Juegos de lenguaje para la intervención. Segunda parte: acerca de las reglas

Intervention methodology use can be seen as a Wittgenstein´s Language Game, this equivalence allows flexibility at the moment of combining methodologies from different paradigms in problem – solving. This is the argument developed on the first of these three – parts series. However, on the same text it is pointed out that the concept of Game is so wide that it does not seem to provide guidance for intervention processes. For that reason the purpose of this second part is to explore ways to rule on intervention activity, looking for guides, without losing flexibility for the use of methodologies, basing the argumentation on the concepts of rule and principles in language pragmatics.

• Autores: Jorge Iván Vélez Castiblanco
• Fecha de publicación: 2019
• Institución: Universidad EAFIT
• Repositorio: Repositorio EAFIT
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/14092
• Acceso en línea: http://hdl.handle.net/10784/14092
• Palabra clave: Language Pragmatics; Rules; Principles; Searle; Grice; Sperber; Wilson; Relevance; Critical Systems Thinking; Methodological Pluralism; Systems Thinking; Language Games; Intervention.; El uso de metodologías de intervención puede ser equiparado con la noción de Juego de Lenguaje en Wittgenstein; lo cual permite flexibilidad a la hora de articular metodologías de diversos paradigmas en la resolución de problemas. Tal es el argumento que
• License: Copyright © 2004 Jorge Iván Vélez Castiblanco