Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real

Introducción: En este artículo se describe la simulación híbrida en tiempo real (RTHS) de un amortiguador no lineal de masa sintonizado (NTMD) y se comparan los resultados con los obtenidos de ensayos experimentales convencionales de una estructura a cortante, de un piso, con el NTMD. Objetivo: El...

Full description

Autores:: Riascos-González, Carlos Andrés
Thomson, Peter
Dyke, Shirley

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Corporación Universidad de la Costa

Repositorio:: REDICUC - Repositorio CUC

Idioma:: spa

id	RCUC2_fef2d0410fbbe55377e5bf77d5df6fd6
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/12213
network_acronym_str	RCUC2
network_name_str	REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Performance Evaluation of a Non-linear Tuned Mass Damper Through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation
title	Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real
spellingShingle	Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real non-linear tuned mass damper real-time hybrid simulation shaking table damper-structure interaction structural control amortiguador no lineal de masa sintonizado simulación híbrida en tiempo real mesa vibratoria interacción amortiguador-estructura control estructural
title_short	Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real
title_full	Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real
title_fullStr	Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real
title_sort	Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Riascos-González, Carlos Andrés Thomson, Peter Dyke, Shirley
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Riascos-González, Carlos Andrés Thomson, Peter Dyke, Shirley
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	non-linear tuned mass damper real-time hybrid simulation shaking table damper-structure interaction structural control
topic	non-linear tuned mass damper real-time hybrid simulation shaking table damper-structure interaction structural control amortiguador no lineal de masa sintonizado simulación híbrida en tiempo real mesa vibratoria interacción amortiguador-estructura control estructural
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	amortiguador no lineal de masa sintonizado simulación híbrida en tiempo real mesa vibratoria interacción amortiguador-estructura control estructural
description	Introducción: En este artículo se describe la simulación híbrida en tiempo real (RTHS) de un amortiguador no lineal de masa sintonizado (NTMD) y se comparan los resultados con los obtenidos de ensayos experimentales convencionales de una estructura a cortante, de un piso, con el NTMD. Objetivo: El objetivo de este artículo es valuar la efectividad de una RTHS para estimar el desempeño de un NTMD. Metodología: La metodología consistió de las siguientes tres etapas: identificación de la estructura principal, diseño del NTMD y evaluación experimental del sistema estructura-NTMD. Para la tercera etapa, se utilizaron RTHS y ensayos sobre mesa vibratoria. Resultados: Los resultados de los ensayos en mesa vibratoria demostraron que el NTMD redujo el 77% y 63% de las aceleraciones pico y RMS de la estructura principal, con respecto a la estructura sin control. Los valores de estas reducciones obtenidos con RTHS fueron 73% y 63%, respectivamente. Los índices de precisión del sistema de transferencia correspondieron a una amplitud generalizada de 1.01 y un retraso de 2 ms. Conclusiones: el NTMD, con una razón de masas del 10%, alcanzó reducciones superiores al 60% de la respuesta estructural. La RTHS y el ensayo de mesa vibratoria demostraron que el sistema estructura-NTMD tuvo solo un pico en la respuesta en frecuencia. El ruido en la retroalimentación de la RTHS aumentó el grado de amortiguamiento de la estructura controlada. Finalmente, los resultados experimentales demostraron que la RTHS es una técnica que predice efectivamente la aceleración RMS del sistema estructura-NTMD y puede sobreestimar ligeramente su aceleración pico.
publishDate	2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01 00:00:00 2024-04-09T20:15:13Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01 00:00:00 2024-04-09T20:15:13Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0122-6517
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12213
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.15.2.2019.02
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.17981/ingecuc.15.2.2019.02
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2382-4700
identifier_str_mv	0122-6517 10.17981/ingecuc.15.2.2019.02 2382-4700
url	https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12213 https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.15.2.2019.02
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Inge Cuc
