Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes
Understanding stakeholder power relations—such as between land sellers, land buyers, and local governments—is crucial to understanding Land Value Capture (LVC). While scholars have focused on stakeholder relationships through approaches such as stakeholder salience, stakeholder interaction, stakehol...
- Autores:
-
Wang, Weifang
van Noorloos, Femke
Spit, Tejo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/7759
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7759
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104357
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Land Value Capture
power relation
stakeholder
public property
private property
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
| id |
RCUC2_e92717153c9552c948942c424339b95c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/7759 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCUC2 |
| network_name_str |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes |
| title |
Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes |
| spellingShingle |
Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes Land Value Capture power relation stakeholder public property private property |
| title_short |
Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes |
| title_full |
Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes |
| title_fullStr |
Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes |
| title_sort |
Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimes |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Wang, Weifang van Noorloos, Femke Spit, Tejo |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Wang, Weifang van Noorloos, Femke Spit, Tejo |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Land Value Capture power relation stakeholder public property private property |
| topic |
Land Value Capture power relation stakeholder public property private property |
| description |
Understanding stakeholder power relations—such as between land sellers, land buyers, and local governments—is crucial to understanding Land Value Capture (LVC). While scholars have focused on stakeholder relationships through approaches such as stakeholder salience, stakeholder interaction, stakeholder value network, and stakeholder multiplicity, much research either places insufficient focus on power or only stresses partial attributes of power. As a result, the role of power relations among key stakeholders in LVC remains insufficiently explored. Our contribution is a new analytical framework for stakeholder power dynamics surrounding LVC. This provides an empirical analysis by comparing the public (China) and the private (U.S.) dominant regimes, through the perspectives of power direction, strength, and mechanism. To conceptualize the three perspectives of power in LVC, we constructed an analytical matrix and then categorized data in terms of stakeholder, space, and time perspectives. Based on empirical findings, four emerging dilemmas shed light on consequences for LVC policy making as well as areas in need of further research |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-22T23:50:49Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-22T23:50:49Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7759 |
| dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104357 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7759 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104357 https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Land-property markets and planning: A special case Land Use Policy, 41 (2014), pp. 533-540 A theory of the urban land market Papers in Regional Science, 6 (1960), pp. 149-157 Land use regulations and property values: The’Windfalls Capture’idea revisited (2012), pp. 755-786 Taxing land for urban containment: Reflections on a Dutch debate Land Use Policy, 26 (2009), pp. 233-241 Factors Influencing the Value of Urban Land: Evidence from Halifax‐Dartmouth, Canada Real Estate Economics, 13 (1985), pp. 361-377 The causal structure of land price determinants Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 54 (2006), pp. 227-245 Performance-based planning: perspectives from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25 (2006), pp. 396-409 Conspicuous consumption behavior of land-lost farmers: A perspective of social identity Cities, 66 (2017), pp. 81-90 Bao and Peng, 2016 H. Bao, Y. Peng Effect of land expropriation on land-lost farmers’ entrepreneurial action: A case study of Zhejiang Province Habitat International, 53 (2016), pp. 342-349 Batt, 2001 H.W. Batt Value Capture as a Policy Tool in Transportation Economics: An Exploration in Public Finance in the Tradition of Henry George American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60 (2001), pp. 195-228 Beaton, 1991 W.P. Beaton The impact of regional land-use controls on property values: the case of the New Jersey Pinelands Land Economics, 67 (1991), pp. 172-194 Beritelli and Laesser, 2011 P. Beritelli, C. Laesser Power dimensions and influence reputation in tourist destinations: Empirical evidence from a network of actors and stakeholders Tourism Management, 32 (2011), pp. 1299-1309 Borras, 2003 S.M. Borras Questioning market‐led agrarian reform: Experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa Journal of agrarian change, 3 (2003), pp. 367-394 Boucher et al., 2005 S.R. Boucher, B.L. Barham, M.R. Carter The Impact of “Market-Friendly” Reforms on Credit and Land Markets in Honduras and Nicaragua World Development, 33 (2005), pp. 107-128 Bowman and Ambrosini, 2000 C. Bowman, V. Ambrosini Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy British journal of management, 11 (2000), pp. 1-15 Boyd, 2011 D. Boyd Land Value Taxation: Theory, Evidence, and Practice F. Richard (Ed.), Dye and Richard W, Wiley Online Library, England (2011) Cai, 2017 M. Cai Revenue, time horizon, and land allocation in China Land Use Policy, 62 (2017), pp. 101-112 Cameron et al., 2011 B.G. Cameron, E.F. Crawley, W. Feng, M. Lin Strategic decisions in complex stakeholder environments: a theory of generalized exchange Engineering Management Journal, 23 (2011), pp. 37-45 Cao et al., 2008 G. Cao, C. Feng, R. Tao Local “land finance” in China’s urban expansion: challenges and solutions China & World Economy, 16 (2008), pp. 19-30 Capozza et al., 2002 D.R. Capozza, P.H. Hendershott, C. Mack, C.J. Mayer Determinants of real house price dynamics National Bureau of Economic Research. (2002) Chapman, 2017 J. Chapman Value Capture Taxation as