Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia

Studies on the exploitation of trophic resources allow to establish interactions between predators and predator-prey, and this dynamic can present fl uctuations over time and space. We analysed stomach contents of 19 anuran species from tropical dry forests of Colombia, quantifi ed the overlap betwe...

Full description

Autores:
Blanco-Torres, Argelina
Duré, Marta I.
Argenis Bonilla, María
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8716
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8716
https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120201022
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Amphibia
Neotropical lowlands
Trophic overlap
Prey taxonomic
Resolution
Rights
openAccess
License
CC0 1.0 Universal
id RCUC2_ff4073252d688fa30b4502bb7a6bde22
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8716
network_acronym_str RCUC2
network_name_str REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia
title Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia
spellingShingle Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia
Amphibia
Neotropical lowlands
Trophic overlap
Prey taxonomic
Resolution
title_short Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia
title_full Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia
title_fullStr Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia
title_sort Anurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Blanco-Torres, Argelina
Duré, Marta I.
Argenis Bonilla, María
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Blanco-Torres, Argelina
Duré, Marta I.
Argenis Bonilla, María
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Amphibia
Neotropical lowlands
Trophic overlap
Prey taxonomic
Resolution
topic Amphibia
Neotropical lowlands
Trophic overlap
Prey taxonomic
Resolution
description Studies on the exploitation of trophic resources allow to establish interactions between predators and predator-prey, and this dynamic can present fl uctuations over time and space. We analysed stomach contents of 19 anuran species from tropical dry forests of Colombia, quantifi ed the overlap between species and identifi ed anuran trophic guilds. Most of the species were generalists in diet (89.5%), some with strong prey dominance and only two species were classifi ed as specialists. Two anurans guilds were identifi ed according to diet structure and habitat use: “ground foraging anurans, consuming Formicidae and Isoptera” and “arboreal ‘sit-and-wait’ predators, primarily consuming arachnids”. A considerable number of species did not clearly group in community trophic structure analysis. The level of taxonomic resolution with that preys are worked affects analysis of trophic niches segregation when analyzing regional and local patterns. Anuran species of tropical dry forest in the Colombian Caribbean display trophic resources partitioning at the level of species and/or morphospecies, as a mechanism of coexistence.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-16T15:16:57Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-16T15:16:57Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 0001-3765
1678-2690
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8716
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120201022
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv 0001-3765
1678-2690
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
url https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8716
https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120201022
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv ADAMS D. 2007. Organization of Plethodon Salamander Communities. Guild-Based Community Assembly. Ecology 88: 1292-1299.
ALBRECH M & GOTELLI N. 2001. Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecol 126: 134-141.
ALMEIDA B, SANTOS R, DOS SANTOS T, DE SOUZA M & MENIN M. 2019. Diet of five anuran species in a forest remnant in eastern Acre state, Brazilian Amazonia. Herpetol Notes 12: 945-952.
AMARASEKARE P. 2008. Spatial Dynamics of Foodwebs. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39: 479-500.
ANGULO A, RUEDA-ALMONACID J, RODRÍGUEZ-MAHECHA J & LA MARCA E. 2006. Técnicas de Inventario y Monitoreo para los Anfibios de la Región Tropical Andina. Bogotá: Panamericana Formas e Impresos S.A., 299 p.
ARMBRECHT I & ULLOA-CHACÓN P. 1999. Rareza y Diversidad de Hormigas en Fragmentos de Bosque Seco Colombianos y sus Matrices. Biotropica 3: 646-653.
ARNAU J. 1996. Métodos y técnicas avanzadas de análisis de datos en ciencias del comportamiento. Barcelona: Editorial Universitat de Barcelona, 366 p.
BENGTSSON J. 1998. Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 10: 191-199.
BENÍTEZ M, MIRAMONTES O & VALIENTE-BANUET A. 2014. Frontiers in Ecology, Evolution and Complexity. Mexico D.F.: EditoraC3, 283 p.
BIAVATI G, WIEDERHECKER H & COLLI G. 2004. Diet of Epipedobates flavopictus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) in a Neotropical Savanna. J Herpetol 38: 510-518.
BLANCO-TORRES A, BARUFFOL M, ACOSTA GALVIS A & NUÑEZ N. 2019. Rasgos funcionales de anfibios de Colombia. Bogotá D. C.: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt- Colciencias, 69 p.
