Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene
Supplier selection is an important process for companies in the plastic sector due to its influence on firm performance and competitiveness. For a proper selection, a number of criteria from different aspects need to be considered by decision makers. Yet, as in different fields, because there are nu...
- Autores:
-
Ortiz Barrios, Miguel Angel
Berk, Kucukaltan
Carvajal Tinoco, Daniel Josué
Neira Rodado, Dionicio
Jimenez, Genett
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/1198
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/11323/1198
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Supply Chains
Decision Making
Green Supplier
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual
| id |
RCUC2_f03ed0dc656602d5afb4e2e917219231 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/1198 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCUC2 |
| network_name_str |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene |
| title |
Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene |
| spellingShingle |
Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene Supply Chains Decision Making Green Supplier |
| title_short |
Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene |
| title_full |
Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene |
| title_fullStr |
Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene |
| title_sort |
Strategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethylene |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Ortiz Barrios, Miguel Angel Berk, Kucukaltan Carvajal Tinoco, Daniel Josué Neira Rodado, Dionicio Jimenez, Genett |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ortiz Barrios, Miguel Angel Berk, Kucukaltan Carvajal Tinoco, Daniel Josué Neira Rodado, Dionicio Jimenez, Genett |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Supply Chains Decision Making Green Supplier |
| topic |
Supply Chains Decision Making Green Supplier |
| description |
Supplier selection is an important process for companies in the plastic sector due to its influence on firm performance and competitiveness. For a proper selection, a number of criteria from different aspects need to be considered by decision makers. Yet, as in different fields, because there are numerous criteria and alternatives to be considered in the plastic industry, choosing an appropriate multicriteria decision-making approach has become a critical step for selecting suppliers. Therefore, the aim of this research is to define the most suitable supplier of high-density polyethylene through the integration of powerful multicriteria decision-making methods. For this purpose, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) is initially applied to define initial weights of factors and subfactors under uncertainty, followed by the use of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) to evaluate interrelations between the elements of the hierarchy. Then, after combining FAHP and DEMATEL to calculate the final contributions of both factors and subfactors on the basis of interdependence, the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution is used to assess the supplier alternatives. In addition, this paper also explores the differences between the judgments of decision makers for both AHP and DEMATEL methods. To do these, a case study is presented to demonstrate the validity of the proposed approach. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-16T22:33:33Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-16T22:33:33Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
1099-1360 |
| dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11323/1198 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
1099-1360 Corporación Universidad de la Costa REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11323/1198 https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alimardani, M., Rabbani, M., & Rafiei, H. (2014). A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP and TOPSIS for supplier selection in agile supply chains. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 18(2), 179–211. Ar, I. M., Göksen, H., & Tuncer, M. A. (2015). Kablo Sektöründe Tedarikçi Seçimi Için Bütünlesik DEMATEL‐AAS‐VIKOR Yönteminin Kullanilmasi/using integrated DEMATEL‐ANP‐VIKOR method for supplier selection in cable sector. Ege Akademik Bakis, 15(2), 285. Ayhan, M. B. (2013). A fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: A case study in a gear motor company. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.2886. Azar, G., & Drogendijk, R. (2014). Psychic distance, innovation, and firm performance. Management International Review, 54(5), 581–613. Barrios, M. A. O., De Felice, F., Negrete, K. P., Romero, B. A., Arenas, A. Y., & Petrillo, A. (2016). An AHP‐TOPSIS integrated model for selecting the most appropriate tomography equipment. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(4), 861–885. Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision‐making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872–3885. Chamodrakas, I., Leftheriotis, I., & Martakos, D. (2011). In‐depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS. Applied Soft Computing, 11(1), 900–907. Chan, F. S. (2003). Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: An analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research, 41(15), 3549–3579. Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301. Daim, T. U., Udbye, A., & Balasubramanian, A. (2013). Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for selection of 3PL providers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), 28–51. Dargi, A., Anjomshoae, A., Galankashi, M. R., Memari, A., & Tap, M. B. M. (2014). Supplier selection: A fuzzy‐ANP approach. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 691–700. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.317 Demirtas, E. A., & Üstün, Ö. (2008). An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation. Omega, 36(1), 76–90. Dweiri, F., Kumar, S., Khan, S. A., & Jain, V. (2016). Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 273–283. Dymova, L., Sevastjanov, P., & Tikhonenko, A. (2013). A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(12), 4841–4847. Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702–715. Florez Piña, L. (2013). Ejecución de un protocolo para la selección de proveedores de una poliolefina de alta densidad. Universidad de Costa Rica. Forum, W. E. (Ed) (2016). The New Plastics Economy Rethinking the future of plastics. Geneva: Switzerland. Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi‐criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24. Hosseini, S., & Al Khaled, A. (2016). A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–22. Hsieh, Y. F., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, S. B. (2016). Rebuilding DEMATEL threshold value: An example of a food and beverage information system. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1385. Huizingh, E. K., & Vrolijk, H. C. (1997). A comparison of verbal and numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(3), 237–247. Hung, S. J. (2011). Activity‐based divergent supply chain planning for competitive advantage in the risky global environment: A DEMATEL‐ANP fuzzy goal programming approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9053–9062. Joshi, R., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2011). A Delphi‐AHP‐TOPSIS based benchmarking framework for performance improvement of a cold chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 10170–10182. Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: A case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 194–208. Khorshidi, R., Hassani, A., Rauof, A. H., & Emamy, M. (2013). Selection of an optimal refinement condition to achieve maximum tensile properties of Al–15%Mg2Si composite based on TOPSIS method. Materials & Design, 46, 442–450. Kilincci, O., & Onal, S. A. (2011). Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9656–9664. Kittur, J., Vijaykumar, S., Bellubbi, V. P., Vishal, P., & Shankara, M. G. (2015). Comparison of different MCDM techniques used to evaluate optimal generation. In International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT), October, pp. 172‐177, IEEE. Koufteros, X., Vickery, S. K., & Dröge, C. (2012). The effects of strategic supplier selection on buyer competitive performance in matched domains: Does supplier integration mediate the relationships? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 93–115. Kucukaltan, B., Irani, Z., & Aktas, E. (2016). A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 346–358. Lamoureux, J. F., & Evans, T. A. (2011). Supply chain finance: A new means to support the competitiveness and resilience of global value chains. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2179944 or https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.2179944 Lenth, R. V. (1989). Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials. Technometrics, 31(4), 469–473. Lima Junior, F., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. (2014). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing: vol, 21, 194–209. Liou, J. J., Yen, L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008). Building an effective safety management system for airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(1), 20–26. Meesariganda, B. R., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). Mapping verbal AHP scale to numerical scale for cloud computing strategy selection. Applied Soft Computing, 53(April), 111–118. Mo, H., & Deng, Y. (2016). A new aggregating operator for linguistic information based on D numbers. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge‐Based Systems, 24(06), 831–846. Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and supply chain managementCengage Learning. More, D., & Basu, P. (2013). Challenges of supply chain finance: A detailed study and a hierarchical model based on the experiences of an Indian firm. Business Process Management Journal, 19(4), 624–647. Nerkar, A., & Paruchuri, S. (2005). Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science, 51(5), 771– 785. Orji, I., & Wei, S. (2014). A decision support tool for sustainable supplier selection in manufacturing firms. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(5), 1293–1315. Öztayşi, B., & Uçal, I. (2009). Comparing MADM techniques for use in performance measurement. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 53‐64. Paloma, M., & Ortiz, C. (2012). Presente Futuro de la Industria del Plástico en México. Pecchia, L., Bath, P. A., Pendleton, N., & Bracale, M. (2010). Web‐based system for assessing risk factors for falls in community‐dwelling elderly people using the analytic hierarchy process. Internationa Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2(2). Pecchia, L., Martin, J. L., Ragozzino, A., Vanzanella, C., Scognamiglio, A., Mirarchi, L., & Morgan, S. P. (2013). User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a computed tomography (CT) scanner. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(2), 1–11. Pi, W. N., & Low, C. (2006). Supplier evaluation and selection via Taguchi loss functions and an AHP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27(5–6), 625–630. Poveda‐Bautista, R., Baptista, D. C., & García‐Melón, M. (2012). Setting competitiveness indicators using BSC and ANP. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4738–4752. Prajogo, D., Oke, A., & Olhager, J. (2016). Supply chain processes: Linking supply logistics integration, supply performance, lean processes and competitive performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(2), 220–238. Pulles, N. J., Pulles, N. J., Veldman, J., Veldman, J., Schiele, H., & Schiele, H. (2016). Winning the competition for supplier resources: The role of preferential resource allocation from suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(11), 1458–1481. Rastar, H., Oobari, H. B., Digesarai, E. G., & Sadeghian, S. (2013). Province bank branches performance evaluation by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 3(5), 77–84. Raut, R. D., Bhasin, H. V., & Kamble, S. S. (2011). Evaluation of supplier selection criteria by combination of AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL method. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(4), 359–392. Rezaeisaray, M., Ebrahimnejad, S., & Khalili‐Damghani, K. (2016). A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing supplier selection: A case study in pipe and fittings manufacturing. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 536–559. Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—The analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1–35. Saaty, T. L. (2005). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision‐making. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (pp. 345–407). Boston: Springer Science + Business Media Inc. Saaty, T. L. (2013). The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research, 61(5), 1101–1118. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2013). The logic of priorities: applications of business, energy, health and transportationSpringer Science & Business Q14 Media. Sadgrove, K. (2016). The complete guide to business risk management. Q15 Routledge. Sanders, N. R. (2007). The benefits of using E‐business technology: The supplier perspective. Journal of Business Logistics, 28(2), 177–207. Santana, R. M. C., & Gondim, G. (2009). Influence of cleaning conditions on the degradation of recycled HDPE. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 112(3), 1454–1460. Scholl, A., Manthey, L., Helm, R., & Steiner, M. (2005). Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(3), 760–777. Shaik, M. N., & Abdul‐Kader, W. (2013). Transportation in reverse logistics enterprise: A comprehensive performance measurement methodology. Production Planning & Control, 24(6), 495–510. Shanian, A., & Savadogo, O. (2006). TOPSIS multiple‐criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 159(2), 1095–1104. Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., & Ramezani, I. (2014). Application of fuzzy AHP approach for financial performance evaluation of Iranian petrochemical sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 995–1004. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.352 Simić, D., Kovačević, I., Svirčević, V., & Simić, S. (2016). 50 years of fuzzy set theory and models for supplier assessment and selection: A literature review. Journal of Applied Logic. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. jal.2016.11.016 Stević, Ž., Tanackov, I., Vasiljević, M., Novarlić, B., & Stojić, G. (2016). An integrated fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS model for supplier evaluation. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 15–27. Su, C. M., Horng, D. J., Tseng, M. L., Chiu, A. S., Wu, K. J., & Chen, H. P. (2016). Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey‐DEMATEL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 469–481. Sun, C., Huang, H., & Miao, M. (2015). Collaborative decision‐making method for large equipment enterprise's supplier selection with incomplete information. In 12th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), June, pp. 1‐5, IEEE. Tajdini, S., & Nazari, M. (2012). IS outsourcing decision: A quantitative approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 113–129. Upton, D. M. (1994). The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Review, 36(2), 72–89. Urban, G. L., Sultan, F., & Qualls, W. J. (2000). Placing trust at the center of your Internet strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 39. Ustun, O., & Demirtas, E. A. (2008). An integrated multi‐objective decision‐ making process for multi‐period lot‐sizing with supplier selection. Omega, 36(4), 509–521. Van Horenbeek, A., & Pintelon, L. (2014). Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—Using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega, 42(1), 33–46. Vázquez, H., & Dacosta, O. (2007). Fermentación alcohólica: Una opción para la producción de energía renovable a partir de desechos agrícolas. Ingeniería, Investigación Y Tecnología, 8(4), 249–259. Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi‐criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56– 66. Vijayvargiya, A., & Dey, A. K. (2010). An analytical approach for selection of a logistics provider. Management Decision, 48(3), 403–418. Viloria, A. (2016). Commercial strategies providers pharmaceutical chains for logistics cost reduction. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(1). Q16 Wang, G., Qin, L., Li, G., & Chen, L. (2009). Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(8), 2414–2421. Wang, C. H., & Wu, H. S. (2016). A novel framework to evaluate programmable logic controllers: A fuzzy MCDM perspective. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(2), 315–324. Wei, P. L., Huang, J. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Wu, S. I. (2010). Causal modeling of web‐advertising effects by improving SEM based on DEMATEL technique. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 9(05), 799–829. Wetzstein, A., Hartmann, E., Benton Jr., W. C., & Hohenstein, N.‐O. (2016). A systematic assessment of supplier selection literature—State‐of‐the‐ art and future scope. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 304–323. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.022 Wood, D. A. (2016). Supplier selection for development of petroleum industry facilities, applying multi‐criteria decision making techniques including fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS with flexible entropy weighting. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 28, 594–612. Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835. Wu, Q., Jia, R., & Yu, H. (2014). Study on environmental efficiency of electric power industry based on DEA optimization model. Journal of Information & Computational Science, 11(3), 781–795. Wu, C. S., Lin, C. T., & Lee, C. (2010). Optimal marketing strategy: A decision‐making with ANP and TOPSIS. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(1), 190–196. Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Antucheviciene, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision‐making methods: A review of applications for sustainability iss |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis |
| institution |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/1198/1/Strategic%20hybrid%20approach%20for%20selecting%20suppliers%20of%20high%e2%80%90density.pdf https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/1198/2/license.txt https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/1198/4/Strategic%20hybrid%20approach%20for%20selecting%20suppliers%20of%20high%e2%80%90density.pdf.jpg https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/1198/5/Strategic%20hybrid%20approach%20for%20selecting%20suppliers%20of%20high%e2%80%90density.pdf.txt |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
9e9d1406636b9702b68f1c18ea51f194 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 a537877a871d3a720d333fafeabf191a cb1da36718a25cf5149b5e186faee034 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad de La Costa |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1808400153937182720 |
| spelling |
Ortiz Barrios, Miguel Angel0194f6a9674b28ba0ae84402ee76f9e4Berk, Kucukaltan5a41b8c5aad6aa8125b3870f44c759ecCarvajal Tinoco, Daniel Josué93bf3e9ffedcbc01cdd00ed5c462f36eNeira Rodado, Dionicio3be1ac9c504a1282ad14d2dee803adcfJimenez, Genettc56d04e80b00ef9dfc4706bc1d6b31572018-11-16T22:33:33Z2018-11-16T22:33:33Z20171099-1360http://hdl.handle.net/11323/1198Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Supplier selection is an important process for companies in the plastic sector due to its influence on firm performance and competitiveness. For a proper selection, a number of criteria from different aspects need to be considered by decision makers. Yet, as in different fields, because there are numerous criteria and alternatives to be considered in the plastic industry, choosing an appropriate multicriteria decision-making approach has become a critical step for selecting suppliers. Therefore, the