El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia
El tema central del estudio se encuentra constituido por el rol social y la independencia procesal que cumple el investigador en los procedimientos penales de la Federación de Rusia como un sujeto clave, que dirige los procedimientos penales en las etapas previas al juicio. Los autores examinan la r...
- Autores:
-
Adygezalova, Gyulnaz Eldarovna
Dolgov, Andrey Mikhailovich
Lukozhev, Husen Manaevich
Faroi, Tatyana Valerievna
Redkovskiy, Mikhail Aleksandrovich
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/12562
- Palabra clave:
- procedural status
powers
legal certainty
investigative body
balance of interests
equilibrio de intereses
estado procesal
poderes
organismo de investigación
seguridad jurídica
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- JURÍDICAS CUC - 2022
| id |
RCUC2_e1c01e5e92987eddd310412da8933f68 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/12562 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCUC2 |
| network_name_str |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
The social role and procedural independence of the investigator in the criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation |
| title |
El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia |
| spellingShingle |
El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia procedural status powers legal certainty investigative body balance of interests equilibrio de intereses estado procesal poderes organismo de investigación seguridad jurídica |
| title_short |
El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia |
| title_full |
El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia |
| title_fullStr |
El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia |
| title_sort |
El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Adygezalova, Gyulnaz Eldarovna Dolgov, Andrey Mikhailovich Lukozhev, Husen Manaevich Faroi, Tatyana Valerievna Redkovskiy, Mikhail Aleksandrovich |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Adygezalova, Gyulnaz Eldarovna Dolgov, Andrey Mikhailovich Lukozhev, Husen Manaevich Faroi, Tatyana Valerievna Redkovskiy, Mikhail Aleksandrovich |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
procedural status powers legal certainty investigative body balance of interests |
| topic |
procedural status powers legal certainty investigative body balance of interests equilibrio de intereses estado procesal poderes organismo de investigación seguridad jurídica |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
equilibrio de intereses estado procesal poderes organismo de investigación seguridad jurídica |
| description |
El tema central del estudio se encuentra constituido por el rol social y la independencia procesal que cumple el investigador en los procedimientos penales de la Federación de Rusia como un sujeto clave, que dirige los procedimientos penales en las etapas previas al juicio. Los autores examinan la relación entre el investigador, el fiscal, el jefe del organismo de investigación, el interrogador y otros participantes en el procedimiento penal frente a la independencia procesal para el investigador. La metodología de investigación utilizada se basa en la metodología jurídica dialéctica, formal lógica y comparativa. Como resultado del estudio, se pudo determinar el rol social del investigador en el procedimiento penal, el cual se considera como elemento fundamental de la independencia procesal. Se concluye que los roles sociales del tribunal y del investigador en el proceso penal son comparables en cuanto a la defensa de los intereses públicos y a la importancia de su participación en la aplicación de las normas del derecho penal. Al mismo tiempo, al tribunal se le reconoce una función exclusiva: la administración de justicia. Se destaca que el vacio normativo referente a la independencia procesal del investigador no permite determinar su rol social como garante del equilibrio de intereses y de la responsabilidad mutua entre el individuo y el Estado, ya que el investigador sólo puede ser considerado responsable como representante del Estado si es independiente al momento de proceder según su discreción. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-20 00:00:00 2024-04-09T20:26:46Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-20 00:00:00 2024-04-09T20:26:46Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-20 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1692-3030 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12562 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.10 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.10 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2389-7716 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1692-3030 10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.10 2389-7716 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12562 https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.10 |
| dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídicas CUC |
| dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv |
Adygezalova, G. E. (2017). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the 20th century: the formation of doctrine, the development and improvement of the rule of law. [Doctoral thesis]. Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia. Adygezalova, G. E. (2012). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the twentieth century: the formation of doctrine, the development and improvement of the rule of law. St. Petersburg: Legal-Press Centre. Adygezalova, G. E. (2008). Harmonization of the interests of the state, society and the individual (from the standpoint of American sociological jurisprudence and the realistic school of law). In, RGNF, State responsibility to the individual: the experience of history and the present: materials of the international conference, (pp. 132–142). Krasnodar: Kuban State University. Adygezalova, G. E., Faroi, T. V., Mikhel, D. E. & Lukozhev, H. M. (2020). Judicial debate in criminal proceedings as a way of expressing the interests of the parties to the conflict. Revista Inclusiones, 7(SI), 319–327. Available: https://revistainclusiones.org/index.php/inclu/article/view/322 Austin, J. (1995). The province of jurisprudence determined. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press. Begiev, Kh. B. (2010a). Problems of ensuring the procedural independence of the investigator at the stage of the completion of the preliminary investigation. Society and law, 5(32), 194–200. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site119/folder_page/003/467/465/sl-2010-5.pdf Begiev, Kh. B. (2010b). Implementation of the procedural independence of the investigator at the stage of initiating a criminal case in modern criminal proceedings in Russia. Society and law, 2(29), 206–212. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site119/folder_page/003/467/465/sl-2010-2.pdf Denis, D. (1974). L’enquete preliminaire. Etude theorique et pratique. Paris: Police-revue. Federal Republic of Germany. (2019). Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/28/Germany/show French Republic. (2020). Criminal Code of Procedure of the French Republic. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/30/France/show Gladysheva, O. V., Lukozhev, Kh. M. & Sementsov, V. A. (2013). Guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings: problems and possible solutions. Moscow: Yurlitinform. Gredyagin, I. V. (2010). The concept and content of the procedural independence of the interrogator. Society and Law, 4(31), 252–255. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-i-soderzhanie-protsessualnoy-samostoyatelnosti-doznavatelya Gutnik, O. V. (2017). Institute for the independence of the court in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. Russian Law, (4), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2017.125.4.067-073 Iering, R. (1881). Purpose in law. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of N.V. Muravyov. Ivanov, A. L. (2010). Procurator’s protection of citizens’ constitutional rights. Legality, 9(911), 55–57. Kachalova, O. V. (2014). Procedural independence of the investigator through the prism of his social function. Crime Investigation: problems and ways of their solutions, 4, 349–354. Khazhnagoev, A. Z. (2005). Procedural independence of the investigator and prosecutor’s supervision. Russian Agricultural Journal, 6, 12–14. Khoryakov, S. N. (2006). Procedural independence of the investigator. [Doctor thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. Lapaeva, V. V. (2000). Sociology of law. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M. Lloyd, D. & Freeman, M. (1979). Introduction to jurisprudence. London: Stevens & Sons. Lukozhev, Kh. M. & Dolgov, A. M. (2018). Inquiry as a form of preliminary investigation. Moscow: Yurlitinform. Melnikov, V. Yu. (2008). Investigator and interrogator in criminal proceedings. Conflict processing, 4, 3–6. Melnikov, V. Yu. (2008). Procedural independence of the investigator as a guarantee of the protection of the rights and freedoms of the individual. Business Safety, 2, 6–12. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/protsessualnaya-samostoyatelnost-sledovatelya-kak-garantiya-zaschity-konstitutsionnyh-prav-i-svobod-uchastnikov-ugolovnogo Motyleva, E. A. (2004). On the procedural independence of the investigator of the internal affairs bodies. Law and Justice, 4, 54–55. Nersesyants, V. S. (1999). Philosophy of law: Textbook for universities. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M. Ogorodov, A. N. (2017). Procedural independence of an investigator in criminal proceedings. [Doctoral thesis]. University of Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. Olisov, R. Yu. (2006). The ratio of the procedural independence of the investigator and prosecutor’s supervision in domestic pre-trial proceedings. [Doctoral Thesis]. N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod National Research, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia. Popova, T. Yu. (2010). Influence of remedial and administrative powers of the head of investigatory body on realization of procedural independence of the investigato. Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1(12), 161–165. Available from https://media.mvd.ru/files/application/1000854 Pound, R. (1945a). An introduction to the philosophy of law. New Haven/London: Yale University Press/Humphrey Milford-Oxford University Press. Pound, R. (1945b). Criminal justice in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Pound, R. (1942). Social control through law. New Haven/London: Yale University Press/Humphrey Milford-Oxford University Press. Prusak, F. (1984). Prosecutor's supervision over preparatory proceedings. Warszawa: Legal Editorial. RF. State Duma. (2020). Constitution of the Russian Federation. [Online]. Available: http://www.constitution.ru/ RF. State Duma. (November 22, 2001). The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [УПК РФ]. Federal Law No. 174-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901802257 Republic or Poland. (2003). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Poland. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/10/Poland/show Romashov, R. A. & Nizhnik, N. S. (Eds.) (2005). State, society, personality: compatibility problems. Moscow: Yuurist. Schroeder, F. C. (2014). Strafprozessrecht. München: C. H. Beck. Sementsov, V. A. (2017). Investigative actions in pre-trial proceedings (general provisions of theory and practice). Moscow: Yurlitinform. Sidorenko, M. V. (2018). Legal certainty of Russian criminal procedure law. [Doctoral thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. Sidorenko, M. V. (2017). Legal certainty of the Russian criminal procedural law (state and formulation of the problem). Moscow: Yurlitinform. Soyer, J.-Cl. (1992). Droit penal et procedure penale. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence. Zhidkov, O. A. (Ed.) (1999). Anthology of world legal thought: In 5 volumes. [Vol. 3. Europe. America: 17th–20th centuries]. Moscow: Mysl. |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
217–240 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
217–240 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
1 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
18 |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3669/3999 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3669/4000 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3669/4002 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3669/4001 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 1 , Año 2022 : Jurídicas CUC 2022 |
| dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
JURÍDICAS CUC - 2022 |
| dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
JURÍDICAS CUC - 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/xml application/epub+zip |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3669 |
| institution |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/c72af71d-dda6-46d9-badc-b6aebb8810a3/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
ac6f5a9b6cde9b1aaf7c2dd3b55b9ae0 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repdigital@cuc.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1811760777824043008 |
| spelling |
Adygezalova, Gyulnaz EldarovnaDolgov, Andrey MikhailovichLukozhev, Husen ManaevichFaroi, Tatyana ValerievnaRedkovskiy, Mikhail Aleksandrovich2021-08-20 00:00:002024-04-09T20:26:46Z2021-08-20 00:00:002024-04-09T20:26:46Z2021-08-201692-3030https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12562https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.1010.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.102389-7716El tema central del estudio se encuentra constituido por el rol social y la independencia procesal que cumple el investigador en los procedimientos penales de la Federación de Rusia como un sujeto clave, que dirige los procedimientos penales en las etapas previas al juicio. Los autores examinan la relación entre el investigador, el fiscal, el jefe del organismo de investigación, el interrogador y otros participantes en el procedimiento penal frente a la independencia procesal para el investigador. La metodología de investigación utilizada se basa en la metodología jurídica dialéctica, formal lógica y comparativa. Como resultado del estudio, se pudo determinar el rol social del investigador en el procedimiento penal, el cual se considera como elemento fundamental de la independencia procesal. Se concluye que los roles sociales del tribunal y del investigador en el proceso penal son comparables en cuanto a la defensa de los intereses públicos y a la importancia de su participación en la aplicación de las normas del derecho penal. Al mismo tiempo, al tribunal se le reconoce una función exclusiva: la administración de justicia. Se destaca que el vacio normativo referente a la independencia procesal del investigador no permite determinar su rol social como garante del equilibrio de intereses y de la responsabilidad mutua entre el individuo