BLANCO-TORRES A, DURÉ MI, BONILLA MA & CAGNOLO L. 2020. Predator-Prey Interactions in Tropical Dry Forest Anurans of the Colombian Caribbean: A Functional Approach. Biotropica 52: 730-737.
BRICEÑO-MÉNDEZ M, NARANJO E, PÉREZ-IRINEO G, CONTRERAS-PERERA Y, SANDOVAL-SERÉS E & HIDALGOMIHART MG. 2017. Richness and trophic guilds of carnivorous mammals in ejido Nuevo Becal, Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. Therya 8: 145-150.
BRUSSAARD L. 1998. Soil fauna, guilds, functional groups and ecosystem processes. Appl Soil Ecol 9: 123-135.
CAMERO-R E, DÍAZ J, SALINAS A, SALINAS A, TÉLLEZ L & AGUDELO D. 2005. Estudio de la artropofauna asociada a suelos de dos tipos de ecosistemas en la cuenca del río Cauca – Colombia. Acta Biol Colomb 10: 35-44.
CERON K, OLIVEIRA-SANTOS LGR, SOUZA CS, MESQUITA DO, CALDAS FL, ARAUJO AC & SANTANA DJ. 2019. Global patterns in anuran-prey networks: structure mediated by latitude. Oikos 128: 1537-1548.
CLARKE R. 1974. Food Habits of Toads. Genus Bufo (Amphibia: Bufonidae). Am Midl Nat 91: 140-147.
CLAVEL J, JULLIARD R & DEVICTOR V. 2011. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization?. Front Ecol Environ 9: 222-228.
CRUMP ML & SCOTT NJ. 1994. Visual encounter surveys. In: Heyer WR et al. (Eds), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Amphibians, Washington DC.: Smithsonian Institution Press, p. 84-92.
DUNHAM AE. 1983. Realized niche overlap, resource abundance and intensity of interspecific competition. In: Huey RD et al. (Eds), Lizards Ecology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 261-280.
DURÉ M. 1999. Interrelaciones en los nichos tróficos de dos especies sintópicas de la familia hylidae (anura) en un área subtropical de Argentina. Cuadernos Herpetol 13: 11-18.
DURÉ M & KEHR A. 1996. Bufo paracnemis (kururu Guazu. Sapo Buey. Sapo Rococo). DIET. Herpetol Rev 27: 138.
DURÉ MI, KEHR A & SCHAEFER E. 2009. Niche overlap and resource partitioning among five sympatric bufonids (Anura, Bufonidae) from northeastern Argentina. Phyllomedusa 8: 27-39.
ENTSMINGER GL. 2012. EcoSim Prefessional: Null modelling software for ecologists. Available from: http://www.garyentsminger.com/ecosim/index.htm » http://www.garyentsminger.com/ecosim/index.htm
ESCOBAR F. 1997. Estudio de la comunidad de coleópteros coprófagos (Scarabaeidae) en un remanente de bosque seco al norte del Tolima, Colombia. Caldasia 19: 419-430.
FEINSINGER P, SPEARS E & POOLE R. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62: 27-32.
FERNANDEZ F. 2003. Introducción a las Hormigas de la región Neotropical. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 404 p.
FONSECA-PÉREZ KA, MOLINA C & TÁRANO Z. 2017. Diet of Dendropsophus microcephalus and Scarthyla vigilans (Anura: Hylidae) at a locality in north-western Venezuela with notes on microhabitat occupation. Pap Avulsos Zool 57: 93-104.
GARCÍA-ROBLEDO C, KUPREWICZ EK, BAER CS, CLIFTON E, HERNÁNDEZ GG & WAGNER DL. 2020. The Erwin equation of biodiversity: From little steps to quantum leaps in the discovery of tropical insect diversity. Biotropica 52: 1-8.
GONZÁLEZ-DURAN G, GUTIÉRREZ-CÁRDENAS P & ESCOBAR LASSO S. 2012. Physalaemus pustulosus (Tungara Frog). DIET. Herpetol Rev 43: 124.
