AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional
La contratación de proveedores de tercera parte logística (3PL) ha venido aumentando en los últimos años a nivel mundial y local. Uno de los servicios que más se terceriza es el transporte. La contratación de un proveedor de tercera parte para el transporte terrestre de mercancías es un problema de...
- Autores:
-
Gómez, Juan Carlos Osorio
Tabares-Urrea, Natalia
Ramírez-Flórez, Giselle
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad EIA .
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EIA .
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.eia.edu.co:11190/5086
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.eia.edu.co/handle/11190/5086
https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v17i33.1329
- Palabra clave:
- Selección de proveedores
Tercera parte logística – 3PL
AHP difuso
TOPSIS
Transporte terrestre de mercancías
Problemas de decisión multicriterio
Riesgo operacional.
Selection of suppliers
Third-party logistics 3PL
Diffuse AHP
TOPSIS
Ground transportation of merchandise
Multicriteria decision problems
Operational risk
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Revista EIA - 2020
id |
REIA2_afe55c152e5cdae316e9106859defc71 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.eia.edu.co:11190/5086 |
network_acronym_str |
REIA2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EIA . |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional |
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Diffuse AHP and TOPSIS for the selection of a third-party provider considering operational risk |
title |
AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional |
spellingShingle |
AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional Selección de proveedores Tercera parte logística – 3PL AHP difuso TOPSIS Transporte terrestre de mercancías Problemas de decisión multicriterio Riesgo operacional. Selection of suppliers Third-party logistics 3PL Diffuse AHP TOPSIS Ground transportation of merchandise Multicriteria decision problems Operational risk |
title_short |
AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional |
title_full |
AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional |
title_fullStr |
AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional |
title_full_unstemmed |
AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional |
title_sort |
AHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Gómez, Juan Carlos Osorio Tabares-Urrea, Natalia Ramírez-Flórez, Giselle |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gómez, Juan Carlos Osorio Tabares-Urrea, Natalia Ramírez-Flórez, Giselle |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Selección de proveedores Tercera parte logística – 3PL AHP difuso TOPSIS Transporte terrestre de mercancías Problemas de decisión multicriterio Riesgo operacional. |
topic |
Selección de proveedores Tercera parte logística – 3PL AHP difuso TOPSIS Transporte terrestre de mercancías Problemas de decisión multicriterio Riesgo operacional. Selection of suppliers Third-party logistics 3PL Diffuse AHP TOPSIS Ground transportation of merchandise Multicriteria decision problems Operational risk |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Selection of suppliers Third-party logistics 3PL Diffuse AHP TOPSIS Ground transportation of merchandise Multicriteria decision problems Operational risk |
description |
La contratación de proveedores de tercera parte logística (3PL) ha venido aumentando en los últimos años a nivel mundial y local. Uno de los servicios que más se terceriza es el transporte. La contratación de un proveedor de tercera parte para el transporte terrestre de mercancías es un problema de decisión multicriterio que debe ser abordado con herramientas adecuadas de manera que se garantice la mejor contratación posible considerando los criterios que la organización contratante considere para esta transacción. El presente trabajo propone un desarrollo multicriterio a partir de la utilización del proceso analítico jerárquico difuso (AHP difuso) y TOPSIS para la selección de un proveedor de tercera parte en el transporte terrestre de mercancía incluyendo el riesgo operacional como uno de los criterios de selección. La propuesta es aplicada para la selección de un transportador por parte de una empresa manufacturera del Valle del Cauca en Colombia. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-03 00:00:00 2022-06-17T20:20:24Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-03 00:00:00 2022-06-17T20:20:24Z |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-03 |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF |
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1794-1237 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.eia.edu.co/handle/11190/5086 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.24050/reia.v17i33.1329 |
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2463-0950 |
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v17i33.1329 |
identifier_str_mv |
1794-1237 10.24050/reia.v17i33.1329 2463-0950 |
url |