aim of this research is to define the most suitable supplier of high-density polyethylene through the integration of powerful multicriteria decision-making methods. For this purpose, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) is initially applied to define initial weights of factors and subfactors under uncertainty, followed by the use of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) to evaluate interrelations between the elements of the hierarchy. Then, after combining FAHP and DEMATEL to calculate the final contributions of both factors and subfactors on the basis of interdependence, the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution is used to assess the supplier alternatives. In addition, this paper also explores the differences between the judgments of decision makers for both AHP and DEMATEL methods. To do these, a case study is presented to demonstrate the validity of the proposed approach.engJournal of MultiCriteria Decision AnalysisAtribución – No comercial – Compartir igualinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Supply ChainsDecision MakingGreen SupplierStrategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high-density polyethyleneArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionAlimardani, M., Rabbani, M., & Rafiei, H. (2014). A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP and TOPSIS for supplier selection in agile supply chains. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 18(2), 179–211. Ar, I. M., Göksen, H., & Tuncer, M. A. (2015). Kablo Sektöründe Tedarikçi Seçimi Için Bütünlesik DEMATEL‐AAS‐VIKOR Yönteminin Kullanilmasi/using integrated DEMATEL‐ANP‐VIKOR method for supplier selection in cable sector. Ege Akademik Bakis, 15(2), 285. Ayhan, M. B. (2013). A fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: A case study in a gear motor company. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.2886. Azar, G., & Drogendijk, R. (2014). Psychic distance, innovation, and firm performance. Management International Review, 54(5), 581–613. Barrios, M. A. O., De Felice, F., Negrete, K. P., Romero, B. A., Arenas, A. Y., & Petrillo, A. (2016). An AHP‐TOPSIS integrated model for selecting the most appropriate tomography equipment. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(4), 861–885. Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision‐making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872–3885. Chamodrakas, I., Leftheriotis, I., & Martakos, D. (2011). In‐depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS. Applied Soft Computing, 11(1), 900–907. Chan, F. S. (2003). Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: An analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research, 41(15), 3549–3579. Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301. Daim, T. U., Udbye, A., & Balasubramanian, A. (2013). Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for selection of 3PL providers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), 28–51. Dargi, A., Anjomshoae, A., Galankashi, M. R., Memari, A., & Tap, M. B. M. (2014). Supplier selection: A fuzzy‐ANP approach. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 691–700. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.317 Demirtas, E. A., & Üstün, Ö. (2008). An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation. Omega, 36(1), 76–90. Dweiri, F., Kumar, S., Khan, S. A., & Jain, V. (2016). Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 273–283. Dymova, L., Sevastjanov, P., & Tikhonenko, A. (2013). A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(12), 4841–4847. Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702–715. Florez Piña, L. (2013). Ejecución de un protocolo para la selección de proveedores de una poliolefina de alta densidad. Universidad de Costa Rica. Forum, W. E. (Ed) (2016). The New Plastics Economy Rethinking the future of plastics. Geneva: Switzerland. Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi‐criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24. Hosseini, S., & Al Khaled, A. (2016). A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–22. Hsieh, Y. F., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, S. B. (2016). Rebuilding DEMATEL threshold value: An example of a food and beverage information system. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1385. Huizingh, E. K., & Vrolijk, H. C. (1997). A comparison of verbal and numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(3), 237–247. Hung, S. J. (2011). Activity‐based divergent supply chain planning for competitive advantage in the risky global environment: A DEMATEL‐ANP fuzzy goal programming approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9053–9062. Joshi, R., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2011). A Delphi‐AHP‐TOPSIS based benchmarking framework for performance improvement of a cold chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 10170–10182. Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: A case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 194–208. Khorshidi, R., Hassani, A., Rauof, A. H., & Emamy, M. (2013). Selection of an optimal refinement condition to achieve maximum tensile properties of Al–15%Mg2Si composite based on TOPSIS method. Materials & Design, 46, 442–450. Kilincci, O., & Onal, S. A. (2011). Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9656–9664. Kittur, J., Vijaykumar, S., Bellubbi, V. P., Vishal, P., & Shankara, M. G. (2015). Comparison of different MCDM techniques used to evaluate optimal generation. In International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT), October, pp. 172‐177, IEEE. Koufteros, X., Vickery, S. K., & Dröge, C. (2012). The effects of strategic supplier selection on buyer competitive performance in matched domains: Does supplier integration mediate the relationships? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 93–115. Kucukaltan, B., Irani, Z., & Aktas, E. (2016). A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 346–358. Lamoureux, J. F., & Evans, T. A. (2011). Supply chain finance: A new means to support the competitiveness and resilience of global value chains. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2179944 or https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.2179944 Lenth, R. V. (1989). Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials. Technometrics, 31(4), 469–473. Lima Junior, F., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. (2014). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing: vol, 21, 194–209. Liou, J. J., Yen, L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008). Building an effective safety management system for airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(1), 20–26. Meesariganda, B. R., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). Mapping verbal AHP scale to numerical scale for cloud computing strategy selection. Applied Soft Computing, 53(April), 111–118. Mo, H., & Deng, Y. (2016). A new aggregating operator for linguistic information based on D numbers. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge‐Based Systems, 24(06), 831–846. Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and supply chain managementCengage Learning. More, D., & Basu, P. (2013). Challenges of supply chain finance: A detailed study and a hierarchical model based on the experiences of an Indian firm. Business Process Management Journal, 19(4), 624–647. Nerkar, A., & Paruchuri, S. (2005). Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science, 51(5), 771– 785. Orji, I., & Wei, S. (2014). A decision support tool for sustainable supplier selection in manufacturing firms. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(5), 1293–1315. Öztayşi, B., & Uçal, I. (2009). Comparing MADM techniques for use in performance measurement. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 53‐64. Paloma, M., & Ortiz, C. (2012). Presente Futuro de la Industria del Plástico en México. Pecchia, L., Bath, P. A., Pendleton, N., & Bracale, M. (2010). Web‐based system for assessing risk factors for falls in community‐dwelling elderly people using the analytic hierarchy process. Internationa Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2(2). Pecchia, L., Martin, J. L., Ragozzino, A., Vanzanella, C., Scognamiglio, A., Mirarchi, L., & Morgan, S. P. (2013). User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a computed tomography (CT) scanner. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(2), 1–11. Pi, W. N., & Low, C. (2006). Supplier evaluation and selection via Taguchi loss functions and an AHP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27(5–6), 625–630. Poveda‐Bautista, R., Baptista, D. C., & García‐Melón, M. (2012). Setting competitiveness indicators using BSC and ANP. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4738–4752. Prajogo, D., Oke, A., & Olhager, J. (2016). Supply chain processes: Linking supply logistics integration, supply performance, lean processes and competitive performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(2), 220–238. Pulles, N. J., Pulles, N. J., Veldman, J., Veldman, J., Schiele, H., & Schiele, H. (2016). Winning the competition for supplier resources: The role of preferential resource allocation from suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(11), 1458–1481. Rastar, H., Oobari, H. B., Digesarai, E. G., & Sadeghian, S. (2013). Province bank branches performance evaluation by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 3(5), 77–84. Raut, R. D., Bhasin, H. V., & Kamble, S. S. (2011). Evaluation of supplier selection criteria by combination of AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL method. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(4), 359–392. Rezaeisaray, M., Ebrahimnejad, S., & Khalili‐Damghani, K. (2016). A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing supplier selection: A case study in pipe and fittings manufacturing. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 536–559. Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—The analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1–35. Saaty, T. L. (2005). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision‐making. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (pp. 345–407). Boston: Springer Science + Business Media Inc. Saaty, T. L. (2013). The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research, 61(5), 1101–1118. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2013). The logic of priorities: applications of business, energy, health and transportationSpringer Science & Business Q14 Media. Sadgrove, K. (2016). The complete guide to business risk management. Q15 Routledge. Sanders, N. R. (2007). The benefits of using E‐business technology: The supplier perspective. Journal of Business Logistics, 28(2), 177–207. Santana, R. M. C., & Gondim, G. (2009). Influence of cleaning conditions on the degradation of recycled HDPE. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 112(3), 1454–1460. Scholl, A., Manthey, L., Helm, R., & Steiner, M. (2005). Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(3), 760–777. Shaik, M. N., & Abdul‐Kader, W. (2013). Transportation in reverse logistics enterprise: A comprehensive performance measurement methodology. Production Planning & Control, 24(6), 495–510. Shanian, A., & Savadogo, O. (2006). TOPSIS multiple‐criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 159(2), 1095–1104. Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., & Ramezani, I. (2014). Application of fuzzy AHP approach for financial performance evaluation of Iranian petrochemical sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 995–1004. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.352 Simić, D., Kovačević, I., Svirčević, V., & Simić, S. (2016). 50 years of fuzzy set theory and models for supplier assessment and selection: A literature review. Journal of Applied Logic. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. jal.2016.11.016 Stević, Ž., Tanackov, I., Vasiljević, M., Novarlić, B., & Stojić, G. (2016). An integrated fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS model for supplier evaluation. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 15–27. Su, C. M., Horng, D. J., Tseng, M. L., Chiu, A. S., Wu, K. J., & Chen, H. P. (2016). Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey‐DEMATEL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 469–481. Sun, C., Huang, H., & Miao, M. (2015). Collaborative decision‐making method for large equipment enterprise's supplier selection with incomplete information. In 12th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), June, pp. 1‐5, IEEE. Tajdini, S., & Nazari, M. (2012). IS outsourcing decision: A quantitative approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 113–129. Upton, D. M. (1994). The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Review, 36(2), 72–89. Urban, G. L., Sultan, F., & Qualls, W. J. (2000). Placing trust at the center of your Internet strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 39. Ustun, O., & Demirtas, E. A. (2008). An integrated multi‐objective decision‐ making process for multi‐period lot‐sizing with supplier selection. Omega, 36(4), 509–521. Van Horenbeek, A., & Pintelon, L. (2014). Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—Using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega, 42(1), 33–46. Vázquez, H., & Dacosta, O. (2007). Fermentación alcohólica: Una opción para la producción de energía renovable a partir de desechos agrícolas. Ingeniería, Investigación Y Tecnología, 8(4), 249–259. Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi‐criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56– 66. Vijayvargiya, A., & Dey, A. K. (2010). An analytical approach for selection of a logistics provider. Management Decision, 48(3), 403–418. Viloria, A. (2016). Commercial strategies providers pharmaceutical chains for logistics cost reduction. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(1). Q16 Wang, G., Qin, L., Li, G., & Chen, L. (2009). Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(8), 2414–2421. Wang, C. H., & Wu, H. S. (2016). A novel framework to evaluate programmable logic controllers: A fuzzy MCDM perspective. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(2), 315–324. Wei, P. L., Huang, J. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Wu, S. I. (2010). Causal modeling of web‐advertising effects by improving SEM based on DEMATEL technique. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 9(05), 799–829. Wetzstein, A., Hartmann, E., Benton Jr., W. C., & Hohenstein, N.‐O. (2016). A systematic assessment of supplier selection literature—State‐of‐the‐ art and future scope. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 304–323. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.022 Wood, D. A. (2016). Supplier selection for development of petroleum industry facilities, applying multi‐criteria decision making techniques including fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS with flexible entropy weighting. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 28, 594–612. Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835. Wu, Q., Jia, R., & Yu, H. (2014). Study on environmental efficiency of electric power industry based on DEA optimization model. Journal of Information & Computational Science, 11(3), 781–795. Wu, C. S., Lin, C. T., & Lee, C. (2010). Optimal marketing strategy: A decision‐making with ANP and TOPSIS. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(1), 190–196. Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Antucheviciene, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision‐making methods: A review of applications for sustainability issORIGINALStrategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high‐density.pdfStrategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high‐density.pdfapplication/pdf1121165https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/1198/1/Strategic%20hybrid%20approach%20for%20selecting%20suppliers%20of%20high%e2%80%90density.pdf9e9d1406636b9702b68f1c18ea51f194MD51open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/1198/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52open accessTHUMBNAILStrategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high‐density.pdf.jpgStrategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high‐density.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg70584https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/1198/4/Strategic%20hybrid%20approach%20for%20selecting%20suppliers%20of%20high%e2%80%90density.pdf.jpga537877a871d3a720d333fafeabf191aMD54open accessTEXTStrategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high‐density.pdf.txtStrategic hybrid approach for selecting suppliers of high‐density.pdf.txttext/plain104746https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/1198/5/Strategic%20hybrid%20approach%20for%20selecting%20suppliers%20of%20high%e2%80%90density.pdf.txtcb1da36718a25cf5149b5e186faee034MD55open access11323/1198oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/11982023-12-14 15:39:41.2open accessRepositorio Universidad de La Costabdigital@metabiblioteca.comTk9URTogUExBQ0UgWU9VUiBPV04gTElDRU5TRSBIRVJFClRoaXMgc2FtcGxlIGxpY2Vuc2UgaXMgcHJvdmlkZWQgZm9yIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgcHVycG9zZXMgb25seS4KCk5PTi1FWENMVVNJVkUgRElTVFJJQlVUSU9OIExJQ0VOU0UKCkJ5IHNpZ25pbmcgYW5kIHN1Ym1pdHRpbmcgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCB5b3UgKHRoZSBhdXRob3Iocykgb3IgY29weXJpZ2h0Cm93bmVyKSBncmFudHMgdG8gRFNwYWNlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgKERTVSkgdGhlIG5vbi1leGNsdXNpdmUgcmlnaHQgdG8gcmVwcm9kdWNlLAp0cmFuc2xhdGUgKGFzIGRlZmluZWQgYmVsb3cpLCBhbmQvb3IgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZSB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gKGluY2x1ZGluZwp0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3QpIHdvcmxkd2lkZSBpbiBwcmludCBhbmQgZWxlY3Ryb25pYyBmb3JtYXQgYW5kIGluIGFueSBtZWRpdW0sCmluY2x1ZGluZyBidXQgbm90IGxpbWl0ZWQgdG8gYXVkaW8gb3IgdmlkZW8uCgpZb3UgYWdyZWUgdGhhdCBEU1UgbWF5LCB3aXRob3V0IGNoYW5naW5nIHRoZSBjb250ZW50LCB0cmFuc2xhdGUgdGhlCnN1Ym1pc3Npb24gdG8gYW55IG1lZGl1bSBvciBmb3JtYXQgZm9yIHRoZSBwdXJwb3NlIG9mIHByZXNlcnZhdGlvbi4KCllvdSBhbHNvIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgRFNVIG1heSBrZWVwIG1vcmUgdGhhbiBvbmUgY29weSBvZiB0aGlzIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZm9yCnB1cnBvc2VzIG9mIHNlY3VyaXR5LCBiYWNrLXVwIGFuZCBwcmVzZXJ2YXRpb24uCgpZb3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgdGhlIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gaXMgeW91ciBvcmlnaW5hbCB3b3JrLCBhbmQgdGhhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZQp0aGUgcmlnaHQgdG8gZ3JhbnQgdGhlIHJpZ2h0cyBjb250YWluZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLiBZb3UgYWxzbyByZXByZXNlbnQKdGhhdCB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZG9lcyBub3QsIHRvIHRoZSBiZXN0IG9mIHlvdXIga25vd2xlZGdlLCBpbmZyaW5nZSB1cG9uCmFueW9uZSdzIGNvcHlyaWdodC4KCklmIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uIGNvbnRhaW5zIG1hdGVyaWFsIGZvciB3aGljaCB5b3UgZG8gbm90IGhvbGQgY29weXJpZ2h0LAp5b3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgeW91IGhhdmUgb2J0YWluZWQgdGhlIHVucmVzdHJpY3RlZCBwZXJtaXNzaW9uIG9mIHRoZQpjb3B5cmlnaHQgb3duZXIgdG8gZ3JhbnQgRFNVIHRoZSByaWdodHMgcmVxdWlyZWQgYnkgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCBhbmQgdGhhdApzdWNoIHRoaXJkLXBhcnR5IG93bmVkIG1hdGVyaWFsIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgaWRlbnRpZmllZCBhbmQgYWNrbm93bGVkZ2VkCndpdGhpbiB0aGUgdGV4dCBvciBjb250ZW50IG9mIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgoKSUYgVEhFIFNVQk1JU1NJT04gSVMgQkFTRUQgVVBPTiBXT1JLIFRIQVQgSEFTIEJFRU4gU1BPTlNPUkVEIE9SIFNVUFBPUlRFRApCWSBBTiBBR0VOQ1kgT1IgT1JHQU5JWkFUSU9OIE9USEVSIFRIQU4gRFNVLCBZT1UgUkVQUkVTRU5UIFRIQVQgWU9VIEhBVkUKRlVMRklMTEVEIEFOWSBSSUdIVCBPRiBSRVZJRVcgT1IgT1RIRVIgT0JMSUdBVElPTlMgUkVRVUlSRUQgQlkgU1VDSApDT05UUkFDVCBPUiBBR1JFRU1FTlQuCgpEU1Ugd2lsbCBjbGVhcmx5IGlkZW50aWZ5IHlvdXIgbmFtZShzKSBhcyB0aGUgYXV0aG9yKHMpIG9yIG93bmVyKHMpIG9mIHRoZQpzdWJtaXNzaW9uLCBhbmQgd2lsbCBub3QgbWFrZSBhbnkgYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiwgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBhcyBhbGxvd2VkIGJ5IHRoaXMKbGljZW5zZSwgdG8geW91ciBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgo= |