an Infrastructure Funding Technique Public Works Management & Policy, 22 (2017), pp. 31-37 Chen and Kung, 2016 T. Chen, J.K.S. Kung Do land revenue windfalls create a political resource curse? Evidence from China Journal of Development Economics, 123 (2016), pp. 86-106 Cheshire and Sheppard, 1995 P. Cheshire, S. Sheppard On the price of land and the value of amenities Economica (1995), pp. 247-267 Cheshire, 2013 P.C. Cheshire Land market regulation: market versus policy failures Journal of property research, 30 (2013), pp. 170-188 Chi-Man Hui et al., 2004 E. Chi-Man Hui, V. Sze-Mun Ho, D. Kim-Hin Ho Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore: A comparative analysis Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22 (2004), pp. 76-100 Choumert and Phélinas, 2015 J. Choumert, P. Phélinas Determinants of agricultural land values in Argentina Ecological Economics, 110 (2015), pp. 134-140 Cigdem and Wood, 2012 M. Cigdem, G. Wood Choice and government intervention in housing markets International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (2012), pp. 137-143 Coleman and Grimes, 2010 A. Coleman, A. Grimes Betterment taxes, capital gains and benefit cost ratios Economics Letters, 109 (2010), pp. 54-56 Colwell and Munneke, 1997 P.F. Colwell, H.J. Munneke The structure of urban land prices Journal of Urban Economics, 41 (1997), pp. 321-336 Connolly and Wall, 2016 C. Connolly, A. Wall Value capture: A valid means of funding PPPs? Financial Accountability & Management, 32 (2016), pp. 157-178 Czyżewski and Matuszczak, 2016 B. Czyżewski, A. Matuszczak A new land rent theory for sustainable agriculture Land Use Policy, 55 (2016), pp. 222-229 Czyżewski et al., 2017 B. Czyżewski, G. Przekota, A. Poczta-Wajda The incidence of agricultural policy on the land market in Poland: Two-dimensional and multilevel analysis Land Use Policy, 63 (2017), pp. 174-185 Davis and Heathcote, 2007 M.A. Davis, J. Heathcote The price and quantity of residential land in the United States Journal of Monetary Economics, 54 (2007), pp. 2595-2620 Davis and Palumbo, 2008 M.A. Davis, M.G. Palumbo The price of residential land in large US cities Journal of Urban Economics, 63 (2008), pp. 352-384 de Bussy and Kelly, 2010 N.M. de Bussy, L. Kelly Stakeholders, politics and power: Towards an understanding of stakeholder identification and salience in government Journal of Communication Management, 14 (2010), pp. 289-305 Diamond, 1985 N. Diamond Rural Collectivization and Decollectivization in China—A Review Article The Journal of Asian Studies, 44 (1985), pp. 785-792 Ding, 2003 C. Ding Land policy reform in China: assessment and prospects Land use policy, 20 (2003), pp. 109-120 Ding, 2007 C. Ding Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China Land use policy, 24 (2007), pp. 1-13 Ding and Zhao, 2014 C. Ding, X. Zhao Land market, land development and urban spatial structure in Beijing Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 83-90 Du et al., 2015 J. Du, Y. Lu, Z. Tao Government expropriation and Chinese-style firm diversification Journal of Comparative Economics, 43 (2015), pp. 155-169 Du et al., 2014 J. Du, J.-C. Thill, R.B. Peiser, C. Feng Urban land market and land-use changes in post-reform China: A case study of Beijing Landscape and Urban Planning, 124 (2014), pp. 118-128 Eddie et al., 2004 C.M.H. Eddie, S.M.H. Vivian, K.H.H. David Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore: A comparative analysis Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22 (2004), pp. 76-100 Eidelman, 2016 G. Eidelman Rethinking public land ownership and urban development: A Canadian perspective Cities, 55 (2016), pp. 122-126 Emerson, 1962 R.M. Emerson Power-dependence relations American sociological review (1962), pp. 31-41 Evans, 1983 A.W. Evans The determination of the price of land Urban Studies, 20 (1983), pp. 119-129 Evans, 1999 A.W. Evans The land market and government intervention Handbook of regional and urban economics, 3 (1999), pp. 1637-1669 Feng et al., 2014 L. Feng, H.X.H. Bao, Y. Jiang Land reallocation reform in rural China: A behavioral economics perspective Land Use Policy, 41 (2014), pp. 246-259 Feng, 2013 W. Feng Strategic management for large engineering projects: the stakeholder value network approach Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2013) Floetotto et al., 2016 M. Floetotto, M. Kirker, J. Stroebel Government intervention in the housing market: Who wins, who loses? Journal of Monetary Economics, 80 (2016), pp. 106-123 Ford and Johnson, 1998 R. Ford, C. Johnson The perception of power: Dependence and legitimacy in conflict Social Psychology Quarterly (1998), pp. 16-32 Foucault, 1991 M. Foucault The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality University of Chicago Press (1991) Foucault, 1998 M. Foucault J. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 2 (1998) Friis and Nielsen, 2016 C. Friis, J.Ø. Nielsen Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: Exploring the case of Chinese banana investments in Northern Laos Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 117-129 Frooman, 1999 J. Frooman Stakeholder influence strategies Academy of management review, 24 (1999), pp. 191-205 Gao et al., 2017 J. Gao, W. Chen, F. Yuan Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations Land Use Policy, 68 (2017), pp. 604-613 Garza and Lizieri, 2016 N. Garza, C. Lizieri A spatial-temporal assessment of the Land Value Development Tax Land Use Policy, 50 (2016), pp. 449-460 Gaventa, 2003 J. Gaventa Power after Lukes: an overview of theories of power since Lukes and their application to development Participation Group, Institute of Development Studies., Brighton (2003) Ghatak and Mookherjee, 2014 M. Ghatak, D. Mookherjee Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers Journal of Development Economics, 110 (2014), pp. 303-312 Gleeson, 1994 B. Gleeson Reforming planning legislation: a New Zealand perspective (1994) Guo et al., 2015 S. Guo, L. Liu, Y. Zhao The business cycle implications of land financing in China Economic Modelling, 46 (2015), pp. 225-237 Han and Kung, 2015 L. Han, J.K.