Does managerial discretion affect debt maturity in Chilean firms? An agency cost and asymmetric information approach
We address debt maturity determinants for Chilean firms using data whose information was drawn from the Longitudinal Survey of Companies (ELE). Results from pooled Tobit regressions indicate that for firms with high growth opportunities, managerial discretion will encourage longer debt terms, a deci...
- Autores:
-
Muñoz Mendoza, Jorge Andrés
Sepúlveda Yelpo, Sandra María
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad EAFIT
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EAFIT
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/11278
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10784/11278
- Palabra clave:
- G31
G32
G33
Debt maturity
agency costs
ownership structure
manager reputation
monitoring
Vencimiento de la deuda
costos de agencia
estructura de propiedad
discreción gerencial
monitoreo
- Rights
- License
- Copyright (c) 2016 Jorge Andrés Muñoz Mendoza, Sandra María Sepúlveda Yelpo
Summary: | We address debt maturity determinants for Chilean firms using data whose information was drawn from the Longitudinal Survey of Companies (ELE). Results from pooled Tobit regressions indicate that for firms with high growth opportunities, managerial discretion will encourage longer debt terms, a decision that contributes to reducing liquidity risk. For firms with low growth opportunities, managerial discretion does not affect debt maturity, while external monitoring reduces it. These results provide new evidence for international literature. Other conclusions suggest that debt maturity is positively related to firm size, capital structure, and asset tangibility and negatively related to agency costs and membership in a holding company. These findings are consistent with international studies. |
---|