GOTELLI NJ & ELLISON AM. 2013. EcoSimR, Version 1.00. Available from: http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.html » http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.html
GOTELLI N & ENTSMINGER G. 2005. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Available from: <http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm>. » http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm>
GUISANDE GONZÁLEZ C, VAAMONDE LISTE A & BARREIRO FELPETO A. 2011. Tratamiento de datos con R, Statistica y SPSS. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos, 978 p.
HAMMER Ø, HARPER D & RYAN P. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 1-9.
HAWKINS CH & MACMAHON J. 1989. Guilds: The multiple meanings of a concept. Ann Rev Entomol 34: 423-451.
HURLBERT S. 1978. The Measurement of Niche Overlap and Some Relatives. Ecology 59: 67-77.
ISAACS P & HOYOS JM. 2010. Diet of the Cane Toad in Different Vegetation Covers in the Productive Systems of the Colombian Coffee Region. S Am J Herpetol 5: 45-50.
ISACCH J & BARG M. 2002. Are bufonid toads specialized ant-feeders? A case test from Argentinian flooding pampa. J Nat Hist 36: 2005-2012.
JUNKER R, BLÜTHGEN N, BREHM T, BINKENSTEIN J, PAULUS J & SCHAEFER HM. 2013. Specialization on traits as basis for the niche-breadth of flower visitors and as structuring mechanism of ecological networks. Funct Ecol 27: 329-341.
LE DT, ROWLEY J, TRAN DTA, VO TN & HOANG HD. 2019. Diet Composition and Overlap in a Montane Frog Community in Vietnam. Herpetol Conserv Biol 13: 205-215.
LEVINS R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 132 p.
LOPES GN, SOUZA-FILHO MF, GOTELLI NJ, LEMOS L, GODOY W & ZUCCHI R. 2015. Temporal Overlap and Co-Occurrence in a Guild of Sub-Tropical Tephritid Fruit Flies. PLoS ONE 10: e0132124.
LÓPEZ J, GHIRARDI R, SCARABOTTI P & MEDRANO M. 2007. Feeding ecology of Elachistocleis bicolor in a riparian locality of the middle Paraná River. Herpetol J 17: 48-53.
LUISELLI L & AMORI G. 2016. Diet. In: Dodd CK Jr. (Ed), Reptile Ecology and Conservation a handbook of techniques, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 97-109.
MAGURRAN AE. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. London: Blackwell Publishing Company, 215 p.
MARTÍNEZ RAMOS M. 2008. Grupos funcionales. In: Soberón J et al. (Eds), Capital natural de México, Vol. I. Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad, Mexico D.F.: Conabio, p. 365-412.
MICHELIN G, CERON K & SANTANA DJ. 2020. Prey availability influences the diet of Scinax fuscomarginatus in a Cerrado area, Central Brazil. Anim Biodivers Conserv 43: 169-175.
MORIN P. 1983. Predation, Competition, and the Composition of Larval Anuran Guilds. Ecol Monogr 53: 119-138.
MUÑOZ-GUERRERO J, SERRANO V & RAMÍREZ-PINILLA M. 2007. Uso de microhábitat, dieta y tiempo de actividad en cuatro especies simpátricas de ranas hílidas neotropicales (Anura: Hylidae). Caldasia 29: 413-425.
NARVÁEZ AE & RON SR. 2013. Feeding Habits of Engystomops pustulatus Anura. Leptodactylidae in Western Ecuador. S Am J Herpetol 8: 161-167.
PALACIOS-VARGAS J, CASTAÑO-MENESES G, GÓMEZ-ANAYA J, MARTÍNEZ-YRIZAR A, MEJÍA-RECAMIER B & MARTÍNEZ-SÁNCHEZ J. 2007. Litter and soil arthropods diversity and density in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in Western México. Biodivers Conserv 16: 3703-3717.
PARKER K, PARKER A & VALE T. 2001. Vertebrate Feeding Guilds in California’s Sierra Nevada. Relations to Environmental Condition and Change in Spatial Scale. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91: 245-262.
PARMELEE J. 1999. Trophic ecology of a tropical anuran assemblage. Sci Pap Univ Kansas Nat Hist Mus 11: 1-59.
PEREIRA NA, FRIZZAS MR & DE OLIVEIRA CM. 2011. Seasonality in insect abundance in the “Cerrado” of Goiás State, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 55: 79-87.
PERRY G & PIANKA E. 1997. Animal foraging. past, present and future. Trends Ecol Evol 12: 360-364.
