.[17] P. Maghouli, A. Soroudi, A. Keane. Robust computational framework for mid-term techno-economical assessment of energy storage. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 10 n. 3. Feb 2016, pp. 822–831.[18] Hafez, A., AlSadi, S., Nassar, Y., Chaotic Optimization Versus Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Tuning of Static Synchronous Series Compensator Stabilizing Controller, (2019) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 14 (3), pp. 159-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v14i3.16163[19] Mmary, E., Marungsri, B., Multiobjective Optimization of Renewable Distributed Generations in Radial Distribution Networks with Optimal Power Factor, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (4), pp. 297-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i4.15069[20] Adam, K., Miyauchi, H., Optimization of a Photovoltaic Hybrid Energy Storage System Using Energy Storage Peak Shaving, (2019) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 14 (1), pp. 8-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v14i1.16162[21] Oloulade, A., Moukengue, A., Vianou, A., Multi-Criteria Optimization of the Functionning of a Distribution Network in Normal Operating Regime, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (4), pp. 290-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i4.14401[22] Hassoune, A., Khafallah, M., Mesbahi, A., Benaaouinate, L., ouragba, T., Control Strategies of a Smart Topology of EVs Charging Station Based Grid Tied RES-Battery, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (5), pp. 385-396. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i5.15520[23] Moreno, R. Identification of Topological Vulnerabilities for Power Systems Networks. In 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), pp. 1-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2018.8586143[24] Moreno-Chuquen, R., Obando-Ceron, J., Network Topological Notions for Power Systems Security Assessment, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (3), pp. 237-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i3.14210[25] Khemmook, P., Khomfoi, S., Transient Stability Improvement Using Coordinated Control of Solar PVs and Solid State Transformers, (2018) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 13 (6), pp. 486-494. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i6.15869[26] Omar, A., Ali, Z., Abdel Aleem, S., Abou-El-Zahab, E., Sharaf, A., A Dynamic Switched Compensation Scheme for Grid- Connected Wind Energy Systems Using Cuckoo Search Algorithm, (2019) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 7 (2), pp. 64-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v7i2.16895[27] Mauledoux, M., Valencia, A., Avilés, O., Genetic Algorithm Optimization for DC Micro Grid Design, a Case of Study, (2017) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 12 (4), pp. 318-323. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v12i4.11544[28] Jabri, M., Aloui, H., Genetic Lagrangian Relaxation Selection Method for the Solution of Unit Commitment Problem, (2019) International Journal on Engineering Applications (IREA), 7 (2), pp. 59-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irea.v7i2.17022[29] Prodromidis, G., Tsiaras, E., Coutelieris, F., Autonomous Buildings with Electricity by Renewables, (2018) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 6 (5), pp. 153-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v6i5.15919[30] Rizk-Allah, R., Abdel Mageed, H., El-Sehiemy, R., Abdel Aleem, S., El Shahat, A., A New Sine Cosine Optimization Algorithm for Solving Combined Non-Convex Economic and Emission Power Dispatch Problems, (2017) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 5 (6), pp. 180-192. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v5i6.14291[31] Syahputra, R., Robandi, I., Ashari, M., Performance Improvement of Radial Distribution Network with Distributed Generation Integration Using Extended Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, (2015) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 10 (2), pp. 293-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v10i2.5410[32] Muthukumar, K., Jayalalitha, S., Ramaswamy, M., PSO Embedded Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Optimal Shunt Capacitor Allocation and Sizing in Radial Distribution Networks with Voltage Dependent Load Models, (2015) International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 10 (2), pp. 305-320. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v10i2.5481[33] Moreno, R., Obando, J., Gonzalez, G., An integrated OPF dispatching model with wind power and demand response for day-ahead markets, (2019) International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 4 (4), pp. 2794-2802. doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i4.pp2794-2802[34] Wongdet, P., Leeton, U., Marungsri, B., Line Loss Reduction by Optimal Location of Battery Energy Storage System for the Daily Operation in Microgrid with Distributed Generations, (2018) International Journal on Energy Conversion (IRECON), 6 (3), pp. 83-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v6i3.15095[35] Obando, J., Gonzalez, G., Moreno, R., Quantification of operating reserves with high penetration of wind power considering extreme values, (2020) International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10 (2), pp. 1693-1700. doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i2.pp1693-1700[36] J. Yi-Xiong, C. Hao-Zhong, Y. Jian-yong, Z. Li, New discrete method for particle swarm optimization and its application in transmission network expansion planning, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 77 n. 3-4, 2007, pp. 227-233. doi. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2006.02.016[37] COIN-OR Branch and Cut Interface Julia package. Accessed on Aug. 4, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/JuliaOpt/Cbc.jl[38] COIN-OR Linear Programming Interface Julia package. Accessed on Aug. 5, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/JuliaOpt/Clp.jl[39] IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio V12.9.0 documentation. Accessed on Aug. 4, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSSA5P_12.9.0/i log.odms.studio.help/Optimization_Studio/topics/COS_home.html[40] The GUROBI Manual. Accessed on August 5, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.gurobi.com/documentation/8.1/refman/index.html[41] Julia GNU Linear Programming Kit (GLPK) package. Accessed on August 5, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/JuliaOpt/GLPK.jl[42] Julia for Mathematical Optimization (JuMP) package. Accessed on Aug. 4, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.juliaopt.org/JuMP.jl/v0.19.0Comunidad universitaria en generalGeneralPublicationLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81665https://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com/bitstreams/7ba53572-a890-4705-b859-85c9f6d1d754/download20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560MD52ORIGINALAssessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation.pdfAssessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation.pdfTexto archivo completo del artículo de revista, PDFapplication/pdf822046https://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com/bitstreams/2fcc8034-1141-464b-97d4-36159442281b/download98b97e693141decfb1f341ebc9e7b74bMD53TEXTAssessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation.pdf.txtAssessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain41056https://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com/bitstreams/bd9fe9d1-152f-410e-a722-5397bf9e838b/downloadc2a3ec6861509b36f00fdfd623af9e56MD54THUMBNAILAssessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation.pdf.jpgAssessment of a multiperiod optimal power flow for power system operation.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg13747https://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com/bitstreams/48b56cf2-180d-461a-b72f-e310b8db2611/downloadef5d991e45da4e0347ca51524844ca0dMD5510614/13288oai:dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.com:10614/132882024-01-19 16:50:09.551https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos reservados - Praise Worthy Prize, 2020open.accesshttps://dspace7-uao.metacatalogo.comRepositorio UAOrepositorio@uao.edu.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