-S. Kung Fiscal incentives and policy choices of local governments: Evidence from China Journal of Development Economics, 116 (2015), pp. 89-104 Hankinson, 2009 G. Hankinson Managing destination brands: establishing a theoretical foundation Journal of Marketing Management, 25 (2009), pp. 97-115 Haque and Asami, 2014 A. Haque, Y. Asami Optimizing urban land use allocation for planners and real estate developers Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 46 (2014), pp. 57-69 Hein et al., 2017 A.M. Hein, M. Jankovic, W. Feng, R. Farel, J.H. Yune, B. Yannou Stakeholder power in industrial symbioses: A stakeholder value network approach Journal of Cleaner Production, 148 (2017), pp. 923-933 Hu and Qian, 2017 F.Z.Y. Hu, J. Qian Land-based finance, fiscal autonomy and land supply for affordable housing in urban China: A prefecture-level analysis Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 454-460 Huang et al., 2017 X. Huang, X. Huang, Y. He, X. Yang Assessment of livelihood vulnerability of land-lost farmers in urban fringes: A case study of Xi’an, China Habitat International, 59 (2017), pp. 1-9 Huang and Du, 2017 Z. Huang, X. Du Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China Cities, 60 (2017), pp. 323-332 Hui et al., 2013 E.C.M. Hui, H.J. Bao, X.L. Zhang The policy and praxis of compensation for land expropriations in China: An appraisal from the perspective of social exclusion Land Use Policy, 32 (2013), pp. 309-316 Ingram and Hong, 2012 G.K. Ingram, Y.-h. Hong Value capture and land policies Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2012) Ito et al., 2016 J. Ito, M. Nishikori, M. Toyoshi, H.N. Feuer The contribution of land exchange institutions and markets in countering farmland abandonment in Japan Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 582-593 Jaeger, 2013 W.K. Jaeger Determinants of urban land market outcomes: Evidence from California Land Use Policy, 30 (2013), pp. 966-973 Jäger, 2009 J. Jäger Land rent theory (2009) Jones, 2014 C. Jones Land use planning policies and market forces: Utopian aspirations thwarted? Land Use Policy, 38 (2014), pp. 573-579 Larsen et al., 2009 I.K. Larsen, M. Småstuen, T.B. Johannesen, F. Langmark, D.M. Parkin, F. Bray, B.J.E.j.o.c Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness European Journal of Cancer, 45 (2009), pp. 1218-1231 Leeper et al., 2010 E.M. Leeper, T.B. Walker, S.-C.S. Yang Government investment and fiscal stimulus Journal of monetary Economics, 57 (2010), pp. 1000-1012 Lepak et al., 2007 D.P. Lepak, K.G. Smith, M.S. Taylor Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective Academy of management review, 32 (2007), pp. 180-194 Lerman and Shagaida, 2007 Z. Lerman, N. Shagaida Land policies and agricultural land markets in Russia Land Use Policy, 24 (2007), pp. 14-23 Lichtenberg and Ding, 2009 E. Lichtenberg, C. Ding Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China Journal of Urban Economics, 66 (2009), pp. 57-64 Lin and Zhu, 2014 R. Lin, D. Zhu A spatial and temporal analysis on land incremental values coupled with land rights in China Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 168-176 Liu et al., 2016 T. Liu, G. Cao, Y. Yan, R.Y. Wang Urban land marketization in China: Central policy, local initiative, and market mechanism Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 265-276 Liu et al., 2014 Y. Liu, F. Fang, Y. Li Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 6-12 Long, 2014 H. Long Land use policy in China: Introduction Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 1-5 Mathur, 2013 S. Mathur Use of land pooling and reconstitution for urban development: Experiences from Gujarat, India Habitat International, 38 (2013), pp. 199-206 Medda, 2012 F. Medda Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: a review Journal of Transport Geography, 25 (2012), pp. 154-161 Meehan and Wright, 2011 J. Meehan, G.H. Wright Power priorities: A buyer–seller comparison of areas of influence Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17 (2011), pp. 32-41 Meehan and Wright, 2012 J. Meehan, G.H. Wright The origins of power in buyer–seller relationships Industrial Marketing Management, 41 (2012), pp. 669-679 Merinero-Rodríguez and Pulido-Fernández, 2016 R. Merinero-Rodríguez, J.I. Pulido-Fernández Analysing relationships in tourism: A review Tourism Management, 54 (2016), pp. 122-135 Mill, 1884 J.S. Mill Principles of political economy D. Appleton (1884) Mills, 1969 E.S. Mills The value of urban land (1969) Miraftab, 2004 F. Miraftab Public-private partnerships: The Trojan horse of neoliberal development? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24 (2004), pp. 89-101 Mitchell et al., 1997 R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, D.J. Wood Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts Academy of management review, 22 (1997), pp. 853-886 Mittal, 2014 J. Mittal Self-financing land and urban development via land readjustment and value capture Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 314-323 Moroni, 2010 S. Moroni Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy Planning Theory, 9 (2010), pp. 137-155 Needham, 1992 B. Needham A theory of land prices when land is supplied publicly: the case of the Netherlands Urban Studies, 29 (1992), pp. 669-686 Neville and Menguc, 2006 B.A. Neville, B. Menguc Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders Journal of Business Ethics, 66 (2006), pp. 377-391 Obeng-Odoom, 2012 F. Obeng-Odoom Land reforms in Africa: Theory, practice, and outcome Habitat International, 36 (2012), pp. 161-170 Oliver, 1991 C. Oliver Strategic responses to institutional processes Academy of management review, 16 (1991), pp. 145-179 Paik, 2014 W. Paik Land Developers, States, and Collusive Clientelism in Marketizing China Pacific Focus, 29 (2014), pp. 68-91 Pan et al., 2017 F. Pan, F. Zhang, S. Zhu, D. Wójcik Developing by borrowing? Inter-jurisdictional competition, land finance and local debt accumulation in China Urban Studies, 54 (2017), pp. 897-916 Pan et al., 2015 J.-N. Pan, J.-T. Huang, T.