A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms

This paper provides a microeconometric analysis of the distinctive characteristics of springboard subsidiaries that have a positive impact on the subsidiaries’ performance. Based on panel data estimations for subsidiaries of European multinational companies with a presence in Spain, the authors foun...

Full description

Autores:
Caicedo Marulanda , Carolina
Pla Barber, Jose
León-Darder, Fidel
Mora Rodriguez, Jhon James
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
Repositorio:
RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/11857
Acceso en línea:
http://red.uao.edu.co//handle/10614/11857
Palabra clave:
Econometría
Econometrics
Microeconometric analysis
Springboard country
Springboard subsidiary
Subsidiary – specific advantage
Firm performance
Panel data
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
id REPOUAO2_2b1dd499df21cf4f7194d9ca68544f2b
oai_identifier_str oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/11857
network_acronym_str REPOUAO2
network_name_str RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms
title A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms
spellingShingle A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms
Econometría
Econometrics
Microeconometric analysis
Springboard country
Springboard subsidiary
Subsidiary – specific advantage
Firm performance
Panel data
title_short A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms
title_full A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms
title_fullStr A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms
title_full_unstemmed A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms
title_sort A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Caicedo Marulanda , Carolina
Pla Barber, Jose
León-Darder, Fidel
Mora Rodriguez, Jhon James
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Caicedo Marulanda , Carolina
Pla Barber, Jose
León-Darder, Fidel
Mora Rodriguez, Jhon James
dc.subject.armarc.spa.fl_str_mv Econometría
topic Econometría
Econometrics
Microeconometric analysis
Springboard country
Springboard subsidiary
Subsidiary – specific advantage
Firm performance
Panel data
dc.subject.armarc.e.fl_str_mv Econometrics
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Microeconometric analysis
Springboard country
Springboard subsidiary
Subsidiary – specific advantage
Firm performance
Panel data
description This paper provides a microeconometric analysis of the distinctive characteristics of springboard subsidiaries that have a positive impact on the subsidiaries’ performance. Based on panel data estimations for subsidiaries of European multinational companies with a presence in Spain, the authors found that if the subsidiary is located in the springboard country, then the performance improvement (increase in profit margin) of the subsidiary is about 49 percentage points. When the Spanish subsidiary is considered a springboard subsidiary, its performance is 7.7 percentage points higher than the performance of other subsidiaries that are not springboard subsidiaries. If the subsidiary has a technological relationship with another subsidiary, its performance is 6.7 percentage points higher than the performance of other subsidiaries that do not have a technological relationship. Finally, when the firm has low autonomy, the performance of the subsidiary is 6.2 percentage points lower than that of firms that are independent or have a high level of autonomy
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-12T13:30:16Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-12T13:30:16Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://red.uao.edu.co//handle/10614/11857
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5018/economicsejournal.ja.2015-23
url http://red.uao.edu.co//handle/10614/11857
identifier_str_mv 10.5018/economicsejournal.ja.2015-23
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv 2015-23
dc.relation.citationvolume.none.fl_str_mv 9
dc.relation.cites.spa.fl_str_mv Marulanda, C., Pla-Barber, J., Darder, F. & Rodríguez, J. (2015). A Microeconometric Analysis of the Springboard Subsidiary: The Case of Spanish Firms. Economics, 9 (2015-23), 1–34. http://red.uao.edu.co//handle/10614/11857
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv Adenfelt, M., and Lagerström, K. (2008). “The development and sharing of knowledge by Centers of Excellence and transnational teams: A conceptual framework”, Management International Review, 48(3): 319–338. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11575-008-0018-8
Aitken, B., and Harrison, A. (1999). “Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela,” American Economic Review, 89(3): 605–618. https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v89y1999i3p605-618.html
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., and Holm, U. (2001). “Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs a multi-level analysis”, Organization Studies, 22(6), 1013–1034. http://oss.sagepub.com/content/22/6/1013.abstract
Ambos, T., and Birkinshaw, J. (2010). “Headquarters’ attention and its effect on subsidiary performance”, Management International Review, 50(4): 449–469. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-236877026/headquarters-attention-andits-effect-on-subsidiary
Arnold, J., and Javorcik, B. (2005). “Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign acquisitions and plant performance in Indonesia”, Foreign Acquisitions and Plant Performance in Indonesia (April 2005). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3597. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wbkwbrwps/3597.htm
Barkema, H., Bell, J., and Pennings, J. (1996). “Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 151–166. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199602)17:2%3C151
Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of management, 17(1): 99–120. http://jom.sagepub.com/content/17/1.toc
