Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
This work reflects on the Auto AP10732020 of June 3, 2020 (rad. 51983) of the Criminal Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, an order in which one of the requests submitted regarding the application of the exception of unconstitutionality against article 6 of Legislative Decree 546 of...
- Autores:
-
Boada Acosta, Juan Camilo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad EAFIT
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EAFIT
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/31405
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10784/31405
- Palabra clave:
- Auto AP10732020
exception of unconstitutionality
Covid19
pandemic
principles of necessity and proportionality
Auto AP10732020
excepción de inconstitucionalidad
Covid19
pandemia
principios de necesidad y propocionalidad
- Rights
- License
- Copyright © 2020 Juan Camilo Boada Acosta
id |
REPOEAFIT2_92984c2b5243b813caaaf6bd8cf8c2a7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/31405 |
network_acronym_str |
REPOEAFIT2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EAFIT |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Medellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees2020-12-232022-05-10T14:11:34Z2020-12-232022-05-10T14:11:34Z01208179http://hdl.handle.net/10784/31405This work reflects on the Auto AP10732020 of June 3, 2020 (rad. 51983) of the Criminal Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, an order in which one of the requests submitted regarding the application of the exception of unconstitutionality against article 6 of Legislative Decree 546 of 2020, issued by the National Government in the framework of the pandemic caused by Covid19. Afterwords, a review about the principles of necessity and proportionality in relation to the case is given.En este trabajo se reflexiona en torno al Auto AP10732020 del 3 de junio de 2020 (rad. 51983) de la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, providencia en la cual se analizó una de las solicitudes presentadas en cuanto a la aplicación de la excepción de inconstitucionalidad frente al artículo 6° del Decreto Legislativo 546 del 2020 del proferido por el Gobierno Nacional en el marco de la pandemia provocada por el Covid19. De acuerdo a esto, se da una revisión de los principios de necesidad y proporcionalidad en relación al caso.application/pdfspaUniversidad EAFIThttps://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/6811https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/6811Copyright © 2020 Juan Camilo Boada AcostaAcceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Nuevo Foro Penal, Vol. 16, Núm. 95 (2020)Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of JusticePandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal: Cuando las Cortes no están a la Altura. Comentarios al Auto AP1073-2020 del 3 de junio de 2020 (51983) de la Corte Suprema de Justiciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlearticleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpublishedVersionArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Auto AP10732020exception of unconstitutionalityCovid19pandemicprinciples of necessity and proportionalityAuto AP10732020excepción de inconstitucionalidadCovid19pandemiaprincipios de necesidad y propocionalidadBoada Acosta, Juan CamiloUniversidad de los AndesNuevo Foro Penal1695237253ORIGINALPandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal.pdfPandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal.pdfTexto completo PDFapplication/pdf247788https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/0f31ed74-f48c-4ce3-ae2f-a4ef46366e7e/download2bc6d804976cdd715398e07f49433f3dMD51Pandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal.htmlPandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal.htmlTexto completo HTMLtext/html292https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/8d2b89e4-56e7-4841-9ea7-1c6782d4149a/download2196f4767b06a7cfbe05fed4b2d2806dMD52THUMBNAILminaitura-nfp_Mesa de trabajo 1.jpgminaitura-nfp_Mesa de trabajo 1.jpgimage/jpeg226665https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/cd9dba42-9e43-4707-be23-35eaed44019c/download065f42f12e35dc9ce868bb81af243febMD5310784/31405oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/314052022-05-16 04:32:16.915open.accesshttps://repository.eafit.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad EAFITrepositorio@eafit.edu.co |
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Pandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal: Cuando las Cortes no están a la Altura. Comentarios al Auto AP1073-2020 del 3 de junio de 2020 (51983) de la Corte Suprema de Justicia |
title |
Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice |
spellingShingle |
Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice Auto AP10732020 exception of unconstitutionality Covid19 pandemic principles of necessity and proportionality Auto AP10732020 excepción de inconstitucionalidad Covid19 pandemia principios de necesidad y propocionalidad |
title_short |
Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice |
title_full |
Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice |
title_fullStr |
Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice |
title_sort |
Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Boada Acosta, Juan Camilo |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Boada Acosta, Juan Camilo |
dc.contributor.affiliation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes |
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv |
Auto AP10732020 exception of unconstitutionality Covid19 pandemic principles of necessity and proportionality |
topic |
Auto AP10732020 exception of unconstitutionality Covid19 pandemic principles of necessity and proportionality Auto AP10732020 excepción de inconstitucionalidad Covid19 pandemia principios de necesidad y propocionalidad |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Auto AP10732020 excepción de inconstitucionalidad Covid19 pandemia principios de necesidad y propocionalidad |
description |
This work reflects on the Auto AP10732020 of June 3, 2020 (rad. 51983) of the Criminal Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, an order in which one of the requests submitted regarding the application of the exception of unconstitutionality against article 6 of Legislative Decree 546 of 2020, issued by the National Government in the framework of the pandemic caused by Covid19. Afterwords, a review about the principles of necessity and proportionality in relation to the case is given. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-23 |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-10T14:11:34Z |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-10T14:11:34Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-23 |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion publishedVersion |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
01208179 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10784/31405 |
identifier_str_mv |
01208179 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10784/31405 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.isversionof.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/6811 |
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/6811 |
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
Copyright © 2020 Juan Camilo Boada Acosta |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright © 2020 Juan Camilo Boada Acosta Acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv |
Medellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad EAFIT |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Nuevo Foro Penal, Vol. 16, Núm. 95 (2020) |
institution |
Universidad EAFIT |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/0f31ed74-f48c-4ce3-ae2f-a4ef46366e7e/download https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/8d2b89e4-56e7-4841-9ea7-1c6782d4149a/download https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/cd9dba42-9e43-4707-be23-35eaed44019c/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
2bc6d804976cdd715398e07f49433f3d 2196f4767b06a7cfbe05fed4b2d2806d 065f42f12e35dc9ce868bb81af243feb |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@eafit.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814110447591227392 |