-F. Chiang Empirical study of the local government deficit, land finance and real estate markets in China China Economic Review, 32 (2015), pp. 57-67 Phuc et al., 2014 N.Q. Phuc, A. Van Westen, A. Zoomers Agricultural land for urban development: The process of land conversion in Central Vietnam Habitat International, 41 (2014), pp. 1-7 Pils, 2016 E. Pils Assessing evictions and expropriations in China: Efficiency, credibility and rights Land Use Policy, 58 (2016), pp. 437-444 Qian, 2015 Z. Qian Land acquisition compensation in post-reform China: Evolution, structure and challenges in Hangzhou Land Use Policy, 46 (2015), pp. 250-257 Qun et al., 2015 W. Qun, L. Yongle, Y. Siqi The incentives of China’s urban land finance Land Use Policy, 42 (2015), pp. 432-442 Rabinow, 1991 P. Rabinow The Foulcault reader: an introduction to Foulcault’s thought Penguin, London (1991) Rebelo, 2017 E.M. Rebelo Land betterment capture revisited: A methodology for territorial plans Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 392-407 Rowley, 1997 T.J. Rowley Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences Academy of management Review, 22 (1997), pp. 887-910 Saito and Ruhanen, 2017 H. Saito, L. Ruhanen Power in tourism stakeholder collaborations: Power types and power holders Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31 (2017), pp. 189-196 Scoones, 1998 I. Scoones Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis (1998) Shan et al., 2017 L. Shan, A.T.W. Yu, Y. Wu Strategies for risk management in urban–rural conflict: Two case studies of land acquisition in urbanising China Habitat International, 59 (2017), pp. 90-100 Shaw and Williams, 1994 G. Shaw, A.M. Williams Critical issues in tourism: a geographical perspective Blackwell Publishers (1994) Sheehan and Ritchie, 2005 L.R. Sheehan, J.B. Ritchie Destination stakeholders exploring identity and salience Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (2005), pp. 711-734 Sikor and Müller, 2009 T. Sikor, D. Müller The Limits of State-Led Land Reform: An Introduction World Development, 37 (2009), pp. 1307-1316 Slegtenhorst, 2013 I. Slegtenhorst From value creation to value capture: Instruments of indirect value capture to fund investments in road infrastructure projects (2013) Small, 2007 L.-A. Small The sustainable rural livelihoods approach: a critical review Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 28 (2007), pp. 27-38 Smith and Gihring, 2006 J.J. Smith, T.A. Gihring Financing transit systems through value capture American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65 (2006), pp. 751-786 Smolka, 2013 M.O. Smolka Implementing value capture in Latin America: Policies and tools for urban development Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2013) Suhardiman et al., 2015 D. Suhardiman, M. Giordano, O. Keovilignavong, T. Sotoukee Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss Land Use Policy, 49 (2015), pp. 195-202 Sun et al., 2017 J. Sun, T. Chen, Z. Cheng, C.C. Wang, X. Ning A financing mode of Urban Rail transit based on land value capture: A case study in Wuhan City Transport Policy, 57 (2017), pp. 59-67 Suzuki et al., 2015 H. Suzuki, J. Murakami, Y.-H. Hong, B. Tamayose Financing transit-oriented development with land values: Adapting land value capture in developing countries World Bank Publications (2015) Tao et al., 2010 R. Tao, F. Su, M. Liu, G. Cao Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities Urban Studies, 47 (2010), pp. 2217-2236 Tian and Ma, 2009 L. Tian, W. Ma Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply Land Use Policy, 26 (2009), pp. 599-609 Timur and Getz, 2008 S. Timur, D. Getz A network perspective on managing stakeholders for sustainable urban tourism International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20 (2008), pp. 445-461 Tu et al., 2014 F. Tu, X. Yu, J. Ruan Industrial land use efficiency under government intervention: Evidence from Hangzhou, China Habitat International, 43 (2014), pp. 1-10 Tura, 2018 H.A. Tura Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia, Ethiopia Land Use Policy, 70 (2018), pp. 247-255 Van der Krabben and Jacobs, 2013 E. Van der Krabben, H.M. Jacobs Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience Land Use Policy, 30 (2013), pp. 774-783 Venkatraman, 1989 N. Venkatraman The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence Academy of management review, 14 (1989), pp. 423-444 Walters, 2013 L.C. Walters Land value capture in policy and practice Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration, 10 (2013), p. 5 Wang and Ye, 2016 W. Wang, F. Ye The political economy of land finance in China Public Budgeting & Finance, 36 (2016), pp. 91-110 Wang and Hui, 2017 Y. Wang, E.C.-m. Hui Are local governments maximizing land revenue? Evidence from China China Economic Review, 43 (2017), pp. 196-215 Wang et al., 2015 Y. Wang, D. Potoglou, S. Orford, Y. Gong Bus stop, property price and land value tax: A multilevel hedonic analysis with quantile calibration Land Use Policy, 42 (2015), pp. 381-391 Weersink et al., 1999 A. Weersink, S. Clark, C.G. Turvey, R. Sarker The effect of agricultural policy on farmland values Land Economics (1999), pp. 425-439 Weixin and Dongsong, 1990 L. Weixin, Y. Dongsong China’s land use policy under change Land use policy, 7 (1990), pp. 198-201 Wendt, 1957 P.F. Wendt Theory of urban land values Land economics, 33 (1957), pp. 228-240 Wenner, 2016 F. Wenner Sustainable urban development and land value taxation: The case of Estonia Land Use Policy. (2016) Wilcox, 2016 R.K. Wilcox An introduction to basic mechanics Orthopaedics and Trauma, 30 (2016), pp. 169-175 Wineman and Liverpool-Tasie, 2017 A. Wineman, L.S. Liverpool-Tasie Land markets and the distribution of land in northwestern Tanzania Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 550-563 Wrong, 2017 D. Wrong Power: Its forms, bases and uses Routledge (2017) Xiaoyan and Xiaoshu, 2014 H. Xiaoyan, C. Xiaoshu Mode and Mechanism of Urban Land Redevelopment Journal of Landscape Research, 6 (2014), p. 22 Yan et al., 2014 S. Yan, X.J. Ge, Q. Wu Government intervention in land market and its impacts on land supply and new housing supply: Evidence from major Chinese markets Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 517-527 Ye and Wang, 2013 F. Ye, W. Wang Determinants of land finance in China: a study based on provincial-level panel data (2013) Zhang and Xu, 2017 W. Zhang, H. Xu Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emissions: A panel data analysis for Chinese provinces Land Use Policy, 63 (2017), pp. 493-500 Zhang et al., 2017 X. Zhang, Y. Lin, Y. Wu, M. Skitmore Industrial land price between China’s Pearl River Delta and Southeast Asian regions: Competition or Coopetition? Land Use Policy, 61 (2017), pp. 575-586 Zhang, 1997 X.Q. Zhang Urban land reform in China Land use policy, 14 (1997), pp. 187-199 Zheng et al., 2014 H. Zheng, X. Wang, S. Cao The land finance model jeopardizes China’s sustainable development Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 130-136 |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
land use policy |
