A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)

Almost every country requires some form of environmental licensing prior to the inception of development projects that may affect the integrity of the environment and its social context. We developed a new conceptual and methodological model to instruct the assessment of the potential impacts posed...

Full description

Autores:
Pereira, Cristina I.
Milanés Batista, Celene
Correa, Ivan
Pranzini, Enzo
Cuker, Benjamin
Botero, Camilo M.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/9199
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/9199
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101343
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Processes and landforms
Expert knowledge
Ecosystem approach
Screening
Scoping
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
id RCUC2_fcbcbaf1a5636e709ec1c2bb36646fad
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/9199
network_acronym_str RCUC2
network_name_str REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)
title A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)
spellingShingle A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)
Processes and landforms
Expert knowledge
Ecosystem approach
Screening
Scoping
title_short A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)
title_full A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)
title_fullStr A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)
title_full_unstemmed A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)
title_sort A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Pereira, Cristina I.
Milanés Batista, Celene
Correa, Ivan
Pranzini, Enzo
Cuker, Benjamin
Botero, Camilo M.
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Pereira, Cristina I.
Milanés Batista, Celene
Correa, Ivan
Pranzini, Enzo
Cuker, Benjamin
Botero, Camilo M.
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Processes and landforms
Expert knowledge
Ecosystem approach
Screening
Scoping
topic Processes and landforms
Expert knowledge
Ecosystem approach
Screening
Scoping
description Almost every country requires some form of environmental licensing prior to the inception of development projects that may affect the integrity of the environment and its social context. We developed a new conceptual and methodological model to instruct the assessment of the potential impacts posed by proposed projects. Susceptibility to Human Interventions for Environmental Licensing Determination (SHIELD) includes a novel geomorphological interpretation of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). It considers the impact of human interventions on geomorphological processes and landscape functioning in the context of the entire ecosystem, going further than the classical concept of vulnerability. Estimated susceptibility of the site informs the screening stage, allowing local conditions to help define the criteria used in the process. Similarly, the level of detail of the environmental baseline is scoped by considering the degree of disturbance of natural processes posed by human intervention. Testing this geomorphological susceptibility model on different kinds of environments would allow shifting the environmental licensing practices from the prevailing anthropocentric and static conception of the environment towards an Ecosystem Approach. SHIELD addresses the need to improve the screening and scoping stages that form the basis of the rest of any EIA. SHIELD introduces several innovations to EIA including the incorporation of fuzzy logic, a preassembled database of contributions form experts, and a shifting of emphasis from the type of proposed intervention to the type of environment and its relative susceptibility.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-28T20:26:37Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-28T20:26:37Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 1674-9871
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11323/9199
dc.identifier.url.spa.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101343
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101343
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv 1674-9871
10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101343
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
url https://hdl.handle.net/11323/9199
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101343
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Geoscience Frontiers
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Acerbi et al., 2014 M. Acerbi, E. Sánchez-Triana, S. Enríquez, R. Tiffer-Sotomayor, A. Gomes, K. Siegmann, P. Clemente-Fernandez, E. Nkrumah Environmental Impact Assessment Systems in Latin America and the Caribbean 34th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment for Social and Economic Development. International Association for Impact Assessment. IAIA14 Conference Proceedings, Viña del Mar, Chile (2014), p. 6
Achour and Pourghasemi, 2020 Y. Achour, H.R. Pourghasemi How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 871-883, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.001
Adger, 2006 W.N. Adger Vulnerability Global Environ. Change, 16 (3) (2006), pp. 268-281, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Al-Najjar and Pradhan, 2021 H.A.H. Al-Najjar, B. Pradhan Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning techniques assisted by additional data created with generative adversarial networks Geosci. Front., 12 (2) (2021), pp. 625-637, 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.002
Balogun et al., 2021 A.- L. Balogun, F. Rezaie, Q.B. Pham, L. Gigović, S. Drobnjak, Y.A. Aina, M. Panahi, S.T. Yekeen, S. Lee Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in western Serbia using hybrid support vector regression (SVR) with GWO, BAT and COA algorithms Geosci. Front., 12 (2021), Article 101104, 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.10.009
