Karl Popper y Heráclito: antecedentes y problemas actuales de la Filosofía de la Ciencia

This essay discusses the meaning of Hereaclitus logo and change ideas for Karl Popper's philosophy of science. The author explains that Heraclitus has been misinterpreted and misunderstood, especially since the critical rationalist conception, which Popper places in the Ionian and Ephesian illustration. This has certainly involved, according to the Austrian author, a lack of knowledge of the contributions to scientific thinking of both philosophical, innovative and original ideas in the pre-Socratic era. According to Popper, Heraclito meant for the future of science and philosophy, a true link with the innovative ideas that came over the centuries, issues that influenced later developments of science. This work is a brief study of the two works with which Popper studies Ephesio: Conjectures and Refutations (1991) and The Open Society and Its Enemies (1984); however, some connections are made with the rest of his work, concluding that Popper bases his critical scientific rationalism on the critical rationalism of the first Greek illustration.

• Autores: Villalobos Antúnez, José Vicente; Gutiérrez, José Francisco; Ramírez Molina, Reynier Israel; Díaz Cid, Luis; Ramos Márquez, Yanelis; Enamorado-Estrada, Jairo; Ruiz-Gomez, Gladis Isabel
• Tipo de recurso: Article of journal
• Fecha de publicación: 2020
• Institución: Corporación Universidad de la Costa
• Repositorio: REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/6855
• Acceso en línea: https://hdl.handle.net/11323/6855; https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
• Palabra clave: Heraclito; Karl R. Popper; Logos; Change; Social sciences; Scientific method; Cambio; Ciencias sociales; Método científico
• Rights: openAccess
• License: CC0 1.0 Universal