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	J. A. Oviedo and M. D. P. Duque, “Status of seismic response control techniques in Colombia,” Rev. EIA, vol. 2009, no. 12, pp. 113–124, Jan. 2009. A. Filiatrault and C. Christopoulos, Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 2006. C. Sun, S. Nagarajaiah and A. J. Dick, “Experimental investigation of vibration attenuation using nonlinear tuned mass damper and pendulum tuned mass damper in parallel,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol 78, no. 4, pp. 2699–2715, Aug. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1619-3 G. Gatti, “Fundamental insight on the performance of a nonlinear tuned mass damper,” Meccanica, vol. 53, no. 1–2, pp. 111–123, Jul. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0723-0 V. Gattulli and A. Luongo, “Nonlinear tuned mass damper for self-excited oscillations,” Wind Struct., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 251–264, Aug. 2004. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2004.7.4.251 Y. R. Wang, C. K. Feng and S. Y. Chen, “Damping effects of linear and nonlinear tuned mass dampers on nonlinear hinged-hinged beam,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 430, pp. 150–173, Sep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.05.033 B. Farshi and A. Assadi, “Development of a chaotic nonlinear tuned mass damper for optimal vibration response,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4514–4523, Nov. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.02.011 K.-C. Chen, J.-H. Wang, B.-S. Huang, C.-C. Liu, and W.-G. Huang, “Vibrations of the TAIPEI 101 skyscraper caused by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Japan,” Earth, Planets Sp., vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1277–1286, Jan. 2013. P. V. B. Guimarães, M. V. G. de Morais and S. M. Avila, “Tuned Mass Damper Inverted Pendulum to Reduce Offshore Wind Turbine Vibrations,” in Vibration Engineering and Technology of Machinerym, J. K. Sinha, Ed., Mánchester: University of Manchester, UK., 2015, pp. 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09918-7_34 G. Mosqueda, B. Stojadinovic and S. A. Mahin, “Energy-based procedure for monitoring experimental errors in hybrid simulations,” in 8NCEE, 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference, San Francisco, CA, Apr. 18–22 2006, pp. 1535–1544 G. Mosqueda, B. Stojadinovic and S. A. Mahin, “Real-time error monitoring for hybrid simulation. Part I: methodology and experimental verification,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 133, no. 8, pp. 1100–1108, Aug. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:8(1100) A. Maghareh, A. I. Ozdagli and S. J. Dyke, “Modeling and implementation of distributed real-time hybrid simulation,” in NCEE 2014, 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska, Jul. 21–25, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4231/D32B8VC4F Y. Qian, G. Ou, A. Maghareh and S. J. Dyke, “Parametric identification of a servo-hydraulic actuator for real-time hybrid simulation,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 48, no. 1–2, pp. 260–273, Oct. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.03.001 M. L. Brodersen, G. Ou, J. Høgsberg and S. Dyke, “Analysis of hybrid viscous damper by real time hybrid simulations,” Eng. Struct., vol. 126, pp. 675–688, Nov. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.020 R. Zhang, P. V Lauenstein and B. M. Phillips, “Real-time hybrid simulation of a shear building with a uni-axial shake table,” Eng. Struct., vol. 119, pp. 217–229, Jul. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.022 J. T. Wang, Y. Gui, F. Zhu, F. Jin and M. X. Zhou, “Real-time hybrid simulation of multi-story structures installed with tuned liquid damper,” Struct. Control Heal. Monit., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1015–1031, Dec. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1822 F. Zhu, J. T. Wang, F. Jin and L. Q. Lu, “Real-time hybrid simulation of full-scale tuned liquid column dampers to control multi-order modal responses of structures,” Eng. Struct., vol. 138, pp. 74–90, May. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.004 C. Chen, J. M. Ricles, T. L. Karavasilis, Y. Chae and R. Sause, “Evaluation of a real-time hybrid simulation system for performance evaluation of structures with rate dependent devices subjected to seismic loading,” Eng. Struct., vol. 35, pp. 71–82, Feb. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.006 M. S. Williams and A. Blakeborough, “Laboratory testing of structures under dynamic loads: An introductory review,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 359, no. 1786. pp. 1651–1669, Sep. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.0860 W. J. Chung, C. B. Yun, N. S. Kim and J. W. Seo, “Shaking table and pseudodynamic tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of base-isolated structures,” Eng. Struct., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 365–379, Apr. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00211-3 G. Ou, S. J. Dyke and A. Prakash, “Real time hybrid simulation with online model updating: An analysis of accuracy,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 84, Part. B. pp. 223–240, Feb. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.015 X. Gao, N. Castaneda and S. J. Dyke, “Real time hybrid simulation: From dynamic system, motion control to experimental error,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 815–832, Aug. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2246 G. Ou, A. Prakash and S. Dyke, “Modified Runge-Kutta Integration Algorithm for Improved Stability and Accuracy in Real Time Hybrid Simulation,” J. Earthq. Eng., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1112–1139, Jun. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1027018. G. Ou, A. I. Ozdagli, S. J. Dyke and B. Wu, “Robust integrated actuator control: Experimental verification and real-time hybrid-simulation implementation,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 441–460, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2479 A. Friedman et al., “Large-scale real-time hybrid simulation for evaluation of advanced damping system performance,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 141, no. 6, p. 04014150, Jul. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X. 0001093 C. Riascos, J. Marulanda and P. Thomson, “Semi-active tuned liquid column damper implementation with real-time hybrid simulations,” Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2016, vol. 9799, p. 979919, Apr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2220004 G. Mosqueda, B. Stojadinović and S. A. Mahin, “Implementation and accuracy of continuous hybrid simulation with geographically distributed substructures,” Earthq. Eng. Res. Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, Tech. Rep. UCB/EERC, 2005. R. Christenson et al., “Hybrid Simulation: A Discussion of Current Assessment Measures,” Earthq. Eng. Res., NSF, NEES, West Lafayette, Indiana, Tech. Rep. Cmmi, 2014. A. Y. Tuan and G. Q. Shang, “Vibration control in a 101-storey building using a tuned mass damper,” J. Appl. Sci. Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 141–156, Jan. 2014. https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2014.17.2.05 R. N. Jabary and G. S. P. Madabhushi, “Tuned Mass Damper Positioning Effects on the Seismic Response of a Soil-MDOF-Structure System,” J. Earthq. Eng., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 281–302, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1224743 J. L. Almazán, J. C. De la Llera, J. A. Inaudi, D. López-García and L. E. Izquierdo, “A bidirectional and homogeneous tuned mass damper: A new device for passive control of vibrations,” Eng. Struct., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1548–1560, Jul. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.005 F. Weber, C. Boston and M. Maślanka, “An adaptive tuned mass damper based on the emulation of positive and negative stiffness with an MR damper,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 20, no. 1, Dec. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/1/015012 D. C. Johnson, “Mechanical Vibrations,” Nature, vol. 169, no. 641, pp. 271–288, Abr. 1952. https://doi.org/10.1038/169641b0 T. T. Soong and G. F. Dargush, Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering, New York, USA: MCEER, 1997.
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	22
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	11
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	2
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	15
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/download/1963/2332 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/download/1963/2378 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/download/1963/2381
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 2 , Año 2019 : (Julio-Diciembre)
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	INGE CUC - 2019
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	INGE CUC - 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf text/html application/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/view/1963
institution	Corporación Universidad de la Costa
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/667eb890-fbd6-47c1-b8af-6f32f4a1b563/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	a049a57e60325dc3ca92c4b42f1ef10c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_	1811760854898573312
spelling	Riascos-González, Carlos AndrésThomson, PeterDyke, Shirley2019-07-01 00:00:002024-04-09T20:15:13Z2019-07-01 00:00:002024-04-09T20:15:13Z2019-07-010122-6517https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12213https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.15.2.2019.0210.17981/ingecuc.15.2.2019.022382-4700Introducción: En este artículo se describe la simulación híbrida en tiempo real (RTHS) de un amortiguador no lineal de masa sintonizado (NTMD) y se comparan los resultados con los obtenidos de ensayos experimentales convencionales de una estructura a cortante, de un piso, con el NTMD. Objetivo: El objetivo de este artículo es valuar la efectividad de una RTHS para estimar el desempeño de un NTMD. Metodología: La metodología consistió de las siguientes tres etapas: identificación de la estructura principal, diseño del NTMD y evaluación experimental del sistema estructura-NTMD. Para la tercera etapa, se utilizaron RTHS y ensayos sobre mesa vibratoria. Resultados: Los resultados de los ensayos en mesa vibratoria demostraron que el NTMD redujo el 77% y 63% de las aceleraciones pico y RMS de la estructura principal, con respecto a la estructura sin control. Los valores de estas reducciones obtenidos con RTHS fueron 73% y 63%, respectivamente. Los índices de precisión del sistema de transferencia correspondieron a una amplitud generalizada de 1.01 y un retraso de 2 ms. Conclusiones: el NTMD, con una razón de masas del 10%, alcanzó reducciones superiores al 60% de la respuesta estructural. La RTHS y el ensayo de mesa vibratoria demostraron que el sistema estructura-NTMD tuvo solo un pico en la respuesta en frecuencia. El ruido en la retroalimentación de la RTHS aumentó el grado de amortiguamiento de la estructura controlada. Finalmente, los resultados experimentales demostraron que la RTHS es una técnica que predice efectivamente la aceleración RMS del sistema estructura-NTMD y puede sobreestimar ligeramente su aceleración pico.Introduction: In this paper, the real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) of a non-linear tuned mass damper (NTMD) is described, and the results are compared with those obtained from conventional experimental tests of a one-story shear frame structure with the NTMD. Objective: The aim of this article is to evaluate the effectiveness of a RTHS for the estimation of the performance of a NTMD. Method: the methodology consisted of the following three stages: main structure identification, NTMD design, and experimental evaluation of the structure-NTMD system. For the third stage, both real-time hybrid simulations and shaking table testing were conducted.