Berg, 2001 B.L. Berg Qualitative Research Methods For the Social Sciences (Fourth), Pearson, Long Beach (2001), p. 304
Besné et al., 2018 A.G. Besné, D. Luna, A. Cobos, D. Lameiras, H. Ortiz-Moreno, L.P. Güereca A methodological framework of eco-efficiency based on fuzzy logic and Life Cycle Assessment applied to a Mexican SME Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 38-48, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.008
Bird, 2008 E. Bird Coastal Geomorphology. An Introduction IGARSS 2014 (second. Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex (2008), p. 436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Borgström et al., 2015 S. Borgström, Ö. Bodin, A. Sandström, B. Crona Developing an analytical framework for assessing progress toward ecosystem-based management Ambio, 44 (S3) (2015), pp. 357-369, 10.1007/s13280-015-0655-7
Canavese et al., 2014 D. Canavese, N.R.S. Ortega, M. Queirós The assessment of local sustainability using fuzzy logic: An expert opinion system to evaluate environmental sanitation in the Algarve región Portugal. Ecol. Indic., 36 (2014), pp. 711-718, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.030
Castley et al., 2003 J.G. Castley, H. Bezuidenhout, M.H. Knight Searching for common ground, a scientific approach to subjective environmental impact assessments: an example from the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park Koedoe, 46.DO (2003)
CBD, 2004 CBD, (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) CBD Guidelines The Ecosystem Approach, Montreal, Canada (2004)
Cendrero et al., 2001 A. Cendrero, M. Marchetti, M. Panizza, V. Rivas Geomorphology and environmental impact assessemnt M. Marchetti, V. Rivas (Eds.), Geomorphology and Environmental Impact Assessemnt, A.A. Balkema, Lisse (2001), pp. 1-5
Coca-Domínguez and Ricaurte-Villota, 2019 O. Coca-Domínguez, C. Ricaurte-Villota Validation of the hazard and vulnerability analysis of coastal erosion in the Caribbean and pacific Coast of Colombia J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7 (8) (2019), p. 260, 10.3390/jmse7080260
Darbra et al., 2008 R.M. Darbra, E. Eljarrat, D. Barceló How to measure uncertainties in nvironmental risk assessment TrAC Trends Anal. Chem., 27 (2008), pp. 377-385, 10.1016/j.trac.2008.02.005
Dauer et al., 2011 L.T. Dauer, P. Zanzonico, R.M. Tuttle, D.M. Quinn, H.W. Strauss The Japanese Tsunami and resulting nuclear emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi power facility: technical, radiologic, and response perspectives J. Nucl. Med., 52 (9) (2011), pp. 1423-1432
Downs and Booth, 2011 P. Downs, D. Booth Geomorphology in Environmental Management K. Gregory, A. Goudie (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Geomorphology, SAGE Publications Ltd (2011), pp. 81-108
Durden et al., 2018 J.M. Durden, L.E. Lallier, K. Murphy, A. Jaeckel, K. Gjerde, D.O.B. Jones Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’ Mar. Policy, 87 (2018), pp. 194-202, 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013
Enríquez-de-Salamanca, 2018 Á. Enríquez-de-Salamanca Stakeholders’ manipulation of Environmental Impact Assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 10-18, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.003
Epifânio et al., 2014 B. Epifânio, J.L. Zêzere, M. Neves Susceptibility assessment to different types of landslides in the coastal cliffs of Lourinhã (Central Portugal) J. Sea Res., 93 (2014), pp. 150-159, 10.1016/j.seares.2014.04.006
Fitton et al., 2016 J.M. Fitton, J.D. Hansom, A.F. Rennie A national coastal erosion susceptibility model for Scotland Ocean Coast. Manag., 132 (2016), pp. 80-89, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.08.018
Forman, 1995 R.T.T. Forman Land Mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995), p. 605
Glasson et al., 2012 J. Glasson, R. Therivel, A. Chadwick Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment (second ed.), Routledge, London (2012), p. 520
González Del Campo, 2017 A. González Del Campo A conceptualisation framework for building consensus on environmental sensitivity J. Environ. Manage., 200 (2017), pp. 114-122, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.061
Goodhue et al., 2012 N. Goodhue, H. Rouse, D. Ramsay, R. Bell, T. Hume, M. Hicks Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change: Mapping a New Zealand Coastal Sensitivity Index Niwa, Hamilton (2012)
Goudie, 2018 A. Goudie The human impact in geomorphology – 50 years of change Geomorphology, 366 (2018), Article 106601, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.12.002
Goudie, 1994 A. Goudie Environmental management A. Goudie, D. Thomas (Eds.), The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Physical Geography, Blackwell, Oxford (1994), pp. 197-222
Griffiths et al., 2019 J.A. Griffiths, F. Zhu, F.K.S. Chan, D.L. Higgitt Modelling the impact of sea-level rise on urban flood probability in SE China Geosci. Front., 10 (2019), pp. 363-372, 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.02.012
Günther et al., 2014 A. Günther, M. Van Den Eeckhaut, J.-P. Malet, P. Reichenbach, J. Hervás Climate-physiographically differentiated Pan-European landslide susceptibility assessment using spatial multi-criteria evaluation and transnational landslide information Geomorphology, 224 (2014), pp. 69-85, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.011
Haslett, 2009 S.K. Haslett Coastal Systems (second ed.), Routledge (2009), p. 240
Horton, 1945 R.E. Horton Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology Bull. Geol. Soc. A., 56 (1945), pp. 275-370
IAIA and IEA, 1999 IAIA, (International Association for Impact Assessment), IEA, (Institute of Environmental Assessment - UK), 1999. Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice.