| institution |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718317940#! |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/e5bf2457-dcc8-45b3-a207-d15079b35e65/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/d54f2b8f-49e0-4e99-bd73-c7394ce707c6/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/dc1a0b69-009d-4913-beb6-1b5ed2b4aaaa/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/05703680-7161-463c-9ee2-afbb7261d447/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/66de2b15-226e-4413-8c8f-742be2c0264f/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 e30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9bad 7ea770c53fbc78be310f1c31b525e4e8 3eafd2696acc3225cb8bf7f34e531383 959af2e08422bede62a9cd6088641017 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repdigital@cuc.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1811760764436873216 |
| spelling |
Wang, Weifangvan Noorloos, FemkeSpit, Tejo2021-01-22T23:50:49Z2021-01-22T23:50:49Z2020https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7759https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104357Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Understanding stakeholder power relations—such as between land sellers, land buyers, and local governments—is crucial to understanding Land Value Capture (LVC). While scholars have focused on stakeholder relationships through approaches such as stakeholder salience, stakeholder interaction, stakeholder value network, and stakeholder multiplicity, much research either places insufficient focus on power or only stresses partial attributes of power. As a result, the role of power relations among key stakeholders in LVC remains insufficiently explored. Our contribution is a new analytical framework for stakeholder power dynamics surrounding LVC. This provides an empirical analysis by comparing the public (China) and the private (U.S.) dominant regimes, through the perspectives of power direction, strength, and mechanism. To conceptualize the three perspectives of power in LVC, we constructed an analytical matrix and then categorized data in terms of stakeholder, space, and time perspectives. Based on empirical findings, four emerging dilemmas shed light on consequences for LVC policy making as well as areas in need of further researchWang, Weifangvan Noorloos, FemkeSpit, Tejoapplication/pdfengCorporación Universidad de la CostaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2land use policyhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718317940#!Land Value Capturepower relationstakeholderpublic propertyprivate propertyStakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimesArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionLand-property markets and planning: A special case Land Use Policy, 41 (2014), pp. 533-540A theory of the urban land market Papers in Regional Science, 6 (1960), pp. 149-157Land use regulations and property values: The’Windfalls Capture’idea revisited (2012), pp. 755-786Taxing land for urban containment: Reflections on a Dutch debate Land Use Policy, 26 (2009), pp. 233-241Factors Influencing the Value of Urban Land: Evidence from Halifax‐Dartmouth, Canada Real Estate Economics, 13 (1985), pp. 361-377The causal structure of land price determinants Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 54 (2006), pp. 227-245Performance-based planning: perspectives from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25 (2006), pp. 396-409Conspicuous consumption behavior of land-lost farmers: A perspective of social identity Cities, 66 (2017), pp. 81-90Bao and Peng, 2016 H. Bao, Y. Peng Effect of land expropriation on land-lost farmers’ entrepreneurial action: A case study of Zhejiang Province Habitat International, 53 (2016), pp. 342-349Batt, 2001 H.W. Batt Value Capture as a Policy Tool in Transportation Economics: An Exploration in Public Finance in the Tradition of Henry George American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60 (2001), pp. 195-228Beaton, 1991 W.P. Beaton The impact of regional land-use controls on property values: the case of the New Jersey Pinelands Land Economics, 67 (1991), pp. 172-194Beritelli and Laesser, 2011 P. Beritelli, C. Laesser Power dimensions and influence reputation in tourist destinations: Empirical evidence from a network of actors and stakeholders Tourism Management, 32 (2011), pp. 1299-1309Borras, 2003 S.M. Borras Questioning market‐led agrarian reform: Experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa Journal of agrarian change, 3 (2003), pp. 367-394Boucher et al., 2005 S.R. Boucher, B.L. Barham, M.R. Carter The Impact of “Market-Friendly” Reforms on Credit and Land Markets in Honduras and Nicaragua World Development, 33 (2005), pp. 107-128Bowman and Ambrosini, 2000 C. Bowman, V. Ambrosini Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy British journal of management, 11 (2000), pp. 1-15Boyd, 2011 D. Boyd Land Value Taxation: Theory, Evidence, and Practice F. Richard (Ed.), Dye and Richard W, Wiley Online Library, England (2011)Cai, 2017 M. Cai Revenue, time horizon, and land allocation in China Land Use Policy, 62 (2017), pp. 101-112Cameron et al., 2011 B.G. Cameron, E.F. Crawley, W. Feng, M. Lin Strategic decisions in complex stakeholder environments: a theory of generalized exchange Engineering Management Journal, 23 (2011), pp. 37-45Cao et al., 2008 G. Cao, C. Feng, R. Tao Local “land finance” in China’s urban expansion: challenges and solutions China & World Economy, 16 (2008), pp. 19-30Capozza et al., 2002 D.R. Capozza, P.H. Hendershott, C. Mack, C.J. Mayer Determinants of real house price dynamics National Bureau of Economic Research. (2002)Chapman, 2017 J. Chapman Value Capture Taxation as an Infrastructure Funding Technique Public Works Management & Policy, 22 (2017), pp. 31-37Chen and Kung, 2016 T. Chen, J.K.S. Kung Do land revenue windfalls create a political resource curse? Evidence from China Journal of Development Economics, 123 (2016), pp. 86-106Cheshire and Sheppard, 1995 P. Cheshire, S. Sheppard On the price of land and the value of amenities Economica (1995), pp. 247-267Cheshire, 2013 P.C. Cheshire Land market regulation: market versus policy failures Journal of property research, 30 (2013), pp. 170-188Chi-Man Hui et al., 2004 E. Chi-Man Hui, V. Sze-Mun Ho, D. Kim-Hin Ho Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore: A comparative analysis Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22 (2004), pp. 76-100Choumert and Phélinas, 2015 J. Choumert, P. Phélinas Determinants of agricultural land values in Argentina Ecological Economics, 110 (2015), pp. 134-140Cigdem and Wood, 2012 M. Cigdem, G. Wood Choice and government intervention in housing markets International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (2012), pp. 137-143Coleman and Grimes, 2010 A. Coleman, A. Grimes Betterment taxes, capital gains and benefit cost