El liberalismo entendido como una perspectiva ética = Liberalism understood as an ethical perspective

One of the reasons why liberalism aspires to be a better form of political organization of society lies in the supposed impartiality of its normative principles as opposed to comprehensive positions of the good. This article follows Michael Sandel's critique of John Rawls' theory to show that a liberal society cannot avoid assuming ethical positions. To this end, some features of the debate between communitarianism and liberalism are addressed, problematizing the division between the moral and the political on which the latter defends its neutrality. From there, the discussion that Sandel engages with Rawls is extracted, objecting to the latter, that the concrete determination of rights in a liberal society cannot do without the discussion on values and ideas of a good life. Finally, some reflections are offered by way of conclusion

• Autores: Peralta Vélez, Ana María
• Fecha de publicación: 2017
• Institución: Universidad EAFIT
• Repositorio: Repositorio EAFIT
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/25937
• Acceso en línea: http://hdl.handle.net/10784/25937
• Palabra clave: Organización política; Vida buena; Derechos; Política y moral; LIBERALISMO; SANDEL, MICHEL, 1953- CRÍTICA E INTERPRETACIÓN; RAWLS, JOHN, 1921-2002 - CRÍTICA E INTERPRETACIÓN; COMUNITARISMO; ETICA SOCIAL; NEUTRALIDAD; DERECHOS CIVILES; ÉTICA; VALORES SOCIALES; FILÓSOFOS ESTADOUNIDENSES; FILOSOFÍA POLÍTICA; Political organization; Good life; Rights; Politics and moral; Liberalism; Communitarianism; Social ethics; Neutrality; Civil rights; Social values; American philosophers; Political philosophy
• License: Copyright (c) 2017 Ana María Peralta Vélez