Benito, G. (2005). “Divestment and international business strategy”, Journal of Economic Geography, 5(2): 235–251. http://joeg.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/2/235.abstract
Birkinshaw, J. (1996). “How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost”, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3): 467–495. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/paljintbs/v_3a26_3ay_3a1995_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a729-753.htm
Birkinshaw, J., and Hood, N. (1998): Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development, New York: St. Martin’s. Birkinshaw, J., and Morrison, A. (1995). “Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations”, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 729–754. http://www.jstor.org/stable/155297Bouquet, C., and Birkinshaw, J. (2008). “Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence”, Journal of Management, 34(3): 477–508. http://www.sagepub.com/cleggstrategy/Cyril%20Bouquet%20and%20Julian%20Birkinshaw.pdf
Brandt, K., and Hulbert, M. (1976). “Patterns of communications in the multinational corporation: An empirical study”, Journal of International Business Studies, 7(1): 57– 64. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v7y1976i1p57-64.html
BvDEP (2009): BvDEP Ownership Database, Bureau van Dijk Electronic Publishing. http://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/home (access in March 2013)
Caicedo, C. (2014). “La Perspectiva de Springboard: País Trampolín y Filial Trampolín Una nueva alternativa para el proceso de internacionalización” unpublished PhD thesis, Universidad de Valencia, España. Fuller, C., and Phelps, N. (2000). “Multinationals, intracorporate competition, and regional development”, Economic Geography, 76(3): 224–243. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2000.tb00142.x/abstract
Gammelgaard, J., McDonald, F., Stephan, A., Tüselmann, H., and Dörrenbächer, C. (2012). “The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance”, International Business Review, 21(6), 1158–1172. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v21y2012i6p1158-1172.html
Garnier, H. (1982). “Context and decision making autonomy in the foreign affiliates of U.S. multinational corporations”, Academy of Management Journal, 25(4): 893–908. http://www.jstor.org/stable/256105?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Ghemawat, P. (2003). “Semiglobalization and international business strategy”, Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (2): 138–152. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v34y2003i2p138-152.html
Jarillo, J., and Martínez, J. (1990). “Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain”; Strategic Management Journal, 11(7): 501–512. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.4250110702/abstract
Johanson, J., and Vahlne, J. (1977). “The internationalization process of the firm – A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/paljintbs/v_3a8_3ay_3a1977_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a23-32.htm
Johnson, J. (1995). “An empirical analysis of the integration – Responsiveness framework: U.S. construction equipment industry firms in global competition”, Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3): 621–635. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/paljintbs/v_3a26_3ay_3a1995_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a621-635.htm
Kawai, N., and Strange, R. (2013). “Subsidiary autonomy and performance in Japanese multinationals in Europe”, International Business Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.012
Lane, P., Salk, J., and Lyles, M. (2001). “Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures”, Strategic Management Journal, 22(12): 1139–1161. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.206/abstract
Lasserre, P. (1996). “Regional headquarters: The spearhead for Asia Pacific markets”, Long Ranged Planning, 29(1): 30–37. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/240176982_Regional_headquarters_The_spearhead_for_Asia_Pacific_markets
Morosini, P., Shane, S., and Singh, H. (1998). “National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137–158. https://ideas.repec.org/r/pal/jintbs/v29y1998i1p137-158.html
Mudambi, R., and Navarra, P. (2004). “Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs”, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 385–406. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v35y2004i5p385-406.html
O´Donnell, S. (2000). “Managing foreign subsidiaries: Agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network?”, Strategic Management Journal, 2 (5): 525–548. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sharon_Watson/publication/229442707_Managing_foreign_subsidiaries_agents_of_headquarters_or_an_interdependent_network/links/00b7d51aca5b4bc2fe000000.pdf
Penrose, E. (1959): The theory of the growth of the firm, London: Basil Blackwell. Pla-Barber, J., and Camps, J. (2012). “Springboarding: A new geographical landscape for European foreign investment in Latin America”, Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 519–538. https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jecgeo/v12y2012i2p519-538.html
Roth, K., and Morrison, A. (1992). “Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715–735. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v23y1992i4p715-735.html
Rugman, M., (1986): New theories of the multinational enterprise: An assessment of internalization theory, Bulletin of Economic Research, 38(2): 101–118. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/blabuecrs/v_3a38_3ay_3a1986_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a101-18.htm
Rugman, M., and Verbeke, A. (1992). “A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 761–771. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v23y1992i4p761-771.html
Surlemont, B. (1998). “A typology of centres within multinational corporations: An empirical investigation”. En J. Birkinshaw and N. Hood (Eds.), Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development: 162–188. New York: St. Martin’s.