ratios Economics Letters, 109 (2010), pp. 54-56Colwell and Munneke, 1997 P.F. Colwell, H.J. Munneke The structure of urban land prices Journal of Urban Economics, 41 (1997), pp. 321-336Connolly and Wall, 2016 C. Connolly, A. Wall Value capture: A valid means of funding PPPs? Financial Accountability & Management, 32 (2016), pp. 157-178Czyżewski and Matuszczak, 2016 B. Czyżewski, A. Matuszczak A new land rent theory for sustainable agriculture Land Use Policy, 55 (2016), pp. 222-229Czyżewski et al., 2017 B. Czyżewski, G. Przekota, A. Poczta-Wajda The incidence of agricultural policy on the land market in Poland: Two-dimensional and multilevel analysis Land Use Policy, 63 (2017), pp. 174-185Davis and Heathcote, 2007 M.A. Davis, J. Heathcote The price and quantity of residential land in the United States Journal of Monetary Economics, 54 (2007), pp. 2595-2620Davis and Palumbo, 2008 M.A. Davis, M.G. Palumbo The price of residential land in large US cities Journal of Urban Economics, 63 (2008), pp. 352-384de Bussy and Kelly, 2010 N.M. de Bussy, L. Kelly Stakeholders, politics and power: Towards an understanding of stakeholder identification and salience in government Journal of Communication Management, 14 (2010), pp. 289-305Diamond, 1985 N. Diamond Rural Collectivization and Decollectivization in China—A Review Article The Journal of Asian Studies, 44 (1985), pp. 785-792Ding, 2003 C. Ding Land policy reform in China: assessment and prospects Land use policy, 20 (2003), pp. 109-120Ding, 2007 C. Ding Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China Land use policy, 24 (2007), pp. 1-13Ding and Zhao, 2014 C. Ding, X. Zhao Land market, land development and urban spatial structure in Beijing Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 83-90Du et al., 2015 J. Du, Y. Lu, Z. Tao Government expropriation and Chinese-style firm diversification Journal of Comparative Economics, 43 (2015), pp. 155-169Du et al., 2014 J. Du, J.-C. Thill, R.B. Peiser, C. Feng Urban land market and land-use changes in post-reform China: A case study of Beijing Landscape and Urban Planning, 124 (2014), pp. 118-128Eddie et al., 2004 C.M.H. Eddie, S.M.H. Vivian, K.H.H. David Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore: A comparative analysis Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22 (2004), pp. 76-100Eidelman, 2016 G. Eidelman Rethinking public land ownership and urban development: A Canadian perspective Cities, 55 (2016), pp. 122-126Emerson, 1962 R.M. Emerson Power-dependence relations American sociological review (1962), pp. 31-41Evans, 1983 A.W. Evans The determination of the price of land Urban Studies, 20 (1983), pp. 119-129Evans, 1999 A.W. Evans The land market and government intervention Handbook of regional and urban economics, 3 (1999), pp. 1637-1669Feng et al., 2014 L. Feng, H.X.H. Bao, Y. Jiang Land reallocation reform in rural China: A behavioral economics perspective Land Use Policy, 41 (2014), pp. 246-259Feng, 2013 W. Feng Strategic management for large engineering projects: the stakeholder value network approach Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2013)Floetotto et al., 2016 M. Floetotto, M. Kirker, J. Stroebel Government intervention in the housing market: Who wins, who loses? Journal of Monetary Economics, 80 (2016), pp. 106-123Ford and Johnson, 1998 R. Ford, C. Johnson The perception of power: Dependence and legitimacy in conflict Social Psychology Quarterly (1998), pp. 16-32Foucault, 1991 M. Foucault The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality University of Chicago Press (1991)Foucault, 1998 M. Foucault J. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 2 (1998)Friis and Nielsen, 2016 C. Friis, J.Ø. Nielsen Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: Exploring the case of Chinese banana investments in Northern Laos Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 117-129Frooman, 1999 J. Frooman Stakeholder influence strategies Academy of management review, 24 (1999), pp. 191-205Gao et al., 2017 J. Gao, W. Chen, F. Yuan Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations Land Use Policy, 68 (2017), pp. 604-613Garza and Lizieri, 2016 N. Garza, C. Lizieri A spatial-temporal assessment of the Land Value Development Tax Land Use Policy, 50 (2016), pp. 449-460Gaventa, 2003 J. Gaventa Power after Lukes: an overview of theories of power since Lukes and their application to development Participation Group, Institute of Development Studies., Brighton (2003)Ghatak and Mookherjee, 2014 M. Ghatak, D. Mookherjee Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers Journal of Development Economics, 110 (2014), pp. 303-312Gleeson, 1994 B. Gleeson Reforming planning legislation: a New Zealand perspective (1994)Guo et al., 2015 S. Guo, L. Liu, Y. Zhao The business cycle implications of land financing in China Economic Modelling, 46 (2015), pp. 225-237Han and Kung, 2015 L. Han, J.K.-S. Kung Fiscal incentives and policy choices of local governments: Evidence from China Journal of Development Economics, 116 (2015), pp. 89-104Hankinson, 2009 G. Hankinson Managing destination brands: establishing a theoretical foundation Journal of Marketing Management, 25 (2009), pp. 97-115Haque and Asami, 2014 A. Haque, Y. Asami Optimizing urban land use allocation for planners and real estate developers Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 46 (2014), pp. 57-69Hein et al., 2017 A.M. Hein, M. Jankovic, W. Feng, R. Farel, J.H. Yune, B. Yannou Stakeholder power in industrial symbioses: A stakeholder value network approach Journal of Cleaner Production, 148 (2017), pp. 923-933Hu and Qian, 2017 F.Z.Y. Hu, J. Qian Land-based finance, fiscal autonomy and land supply for affordable housing in urban China: A prefecture-level analysis Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 454-460Huang et al., 2017 X. Huang, X. Huang, Y. He, X. Yang Assessment of livelihood vulnerability of land-lost farmers in urban fringes: A case study of Xi’an, China Habitat International, 59 (2017), pp. 1-9Huang and Du, 2017 Z. Huang, X. Du Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China Cities, 60 (2017), pp. 323-332Hui et al., 2013 E.C.M. Hui, H.J. Bao, X.L. Zhang The policy and praxis of compensation for land expropriations in China: An appraisal from the perspective of social exclusion Land Use Policy, 32 (2013), pp. 309-316Ingram and Hong, 2012 G.K. Ingram, Y.