&nbsp; Results:&nbsp; results from shaking table tests demonstrate that the NTMD reduced the peak and RMS accelerations of the main structure 77% and 63% respectively, with respect to the structure without control. The values of these reductions obtained with RTHS were 73% and 63%, respectively. The assessment indices of the transfer system correspond to a generalized amplitude of 1.01 and a delay of 2 ms.&nbsp; Conclusions: the NTMD, with a 10% mass ratio, achieved reductions greater than 60% in the acceleration response of the structure. The RTHS and shaking table test indicated that the structure-NTMD system had only one peak in the frequency response. Noise in RTHS feedback increased the damping level of the controlled structure. Finally, experimental results showed that the RTHS is a technique that predicts effectively the RMS acceleration of the structure-NTMD system, and it can slightly overestimate its peak acceleration.application/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlspaUniversidad de la CostaINGE CUC - 2019http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/view/1963non-linear tuned mass damperreal-time hybrid simulationshaking tabledamper-structure interactionstructural controlamortiguador no lineal de masa sintonizadosimulación híbrida en tiempo realmesa vibratoriainteracción amortiguador-estructuracontrol estructuralEvaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo realPerformance Evaluation of a Non-linear Tuned Mass Damper Through Real-Time Hybrid SimulationArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Inge Cuc J. A. Oviedo and M. D. P. Duque, “Status of seismic response control techniques in Colombia,” Rev. EIA, vol. 2009, no. 12, pp. 113–124, Jan. 2009. A. Filiatrault and C. Christopoulos, Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 2006. C. Sun, S. Nagarajaiah and A. J. Dick, “Experimental investigation of vibration attenuation using nonlinear tuned mass damper and pendulum tuned mass damper in parallel,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol 78, no. 4, pp. 2699–2715, Aug. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1619-3 G. Gatti, “Fundamental insight on the performance of a nonlinear tuned mass damper,” Meccanica, vol. 53, no. 1–2, pp. 111–123, Jul. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0723-0 V. Gattulli and A. Luongo, “Nonlinear tuned mass damper for self-excited oscillations,” Wind Struct., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 251–264, Aug. 2004. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2004.7.4.251 Y. R. Wang, C. K. Feng and S. Y. Chen, “Damping effects of linear and nonlinear tuned mass dampers on nonlinear hinged-hinged beam,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 430, pp. 150–173, Sep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.05.033 B. Farshi and A. Assadi, “Development of a chaotic nonlinear tuned mass damper for optimal vibration response,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4514–4523, Nov. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.02.011 K.-C. Chen, J.-H. Wang, B.-S. Huang, C.-C. Liu, and W.-G. Huang, “Vibrations of the TAIPEI 101 skyscraper caused by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Japan,” Earth, Planets Sp., vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1277–1286, Jan. 2013. P. V. B. Guimarães, M. V. G. de Morais and S. M. Avila, “Tuned Mass Damper Inverted Pendulum to Reduce Offshore Wind Turbine Vibrations,” in Vibration Engineering and Technology of Machinerym, J. K. Sinha, Ed., Mánchester: University of Manchester, UK., 2015, pp. 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09918-7_34 G. Mosqueda, B. Stojadinovic and S. A. Mahin, “Energy-based procedure for monitoring experimental errors in hybrid simulations,” in 8NCEE, 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference, San Francisco, CA, Apr. 18–22 2006, pp. 1535–1544 G. Mosqueda, B. Stojadinovic and S. A. Mahin, “Real-time error monitoring for hybrid simulation. Part I: methodology and experimental verification,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 133, no. 8, pp. 1100–1108, Aug. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:8(1100) A. Maghareh, A. I. Ozdagli and S. J. Dyke, “Modeling and implementation of distributed real-time hybrid simulation,” in NCEE 2014, 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska, Jul. 21–25, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4231/D32B8VC4F Y. Qian, G. Ou, A. Maghareh and S. J. Dyke, “Parametric identification of a servo-hydraulic actuator for real-time hybrid simulation,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 48, no. 1–2, pp. 260–273, Oct. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.03.001 M. L. Brodersen, G. Ou, J. Høgsberg and S. Dyke, “Analysis of hybrid viscous damper by real time hybrid simulations,” Eng. Struct., vol. 126, pp. 675–688, Nov. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.020 R. Zhang, P. V Lauenstein and B. M. Phillips, “Real-time hybrid simulation of a shear building with a uni-axial shake table,” Eng. Struct., vol. 119, pp. 217–229, Jul. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.022 J. T. Wang, Y. Gui, F. Zhu, F. Jin and M. X. Zhou, “Real-time hybrid simulation of multi-story structures installed with tuned liquid damper,” Struct. Control Heal. Monit., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1015–1031, Dec. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1822 F. Zhu, J. T. Wang, F. Jin and L. Q. Lu, “Real-time hybrid simulation of full-scale tuned liquid column dampers to control multi-order modal responses of structures,” Eng. Struct., vol. 138, pp. 74–90, May. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.004 C. Chen, J. M. Ricles, T. L. Karavasilis, Y. Chae and R. Sause, “Evaluation of a real-time hybrid simulation system for performance evaluation of structures with rate dependent devices subjected to seismic loading,” Eng. Struct., vol. 35, pp. 71–82, Feb. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.006 M. S. Williams and A. Blakeborough, “Laboratory testing of structures under dynamic loads: An introductory review,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 359, no. 1786. pp. 1651–1669, Sep. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.0860 W. J. Chung, C. B. Yun, N. S. Kim and J. W. Seo, “Shaking table and pseudodynamic tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of base-isolated structures,” Eng. Struct., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 365–379, Apr. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00211-3 G. Ou, S. J. Dyke and A. Prakash, “Real time hybrid simulation with online model updating: An analysis of accuracy,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 84, Part. B. pp. 223–240, Feb. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.015 X. Gao, N. Castaneda and S. J. Dyke, “Real time hybrid simulation: From dynamic system, motion control to experimental error,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 815–832, Aug. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2246 G. Ou, A. Prakash and S. Dyke, “Modified Runge-Kutta Integration Algorithm for Improved Stability and Accuracy in Real Time Hybrid Simulation,” J. Earthq. Eng., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1112–1139, Jun. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1027018. G. Ou, A. I. Ozdagli, S. J. Dyke and B. Wu, “Robust integrated actuator control: Experimental verification and real-time hybrid-simulation implementation,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 441–460, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2479 A. Friedman et al., “Large-scale real-time hybrid simulation for evaluation of advanced damping system performance,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 141, no. 6, p. 04014150, Jul. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X. 0001093 C. Riascos, J. Marulanda and P. Thomson, “Semi-active tuned liquid column damper implementation with real-time hybrid simulations,” Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2016, vol. 9799, p. 979919, Apr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2220004 G. Mosqueda, B. Stojadinović and S. A. Mahin, “Implementation and accuracy of continuous hybrid simulation with geographically distributed substructures,” Earthq. Eng. Res. Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, Tech. Rep. UCB/EERC, 2005. R. Christenson et al., “Hybrid Simulation: A Discussion of Current Assessment Measures,” Earthq. Eng. Res., NSF, NEES, West Lafayette, Indiana, Tech. Rep. Cmmi, 2014. A. Y. Tuan and G. Q. Shang, “Vibration control in a 101-storey building using a tuned mass damper,” J. Appl. Sci. Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 141–156, Jan. 2014. https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2014.17.2.05 R. N. Jabary and G. S. P. Madabhushi, “Tuned Mass Damper Positioning Effects on the Seismic Response of a Soil-MDOF-Structure System,” J. Earthq. Eng., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 281–302, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1224743 J. L. Almazán, J. C. De la Llera, J. A. Inaudi, D. López-García and L. E. Izquierdo, “A bidirectional and homogeneous tuned mass damper: A new device for passive control of vibrations,” Eng. Struct., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1548–1560, Jul. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.005 F. Weber, C. Boston and M. Maślanka, “An adaptive tuned mass damper based on the emulation of positive and negative stiffness with an MR damper,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 20, no. 1, Dec. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/1/015012 D. C. Johnson, “Mechanical Vibrations,” Nature, vol. 169, no. 641, pp. 271–288, Abr. 1952. https://doi.org/10.1038/169641b0T. T. Soong and G. F. Dargush, Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering, New York, USA: MCEER, 1997.2211215https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/download/1963/2332https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/download/1963/2378https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/download/1963/2381Núm. 2 , Año 2019 : (Julio-Diciembre)PublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2717https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/667eb890-fbd6-47c1-b8af-6f32f4a1b563/downloada049a57e60325dc3ca92c4b42f1ef10cMD5111323/12213oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/122132024-09-17 14:11:46.742http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0INGE CUC - 2019metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.co

Evaluación del desempeño de un amortiguador de masa sintonizado no lineal mediante simulaciones híbridas en tiempo real

Publicaciones similares