https://repository.eia.edu.co/handle/11190/5086 https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v17i33.1329 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Aguezzoul, A., 2011. Overview on supplier selection of goods versus 3PL selection. 2011 4th International Conference on Logistics, LOGISTIQUA’2011, pp.248–253. Aguezzoul, A., 2014. Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods. Omega, 49, pp.69–78. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048314000711 Akman, G. and Baynal, K., 2014. Logistics Service Provider Selection through an Integrated Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach. Journal of industrial Engineering, 2014. Aqlan, F. and Lam, S.S., 2015. A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, pp.54–63. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925527314003636 Arroyo, M., Gaytan, J. and Sierra, S., 2007. El proceso de toma de decisiones para la tercerización de funciones logísticas: prácticas mexicanas. ITESM, Toluca, (221), pp.1–28. Ayhan, M.B., 2013. A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Gearmotor Company. Internation Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC), 4(3), pp.11–23. Bansal, A. and Kumar, P., 2013. 3PL selection using hybrid model of AHP-PROMETHEE. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 14(3), p.373. Bansal, A., Kumar, P. and Issar, S., 2013. 3PL Selection : A Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pp.981–985. Bayazit, O. and Karpak, B., 2013. Selection of a third party logistics service provider for an aerospace company: An analytical decision aiding approach. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 15(4), pp.382–404. Chan, F.T.S. and Kumar, N., 2007. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35, pp.417–431. Chang, C.W., Wu, C.R. and Chen, H.C., 2008. Using expert technology to select unstable slicing machine to control wafer slicing quality via fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), pp. 2210–2220. Chang, D.-Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), pp.649–655. Chen, P.-S. and Wu, M.-T., 2013. A modified failure mode and effects analysis method for supplier selection problems in the supply chain risk environment: A case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(4), pp.634–642. Chunhao, L., Yonghe, S. and Yuanwei, D., 2008. Selection of 3PL service suppliers using a fuzzy analytic network process. Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2008, CCDC 2008, pp.2174–2179. Cooper, O., Tadikamalla, P. and Shang, J., 2012. Selection of a Third-Party Logistics Provider : Capturing the Interaction and In fl uence of Performance Metrics with the Analytical Network Process. 128(January), pp.115–128. Dadeviren, M. and Yuksel, I., 2008. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Information Sciences, 178(6), pp. 1717–1733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016 Daim, T.U., Udbye, A. and Balasubramanian, A., 2013. Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for selection of 3PL providers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), pp.28–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410381311287472 Datta, S., Samantra, C., Mahapatra, S.S., Mandal, G. and Majumdar, G., 2013. Appraisement and selection of third party logistics service providers in fuzzy environment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(4), pp.537–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2011-0087 Demirel, T. and Kahraman, C., 2008. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Application. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, 16, pp.53–83. Govindan, K. and Chaudhuri, A., 2015. Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Govindan, K. and Murugesan, P., 2011. Selection of third-party reverse logistics provider using fuzzy extent analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(1), pp.149–167. Hassanzadeh, S. and Razmi, J., 2009. An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management : A case study of ISP selection and evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), pp.8639–8648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.012 Ho, W., Dey, P.K. and Lockstrom, M., 2011. Strategic sourcing: a combined QFD and AHP approach in manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), pp.446–461. Ho, W., He, T., Lee, C.K.M. and Emrouznejad, A., 2012. Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), pp.10841–10850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.009 Hosseininasab, A. and Ahmadi, A., 2015. Selecting a supplier portfolio with value , development , and risk consideration. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(1), pp.146–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.02.041 Huo, B., Ye, Y. and Zhao, X., 2015. The impacts of trust and contracts on opportunism in the 3PL industry: The moderating role of demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, pp.160–170. Hwang, B.-N., Chen, T.-T. and Lin, J.T., 2016. 3PL selection criteria in integrated circuit manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(1), pp.103–124. Hwang, B.-N. and Shen, Y.-C., 2015. Decision Making for Third Party Logistics Supplier Selection in Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry: A Nonadditive Fuzzy Integral Approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015(Mcdm), pp.1–12. Jharkharia, S. and Shankar, R., 2007. Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, 35(3), pp.274–289. Karsak, E.E. and Dursun, M., 2014. Expert Systems with Applications An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Systems With Applications, [online] 41(16), pp.6995–7004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.020 Karthik B., Rakesh D. Raut, S.S. and Kamble, M.G.K. and S.J., 2015. Decision support system framework for performance based evaluation and ranking system of carry and forward agents. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal. Kilincci, O. and Onal, S.A., 2011. Expert Systems with Applications Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(8), pp.9656–9664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.159 Kull, T.J. and Talluri, S., 2008. A Supply Risk Reduction Model Using Integrated Multicriteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), pp.409–419. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4542978 Kumar, P. and Singh, R.K., 2012. A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(3), pp.287–303. Lee, a. H.I., 2009. A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), pp.2879–2893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045 Lee, C.K.M., Ching Yeung, Y. and Hong, Z., 2012. An integrated framework for outsourcing risk management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(4), pp.541–558. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/02635571211225477 Li, F., Li, L., Jin, C., Wang, R., Wang, H. and Yang, L., 2012. A 3PL supplier selection model based on fuzzy sets. Computers & Operations Research, 39(8), pp.1879–1884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.022 Liu, H.T. and Wang, W.K., 2009. An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), pp.4387–4398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.030 Manotas Duque, D.F., Osorio Gómez, J.C. and Rivera, L., 2016. Operational Risk Assessment in Third Party Logistics. Nekooie, M.A., Sheikhalishahi, M. and Hosnavi, R., 2015. Supplier selection considering strategic and operational risks: a combined qualitative and quantitative approach. Production Engineering, 9(5–6), pp.665–673.http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11740-015-0643-6 Osorio, J.C., Manotas, D.F. and García, J.L., 2016. Multicriteria 3PL selection with risk consideration. Research in Computing Science, 109, pp.51–57. Perçin, S., 2008. Fuzzy multi‐criteria risk‐benefit analysis of business process outsourcing (BPO). Information Management & Computer Security, 16(3), pp.213–234. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09685220810893180 Perçin, S., 2009. Evaluation of third-party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(5), pp.588–604. Pfohl, H., Gallus, P. and Thomas, D., 2011. Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(9), pp.839–859. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09600031111175816 Rattanawiboonsom, V., 2014. Effective Criteria for Selecting Third-Party logistics Providers : The Case of Thai Automotive Industry Rattanawiboonsom. 4(2), pp.196–205. Saaty, R.W., 1987. The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), pp.161–176. Sahu, N.K., Datta, S. and Mahapatra, S.S., 2015. Fuzzy based appraisement module for 3PL evaluation and selection. Saleh Fahed Alkhatib, R.D. and T.T.N., 2015. Logistics Service Providers (LSPs) evaluation and selection: Literature review and framework development. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal. Schoenherr, T., Rao Tummala, V.M. and Harrison, T.P., 2008. Assessing supply chain risks with the analytic hierarchy process: Providing decision support for the offshoring decision by a US manufacturing company. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14, pp.100–111. Senthil, S., Srirangacharyulu, B. and Ramesh, A., 2012. A decision making methodology for the selection of reverse logistics operating channels. Procedia Engineering, 38, pp.418–428. Shiang, K., Hung, H., Chuang, H. and Lin, W.H.C., 2011. An AHP-based approach to the selection of Third-Party Logistics. In: Decision Analysis Symposium. pp.1–11. Soh, S., 2010. A decision model for evaluating third-party logistics providers using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. African Journal of Business Management, 4(3), pp.339–349. http://academicjournals.org/AJBM/PDF/pdf2010/Mar/Soh.pdf Tang, C.S., 2006. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103, pp.451–488. Tang, O. and Nurmaya Musa, S., 2011. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), pp.25–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.013 Urbano Guerrero, L.C., Muñoz Marín, L.S. and Osorio Gómez, J.C., 2015. Selección multicriterio de aliado estratégico para la operación de carga terrestre. Estudios Gerenciales, 32(138), pp.35–43. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0123592315000601 Uygun, Ö., Kazamak, H. and Kahraman, Ü.A., 2014. An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 86, pp.137–146. Wang, Q. and Lv, H., 2015. Supplier Selection Group Decision Making in Logistics Service Value Cocreation Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2015, pp.1–10. Wu, T., Blackhurst, J. and Chidambaram, V., 2006. A model for inbound supply risk analysis. Computers in Industry, 57, pp.350–365. Zapata, J.A., 2011. Metodología para la implementación de tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones TIC’s para soportar una estrategia de cadena de suministro esbelta. TESIS DE MAESTRIA. |