-h. Hong Value capture and land policies Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2012)Ito et al., 2016 J. Ito, M. Nishikori, M. Toyoshi, H.N. Feuer The contribution of land exchange institutions and markets in countering farmland abandonment in Japan Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 582-593Jaeger, 2013 W.K. Jaeger Determinants of urban land market outcomes: Evidence from California Land Use Policy, 30 (2013), pp. 966-973Jäger, 2009 J. Jäger Land rent theory (2009)Jones, 2014 C. Jones Land use planning policies and market forces: Utopian aspirations thwarted? Land Use Policy, 38 (2014), pp. 573-579Larsen et al., 2009 I.K. Larsen, M. Småstuen, T.B. Johannesen, F. Langmark, D.M. Parkin, F. Bray, B.J.E.j.o.c Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness European Journal of Cancer, 45 (2009), pp. 1218-1231Leeper et al., 2010 E.M. Leeper, T.B. Walker, S.-C.S. Yang Government investment and fiscal stimulus Journal of monetary Economics, 57 (2010), pp. 1000-1012Lepak et al., 2007 D.P. Lepak, K.G. Smith, M.S. Taylor Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective Academy of management review, 32 (2007), pp. 180-194Lerman and Shagaida, 2007 Z. Lerman, N. Shagaida Land policies and agricultural land markets in Russia Land Use Policy, 24 (2007), pp. 14-23Lichtenberg and Ding, 2009 E. Lichtenberg, C. Ding Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China Journal of Urban Economics, 66 (2009), pp. 57-64Lin and Zhu, 2014 R. Lin, D. Zhu A spatial and temporal analysis on land incremental values coupled with land rights in China Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 168-176Liu et al., 2016 T. Liu, G. Cao, Y. Yan, R.Y. Wang Urban land marketization in China: Central policy, local initiative, and market mechanism Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 265-276Liu et al., 2014 Y. Liu, F. Fang, Y. Li Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 6-12Long, 2014 H. Long Land use policy in China: Introduction Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 1-5Mathur, 2013 S. Mathur Use of land pooling and reconstitution for urban development: Experiences from Gujarat, India Habitat International, 38 (2013), pp. 199-206Medda, 2012 F. Medda Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: a review Journal of Transport Geography, 25 (2012), pp. 154-161Meehan and Wright, 2011 J. Meehan, G.H. Wright Power priorities: A buyer–seller comparison of areas of influence Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17 (2011), pp. 32-41Meehan and Wright, 2012 J. Meehan, G.H. Wright The origins of power in buyer–seller relationships Industrial Marketing Management, 41 (2012), pp. 669-679Merinero-Rodríguez and Pulido-Fernández, 2016 R. Merinero-Rodríguez, J.I. Pulido-Fernández Analysing relationships in tourism: A review Tourism Management, 54 (2016), pp. 122-135Mill, 1884 J.S. Mill Principles of political economy D. Appleton (1884)Mills, 1969 E.S. Mills The value of urban land (1969)Miraftab, 2004 F. Miraftab Public-private partnerships: The Trojan horse of neoliberal development? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24 (2004), pp. 89-101Mitchell et al., 1997 R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, D.J. Wood Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts Academy of management review, 22 (1997), pp. 853-886Mittal, 2014 J. Mittal Self-financing land and urban development via land readjustment and value capture Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 314-323Moroni, 2010 S. Moroni Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy Planning Theory, 9 (2010), pp. 137-155Needham, 1992 B. Needham A theory of land prices when land is supplied publicly: the case of the Netherlands Urban Studies, 29 (1992), pp. 669-686Neville and Menguc, 2006 B.A. Neville, B. Menguc Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders Journal of Business Ethics, 66 (2006), pp. 377-391Obeng-Odoom, 2012 F. Obeng-Odoom Land reforms in Africa: Theory, practice, and outcome Habitat International, 36 (2012), pp. 161-170Oliver, 1991 C. Oliver Strategic responses to institutional processes Academy of management review, 16 (1991), pp. 145-179Paik, 2014 W. Paik Land Developers, States, and Collusive Clientelism in Marketizing China Pacific Focus, 29 (2014), pp. 68-91Pan et al., 2017 F. Pan, F. Zhang, S. Zhu, D. Wójcik Developing by borrowing? Inter-jurisdictional competition, land finance and local debt accumulation in China Urban Studies, 54 (2017), pp. 897-916Pan et al., 2015 J.-N. Pan, J.-T. Huang, T.-F. Chiang Empirical study of the local government deficit, land finance and real estate markets in China China Economic Review, 32 (2015), pp. 57-67Phuc et al., 2014 N.Q. Phuc, A. Van Westen, A. Zoomers Agricultural land for urban development: The process of land conversion in Central Vietnam Habitat International, 41 (2014), pp. 1-7Pils, 2016 E. Pils Assessing evictions and expropriations in China: Efficiency, credibility and rights Land Use Policy, 58 (2016), pp. 437-444Qian, 2015 Z. Qian Land acquisition compensation in post-reform China: Evolution, structure and challenges in Hangzhou Land Use Policy, 46 (2015), pp. 250-257Qun et al., 2015 W. Qun, L. Yongle, Y. Siqi The incentives of China’s urban land finance Land Use Policy, 42 (2015), pp. 432-442Rabinow, 1991 P. Rabinow The Foulcault reader: an introduction to Foulcault’s thought Penguin, London (1991)Rebelo, 2017 E.M. Rebelo Land betterment capture revisited: A methodology for territorial plans Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 392-407Rowley, 1997 T.J. Rowley Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences Academy of management Review, 22 (1997), pp. 887-910Saito and Ruhanen, 2017 H. Saito, L. Ruhanen Power in tourism stakeholder collaborations: Power types and power holders Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31 (2017), pp. 189-196Scoones, 1998 I. Scoones Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis (1998)Shan et al., 2017 L. Shan, A.T.W. Yu, Y. Wu Strategies for risk management in urban–rural conflict: Two case studies of land acquisition in urbanising China Habitat International, 59 (2017), pp. 90-100Shaw and Williams, 1994 G. Shaw, A.M. Williams Critical issues in tourism: a geographical perspective Blackwell Publishers (1994)Sheehan and Ritchie, 2005 L.R. Sheehan, J.B. Ritchie Destination stakeholders exploring identity and salience Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (2005), pp. 711-734Sikor and Müller, 2009 T. Sikor, D. Müller The Limits of State-Led Land Reform: An Introduction World Development, 37 (2009), pp. 1307-1316Slegtenhorst, 2013 I. Slegtenhorst From value creation to value capture: Instruments of indirect value capture to fund investments in road infrastructure projects (2013)Small, 2007 L.