Hurtado, 2010 J. Hurtado Metodología de la Investigación. Guía para la comprensión holística de la ciencia (4th), CIEA Sypal, Caracas (2010), p. 1327
Jena et al., 2020 R. Jena, B. Pradhan, G. Beydoun, A. Nizamuddin, H. Sofyan, M. Affan Integrated model for earthquake risk assessment using neural network and analytic hierarchy process: Aceh province, Indonesia Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 613-634, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.07.006
Joseph et al., 2015 C. Joseph, T. Gunton, M. Rutherford Good practices for environmental assessment Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 33 (4) (2015), pp. 238-254, 10.1080/14615517.2015.1063811
Kolhoff et al., 2018 A.J. Kolhoff, P.P.J. Driessen, H.A.C. Runhaar Overcoming low EIA performance - A diagnostic tool for the deliberate development of EIA system capacities in low and middle income countries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 98-108, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.001
Langhans et al., 2019 S.D. Langhans, S.C. Jähnig, M. Lago, A. Schmidt-Kloiber, T. Hein The potential of ecosystem-based management to integrate biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision in aquatic ecosystems Sci. Total Environ., 672 (2019), pp. 1017-1020, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.025
Lima and Magrini, 2010 L.H. Lima, A. Magrini The Brazilian Audit Tribunal’s role in improving the federal environmental licensing process Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30 (2010), pp. 108-115, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.005
Liu and Lai, 2009 K.F.R. Liu, J.-H. Lai Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009), pp. 5119-5136, 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.045
Loomis and Dziedzic, 2018 J.J. Loomis, M. Dziedzic Evaluating EIA systems’ effectiveness: A state of the art Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 29-37, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.005
Luers, 2005 A.L. Luers The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework for examining environmental change Glob. Environ. Chang., 15 (2005), pp. 214-223, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.04.003
Mandelik et al., 2005 Y. Mandelik, T. Dayan, E. Feitelson Issues and dilemmas in ecological scoping: scientific, procedural and economic perspectives Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 23 (1) (2005), pp. 55-63, 10.3152/147154605781765724
Mardani et al., 2015 A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, E.K. Zavadskas Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015), pp. 4126-4148, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
Martínez et al., 2019 L.F. Martínez, J. Toro, J. León C. A complex network approach to environmental impact assessment Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 37 (2019), pp. 407-420, 10.1080/14615517.2018.1552442
North, 2009 North, M.A., 2009. A Method for Implementing a Statistically Significant Number of Data Classes in the Jenks Algorithm. In: 2009 Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery 1, pp. 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2009.319
O’Halloran et al., 2004 D. O’Halloran, C. Green, M. Harley, M. Stanley, J. Knill Geological and Landscape Conservation Geological Society, London (2004)
Panizza, 1996 M. Panizza 6 Geomorphology and environmental impact assessment Environmental Geomorphology. Elsevier (1996), pp. 223-239 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-2025(96)80023-X
Paul, 2013 S.K. Paul Vulnerability concepts and its application in various fields, a review on geographical perspective J. Life Earth Sci., 8 (2013), pp. 63-81
Peche and Rodríguez, 2011 R. Peche, E. Rodríguez Environmental impact assessment by means of a procedure based on fuzzy logic: A practical application Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 31 (2011), pp. 87-96, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.03.006
Pereira, 2019 C.I. Pereira Analysis of the Environmental Licensing Procedure For Coastal Environments in Colombia: A Geomorphological Perspective From The Concept Of Susceptibility To The Effect Of Human Interventions EAFIT University (2019), p. 204 pp. Ph.D. thesis
Pereira et al., 2018 C.I. Pereira, C.M. Botero, I. Correa, E. Pranzini Seven good practices for the environmental licensing of coastal interventions: Lessons from the Italian, Cuban, Spanish and Colombian regulatory frameworks and insights on coastal processes Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 73 (2018), pp. 20-30, 10.1016/J.EIAR.2018.06.002
Pereira et al., 2019 C.I. Pereira, A.F. Carvajal, C.B. Milanes, C.M. Botero Regulating human interventions in Colombian coastal areas: Implications for the environmental licensing procedure in middle-income countries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 79 (2019), Article 106284, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106284
Pereira et al., 2021 C.I. Pereira, C.B. Milanes, R. Sarda, B. Cuker, C.M. Botero Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology Geosci. Front., 12 (2021), Article 101228, 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101228
Pinho et al., 2010 P. Pinho, S. McCallum, S.S. Cruz A critical appraisal of EIA screening practice in EU Member in states Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 28 (2010), pp. 91-107, 10.3152/146155110X498799
