Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue
The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences oper...
- Autores:
-
Tindale, Christopher W.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad EAFIT
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EAFIT
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/17646
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10784/17646
- Palabra clave:
- Argument schemes
Booth
Descartes
Rhetorical strategy
Elf-deliberation
Esquemas de argumentación
Booth
Descartes
Estrategia retórica
Autodeliberación
- Rights
- License
- Copyright © 2020 Christopher W. Tindale
| id |
REPOEAFIT2_d01cd59f251e595c747b068bd8731a3a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/17646 |
| network_acronym_str |
REPOEAFIT2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio EAFIT |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Medellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees2020-06-242020-09-04T16:41:27Z2020-06-242020-09-04T16:41:27Z1794-5887http://hdl.handle.net/10784/17646The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation.La Nueva Retórica identifica al autodeliberador como uno de los tres tipos principales de audiencia. Pero dicho giro hacia el yo no guarda concordancia con los estudios contemporáneos de la argumentación, particularmente en cuanto a lo social. La argumentación ocurre “allí afuera” y modifica los ambientes donde operan las audiencias. Resulta igualmente interesante el uso de la autodeliberación como estrategia retórica. En la argumentación con uno mismo, especialmente cuando dicho ser se encuentra de alguna manera alejado de la persona involucrada, se utiliza la autodeliberación más allá de los fines que Perelman le asignó. El objetivo del presente artículo es explorar las características del autodeliberador como audiencia y la autodeliberación como estrategia retórica empleada en la argumentación.application/pdfengUniversidad EAFIThttps://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/co-herencia/article/view/6013https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/co-herencia/article/view/6013Copyright © 2020 Christopher W. TindaleAcceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Co-herencia, Vol. 17, Núm. 32 (2020)Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogueLa autodeliberación y la estrategia del pseudodiálogoarticleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Argument schemesBoothDescartesRhetorical strategyElf-deliberationEsquemas de argumentaciónBoothDescartesEstrategia retóricaAutodeliberaciónTindale, Christopher W.Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric University of WindsorCo-herencia1732159178THUMBNAILminiatura-coherencia.jpgminiatura-coherencia.jpgimage/jpeg230829https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/f8a5d173-ebae-47d4-9504-215824811f51/download6c3e6ec217fd7c11f79cdda26d9319a2MD51ORIGINALdocument - 2020-09-14T122355.720.pdfdocument - 2020-09-14T122355.720.pdfTexto completo PDFapplication/pdf328901https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/b92025b0-09c6-4d66-90ad-c695a52a579f/download36cbaaac9f485cff12179367bfd22bc8MD52articulo - copia (6).htmlarticulo - copia (6).htmlTexto completo HTMLtext/html376https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/00fcbf45-eb3d-4007-8af8-ee3caa297cb0/download2a6f044bddc4096954d4ccad903a3854MD5310784/17646oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/176462020-09-14 12:25:37.679open.accesshttps://repository.eafit.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad EAFITrepositorio@eafit.edu.co |
| dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue |
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
La autodeliberación y la estrategia del pseudodiálogo |
| title |
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue |
| spellingShingle |
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue Argument schemes Booth Descartes Rhetorical strategy Elf-deliberation Esquemas de argumentación Booth Descartes Estrategia retórica Autodeliberación |
| title_short |
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue |
| title_full |
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue |
| title_fullStr |
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue |
| title_sort |
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Tindale, Christopher W. |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Tindale, Christopher W. |
| dc.contributor.affiliation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric University of Windsor |
| dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv |
Argument schemes Booth Descartes Rhetorical strategy Elf-deliberation |
| topic |
Argument schemes Booth Descartes Rhetorical strategy Elf-deliberation Esquemas de argumentación Booth Descartes Estrategia retórica Autodeliberación |
| dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Esquemas de argumentación Booth Descartes Estrategia retórica Autodeliberación |
| description |
The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-04T16:41:27Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-24 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-04T16:41:27Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-24 |
| dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article info:eu-repo/semantics/article publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1794-5887 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10784/17646 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1794-5887 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10784/17646 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.isversionof.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/co-herencia/article/view/6013 |
| dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/co-herencia/article/view/6013 |
| dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
Copyright © 2020 Christopher W. Tindale |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright © 2020 Christopher W. Tindale Acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv |
Medellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad EAFIT |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Co-herencia, Vol. 17, Núm. 32 (2020) |
| institution |
Universidad EAFIT |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/f8a5d173-ebae-47d4-9504-215824811f51/download https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/b92025b0-09c6-4d66-90ad-c695a52a579f/download https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/00fcbf45-eb3d-4007-8af8-ee3caa297cb0/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
6c3e6ec217fd7c11f79cdda26d9319a2 36cbaaac9f485cff12179367bfd22bc8 2a6f044bddc4096954d4ccad903a3854 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@eafit.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1814110299243937792 |