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.eia.edu.co/index.php/reveia/article/download/1329/1276 |
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 33 , Año 2020 |
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
17 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
33 |
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
33007 pp. 1 |
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
17 |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista EIA |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista EIA - 2020 |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Revista EIA - 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Fondo Editorial EIA - Universidad EIA |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.eia.edu.co/index.php/reveia/article/view/1329 |
institution |
Universidad EIA . |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.eia.edu.co/bitstreams/d119bd45-d658-4990-a550-08f1b798fab2/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bfe936adc5e7373cfe07da9acb579422 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad EIA |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
_version_ |
1814100908571623424 |
spelling |
Gómez, Juan Carlos Osorio865e83fda0d572f6469848b1f4aa1b32300Tabares-Urrea, Nataliaeb7eda525b34cc21d39623cd407bc95b300Ramírez-Flórez, Giselle1b11b1ead22f473af3705bee67a111ad3002020-02-03 00:00:002022-06-17T20:20:24Z2020-02-03 00:00:002022-06-17T20:20:24Z2020-02-031794-1237https://repository.eia.edu.co/handle/11190/508610.24050/reia.v17i33.13292463-0950https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v17i33.1329La contratación de proveedores de tercera parte logística (3PL) ha venido aumentando en los últimos años a nivel mundial y local. Uno de los servicios que más se terceriza es el transporte. La contratación de un proveedor de tercera parte para el transporte terrestre de mercancías es un problema de decisión multicriterio que debe ser abordado con herramientas adecuadas de manera que se garantice la mejor contratación posible considerando los criterios que la organización contratante considere para esta transacción. El presente trabajo propone un desarrollo multicriterio a partir de la utilización del proceso analítico jerárquico difuso (AHP difuso) y TOPSIS para la selección de un proveedor de tercera parte en el transporte terrestre de mercancía incluyendo el riesgo operacional como uno de los criterios de selección. La propuesta es aplicada para la selección de un transportador por parte de una empresa manufacturera del Valle del Cauca en Colombia.Contracting third-party logistics providers (3PL) is an activity that has been increasing over the last years globally and locally. One of the most outsourced services is transportation. Hiring a 3PL for ground transportation of merchandise is a multi-criteria decision-based problem, which must be addressed with the right tools to guarantee the best possible hiring considering the criteria that the contracting organization considers the most important for this transaction. The present paper proposes a multi-criteria development based on the use of the diffuse hierarchical analytical process (diffuse AHP) and TOPSIS for the selection of a third-party supplier in ground transportation of merchandise, including operational risk as one of the selection criteria. The proposal is applied to the selection of a transporter by a manufacturing company in Valle del Cauca, Colombia.application/pdfspaFondo Editorial EIA - Universidad EIARevista EIA - 2020https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistas.eia.edu.co/index.php/reveia/article/view/1329Selección de proveedoresTercera parte logística – 3PLAHP difusoTOPSISTransporte terrestre de mercancíasProblemas de decisión multicriterioRiesgo operacional.Selection of suppliersThird-party logistics 3PLDiffuse AHPTOPSISGround transportation of merchandiseMulticriteria decision problemsOperational riskAHP difuso para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacionalDiffuse AHP and TOPSIS for the selection of a third-party provider considering operational riskArtículo de revistaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Aguezzoul, A., 2011. Overview on supplier selection of goods versus 3PL selection. 2011 4th International Conference on Logistics, LOGISTIQUA’2011, pp.248–253.Aguezzoul, A., 2014. Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods. Omega, 49, pp.69–78. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048314000711Akman, G. and Baynal, K., 2014. Logistics Service Provider Selection through an Integrated Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach. Journal of industrial Engineering, 2014.Aqlan, F. and Lam, S.S., 2015. A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, pp.54–63. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925527314003636Arroyo, M., Gaytan, J. and Sierra, S., 2007. El proceso de toma de decisiones para la tercerización de funciones logísticas: prácticas mexicanas. ITESM, Toluca, (221), pp.1–28.Ayhan, M.B., 2013. A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Gearmotor Company. Internation Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC), 4(3), pp.11–23.Bansal, A. and Kumar, P., 2013. 3PL selection using hybrid model of AHP-PROMETHEE. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 14(3), p.373.Bansal, A., Kumar, P. and Issar, S., 2013. 3PL Selection : A Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pp.981–985.Bayazit, O. and Karpak, B., 2013. Selection of a third party logistics service provider for an aerospace company: An analytical decision aiding approach. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 15(4), pp.382–404.Chan, F.T.S. and Kumar, N., 2007. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35, pp.417–431.Chang, C.W., Wu, C.R. and Chen, H.C., 2008. Using expert technology to select unstable slicing machine to control wafer slicing quality via fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), pp. 2210–2220.Chang, D.-Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), pp.649–655.Chen, P.-S. and Wu, M.-T., 2013. A modified failure mode and effects analysis method for supplier selection problems in the supply chain risk environment: A case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(4), pp.634–642.Chunhao, L., Yonghe, S. and Yuanwei, D., 2008. Selection of 3PL service suppliers using a fuzzy analytic network process. Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2008, CCDC 2008, pp.2174–2179.Cooper, O., Tadikamalla, P. and Shang, J., 2012. Selection of a Third-Party Logistics Provider : Capturing the Interaction and In fl uence of Performance Metrics with the Analytical Network Process. 128(January), pp.115–128.Dadeviren, M. and Yuksel, I., 2008. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Information Sciences, 178(6), pp. 1717–1733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016Daim, T.U., Udbye, A. and Balasubramanian, A., 2013. Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for selection of 3PL providers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), pp.28–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410381311287472Datta, S., Samantra, C., Mahapatra, S.S., Mandal, G. and Majumdar, G., 2013. Appraisement and selection of third party logistics service providers in fuzzy environment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(4), pp.537–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2011-0087Demirel, T. and Kahraman, C., 2008. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Application. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, 16, pp.53–83.Govindan, K. and Chaudhuri, A., 2015. Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.Govindan, K. and Murugesan, P., 2011. Selection of third-party reverse logistics provider using fuzzy extent analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(1), pp.149–167.Hassanzadeh, S. and Razmi, J., 2009. An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management : A case study of ISP selection and evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), pp.8639–8648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.012Ho, W., Dey, P.K. and Lockstrom, M., 2011. Strategic sourcing: a combined QFD and AHP approach in manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), pp.446–461.Ho, W., He, T., Lee, C.K.M. and Emrouznejad, A., 2012. Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), pp.10841–10850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.009Hosseininasab, A. and Ahmadi, A., 2015. Selecting a supplier portfolio with value , development , and risk consideration. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(1), pp.146–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.02.041Huo, B., Ye, Y. and Zhao, X., 2015. The impacts of trust and contracts on opportunism in the 3PL industry: The moderating role of demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, pp.160–170.Hwang, B.-N., Chen, T.-T. and Lin, J.T., 2016. 3PL selection criteria in integrated circuit manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(1), pp.103–124.Hwang, B.-N. and Shen, Y.-C., 2015. Decision Making for Third Party Logistics Supplier Selection in Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry: A Nonadditive Fuzzy Integral Approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015(Mcdm), pp.1–12. Jharkharia, S. and Shankar, R., 2007. Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, 35(3), pp.274–289.Karsak, E.E. and Dursun, M., 2014. Expert Systems with Applications An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Systems With Applications, [online] 41(16), pp.6995–7004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.020Karthik B., Rakesh D. Raut, S.S. and Kamble, M.G.K. and S.J., 2015. Decision support system framework for performance based evaluation and ranking system of carry and forward agents. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal.Kilincci, O. and Onal, S.A., 2011. Expert Systems with Applications Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(8), pp.9656–9664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.159Kull, T.J. and Talluri, S., 2008. A Supply Risk Reduction Model Using Integrated Multicriteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), pp.409–419. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4542978Kumar, P. and Singh, R.K., 2012. A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(3), pp.287–303.Lee, a. H.I., 2009. A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), pp.2879–2893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045Lee, C.K.M., Ching Yeung, Y. and Hong, Z., 2012. An integrated framework for outsourcing risk management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(4), pp.541–558. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/02635571211225477Li, F., Li, L., Jin, C., Wang, R., Wang, H. and Yang, L., 2012. A 3PL supplier selection model based on fuzzy sets. Computers & Operations Research, 39(8), pp.1879–1884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.022Liu, H.T. and Wang, W.K., 2009. An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), pp.4387–4398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.030Manotas Duque, D.F., Osorio Gómez, J.C. and Rivera, L., 2016. Operational Risk Assessment in Third Party Logistics.Nekooie, M.A., Sheikhalishahi, M. and Hosnavi, R., 2015. Supplier selection considering strategic and operational risks: a combined qualitative and quantitative approach. Production Engineering, 9(5–6), pp.665–673.http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11740-015-0643-6Osorio, J.C., Manotas, D.F. and García, J.L., 2016. Multicriteria 3PL selection with risk consideration. Research in Computing Science, 109, pp.51–57.Perçin, S., 2008. Fuzzy multi‐criteria risk‐benefit analysis of business process outsourcing (BPO). Information Management & Computer Security, 16(3), pp.213–234. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09685220810893180Perçin, S., 2009. Evaluation of third-party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(5), pp.588–604.Pfohl, H., Gallus, P. and Thomas, D., 2011. Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(9), pp.839–859. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09600031111175816Rattanawiboonsom, V., 2014. Effective Criteria for Selecting Third-Party logistics Providers : The Case of Thai Automotive Industry Rattanawiboonsom. 4(2), pp.196–205.Saaty, R.W., 1987. The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), pp.161–176.Sahu, N.K., Datta, S. and Mahapatra, S.S., 2015. Fuzzy based appraisement module for 3PL evaluation and selection.Saleh Fahed Alkhatib, R.D. and T.T.N., 2015. Logistics Service Providers (LSPs) evaluation and selection: Literature review and framework development. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal.Schoenherr, T., Rao Tummala, V.M. and Harrison, T.P., 2008. Assessing supply chain risks with the analytic hierarchy process: Providing decision support for the offshoring decision by a US manufacturing company. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14, pp.100–111.Senthil, S., Srirangacharyulu, B. and Ramesh, A., 2012. A decision making methodology for the selection of reverse logistics operating channels. Procedia Engineering, 38, pp.418–428.Shiang, K., Hung, H., Chuang, H. and Lin, W.H.C., 2011. An AHP-based approach to the selection of Third-Party Logistics. In: Decision Analysis Symposium. pp.1–11.Soh, S., 2010. A decision model for evaluating third-party logistics providers using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. African Journal of Business Management, 4(3), pp.339–349. http://academicjournals.org/AJBM/PDF/pdf2010/Mar/Soh.pdfTang, C.S., 2006. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103, pp.451–488.Tang, O. and Nurmaya Musa, S., 2011. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), pp.25–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.013Urbano Guerrero, L.C., Muñoz Marín, L.S. and Osorio Gómez, J.C., 2015. Selección multicriterio de aliado estratégico para la operación de carga terrestre. Estudios Gerenciales, 32(138), pp.35–43. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0123592315000601Uygun, Ö., Kazamak, H. and Kahraman, Ü.A., 2014. An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 86, pp.137–146.Wang, Q. and Lv, H., 2015. Supplier Selection Group Decision Making in Logistics Service Value Cocreation Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2015, pp.1–10.Wu, T., Blackhurst, J. and Chidambaram, V., 2006. A model for inbound supply risk analysis. Computers in Industry, 57, pp.350–365.Zapata, J.A., 2011. Metodología para la implementación de tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones TIC’s para soportar una estrategia de cadena de suministro esbelta. TESIS DE MAESTRIA.https://revistas.eia.edu.co/index.php/reveia/article/download/1329/1276Núm. 33 , Año 2020173333007 pp. 117Revista EIAPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2643https://repository.eia.edu.co/bitstreams/d119bd45-d658-4990-a550-08f1b798fab2/downloadbfe936adc5e7373cfe07da9acb579422MD5111190/5086oai:repository.eia.edu.co:11190/50862023-07-25 17:13:42.462https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Revista EIA - 2020metadata.onlyhttps://repository.eia.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad EIAbdigital@metabiblioteca.com |