Taggart, J. (1998). “Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries”, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (7): 663–681. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0266%28199807%2919:7%3C663
Tran, Y., Mahnke, V., and Ambos, B. (2010). “The effect of quantity, quality and timing of headquarters-initiated knowledge flows on subsidiary performance”, Management International Review, 50(4): 493–511. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/225402807_The_Effect_of_Quantity_Quality_and_Timing_of_Headquartersinitiated_Knowledge_Flows_on_Subsidiary_Performance
UNCTAD (2013): World investment report 2013. Global value chains: Investment and trade for development, United Nations, New York and Geneve. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2013_en.pdf
Wade, M., and Gravill, J. (2003). “Diversification and performance of Japanese IT subsidiaries: A resource-based view”, Information and Management, 40(4): 305–316. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=775599
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 35 páginas
dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Calle 25 115-85. Km 2 vía Cali-Jamundí
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Economics
institution Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/eef83878-941a-4ffd-922c-2a50407507bd/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/8a8b69c3-0820-471d-8613-826f5007af43/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/d17d8cb6-c8d7-4b21-84fa-9224104a67e0/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/92f17da6-e9cc-403c-ac2a-a50879b1430f/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/eb3bcf76-7c9d-4eae-94ba-f7d48e2e2702/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/fc769f15-c8d7-4f9c-aac8-e0d72a6c6f83/download
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/3767d9c7-e0c7-4e99-bc55-951fab77acf0/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv adc0bcc6cc45eaf03783115874e9b249
adc0bcc6cc45eaf03783115874e9b249
aac03f644a826d5bb3b78a0077830912
aac03f644a826d5bb3b78a0077830912
53b0947136145f1fde20364992e5bc7f
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidente
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@uao.edu.co
_version_ 1808478894773239808
spelling Caicedo Marulanda , Carolina virtual::3074-1Pla Barber, Jose15e5f9a6a98c14daca3964d9ee4986d2León-Darder, Fidel69f69d4deec17d66dd58974a98ca66fdMora Rodriguez, Jhon James009fa4acf7b6c6a17e1197d66ecca62cUniversidad Autónoma de Occidente. Calle 25 115-85. Km 2 vía Cali-Jamundí2020-02-12T13:30:16Z2020-02-12T13:30:16Z2015http://red.uao.edu.co//handle/10614/1185710.5018/economicsejournal.ja.2015-23This paper provides a microeconometric analysis of the distinctive characteristics of springboard subsidiaries that have a positive impact on the subsidiaries’ performance. Based on panel data estimations for subsidiaries of European multinational companies with a presence in Spain, the authors found that if the subsidiary is located in the springboard country, then the performance improvement (increase in profit margin) of the subsidiary is about 49 percentage points. When the Spanish subsidiary is considered a springboard subsidiary, its performance is 7.7 percentage points higher than the performance of other subsidiaries that are not springboard subsidiaries. If the subsidiary has a technological relationship with another subsidiary, its performance is 6.7 percentage points higher than the performance of other subsidiaries that do not have a technological relationship. Finally, when the firm has low autonomy, the performance of the subsidiary is 6.2 percentage points lower than that of firms that are independent or have a high level of autonomyapplication/pdf35 páginasspaEconomicsDerechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidentehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firmsArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85EconometríaEconometricsMicroeconometric analysisSpringboard countrySpringboard subsidiarySubsidiary – specific advantageFirm performancePanel data2015-239Marulanda, C., Pla-Barber, J., Darder, F. & Rodríguez, J. (2015). A Microeconometric Analysis of the Springboard Subsidiary: The Case of Spanish Firms. Economics, 9 (2015-23), 1–34. http://red.uao.edu.co//handle/10614/11857Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-JournalAdenfelt, M., and Lagerström, K. (2008). “The development and sharing of knowledge by Centers of Excellence and transnational teams: A conceptual framework”, Management International Review, 48(3): 319–338. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11575-008-0018-8Aitken, B., and Harrison, A. (1999). “Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela,” American Economic Review, 89(3): 605–618. https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v89y1999i3p605-618.htmlAndersson, U., Forsgren, M., and Holm, U. (2001). “Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs a multi-level analysis”, Organization Studies, 22(6), 1013–1034. http://oss.sagepub.com/content/22/6/1013.abstractAmbos, T., and Birkinshaw, J. (2010). “Headquarters’ attention and its effect on subsidiary performance”, Management International Review, 50(4): 449–469. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-236877026/headquarters-attention-andits-effect-on-subsidiaryArnold, J., and Javorcik, B. (2005). “Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign acquisitions and plant performance in Indonesia”, Foreign Acquisitions and Plant Performance in Indonesia (April 2005). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3597. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wbkwbrwps/3597.htmBarkema, H., Bell, J., and Pennings, J. (1996). “Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 151–166. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199602)17:2%3C151Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of management, 17(1): 99–120. http://jom.sagepub.com/content/17/1.tocBenito, G. (2005). “Divestment and international business strategy”, Journal of Economic Geography, 5(2): 235–251. http://joeg.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/2/235.abstractBirkinshaw, J. (1996). “How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost”, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3): 467–495. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/paljintbs/v_3a26_3ay_3a1995_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a729-753.htmBirkinshaw, J., and Hood, N. (1998): Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development, New York: St. Martin’s. Birkinshaw, J., and Morrison, A. (1995). “Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations”, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 729–754. http://www.jstor.org/stable/155297Bouquet, C., and Birkinshaw, J. (2008). “Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence”, Journal of Management, 34(3): 477–508. http://www.sagepub.com/cleggstrategy/Cyril%20Bouquet%20and%20Julian%20Birkinshaw.pdfBrandt, K., and Hulbert, M. (1976). “Patterns of communications in the multinational corporation: An empirical study”, Journal of International Business Studies, 7(1): 57– 64. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v7y1976i1p57-64.htmlBvDEP (2009): BvDEP Ownership Database, Bureau van Dijk Electronic Publishing. http://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/home (access in March 2013)Caicedo, C. (2014). “La Perspectiva de Springboard: País Trampolín y Filial Trampolín Una nueva alternativa para el proceso de internacionalización” unpublished PhD thesis, Universidad de Valencia, España. Fuller, C., and Phelps, N. (2000). “Multinationals, intracorporate competition, and regional development”, Economic Geography, 76(3): 224–243. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2000.tb00142.x/abstractGammelgaard, J., McDonald, F., Stephan, A., Tüselmann, H., and Dörrenbächer, C. (2012). “The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance”, International Business Review, 21(6), 1158–1172. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v21y2012i6p1158-1172.htmlGarnier, H. (1982). “Context and decision making autonomy in the foreign affiliates of U.S. multinational corporations”, Academy of Management Journal, 25(4): 893–908. http://www.jstor.org/stable/256105?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsGhemawat, P. (2003). “Semiglobalization and international business strategy”, Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (2): 138–152. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v34y2003i2p138-152.htmlJarillo, J., and Martínez, J. (1990). “Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain”; Strategic Management Journal, 11(7): 501–512. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.4250110702/abstractJohanson, J., and Vahlne, J. (1977). “The internationalization process of the firm – A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/paljintbs/v_3a8_3ay_3a1977_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a23-32.htmJohnson, J. (1995). “An empirical analysis of the integration – Responsiveness framework: U.S. construction equipment industry firms in global competition”, Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3): 621–635. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/paljintbs/v_3a26_3ay_3a1995_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a621-635.htmKawai, N., and Strange, R. (2013). “Subsidiary autonomy and performance in Japanese multinationals in Europe”, International Business Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.012Lane, P., Salk, J., and Lyles, M. (2001). “Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures”, Strategic Management Journal, 22(12): 1139–1161. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.206/abstractLasserre, P. (1996). “Regional headquarters: The spearhead for Asia Pacific markets”, Long Ranged Planning, 29(1): 30–37. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/240176982_Regional_headquarters_The_spearhead_for_Asia_Pacific_marketsMorosini, P., Shane, S., and Singh, H. (1998). “National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137–158. https://ideas.repec.org/r/pal/jintbs/v29y1998i1p137-158.htmlMudambi, R., and Navarra, P. (2004). “Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs”, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 385–406. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v35y2004i5p385-406.htmlO´Donnell, S. (2000). “Managing foreign subsidiaries: Agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network?”, Strategic Management Journal, 2 (5): 525–548. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sharon_Watson/publication/229442707_Managing_foreign_subsidiaries_agents_of_headquarters_or_an_interdependent_network/links/00b7d51aca5b4bc2fe000000.pdfPenrose, E. (1959): The theory of the growth of the firm, London: Basil Blackwell. Pla-Barber, J., and Camps, J. (2012). “Springboarding: A new geographical landscape for European foreign investment in Latin America”, Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 519–538. https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jecgeo/v12y2012i2p519-538.htmlRoth, K., and Morrison, A. (1992). “Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715–735. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v23y1992i4p715-735.htmlRugman, M., (1986): New theories of the multinational enterprise: An assessment of internalization theory, Bulletin of Economic Research, 38(2): 101–118. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/blabuecrs/v_3a38_3ay_3a1986_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a101-18.htmRugman, M., and Verbeke, A. (1992). “A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 761–771. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v23y1992i4p761-771.htmlSurlemont, B. (1998). “A typology of centres within multinational corporations: An empirical investigation”. En J. Birkinshaw and N. Hood (Eds.), Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development: 162–188. New York: St. Martin’s.Taggart, J. (1998). “Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries”, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (7): 663–681. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0266%28199807%2919:7%3C663Tran, Y., Mahnke, V., and Ambos, B. (2010). “The effect of quantity, quality and timing of headquarters-initiated knowledge flows on subsidiary performance”, Management International Review, 50(4): 493–511. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/225402807_The_Effect_of_Quantity_Quality_and_Timing_of_Headquartersinitiated_Knowledge_Flows_on_Subsidiary_PerformanceUNCTAD (2013): World investment report 2013. Global value chains: Investment and trade for development, United Nations, New York and Geneve. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2013_en.pdfWade, M., and Gravill, J. (2003). “Diversification and performance of Japanese IT subsidiaries: A resource-based view”, Information and Management, 40(4): 305–316. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=775599Publicationa183c021-f01e-4ba4-a5c8-004ee18b06b7virtual::3074-1a183c021-f01e-4ba4-a5c8-004ee18b06b7virtual::3074-1https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=i12K1DcAAAAJ&hl=esvirtual::3074-10000-0003-0513-7578virtual::3074-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000022753virtual::3074-1TEXTA0233.pdf.txtA0233.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain83988https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/eef83878-941a-4ffd-922c-2a50407507bd/downloadadc0bcc6cc45eaf03783115874e9b249MD54A0233_A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms.pdf.txtA0233_A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain83988https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/8a8b69c3-0820-471d-8613-826f5007af43/downloadadc0bcc6cc45eaf03783115874e9b249MD56THUMBNAILA0233.pdf.jpgA0233.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg12571https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/d17d8cb6-c8d7-4b21-84fa-9224104a67e0/downloadaac03f644a826d5bb3b78a0077830912MD55A0233_A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms.pdf.jpgA0233_A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg12571https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/92f17da6-e9cc-403c-ac2a-a50879b1430f/downloadaac03f644a826d5bb3b78a0077830912MD57ORIGINALA0233_A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms.pdfA0233_A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: the case of spanish firms.pdfTexto archivo completo del artículo de revista, PDFapplication/pdf363969https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/eb3bcf76-7c9d-4eae-94ba-f7d48e2e2702/download53b0947136145f1fde20364992e5bc7fMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/fc769f15-c8d7-4f9c-aac8-e0d72a6c6f83/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81665https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/3767d9c7-e0c7-4e99-bc55-951fab77acf0/download20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560MD5310614/11857oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/118572024-03-08 15:07:03.913https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidenteopen.accesshttps://red.uao.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidenterepositorio@uao.edu.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