Pourghasemi et al., 2020 H.R. Pourghasemi, A. Gayen, M. Edalat, M. Zarafshar, J.P. Tiefenbacher Is multi-hazard mapping effective in assessing natural hazards and integrated watershed management? Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 1203-1217, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.008
Rajaram and Das, 2011 T. Rajaram, A. Das Screening for EIA in India: Enhancing effectiveness through ecological carrying capacity approach J. Environ. Manage., 92 (2011), pp. 140-148, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.024
Retief et al., 2011 F. Retief, C.N.J. Welman, L. Sandham Performance of environmental impact assessment (EIA) screening in South Africa: a comparative analysis between the 1997 and 2006 EIA regimes South African Geogr. J., 93 (2) (2011), pp. 154-171, 10.1080/03736245.2011.592263
Riegel et al., 2020 R.P. Riegel, D.D. Alves, B.C. Schmidt, G.G. de Oliveira, C. Haetinger, D.M.M. Osório, M.A.S. Rodrigues, D.M. de Quevedo Assessment of susceptibility to landslides through geographic information systems and the logistic regression model Nat. Hazards, 103 (1) (2020), pp. 497-511, 10.1007/s11069-020-03997-8
Rivas et al., 1997 V. Rivas, K. Rix, E. Frances, A. Cendrero, D. Brunsden Geomorphological indicators for environmental impact assessment: consumable and non-consumable geomorphological resources Geomorphology, 18 (1997), pp. 169-182, 10.1016/S0169-555X(96)00024-4
Robles et al., 2017 C. Robles, A. Polo, A. Ospino An analytic hierarchy process based approach for evaluating renewable energy sources Int. J. Energy Econimics Policy, 7 (2017), pp. 38-47
Rocha and Fonseca, 2017 C.P.F. Rocha, A. Fonseca Simulations of EIA screening across jurisdictions: exposing the case for harmonic criteria? Impact Assess Proj. Apprais., 35 (3) (2017), pp. 214-226, 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271537
Sarda et al., 2014 R. Sarda, T. O’Higgins, R. Cormier, A. Diedrich, J. Tintore A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management Ecol. Soc., 19 (2014), 10.5751/ES-07055-190451
Slootweg and Kolhoff, 2003 R. Slootweg, A. Kolhoff A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 23 (2003), pp. 657-681, 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00114-8
Snell and Cowell, 2006 T. Snell, R. Cowell Scoping in environmental impact assessment: Balancing precaution and efficiency? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 26 (2006), pp. 359-376, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.003
Strahler, 1952 A.N. Strahler Dynamic basis of geomorphology Bull. Geol. Soc., 63 (9) (1952), p. 923, 10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[923:DBOG]2.0.CO;2
Suhartono et al., 2013 D. Suhartono, W. Aditya, M. Lestari, M. Yasin Expert system in detecting coffe plant diseases Int. J. Electr. Energy, 1 (2013), pp. 156-162
The World Bank, 2012 The World Bank, 2012. Getting to Green - A Sourcebook of Pollution Management Policy Tools for Growth and Competitiveness.
Toro et al., 2012a J. Toro, J. Duarte, I. Requena, M. Zamorano Determining vulnerability importance in environmental impact assessment. The case of Colombia Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 32 (1) (2012), pp. 107-117, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.005
Toro et al., 2012b J. Toro, O. Duarte, I. Requena, M. Zamorano Determining vulnerability importance in environmental impact assessment: The case of Colombia Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 32 (2012), pp. 107-117, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.005
Toro et al., 2013 J. Toro, I. Requena, O. Duarte, M. Zamorano A qualitative method proposal to improve environmental impact assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 43 (2013), pp. 9-20, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.04.004
Turconi et al., 2019 L. Turconi, F. Luino, M. Gussoni, F. Faccini, M. Giardino, M. Casazza Intrinsic Environmental Vulnerability as Shallow Landslide Susceptibility in Environmental Impact Assessment Sustainability, 11 (2019), p. 6285, 10.3390/su11226285
Villarroya et al., 2014 A. Villarroya, A.C. Barros, J. Kiesecker, C.N. Jenkins Policy development for environmental licensing and biodiversity offsets in Latin America PLoS One, 9 (9) (2014), p. e107144
Weston, 2000 J. Weston EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK Practice J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 43 (2) (2000), pp. 185-203, 10.1080/09640560010667
Williams and Dupuy, 2017 A. Williams, K. Dupuy Deciding over nature: Corruption and environmental impact assessments Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 65 (2017), pp. 118-124, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.002
Wood and Becker, 2005 G. Wood, J. Becker Discretionary judgement in local planning authority decision making: screening development proposals for environmental impact assessment J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 48 (3) (2005), pp. 349-371, 10.1080/09640560500067467
Zhang et al., 2013 J. Zhang, L. Kørnøv, P. Christensen Critical factors for EIA implementation: Literature review and research options J. Environ. Manage., 114 (2013), pp. 148-157, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 11
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 13
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 11 Páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv China
institution Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987121002073
