Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue
The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences oper...
- Autores:
-
Tindale, Christopher W.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad EAFIT
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EAFIT
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/17646
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10784/17646
- Palabra clave:
- Argument schemes
Booth
Descartes
Rhetorical strategy
Elf-deliberation
Esquemas de argumentación
Booth
Descartes
Estrategia retórica
Autodeliberación
- Rights
- License
- Copyright © 2020 Christopher W. Tindale
| Summary: | The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation. |
|---|