PIANKA E. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4: 53-74.
PIATTI L & SOUZA F. 2011. Diet and resource partitioning among anurans in irrigated rice fields in Pantanal, Brazil. Braz J Biol 71: 653-661.
PIZANO C & GARCÍA H. 2014. El Bosque Seco Tropical en Colombia. Bogotá D.C: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 354 p.
RANGEL-CH J, LOWY-C P & SANCHEZ-C H. 1995. Región Caribe. In: Rangel-Ch JO (Ed), Colombia Diversidad Biótica I, Bogotá D.C.: Instituto de Ciencias Naturales-Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Inderena, p. 217-232.
RANVESTEL AW, LIPS K, PRINGLE C, WHILES M & BIXBY R. 2004. Neotropical tadpoles influence stream benthos: evidence for the ecological consequences of decline in amphibian populations. Freshw Biol 49: 274-285.
ROOT R. 1967. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-grey gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr 37: 317-350.
SANTANA AS & JUNCÁ F. 2007. Diet of Physalaemus cf. cicada (Leptodactylidae) and Bufo granulosus (Bufonidae) in a semideciduous forest. Braz J Biol 67: 125-131.
SILVA FR & ROSSA-FERES DC. 2010. Diet of anurans captured in forest remnants in southeastern Brazil. Rev Esp Herpetol 24: 5-17.
SIMBERLOFF D & DAYAN T. 1991. The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22: 115-143.
STUART SN, HOFFMANN M, CHANSON JS, COX NA, BERRIDGE RJ, RAMANI P & YOUNG BE. 2008. Threatened Amphibians of the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, Arlington: IUCN, Gland and Conservation International, 776 p.
TEIXEIRA R & RÖDDER D. 2007. Diet, foraging strategy and reproduction of Scinax argyreornatus (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926) from a mountainous region of the Atlantic rainforest in southeastern Brazil (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetozoa 19: 161-173.
TOFT C. 1980a. Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia 45: 131-141.
TOFT C. 1980b. Seasonal variation in populations of Panamanian litters frogs and their prey. a comparison of wetter and drier sites. Oecologia 47: 34-38.
TOFT C. 1981. Feeding Ecology of Panamanian litter anurans. Patterns in diet and foraging mode. J Herpetol 15: 139-144.
TRIPLEHORN C & JOHNSON N. 2005. Borror & DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole, 881 p.
VAN SLUYS M, SCHITTINI GM, MARRA RV, AZEVEDO ARM, VICENTE JJ & VRCIBRADIC D. 2006. Body size, diet and endoparasites of the microhylid frog Chiasmocleis capixaba in an Atlantic Forest areaof southern Bahiastate, Brazil. Braz J Biol 66: 167-173.
VARGAS-SALINAS F, MUÑOZ-AVILA JA & MORALES-PUENTES ME. 2019. Biología de los anfibios y reptiles en el bosque seco tropical del norte de Colombia. Tunja: Editorial UPTC, 484 p.
VITT L & CALDWELL J. 2009. Herpetology An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles, 3rd edition. San Diego: Elsevier Inc, 713 p.
VITT L & CALDWELL J. 2014. Herpetology An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles, 4th edition. San Diego: Academic Press, 749 p.
WELLS KD. 2007. The ecology and behaviour of amphibians. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 1162 p.
WHITFIELD M & DONELLY M. 2006. Ontogenetic and seasonal variation in the diets of a Costa Rican leaf-litter herpetofauna. J Trop Ecol 22: 409-417.
WILLIAMS S & HERO J. 1998. Rainforest Frogs of the Australian Wet Tropics. Guild Classification and the Ecological Similarity of Declining Species. Proc Biol Sci 265: 597-602.
WINEMILLER KO & PIANKA ER. 1990. Organization in natural assemblages of desert lizards and tropical fishes. Ecol Monogr 60: 27-55.