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/ae229f39-6312-4410-87d0-8945afd923d4/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/a4764219-4ba6-43f5-9d67-0ec560dde067/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/a15876ab-6884-46f0-b1e7-7a899561f389/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/41c8a5fa-9897-47c5-9172-738b90c07f7d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b8efb9f602500ebaa3c2b9af3babd9f5
e30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9bad
f522f93bca85bd81ee1c333751c531b9
4c25fbbdff58de15583c9df6380091e8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_ 1811760730617151488
spelling Pereira, Cristina I.Milanés Batista, CeleneCorrea, IvanPranzini, EnzoCuker, BenjaminBotero, Camilo M.2022-05-28T20:26:37Z2022-05-28T20:26:37Z20221674-9871https://hdl.handle.net/11323/9199https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.10134310.1016/j.gsf.2021.101343Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Almost every country requires some form of environmental licensing prior to the inception of development projects that may affect the integrity of the environment and its social context. We developed a new conceptual and methodological model to instruct the assessment of the potential impacts posed by proposed projects. Susceptibility to Human Interventions for Environmental Licensing Determination (SHIELD) includes a novel geomorphological interpretation of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). It considers the impact of human interventions on geomorphological processes and landscape functioning in the context of the entire ecosystem, going further than the classical concept of vulnerability. Estimated susceptibility of the site informs the screening stage, allowing local conditions to help define the criteria used in the process. Similarly, the level of detail of the environmental baseline is scoped by considering the degree of disturbance of natural processes posed by human intervention. Testing this geomorphological susceptibility model on different kinds of environments would allow shifting the environmental licensing practices from the prevailing anthropocentric and static conception of the environment towards an Ecosystem Approach. SHIELD addresses the need to improve the screening and scoping stages that form the basis of the rest of any EIA. SHIELD introduces several innovations to EIA including the incorporation of fuzzy logic, a preassembled database of contributions form experts, and a shifting of emphasis from the type of proposed intervention to the type of environment and its relative susceptibility.11 Páginasapplication/pdfengChina University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking UniversityChinaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)2021 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2A geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD)Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987121002073Geoscience FrontiersAcerbi et al., 2014 M. Acerbi, E. Sánchez-Triana, S. Enríquez, R. Tiffer-Sotomayor, A. Gomes, K. Siegmann, P. Clemente-Fernandez, E. Nkrumah Environmental Impact Assessment Systems in Latin America and the Caribbean 34th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment for Social and Economic Development. International Association for Impact Assessment. IAIA14 Conference Proceedings, Viña del Mar, Chile (2014), p. 6Achour and Pourghasemi, 2020 Y. Achour, H.R. Pourghasemi How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 871-883, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.001Adger, 2006 W.N. Adger Vulnerability Global Environ. Change, 16 (3) (2006), pp. 268-281, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006Al-Najjar and Pradhan, 2021 H.A.H. Al-Najjar, B. Pradhan Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning techniques assisted by additional data created with generative adversarial networks Geosci. Front., 12 (2) (2021), pp. 625-637, 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.002Balogun et al., 2021 A.- L. Balogun, F. Rezaie, Q.B. Pham, L. Gigović, S. Drobnjak, Y.A. Aina, M. Panahi, S.T. Yekeen, S. Lee Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in western Serbia using hybrid support vector regression (SVR) with GWO, BAT and COA algorithms Geosci. Front., 12 (2021), Article 101104, 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.10.009Berg, 2001 B.L. Berg Qualitative Research Methods For the Social Sciences (Fourth), Pearson, Long Beach (2001), p. 304Besné et al., 2018 A.G. Besné, D. Luna, A. Cobos, D. Lameiras, H. Ortiz-Moreno, L.P. Güereca A methodological framework of eco-efficiency based on fuzzy logic and Life Cycle Assessment applied to a Mexican SME Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 38-48, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.008Bird, 2008 E. Bird Coastal Geomorphology. An Introduction IGARSS 2014 (second. Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex (2008), p. 436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2Borgström et al., 2015 S. Borgström, Ö. Bodin, A. Sandström, B. Crona Developing an analytical framework for assessing progress toward ecosystem-based management Ambio, 44 (S3) (2015), pp. 357-369, 10.1007/s13280-015-0655-7Canavese et al., 2014 D. Canavese, N.R.S. Ortega, M. Queirós The assessment of local sustainability using fuzzy logic: An expert opinion system to evaluate environmental sanitation in the Algarve región Portugal. Ecol. Indic., 36 (2014), pp. 711-718, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.030Castley et al., 2003 J.G. Castley, H. Bezuidenhout, M.H. Knight Searching for common ground, a scientific approach to subjective environmental impact assessments: an example from the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park Koedoe, 46.DO (2003)CBD, 2004 CBD, (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) CBD Guidelines The Ecosystem Approach, Montreal, Canada (2004)Cendrero et al., 2001 A. Cendrero, M. Marchetti, M. Panizza, V. Rivas Geomorphology and environmental impact assessemnt M. Marchetti, V. Rivas (Eds.), Geomorphology and Environmental Impact Assessemnt, A.A. Balkema, Lisse (2001), pp. 1-5Coca-Domínguez and Ricaurte-Villota, 2019 O. Coca-Domínguez, C. Ricaurte-Villota Validation of the hazard and vulnerability analysis of coastal erosion in the Caribbean and pacific Coast of Colombia J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7 (8) (2019), p. 260, 10.3390/jmse7080260Darbra et al., 2008 R.M. Darbra, E. Eljarrat, D. Barceló How to measure uncertainties in nvironmental risk assessment TrAC Trends Anal. Chem., 27 (2008), pp. 377-385, 10.1016/j.trac.2008.02.005Dauer et al., 2011 L.T. Dauer, P. Zanzonico, R.M. Tuttle, D.M. Quinn, H.W. Strauss The Japanese Tsunami and resulting nuclear emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi power facility: technical, radiologic, and response perspectives J. Nucl. Med., 52 (9) (2011), pp. 1423-1432Downs and Booth, 2011 P. Downs, D. Booth Geomorphology in Environmental Management K. Gregory, A. Goudie (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Geomorphology, SAGE Publications Ltd (2011), pp. 81-108Durden et al., 2018 J.M. Durden, L.E. Lallier, K. Murphy, A. Jaeckel, K. Gjerde, D.O.B. Jones Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’ Mar. Policy, 87 (2018), pp. 194-202, 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013Enríquez-de-Salamanca, 2018 Á. Enríquez-de-Salamanca Stakeholders’ manipulation of Environmental Impact Assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 10-18, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.003Epifânio et al., 2014 B. Epifânio, J.L. Zêzere, M. Neves Susceptibility assessment to different types of landslides in the coastal cliffs of Lourinhã (Central Portugal) J. Sea Res., 93 (2014), pp. 150-159, 10.1016/j.seares.2014.04.006Fitton et al., 2016 J.M. Fitton, J.D. Hansom, A.F. Rennie A national coastal erosion susceptibility model for Scotland Ocean Coast. Manag., 132 (2016), pp. 80-89, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.08.018Forman, 1995 R.T.T. Forman Land Mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995), p. 605Glasson et al., 2012 J. Glasson, R. Therivel, A. Chadwick Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment (second ed.), Routledge, London (2012), p. 520González Del Campo, 2017 A. González Del Campo A conceptualisation framework for building consensus on environmental sensitivity J. Environ. Manage., 200 (2017), pp. 114-122, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.061Goodhue et al., 2012 N. Goodhue, H. Rouse, D. Ramsay, R. Bell, T. Hume, M. Hicks Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change: Mapping a New Zealand Coastal Sensitivity Index Niwa, Hamilton (2012)Goudie, 2018 A. Goudie The human impact in geomorphology – 50 years of change Geomorphology, 366 (2018), Article 106601, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.12.002Goudie, 1994 A. Goudie Environmental management A. Goudie, D. Thomas (Eds.), The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Physical Geography, Blackwell, Oxford (1994), pp. 197-222Griffiths et al., 2019 J.A. Griffiths, F. Zhu, F.K.S. Chan, D.L. Higgitt Modelling the impact of sea-level rise on urban flood probability in SE China Geosci. Front., 10 (2019), pp. 363-372, 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.02.012Günther et al., 2014 A. Günther, M. Van Den Eeckhaut, J.-P. Malet, P. Reichenbach, J. Hervás Climate-physiographically differentiated Pan-European landslide susceptibility assessment using spatial multi-criteria evaluation and transnational landslide information Geomorphology, 224 (2014), pp. 69-85, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.011Haslett, 2009 S.K. Haslett Coastal Systems (second ed.), Routledge (2009), p. 240Horton, 1945 R.E. Horton Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology Bull. Geol. Soc. A., 56 (1945), pp. 275-370IAIA and IEA, 1999 IAIA, (International Association for Impact Assessment), IEA, (Institute of Environmental Assessment - UK), 1999. Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice.Hurtado, 2010 J. Hurtado Metodología de la Investigación. Guía para la comprensión holística de la ciencia (4th), CIEA Sypal, Caracas (2010), p. 1327Jena et al., 2020 R. Jena, B. Pradhan, G. Beydoun, A. Nizamuddin, H. Sofyan, M. Affan Integrated model for earthquake risk assessment using neural network and analytic hierarchy process: Aceh province, Indonesia Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 613-634, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.07.006Joseph et al., 2015 C. Joseph, T. Gunton, M. Rutherford Good practices for environmental assessment Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 33 (4) (2015), pp. 238-254, 10.1080/14615517.2015.1063811Kolhoff et al., 2018 A.J. Kolhoff, P.P.J. Driessen, H.A.C. Runhaar Overcoming low EIA performance - A diagnostic tool for the deliberate development of EIA system capacities in low and middle income countries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 98-108, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.001Langhans et al., 2019 S.D. Langhans, S.C. Jähnig, M. Lago, A. Schmidt-Kloiber, T. Hein The potential of ecosystem-based management to integrate biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision in aquatic ecosystems Sci. Total Environ., 672 (2019), pp. 1017-1020, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.025Lima and Magrini, 2010 L.H. Lima, A. Magrini The Brazilian Audit Tribunal’s role in improving the federal environmental licensing process Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30 (2010), pp. 108-115, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.005Liu and Lai, 2009 K.F.R. Liu, J.