Automatic Design of Large-Scale Trusses: A Comparison Between Derivative-Free Algorithms

The design of steel trusses is a frequent problem in civil engineering, which requires the experience of the design engineer to achieve a structural solution with good performance and that can satisfy the established needs. In recent years, the design of these systems has been supported by the appli...

Full description

Autores:
Niño-Alvarez, Luis
Guevara-Corzo, Jeffrey
Begambre-Carrillo, Oscar
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad EAFIT
Repositorio:
Repositorio EAFIT
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/25806
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10784/25806
Palabra clave:
Multi-objective metaheuristic optimization
articulatedstructures
trusses
large scale
Optimización metaheurística multiobjetivo
estructurasarticuladas
cercha
gran escala
Rights
openAccess
License
Copyright © 2020 Luis Niño-Alvarez, Jeffrey Guevara-Corzo, Oscar Begambre-Carrillo
Description
Summary:The design of steel trusses is a frequent problem in civil engineering, which requires the experience of the design engineer to achieve a structural solution with good performance and that can satisfy the established needs. In recent years, the design of these systems has been supported by the application of various methods of optimization, which allow optimal solutions, meeting the proposed design objectives, automatically and in a shorter time. This research presents the application of a series of multiobjective metaheuristic algorithms for the automatic design of large-scale trusses. The NSGA-II, MOPSO and AMOSA algorithms were applied and the structures reported in the literature were considered to be made up of a high number of elements. The performance of the algorithms was evaluated based on the computational cost, the hypervolume criterion and the behavior that the algorithms have when increasing the amount of iterations per optimization cycle. The search space used in the optimization was discrete, restricted by the W steel profiles available in the Colombian market. The results obtained show that, for the proposed problems, the MOPSO algorithm is the most efficient, followed by the AMOSA and the NSGA-II which showed a higher computational cost. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the calculation times were less than one hour, for trusses close to a thousand elements.