-A. Small The sustainable rural livelihoods approach: a critical review Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 28 (2007), pp. 27-38Smith and Gihring, 2006 J.J. Smith, T.A. Gihring Financing transit systems through value capture American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65 (2006), pp. 751-786Smolka, 2013 M.O. Smolka Implementing value capture in Latin America: Policies and tools for urban development Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2013)Suhardiman et al., 2015 D. Suhardiman, M. Giordano, O. Keovilignavong, T. Sotoukee Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss Land Use Policy, 49 (2015), pp. 195-202Sun et al., 2017 J. Sun, T. Chen, Z. Cheng, C.C. Wang, X. Ning A financing mode of Urban Rail transit based on land value capture: A case study in Wuhan City Transport Policy, 57 (2017), pp. 59-67Suzuki et al., 2015 H. Suzuki, J. Murakami, Y.-H. Hong, B. Tamayose Financing transit-oriented development with land values: Adapting land value capture in developing countries World Bank Publications (2015)Tao et al., 2010 R. Tao, F. Su, M. Liu, G. Cao Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities Urban Studies, 47 (2010), pp. 2217-2236Tian and Ma, 2009 L. Tian, W. Ma Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply Land Use Policy, 26 (2009), pp. 599-609Timur and Getz, 2008 S. Timur, D. Getz A network perspective on managing stakeholders for sustainable urban tourism International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20 (2008), pp. 445-461Tu et al., 2014 F. Tu, X. Yu, J. Ruan Industrial land use efficiency under government intervention: Evidence from Hangzhou, China Habitat International, 43 (2014), pp. 1-10Tura, 2018 H.A. Tura Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia, Ethiopia Land Use Policy, 70 (2018), pp. 247-255Van der Krabben and Jacobs, 2013 E. Van der Krabben, H.M. Jacobs Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience Land Use Policy, 30 (2013), pp. 774-783Venkatraman, 1989 N. Venkatraman The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence Academy of management review, 14 (1989), pp. 423-444Walters, 2013 L.C. Walters Land value capture in policy and practice Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration, 10 (2013), p. 5Wang and Ye, 2016 W. Wang, F. Ye The political economy of land finance in China Public Budgeting & Finance, 36 (2016), pp. 91-110Wang and Hui, 2017 Y. Wang, E.C.-m. Hui Are local governments maximizing land revenue? Evidence from China China Economic Review, 43 (2017), pp. 196-215Wang et al., 2015 Y. Wang, D. Potoglou, S. Orford, Y. Gong Bus stop, property price and land value tax: A multilevel hedonic analysis with quantile calibration Land Use Policy, 42 (2015), pp. 381-391Weersink et al., 1999 A. Weersink, S. Clark, C.G. Turvey, R. Sarker The effect of agricultural policy on farmland values Land Economics (1999), pp. 425-439Weixin and Dongsong, 1990 L. Weixin, Y. Dongsong China’s land use policy under change Land use policy, 7 (1990), pp. 198-201Wendt, 1957 P.F. Wendt Theory of urban land values Land economics, 33 (1957), pp. 228-240Wenner, 2016 F. Wenner Sustainable urban development and land value taxation: The case of Estonia Land Use Policy. (2016)Wilcox, 2016 R.K. Wilcox An introduction to basic mechanics Orthopaedics and Trauma, 30 (2016), pp. 169-175Wineman and Liverpool-Tasie, 2017 A. Wineman, L.S. Liverpool-Tasie Land markets and the distribution of land in northwestern Tanzania Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 550-563Wrong, 2017 D. Wrong Power: Its forms, bases and uses Routledge (2017)Xiaoyan and Xiaoshu, 2014 H. Xiaoyan, C. Xiaoshu Mode and Mechanism of Urban Land Redevelopment Journal of Landscape Research, 6 (2014), p. 22Yan et al., 2014 S. Yan, X.J. Ge, Q. Wu Government intervention in land market and its impacts on land supply and new housing supply: Evidence from major Chinese markets Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 517-527Ye and Wang, 2013 F. Ye, W. Wang Determinants of land finance in China: a study based on provincial-level panel data (2013)Zhang and Xu, 2017 W. Zhang, H. Xu Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emissions: A panel data analysis for Chinese provinces Land Use Policy, 63 (2017), pp. 493-500Zhang et al., 2017 X. Zhang, Y. Lin, Y. Wu, M. Skitmore Industrial land price between China’s Pearl River Delta and Southeast Asian regions: Competition or Coopetition? Land Use Policy, 61 (2017), pp. 575-586Zhang, 1997 X.Q. Zhang Urban land reform in China Land use policy, 14 (1997), pp. 187-199Zheng et al., 2014 H. Zheng, X. Wang, S. Cao The land finance model jeopardizes China’s sustainable development Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 130-136PublicationCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/e5bf2457-dcc8-45b3-a207-d15079b35e65/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83196https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/d54f2b8f-49e0-4e99-bd73-c7394ce707c6/downloade30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9badMD53ORIGINALStakeholder power relations in land value capture comparing public China and private U.S dominant regimes.pdfStakeholder power relations in land value capture comparing public China and private U.S dominant regimes.pdfapplication/pdf97910https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/dc1a0b69-009d-4913-beb6-1b5ed2b4aaaa/download7ea770c53fbc78be310f1c31b525e4e8MD51THUMBNAILStakeholder power relations in land value capture comparing public China and private U.S dominant regimes.pdf.jpgStakeholder power relations in land value capture comparing public China and private U.S dominant regimes.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg35418https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/05703680-7161-463c-9ee2-afbb7261d447/download3eafd2696acc3225cb8bf7f34e531383MD54TEXTStakeholder power relations in land value capture comparing public China and private U.S dominant regimes.pdf.txtStakeholder power relations in land value capture comparing public China and private U.S dominant regimes.pdf.txttext/plain1455https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/66de2b15-226e-4413-8c8f-742be2c0264f/download959af2e08422bede62a9cd6088641017MD5511323/7759oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/77592024-09-17 11:02:38.879http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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 |