-H. Lai Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009), pp. 5119-5136, 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.045Loomis and Dziedzic, 2018 J.J. Loomis, M. Dziedzic Evaluating EIA systems’ effectiveness: A state of the art Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 29-37, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.005Luers, 2005 A.L. Luers The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework for examining environmental change Glob. Environ. Chang., 15 (2005), pp. 214-223, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.04.003Mandelik et al., 2005 Y. Mandelik, T. Dayan, E. Feitelson Issues and dilemmas in ecological scoping: scientific, procedural and economic perspectives Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 23 (1) (2005), pp. 55-63, 10.3152/147154605781765724Mardani et al., 2015 A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, E.K. Zavadskas Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015), pp. 4126-4148, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003Martínez et al., 2019 L.F. Martínez, J. Toro, J. León C. A complex network approach to environmental impact assessment Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 37 (2019), pp. 407-420, 10.1080/14615517.2018.1552442North, 2009 North, M.A., 2009. A Method for Implementing a Statistically Significant Number of Data Classes in the Jenks Algorithm. In: 2009 Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery 1, pp. 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2009.319O’Halloran et al., 2004 D. O’Halloran, C. Green, M. Harley, M. Stanley, J. Knill Geological and Landscape Conservation Geological Society, London (2004)Panizza, 1996 M. Panizza 6 Geomorphology and environmental impact assessment Environmental Geomorphology. Elsevier (1996), pp. 223-239 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-2025(96)80023-XPaul, 2013 S.K. Paul Vulnerability concepts and its application in various fields, a review on geographical perspective J. Life Earth Sci., 8 (2013), pp. 63-81Peche and Rodríguez, 2011 R. Peche, E. Rodríguez Environmental impact assessment by means of a procedure based on fuzzy logic: A practical application Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 31 (2011), pp. 87-96, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.03.006Pereira, 2019 C.I. Pereira Analysis of the Environmental Licensing Procedure For Coastal Environments in Colombia: A Geomorphological Perspective From The Concept Of Susceptibility To The Effect Of Human Interventions EAFIT University (2019), p. 204 pp. Ph.D. thesisPereira et al., 2018 C.I. Pereira, C.M. Botero, I. Correa, E. Pranzini Seven good practices for the environmental licensing of coastal interventions: Lessons from the Italian, Cuban, Spanish and Colombian regulatory frameworks and insights on coastal processes Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 73 (2018), pp. 20-30, 10.1016/J.EIAR.2018.06.002Pereira et al., 2019 C.I. Pereira, A.F. Carvajal, C.B. Milanes, C.M. Botero Regulating human interventions in Colombian coastal areas: Implications for the environmental licensing procedure in middle-income countries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 79 (2019), Article 106284, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106284Pereira et al., 2021 C.I. Pereira, C.B. Milanes, R. Sarda, B. Cuker, C.M. Botero Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology Geosci. Front., 12 (2021), Article 101228, 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101228Pinho et al., 2010 P. Pinho, S. McCallum, S.S. Cruz A critical appraisal of EIA screening practice in EU Member in states Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 28 (2010), pp. 91-107, 10.3152/146155110X498799Pourghasemi et al., 2020 H.R. Pourghasemi, A. Gayen, M. Edalat, M. Zarafshar, J.P. Tiefenbacher Is multi-hazard mapping effective in assessing natural hazards and integrated watershed management? Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 1203-1217, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.008Rajaram and Das, 2011 T. Rajaram, A. Das Screening for EIA in India: Enhancing effectiveness through ecological carrying capacity approach J. Environ. Manage., 92 (2011), pp. 140-148, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.024Retief et al., 2011 F. Retief, C.N.J. Welman, L. Sandham Performance of environmental impact assessment (EIA) screening in South Africa: a comparative analysis between the 1997 and 2006 EIA regimes South African Geogr. J., 93 (2) (2011), pp. 154-171, 10.1080/03736245.2011.592263Riegel et al., 2020 R.P. Riegel, D.D. Alves, B.C. Schmidt, G.G. de Oliveira, C. Haetinger, D.M.M. Osório, M.A.S. Rodrigues, D.M. de Quevedo Assessment of susceptibility to landslides through geographic information systems and the logistic regression model Nat. Hazards, 103 (1) (2020), pp. 497-511, 10.1007/s11069-020-03997-8Rivas et al., 1997 V. Rivas, K. Rix, E. Frances, A. Cendrero, D. Brunsden