WOLFF M. 2006. Insectos de Colombia. Medellín: Multimpresos Ltda, 460 p.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Ecosystems
institution Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/fYKysHxjjWxQvTzLgnBnRHD/?lang=en
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/8914c968-2b3d-467f-ab82-6e4ec97321d0/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/347e90c4-7cae-4189-93a3-9fe2d870af90/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/b5185474-91fd-4c8f-8ce9-493806a4eba5/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/dea11865-ce59-4cc3-98b4-02887478b0f4/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/37ce40fc-9c43-4598-9c47-5d392fbdddd8/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 90dea93eb702a0b447574157f0259ae9
42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c
e30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9bad
86b064b66a0a7b42ed8f90a9da68c81a
48485427f37e191782ba5832ad7af92f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_ 1828166818826551296
spelling Blanco-Torres, ArgelinaDuré, Marta I.Argenis Bonilla, María2021-09-16T15:16:57Z2021-09-16T15:16:57Z20210001-37651678-2690https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8716https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120201022Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Studies on the exploitation of trophic resources allow to establish interactions between predators and predator-prey, and this dynamic can present fl uctuations over time and space. We analysed stomach contents of 19 anuran species from tropical dry forests of Colombia, quantifi ed the overlap between species and identifi ed anuran trophic guilds. Most of the species were generalists in diet (89.5%), some with strong prey dominance and only two species were classifi ed as specialists. Two anurans guilds were identifi ed according to diet structure and habitat use: “ground foraging anurans, consuming Formicidae and Isoptera” and “arboreal ‘sit-and-wait’ predators, primarily consuming arachnids”. A considerable number of species did not clearly group in community trophic structure analysis. The level of taxonomic resolution with that preys are worked affects analysis of trophic niches segregation when analyzing regional and local patterns. Anuran species of tropical dry forest in the Colombian Caribbean display trophic resources partitioning at the level of species and/or morphospecies, as a mechanism of coexistence.Blanco-Torres, Argelina-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-6961-6845-600Duré, Marta I.-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-7037-162X-600Argenis Bonilla, Maríaapplication/pdfengCorporación Universidad de la CostaCC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Ecosystemshttps://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/fYKysHxjjWxQvTzLgnBnRHD/?lang=enAmphibiaNeotropical lowlandsTrophic overlapPrey taxonomicResolutionAnurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of ColombiaArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionADAMS D. 2007. Organization of Plethodon Salamander Communities. Guild-Based Community Assembly. Ecology 88: 1292-1299.ALBRECH M & GOTELLI N. 2001. Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecol 126: 134-141.ALMEIDA B, SANTOS R, DOS SANTOS T, DE SOUZA M & MENIN M. 2019. Diet of five anuran species in a forest remnant in eastern Acre state, Brazilian Amazonia. Herpetol Notes 12: 945-952.AMARASEKARE P. 2008. Spatial Dynamics of Foodwebs. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39: 479-500.ANGULO A, RUEDA-ALMONACID J, RODRÍGUEZ-MAHECHA J & LA MARCA E. 2006. Técnicas de Inventario y Monitoreo para los Anfibios de la Región Tropical Andina. Bogotá: Panamericana Formas e Impresos S.A., 299 p.ARMBRECHT I & ULLOA-CHACÓN P. 1999. Rareza y Diversidad de Hormigas en Fragmentos de Bosque Seco Colombianos y sus Matrices. Biotropica 3: 646-653.ARNAU J. 1996. Métodos y técnicas avanzadas de análisis de datos en ciencias del comportamiento. Barcelona: Editorial Universitat de Barcelona, 366 p.BENGTSSON J. 1998. Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 10: 191-199.BENÍTEZ M, MIRAMONTES O & VALIENTE-BANUET A. 2014. Frontiers in Ecology, Evolution and Complexity. Mexico D.F.: EditoraC3, 283 p.BIAVATI G, WIEDERHECKER H & COLLI G. 2004. Diet of Epipedobates flavopictus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) in a Neotropical Savanna. J Herpetol 38: 510-518.BLANCO-TORRES A, BARUFFOL M, ACOSTA GALVIS A & NUÑEZ N. 2019. Rasgos funcionales de anfibios de Colombia. Bogotá D. C.: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt- Colciencias, 69 p.BLANCO-TORRES A, DURÉ MI, BONILLA MA & CAGNOLO L. 2020. Predator-Prey Interactions in Tropical Dry Forest Anurans of the Colombian Caribbean: A Functional Approach. Biotropica 52: 730-737.BRICEÑO-MÉNDEZ M, NARANJO E, PÉREZ-IRINEO G, CONTRERAS-PERERA Y, SANDOVAL-SERÉS E & HIDALGOMIHART MG. 2017. Richness and trophic guilds of carnivorous mammals in ejido Nuevo Becal, Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. Therya 8: 145-150.BRUSSAARD L. 1998. Soil fauna, guilds, functional groups and ecosystem processes. Appl Soil Ecol 9: 123-135.CAMERO-R E, DÍAZ J, SALINAS A, SALINAS A, TÉLLEZ L & AGUDELO D. 2005. Estudio de la artropofauna asociada a suelos de dos tipos de ecosistemas en la cuenca del río Cauca – Colombia. Acta Biol Colomb 10: 35-44.CERON K, OLIVEIRA-SANTOS LGR, SOUZA CS, MESQUITA DO, CALDAS FL, ARAUJO AC & SANTANA DJ. 2019. Global patterns in anuran-prey networks: structure mediated by latitude. Oikos 128: 1537-1548.CLARKE R. 1974. Food Habits of Toads. Genus Bufo (Amphibia: Bufonidae). Am Midl Nat 91: 140-147.CLAVEL J, JULLIARD R & DEVICTOR V. 2011. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization?. Front Ecol Environ 9: 222-228.CRUMP ML & SCOTT NJ. 1994. Visual encounter surveys. In: Heyer WR et al. (Eds), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Amphibians, Washington DC.: Smithsonian Institution Press, p. 84-92.DUNHAM AE. 1983. Realized niche overlap, resource abundance and intensity of interspecific competition. In: Huey RD et al. (Eds), Lizards Ecology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 261-280.DURÉ M. 1999. Interrelaciones en los nichos tróficos de dos especies sintópicas de la familia hylidae (anura) en un área subtropical de Argentina. Cuadernos Herpetol 13: 11-18.DURÉ M & KEHR A. 1996. Bufo paracnemis (kururu Guazu. Sapo Buey. Sapo Rococo). DIET. Herpetol Rev 27: 138.DURÉ MI, KEHR A & SCHAEFER E. 2009. Niche overlap and resource partitioning among five sympatric bufonids (Anura, Bufonidae) from northeastern Argentina. Phyllomedusa 8: 27-39.ENTSMINGER GL. 2012. EcoSim Prefessional: Null modelling software for ecologists. Available from: http://www.garyentsminger.com/ecosim/index.htm » http://www.garyentsminger.com/ecosim/index.htmESCOBAR F. 1997. Estudio de la comunidad de coleópteros coprófagos (Scarabaeidae) en un remanente de bosque seco al norte del Tolima, Colombia. Caldasia 19: 419-430.FEINSINGER P, SPEARS E & POOLE R. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62: 27-32.FERNANDEZ F. 2003. Introducción a las Hormigas de la región Neotropical. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 404 p.FONSECA-PÉREZ KA, MOLINA C & TÁRANO Z. 2017. Diet of Dendropsophus microcephalus and Scarthyla vigilans (Anura: Hylidae) at a locality in north-western Venezuela with notes on microhabitat occupation. Pap Avulsos Zool 57: 93-104.GARCÍA-ROBLEDO C, KUPREWICZ EK, BAER CS, CLIFTON E, HERNÁNDEZ GG & WAGNER DL. 2020. The Erwin equation of biodiversity: From little steps to quantum leaps in the discovery of tropical insect diversity. Biotropica 52: 1-8.GONZÁLEZ-DURAN G, GUTIÉRREZ-CÁRDENAS P & ESCOBAR LASSO S. 2012. Physalaemus pustulosus (Tungara Frog). DIET. Herpetol Rev 43: 124.GOTELLI NJ & ELLISON AM. 2013. EcoSimR, Version 1.00. Available from: http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.html » http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.htmlGOTELLI N & ENTSMINGER G. 2005. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Available from: <http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm>. » http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm>GUISANDE GONZÁLEZ C, VAAMONDE LISTE A & BARREIRO FELPETO A. 2011. Tratamiento de datos con R, Statistica y SPSS. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos, 978 p.HAMMER Ø, HARPER D & RYAN P. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 1-9.HAWKINS CH & MACMAHON J. 1989. Guilds: The multiple meanings of a concept. Ann Rev Entomol 34: 423-451.HURLBERT S. 1978. The Measurement of Niche Overlap and Some Relatives. Ecology 59: 67-77.ISAACS P & HOYOS JM. 2010. Diet of the Cane Toad in Different Vegetation Covers in the Productive Systems of the Colombian Coffee Region. S Am J Herpetol 5: 45-50.ISACCH J & BARG M. 2002. Are bufonid toads specialized ant-feeders? A case test from Argentinian flooding pampa. J Nat Hist 36: 2005-2012.JUNKER R, BLÜTHGEN N, BREHM T, BINKENSTEIN J, PAULUS J & SCHAEFER HM. 2013. Specialization on traits as basis for the niche-breadth of flower visitors and as structuring mechanism of ecological networks. Funct Ecol 27: 329-341.LE DT, ROWLEY J, TRAN DTA, VO TN & HOANG HD. 2019. Diet Composition and Overlap in a Montane Frog Community in Vietnam. Herpetol Conserv Biol 13: 205-215.LEVINS R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 132 p.LOPES GN, SOUZA-FILHO MF, GOTELLI NJ, LEMOS L, GODOY W & ZUCCHI R. 2015. Temporal Overlap and Co-Occurrence in a Guild of Sub-Tropical Tephritid Fruit Flies. PLoS ONE 10: e0132124.LÓPEZ J, GHIRARDI R, SCARABOTTI P & MEDRANO M. 2007. Feeding ecology of Elachistocleis bicolor in a riparian locality of the middle Paraná River. Herpetol J 17: 48-53.LUISELLI L & AMORI G. 2016. Diet. In: Dodd CK Jr. (Ed), Reptile Ecology and Conservation a handbook of techniques, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 97-109.MAGURRAN AE. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. London: Blackwell Publishing Company, 215 p.MARTÍNEZ RAMOS M. 2008. Grupos funcionales. In: Soberón J et al. (Eds), Capital natural de México, Vol. I. Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad, Mexico D.F.: Conabio, p. 365-412.MICHELIN G, CERON K & SANTANA DJ. 2020. Prey availability influences the diet of Scinax fuscomarginatus in a Cerrado area, Central Brazil. Anim Biodivers Conserv 43: 169-175.MORIN P. 1983. Predation, Competition, and the Composition of Larval Anuran Guilds. Ecol Monogr 53: 119-138.MUÑOZ-GUERRERO J, SERRANO V & RAMÍREZ-PINILLA M. 2007. Uso de microhábitat, dieta y tiempo de actividad en cuatro especies simpátricas de ranas hílidas neotropicales (Anura: Hylidae). Caldasia 29: 413-425.NARVÁEZ AE & RON SR. 2013. Feeding Habits of Engystomops pustulatus Anura. Leptodactylidae in Western Ecuador. S Am J Herpetol 8: 161-167.PALACIOS-VARGAS J, CASTAÑO-MENESES G, GÓMEZ-ANAYA J, MARTÍNEZ-YRIZAR A, MEJÍA-RECAMIER B & MARTÍNEZ-SÁNCHEZ J. 2007. Litter and soil arthropods diversity and density in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in Western México. Biodivers Conserv 16: 3703-3717.PARKER K, PARKER A & VALE T. 2001. Vertebrate Feeding Guilds in California’s Sierra Nevada. Relations to Environmental Condition and Change in Spatial Scale. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91: 245-262.PARMELEE J. 1999. Trophic ecology of a tropical anuran assemblage. Sci Pap Univ Kansas Nat Hist Mus 11: 1-59.PEREIRA NA, FRIZZAS MR & DE OLIVEIRA CM. 2011. Seasonality in insect abundance in the “Cerrado” of Goiás State, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 55: 79-87.PERRY G & PIANKA E. 1997. Animal foraging. past, present and future. Trends Ecol Evol 12: 360-364.PIANKA E. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4: 53-74.PIATTI L & SOUZA F. 2011. Diet and resource partitioning among anurans in irrigated rice fields in Pantanal, Brazil. Braz J Biol 71: 653-661.PIZANO C & GARCÍA H. 2014. El Bosque Seco Tropical en Colombia. Bogotá D.C: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 354 p.RANGEL-CH J, LOWY-C P & SANCHEZ-C H. 1995. Región Caribe. In: Rangel-Ch JO (Ed), Colombia Diversidad Biótica I, Bogotá D.C.: Instituto de Ciencias Naturales-Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Inderena, p. 217-232.RANVESTEL AW, LIPS K, PRINGLE C, WHILES M & BIXBY R. 2004. Neotropical tadpoles influence stream benthos: evidence for the ecological consequences of decline in amphibian populations. Freshw Biol 49: 274-285.ROOT R. 1967. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-grey gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr 37: 317-350.SANTANA AS & JUNCÁ F. 2007. Diet of Physalaemus cf. cicada (Leptodactylidae) and Bufo granulosus (Bufonidae) in a semideciduous forest. Braz J Biol 67: 125-131.SILVA FR & ROSSA-FERES DC. 2010. Diet of anurans captured in forest remnants in southeastern Brazil. Rev Esp Herpetol 24: 5-17.SIMBERLOFF D & DAYAN T. 1991. The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22: 115-143.STUART SN, HOFFMANN M, CHANSON JS, COX NA, BERRIDGE RJ, RAMANI P & YOUNG BE. 2008. Threatened Amphibians of the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, Arlington: IUCN, Gland and Conservation International, 776 p.TEIXEIRA R & RÖDDER D. 2007. Diet, foraging strategy and reproduction of Scinax argyreornatus (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926) from a mountainous region of the Atlantic rainforest in southeastern Brazil (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetozoa 19: 161-173.TOFT C. 1980a. Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia 45: 131-141.TOFT C. 1980b. Seasonal variation in populations of Panamanian litters frogs and their prey. a comparison of wetter and drier sites. Oecologia 47: 34-38.TOFT C. 1981. Feeding Ecology of Panamanian litter anurans. Patterns in diet and foraging mode. J Herpetol 15: 139-144.TRIPLEHORN C & JOHNSON N. 2005. Borror & DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole, 881 p.VAN SLUYS M, SCHITTINI GM, MARRA RV, AZEVEDO ARM, VICENTE JJ & VRCIBRADIC D. 2006. Body size, diet and endoparasites of the microhylid frog Chiasmocleis capixaba in an Atlantic Forest areaof southern Bahiastate, Brazil. Braz J Biol 66: 167-173.VARGAS-SALINAS F, MUÑOZ-AVILA JA & MORALES-PUENTES ME. 2019. Biología de los anfibios y reptiles en el bosque seco tropical del norte de Colombia. Tunja: Editorial UPTC, 484 p.VITT L & CALDWELL J. 2009. Herpetology An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles, 3rd edition. San Diego: Elsevier Inc, 713 p.VITT L & CALDWELL J. 2014. Herpetology An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles, 4th edition. San Diego: Academic Press, 749 p.WELLS KD. 2007. The ecology and behaviour of amphibians. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 1162 p.WHITFIELD M & DONELLY M. 2006. Ontogenetic and seasonal variation in the diets of a Costa Rican leaf-litter herpetofauna. J Trop Ecol 22: 409-417.WILLIAMS S & HERO J. 1998. Rainforest Frogs of the Australian Wet Tropics. Guild Classification and the Ecological Similarity of Declining Species. Proc Biol Sci 265: 597-602.WINEMILLER KO & PIANKA ER. 1990. Organization in natural assemblages of desert lizards and tropical fishes. Ecol Monogr 60: 27-55.WOLFF M. 2006. Insectos de Colombia. Medellín: Multimpresos Ltda, 460 p.PublicationORIGINALAnurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia.pdfAnurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia.pdfapplication/pdf2370292https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/8914c968-2b3d-467f-ab82-6e4ec97321d0/download90dea93eb702a0b447574157f0259ae9MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/347e90c4-7cae-4189-93a3-9fe2d870af90/download42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83196https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/b5185474-91fd-4c8f-8ce9-493806a4eba5/downloade30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9badMD53THUMBNAILAnurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia.pdf.jpgAnurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg54183https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/dea11865-ce59-4cc3-98b4-02887478b0f4/download86b064b66a0a7b42ed8f90a9da68c81aMD54TEXTAnurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia.pdf.txtAnurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombia.pdf.txttext/plain59541https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/37ce40fc-9c43-4598-9c47-5d392fbdddd8/download48485427f37e191782ba5832ad7af92fMD5511323/8716oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/87162024-09-17 14:13:38.431http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/CC0 1.0 Universalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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

Publicaciones similares