y el Estado, ya que el investigador sólo puede ser considerado responsable como representante del Estado si es independiente al momento de proceder según su discreción.The subject of the study is the social role and procedural independence of the investigator in the criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation as a key subject conducting criminal proceedings in the pre-trial stages. The authors consider the relationship between the investigator, the prosecutor, the head of the investigative body, the interrogator, and other participants in criminal proceedings, as well as problematic definitions and ensuring the procedural independence of the investigator. The methodology of research have been based on a set of general scientific methods and techniques used by legal science. According to the results of the study, the social role of the investigator in criminal proceedings has been determined, which is considered as one of the fundamental elements of his/her procedural independence. It has been concluded that the social role of the court and the investigator in the criminal process is comparable in terms of their defense of public interests and the importance of their participation in the implementation of criminal law. Therein, the court recognizes an exclusive function – the administration of justice. It has been noted that the absence of norms on the procedural independence of the investigator does not allow determining the place of the investigator in ensuring the balance of interests and mutual responsibility of the individual and the state, since the investigator can only be held liable as a representative of the state if he/she is independent in adopting them at his/her discretion.application/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlapplication/epub+zipengUniversidad de la CostaJURÍDICAS CUC - 2022https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3669procedural statuspowerslegal certaintyinvestigative bodybalance of interestsequilibrio de interesesestado procesalpoderesorganismo de investigaciónseguridad jurídicaEl rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de RusiaThe social role and procedural independence of the investigator in the criminal proceedings of the Russian FederationArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Revista Jurídicas CUCAdygezalova, G. E. (2017). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the 20th century: the formation of doctrine, the development and improvement of the rule of law. [Doctoral thesis]. Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia.Adygezalova, G. E. (2012). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the twentieth century: the formation of doctrine, the development and improvement of the rule of law. St. Petersburg: Legal-Press Centre.Adygezalova, G. E. (2008). Harmonization of the interests of the state, society and the individual (from the standpoint of American sociological jurisprudence and the realistic school of law). In, RGNF, State responsibility to the individual: the experience of history and the present: materials of the international conference, (pp. 132–142). Krasnodar: Kuban State University.Adygezalova, G. E., Faroi, T. V., Mikhel, D. E. & Lukozhev, H. M. (2020). Judicial debate in criminal proceedings as a way of expressing the interests of the parties to the conflict. Revista Inclusiones, 7(SI), 319–327. Available: https://revistainclusiones.org/index.php/inclu/article/view/322Austin, J. (1995). The province of jurisprudence determined. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.Begiev, Kh. B. (2010a). Problems of ensuring the procedural independence of the investigator at the stage of the completion of the preliminary investigation. Society and law, 5(32), 194–200. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site119/folder_page/003/467/465/sl-2010-5.pdfBegiev, Kh. B. (2010b). Implementation of the procedural independence of the investigator at the stage of initiating a criminal case in modern criminal proceedings in Russia. Society and law, 2(29), 206–212. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site119/folder_page/003/467/465/sl-2010-2.pdfDenis, D. (1974). L’enquete preliminaire. Etude theorique et pratique. Paris: Police-revue.Federal Republic of Germany. (2019). Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/28/Germany/showFrench Republic. (2020). Criminal Code of Procedure of the French Republic. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/30/France/showGladysheva, O. V., Lukozhev, Kh. M. & Sementsov, V. A. (2013). Guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings: problems and possible solutions. Moscow: Yurlitinform.Gredyagin, I. V. (2010). The concept and content of the procedural independence of the interrogator. Society and Law, 4(31), 252–255. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-i-soderzhanie-protsessualnoy-samostoyatelnosti-doznavatelyaGutnik, O. V. (2017). Institute for the independence of the court in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. Russian Law, (4), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2017.125.4.067-073Iering, R. (1881). Purpose in law. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of N.V. Muravyov.Ivanov, A. L. (2010). Procurator’s protection of citizens’ constitutional rights. Legality, 9(911), 55–57.Kachalova, O. V. (2014). Procedural independence of the investigator through the prism of his social function. Crime Investigation: problems and ways of their solutions, 4, 349–354.Khazhnagoev, A. Z. (2005). Procedural independence of the investigator and prosecutor’s supervision. Russian Agricultural Journal, 6, 12–14.Khoryakov, S. N. (2006). Procedural independence of the investigator. [Doctor thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.Lapaeva, V. V. (2000). Sociology of law. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M.Lloyd, D. & Freeman, M. (1979). Introduction to jurisprudence. London: Stevens & Sons.Lukozhev, Kh. M. & Dolgov, A. M. (2018). Inquiry as a form of preliminary investigation. Moscow: Yurlitinform.Melnikov, V. Yu. (2008). Investigator and interrogator in criminal proceedings. Conflict processing, 4, 3–6.Melnikov, V. Yu. (2008). Procedural independence of the investigator as a guarantee of the protection of the rights and freedoms of the individual. Business Safety, 2, 6–12. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/protsessualnaya-samostoyatelnost-sledovatelya-kak-garantiya-zaschity-konstitutsionnyh-prav-i-svobod-uchastnikov-ugolovnogoMotyleva, E. A. (2004). On the procedural independence of the investigator of the internal affairs bodies. Law and Justice, 4, 54–55.Nersesyants, V. S. (1999). Philosophy of law: Textbook for universities. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M.Ogorodov, A. N. (2017). Procedural independence of an investigator in criminal proceedings. [Doctoral thesis]. University of Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.Olisov, R. Yu. (2006). The ratio of the procedural independence of the investigator and prosecutor’s supervision in domestic pre-trial proceedings. [Doctoral Thesis]. N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod National Research, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia.Popova, T. Yu. (2010). Influence of remedial and administrative powers of the head of investigatory body on realization of procedural independence of the investigato. Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1(12), 161–165. Available from https://media.mvd.ru/files/application/1000854Pound, R. (1945a). An introduction to the philosophy of law. New Haven/London: Yale University Press/Humphrey Milford-Oxford University Press.Pound, R. (1945b). Criminal justice in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Pound, R. (1942). Social control through law. New Haven/London: Yale University Press/Humphrey Milford-Oxford University Press.Prusak, F. (1984). Prosecutor's supervision over preparatory proceedings. Warszawa: Legal Editorial.RF. State Duma. (2020). Constitution of the Russian Federation. [Online]. Available: http://www.constitution.ru/RF. State Duma. (November 22, 2001). The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [УПК РФ]. Federal Law No. 174-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901802257Republic or Poland. (2003). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Poland. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/10/Poland/showRomashov, R. A. & Nizhnik, N. S. (Eds.) (2005). State, society, personality: compatibility problems. Moscow: Yuurist.Schroeder, F. C. (2014). Strafprozessrecht. München: C. H. Beck.Sementsov, V. A. (2017). Investigative actions in pre-trial proceedings (general provisions of theory and practice). Moscow: Yurlitinform.Sidorenko, M. V. (2018). Legal certainty of Russian criminal procedure law. [Doctoral thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.Sidorenko, M. V. (2017). Legal certainty of the Russian criminal procedural law (state and formulation of the problem). Moscow: Yurlitinform.Soyer, J.-Cl. (1992). Droit penal et procedure penale. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Zhidkov, O. A. (Ed.) (1999). Anthology of world legal thought: In 5 volumes. [Vol. 3. Europe. America: 17th–20th centuries]. Moscow: Mysl.217–240217–240118https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3669/3999https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3669/4000https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3669/4002https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3669/4001Núm. 1 , Año 2022 : Jurídicas CUC 2022PublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2819https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/c72af71d-dda6-46d9-badc-b6aebb8810a3/downloadac6f5a9b6cde9b1aaf7c2dd3b55b9ae0MD5111323/12562oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/125622024-09-17 11:06:26.916https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/JURÍDICAS CUC - 2022metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.co |