Geomorphological indicators for environmental impact assessment: consumable and non-consumable geomorphological resources Geomorphology, 18 (1997), pp. 169-182, 10.1016/S0169-555X(96)00024-4Robles et al., 2017 C. Robles, A. Polo, A. Ospino An analytic hierarchy process based approach for evaluating renewable energy sources Int. J. Energy Econimics Policy, 7 (2017), pp. 38-47Rocha and Fonseca, 2017 C.P.F. Rocha, A. Fonseca Simulations of EIA screening across jurisdictions: exposing the case for harmonic criteria? Impact Assess Proj. Apprais., 35 (3) (2017), pp. 214-226, 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271537Sarda et al., 2014 R. Sarda, T. O’Higgins, R. Cormier, A. Diedrich, J. Tintore A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management Ecol. Soc., 19 (2014), 10.5751/ES-07055-190451Slootweg and Kolhoff, 2003 R. Slootweg, A. Kolhoff A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 23 (2003), pp. 657-681, 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00114-8Snell and Cowell, 2006 T. Snell, R. Cowell Scoping in environmental impact assessment: Balancing precaution and efficiency? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 26 (2006), pp. 359-376, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.003Strahler, 1952 A.N. Strahler Dynamic basis of geomorphology Bull. Geol. Soc., 63 (9) (1952), p. 923, 10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[923:DBOG]2.0.CO;2Suhartono et al., 2013 D. Suhartono, W. Aditya, M. Lestari, M. Yasin Expert system in detecting coffe plant diseases Int. J. Electr. Energy, 1 (2013), pp. 156-162The World Bank, 2012 The World Bank, 2012. Getting to Green - A Sourcebook of Pollution Management Policy Tools for Growth and Competitiveness.Toro et al., 2012a J. Toro, J. Duarte, I. Requena, M. Zamorano Determining vulnerability importance in environmental impact assessment. The case of Colombia Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 32 (1) (2012), pp. 107-117, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.005Toro et al., 2012b J. Toro, O. Duarte, I. Requena, M. Zamorano Determining vulnerability importance in environmental impact assessment: The case of Colombia Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 32 (2012), pp. 107-117, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.005Toro et al., 2013 J. Toro, I. Requena, O. Duarte, M. Zamorano A qualitative method proposal to improve environmental impact assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 43 (2013), pp. 9-20, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.04.004Turconi et al., 2019 L. Turconi, F. Luino, M. Gussoni, F. Faccini, M. Giardino, M. Casazza Intrinsic Environmental Vulnerability as Shallow Landslide Susceptibility in Environmental Impact Assessment Sustainability, 11 (2019), p. 6285, 10.3390/su11226285Villarroya et al., 2014 A. Villarroya, A.C. Barros, J. Kiesecker, C.N. Jenkins Policy development for environmental licensing and biodiversity offsets in Latin America PLoS One, 9 (9) (2014), p. e107144Weston, 2000 J. Weston EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK Practice J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 43 (2) (2000), pp. 185-203, 10.1080/09640560010667Williams and Dupuy, 2017 A. Williams, K. Dupuy Deciding over nature: Corruption and environmental impact assessments Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 65 (2017), pp. 118-124, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.002Wood and Becker, 2005 G. Wood, J. Becker Discretionary judgement in local planning authority decision making: screening development proposals for environmental impact assessment J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 48 (3) (2005), pp. 349-371, 10.1080/09640560500067467Zhang et al., 2013 J. Zhang, L. Kørnøv, P. Christensen Critical factors for EIA implementation: Literature review and research options J. Environ. Manage., 114 (2013), pp. 148-157, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030111213Processes and landformsExpert knowledgeEcosystem approachScreeningScopingPublicationORIGINALA geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD).pdfA geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD).pdfapplication/pdf1982212https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/ae229f39-6312-4410-87d0-8945afd923d4/downloadb8efb9f602500ebaa3c2b9af3babd9f5MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83196https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/a4764219-4ba6-43f5-9d67-0ec560dde067/downloade30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9badMD52TEXTA geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD).pdf.txtA geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD).pdf.txttext/plain69091https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/a15876ab-6884-46f0-b1e7-7a899561f389/downloadf522f93bca85bd81ee1c333751c531b9MD53THUMBNAILA geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD).pdf.jpgA geomorphological model of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions for environmental licensing determination (SHIELD).pdf.jpgimage/jpeg15931https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/41c8a5fa-9897-47c5-9172-738b90c07f7d/download4c25fbbdff58de15583c9df6380091e8MD5411323/9199oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/91992024-09-17 10:51:24.535https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)open.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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

Publicaciones similares