Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice

This work reflects on the Auto AP1073­2020 of June 3, 2020 (rad. 51983) of the Criminal Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, an order in which one of the requests submitted regarding the application of the exception of unconstitutionality against article 6 of Legislative Decree 546 of...

Full description

Autores:
Boada Acosta, Juan Camilo
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad EAFIT
Repositorio:
Repositorio EAFIT
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/31405
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10784/31405
Palabra clave:
Auto AP1073­2020
exception of unconstitutionality
Covid­19
pandemic
principles of necessity and proportionality
Auto AP1073­2020
excepción de inconstitucionalidad
Covid­19
pandemia
principios de necesidad y propocionalidad
Rights
License
Copyright © 2020 Juan Camilo Boada Acosta
id REPOEAFIT2_92984c2b5243b813caaaf6bd8cf8c2a7
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/31405
network_acronym_str REPOEAFIT2
network_name_str Repositorio EAFIT
repository_id_str
spelling Medellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees2020-12-232022-05-10T14:11:34Z2020-12-232022-05-10T14:11:34Z0120­8179http://hdl.handle.net/10784/31405This work reflects on the Auto AP1073­2020 of June 3, 2020 (rad. 51983) of the Criminal Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, an order in which one of the requests submitted regarding the application of the exception of unconstitutionality against article 6 of Legislative Decree 546 of 2020, issued by the National Government in the framework of the pandemic caused by Covid­19. Afterwords, a review about the principles of necessity and proportionality in relation to the case is given.En este trabajo se reflexiona en torno al Auto AP1073­2020 del 3 de junio de 2020 (rad. 51983) de la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, providencia en la cual se analizó una de las solicitudes presentadas en cuanto a la aplicación de la excepción de inconstitucionalidad frente al artículo 6° del Decreto Legislativo 546 del 2020 del proferido por el Gobierno Nacional en el marco de la pandemia provocada por el Covid­19. De acuerdo a esto, se da una revisión de los principios de necesidad y proporcionalidad en relación al caso.application/pdfspaUniversidad EAFIThttps://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/6811https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/6811Copyright © 2020 Juan Camilo Boada AcostaAcceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Nuevo Foro Penal, Vol. 16, Núm. 95 (2020)Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of JusticePandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal: Cuando las Cortes no están a la Altura. Comentarios al Auto AP1073-2020 del 3 de junio de 2020 (51983) de la Corte Suprema de Justiciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlearticleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpublishedVersionArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Auto AP1073­2020exception of unconstitutionalityCovid­19pandemicprinciples of necessity and proportionalityAuto AP1073­2020excepción de inconstitucionalidadCovid­19pandemiaprincipios de necesidad y propocionalidadBoada Acosta, Juan CamiloUniversidad de los AndesNuevo Foro Penal1695237253ORIGINALPandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal.pdfPandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal.pdfTexto completo PDFapplication/pdf247788https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/0f31ed74-f48c-4ce3-ae2f-a4ef46366e7e/download2bc6d804976cdd715398e07f49433f3dMD51Pandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal.htmlPandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal.htmlTexto completo HTMLtext/html292https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/8d2b89e4-56e7-4841-9ea7-1c6782d4149a/download2196f4767b06a7cfbe05fed4b2d2806dMD52THUMBNAILminaitura-nfp_Mesa de trabajo 1.jpgminaitura-nfp_Mesa de trabajo 1.jpgimage/jpeg226665https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/cd9dba42-9e43-4707-be23-35eaed44019c/download065f42f12e35dc9ce868bb81af243febMD5310784/31405oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/314052022-05-16 04:32:16.915open.accesshttps://repository.eafit.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad EAFITrepositorio@eafit.edu.co
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Pandemia, prisiones y Derecho Penal: Cuando las Cortes no están a la Altura. Comentarios al Auto AP1073-2020 del 3 de junio de 2020 (51983) de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
title Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
spellingShingle Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
Auto AP1073­2020
exception of unconstitutionality
Covid­19
pandemic
principles of necessity and proportionality
Auto AP1073­2020
excepción de inconstitucionalidad
Covid­19
pandemia
principios de necesidad y propocionalidad
title_short Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
title_full Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
title_fullStr Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
title_full_unstemmed Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
title_sort Pandemic, prisons and Criminal Law: When the Courts are not up to par. Comments to Order AP1073-2020 of June 3, 2020 (51983) of the Supreme Court of Justice
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Boada Acosta, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Boada Acosta, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.affiliation.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv Auto AP1073­2020
exception of unconstitutionality
Covid­19
pandemic
principles of necessity and proportionality
topic Auto AP1073­2020
exception of unconstitutionality
Covid­19
pandemic
principles of necessity and proportionality
Auto AP1073­2020
excepción de inconstitucionalidad
Covid­19
pandemia
principios de necesidad y propocionalidad
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Auto AP1073­2020
excepción de inconstitucionalidad
Covid­19
pandemia
principios de necesidad y propocionalidad
description This work reflects on the Auto AP1073­2020 of June 3, 2020 (rad. 51983) of the Criminal Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, an order in which one of the requests submitted regarding the application of the exception of unconstitutionality against article 6 of Legislative Decree 546 of 2020, issued by the National Government in the framework of the pandemic caused by Covid­19. Afterwords, a review about the principles of necessity and proportionality in relation to the case is given.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-23
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-10T14:11:34Z
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-10T14:11:34Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-23
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0120­8179
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10784/31405
identifier_str_mv 0120­8179
url http://hdl.handle.net/10784/31405
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.isversionof.none.fl_str_mv https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/6811
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/6811
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Copyright © 2020 Juan Camilo Boada Acosta
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright © 2020 Juan Camilo Boada Acosta
Acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv Medellín de: Lat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degrees Long: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad EAFIT
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Nuevo Foro Penal, Vol. 16, Núm. 95 (2020)
institution Universidad EAFIT
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/0f31ed74-f48c-4ce3-ae2f-a4ef46366e7e/download
https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/8d2b89e4-56e7-4841-9ea7-1c6782d4149a/download
https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/cd9dba42-9e43-4707-be23-35eaed44019c/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2bc6d804976cdd715398e07f49433f3d
2196f4767b06a7cfbe05fed4b2d2806d
065f42f12e35dc9ce868bb81af243feb
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@eafit.edu.co
_version_ 1814110447591227392