Proceso de ASC - APLICACION DE LOS ESTANDARES DE LA PRUEBA POR JUECES Y ARBITROS
This study explores the knowledge that both judges and arbitrators possess regarding the concept of the standard of proof and its application, as well as the lack of understanding of this concept when rendering judgment. While the concept is identified, there are conceptual gaps in its application,...
- Autores:
-
García Brun, Álvaro José
Hurtado Aristizábal, Andrés
Gómez Franco, Carmen
Trujillo Montoya, Carolina
Meza Montoya, Daniel
Uribe, Juan Rafael
Lotero Aguirre, Juan Sebastián
Henríquez Kitchen, María José
Sierra Negrete, María Paula
Zuluaga Mejía, Ricardo
Giraldo Moreno, Sofía
Posada Botero, José David
- Tipo de recurso:
- Investigation report
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad EAFIT
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EAFIT
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/34222
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10784/34222
- Palabra clave:
- Standard of proof
preponderance of evidence
beyond reasonable doubt
judgment
arbitral award
Estándar de prueba
probabilidad prevalente
conocimiento más allá de toda duda razonable
sentencia
laudo arbitral
- Rights
- License
- Copyright (c) 2019 © Universidad EAFIT. Vicerrectoría CTeI
Summary: | This study explores the knowledge that both judges and arbitrators possess regarding the concept of the standard of proof and its application, as well as the lack of understanding of this concept when rendering judgment. While the concept is identified, there are conceptual gaps in its application, resulting in inadequate implementation. Additionally, it was observed that the applied standard sometimes becomes more stringent than what is established for certain processes. Furthermore, it has become evident that applying these standards makes it challenging to establish objective criteria. |
---|