Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN

This study aims to re-examine the impacts of monetary and fiscal policy on environmental quality in ASEAN countries from 1990 to 2019. We utilized the panel and time series NARDL approach to explore the long-run and short-run estimates at a regional level and country level. ASEAN regional-wise analy...

Full description

Autores:: Mughal, Nafessa
Kashif, Maryam
Arif, Asma
Grimaldo Guerrero, John William
Nabua, Wilson C.
Niedbała, Gniewko

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Corporación Universidad de la Costa

Repositorio:: REDICUC - Repositorio CUC

Idioma:: eng

id	RCUC2_b01a10da3d2665215561f67141ef91eb
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8635
network_acronym_str	RCUC2
network_name_str	REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN
title	Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN
spellingShingle	Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN Monetary policy Fiscal policy CO2 emissions ASEAN
title_short	Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN
title_full	Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN
title_fullStr	Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN
title_full_unstemmed	Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN
title_sort	Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Mughal, Nafessa Kashif, Maryam Arif, Asma Grimaldo Guerrero, John William Nabua, Wilson C. Niedbała, Gniewko
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Mughal, Nafessa Kashif, Maryam Arif, Asma Grimaldo Guerrero, John William Nabua, Wilson C. Niedbała, Gniewko
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Monetary policy Fiscal policy CO2 emissions ASEAN
topic	Monetary policy Fiscal policy CO2 emissions ASEAN
description	This study aims to re-examine the impacts of monetary and fiscal policy on environmental quality in ASEAN countries from 1990 to 2019. We utilized the panel and time series NARDL approach to explore the long-run and short-run estimates at a regional level and country level. ASEAN regional-wise analysis shows that contractionary monetary policy reduces the CO2 emissions, while expansionary monetary policy enhances CO2 emissions in the long run. The long-run coefficient further confirms that expansionary fiscal policy mitigates CO2 emissions in ASEAN. The impact of expansionary monetary and fiscal policy on CO2 emissions is positive and significant, while contractionary monetary and fiscal policy have an insignificant impact on CO2 emissions in the short run. ASEAN country-wise analysis also reported the country-specific estimates for the short and long run. Some policies can redesign in light of these novel findings in ASEAN economies.
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-09-06T17:02:12Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-09-06T17:02:12Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8635
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-15114-8
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
url	https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8635 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-15114-8 https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv	Corporación Universidad de la Costa REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Adewuyi AO (2016) Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: a dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:489–506 Ahmad M, Ul Haq Z, Khan Z, Khattak SI, Rahman ZU, Khan S (2019) Does the inflow of remittances cause environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from China. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja 32(1):2099–2121 Annicchiarico B, Di Dio F (2017) GHG emissions control and monetary policy. Environ Resour Econ 67(4):823–851 Aslam B, Hu J, Hafeez M, Ma D, AlGarni TS, Saeed M, Abdullah MA, Hussain S (2021a) Applying environmental Kuznets curve framework to assess the nexus of industry, globalization, and CO2 emission. Environ Technol Innov 21:101377 Aslam B, Hu J, Majeed MT, Andlib Z, Ullah S (2021b) Asymmetric macroeconomic determinants of CO 2 emission in China and policy approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14 Balcilar M, Ciftcioglu S, Gungor H (2016) The effects of financial development on Investment in Turkey. Singap Econ Rev 61(4):1650002–16500018 Chan YT (2020) Are macroeconomic policies better in curbing air pollution than environmental policies? A DSGE approach with carbon-dependent fiscal and monetary policies. Energy Policy 141:111454–111468 Chen C, Pan D (2020) The OptimalMix ofMonetary and Climate Policy. MPRA Paper No 97718 Chishti MZ, Ullah S, Ozturk I, Usman A (2020) Examining the asymmetric effects of globalization and tourism on pollution emissions in South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:27721–27737 Chishti MZ, Ahmad M, Rehman A, Khan MK (2021) Mitigations pathways towards sustainable development: assessing the influence of fiscal and monetary policies on carbon emissions in BRICS economies. J Clean Prod 292:126035 Dar JA, Asif M (2017) Is financial development good for carbon mitigation in India? A regime shift-based cointegration analysis. Carbon Management 8(5-6):435–443 Dongyan L (2009) Fiscal and tax policy support for energy efficiency retrofit for existing residential buildings in China’s northern heating region. Energy Policy 37(6):2113–2118 Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377 Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2013) The effect of government expenditure on the environment: an empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 91:48–56 Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2016) The effects of fiscal policy on CO2 emissions: evidence from the USA. Energy Policy 88:317–328 Harper S (2013) Population–environment interactions: European migration, population composition and climate change. Environ Resour Econ 55(4):525–541 He L, Shen J, Zhang Y (2018) Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management. J Environ Manag 206:1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.059 He L, Shao F, Ren L (2020) Sustainability appraisal of desired contaminated groundwater remediation strategies: an information-entropy-based stochastic multi-criteria preference model. Environ Dev Sustain 23:1759–1779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00650-z He X, Zhang T, Xue Q, Zhou Y, Wang H, Bolan NS, Jiang R, Tsang DCW (2021) Enhanced adsorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution by polyethyleneimine modified straw hydrochar. Sci Total Environ 778:146116–146116 International Monetary Fund (2019) International Featured Standards 2019. International Monetary Fund Publications Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ 33(2):284–291 Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S (2018) Testing the role of fiscal policy in the environmental degradation: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(6):5616–5630 Khattak SI, Ahmad M, Khan ZU, Khan A (2020) Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–16 Li J, Hu Z, Shi V, Wang Q (2021a) Manufacturer’s encroachment strategy with substitutable green products. Int J Prod Econ 235:108102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108102 Li X, Yu Z, Salman A, Ali Q, Hafeez M, Aslam MS (2021b) The role of financial development indicators in sustainable development-environmental degradation nexus. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12 Liu Y, Han L, Yin Z, Luo K (2017) A competitive carbon emissions scheme with hybrid fiscal incentives: the evidence from a taxi industry. Energy Policy 102:414–422 Liu J, Yi Y, Wang X (2020) Exploring factors influencing construction waste reduction: a structural equation modeling approach. J Clean Prod 123185:123185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123185 Lopez R E, Palacios A (2010) Have government spending and energy tax policies contributed to make Europe environmentally cleaner? Working paper no 1667-2016-136345 Lopez R, Galinato GI, Islam A (2011) Fiscal spending and the environment: theory and empirics. J Environ Econ Manag 62(2):180–198 Lv Z, Xu T (2019) Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: dynamic panel data analysis of middle-income countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 28(3):317–330 McAusland C (2008) Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack. J Environ Econ Manag 55(1):52–71 Mirzaei M, Bekri M (2017) Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Iran, 2025. Environ Res 154:345–351 Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326 Rausch S (2013) Fiscal consolidation and climate policy: an overlapping generation’s perspective. Energy Econ 40:S134–S148 Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Sadorsky P (2016) The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: implications for sustainable development. Energy Econ 55:52–68 Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, pp 281–314 Sun G, Yuan C, Hafeez M, Raza S, Jie L, Liu X (2020) Does regional energy consumption disparities assist to control environmental degradation in OBOR: an entropy approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(7):7105–7119 Tian P, Lu H, Feng W, Guan Y, Xue Y (2020) Large decrease in streamflow and sediment load of Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau driven by future climate change: a case study in Lhasa River Basin. Catena (Giessen) 187:104340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104340 Ullah S, Majeed MT, Chishti MZ (2020) Examining the asymmetric effects of fiscal policy instruments on environmental quality in Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(30):38287–38299 Ullah S, Ozturk I, Sohail S (2021) The asymmetric effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on Pakistan’s environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(6):7450–7461 Usman A, Ullah S, Ozturk I, Chishti MZ, Zafar SM (2020) Analysis of asymmetries in the nexus among clean energy and environmental quality in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(17):20736–20747 Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159 Yuelan P, Akbar MW, Hafeez M, Ahmad M, Zia Z, Ullah S (2019) The nexus of fiscal policy instruments and environmental degradation Zhao X, Gu B, Gao F, Chen S (2020) Matching model of energy supply and demand of the integrated energy system in coastal areas. J Coast Res 103(sp1):983. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI103-205.1 Zhao W, Hafeez M, Maqbool A, Ullah S, Sohail S (2021) Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–11 Zuo X, Dong M, Gao F, Tian S (2020) The modeling of the electric heating and cooling system of the integrated energy system in the coastal area. J Coast Res 103(sp1):1022. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI103-213.1
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	Environmental Science and Pollution Research
institution	Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11356-021-15114-8
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/ac5e6d3e-0977-4d11-8956-f68ac10528a6/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/f4692511-b012-4d3a-9d7c-10dc2ffa3952/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/05e515e0-cd26-4e40-82a0-bd5f359ba0ac/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/b3eef15d-e9ca-4f92-bc7b-f01598c0a007/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/93ad4051-e375-4278-aa04-76a0de4cc093/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	942aacacdbac42539d60713ed510b43a 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 e30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9bad 4c918c20f328ad2057603ab2be5d7703 993ea64bb39da42b925f6f6b18102852
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_	1811760674133508096
spelling	Mughal, NafessaKashif, MaryamArif, AsmaGrimaldo Guerrero, John WilliamNabua, Wilson C.Niedbała, Gniewko2021-09-06T17:02:12Z2021-09-06T17:02:12Z2021https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8635https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-15114-8Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/This study aims to re-examine the impacts of monetary and fiscal policy on environmental quality in ASEAN countries from 1990 to 2019. We utilized the panel and time series NARDL approach to explore the long-run and short-run estimates at a regional level and country level. ASEAN regional-wise analysis shows that contractionary monetary policy reduces the CO2 emissions, while expansionary monetary policy enhances CO2 emissions in the long run. The long-run coefficient further confirms that expansionary fiscal policy mitigates CO2 emissions in ASEAN. The impact of expansionary monetary and fiscal policy on CO2 emissions is positive and significant, while contractionary monetary and fiscal policy have an insignificant impact on CO2 emissions in the short run. ASEAN country-wise analysis also reported the country-specific estimates for the short and long run. Some policies can redesign in light of these novel findings in ASEAN economies.Mughal, NafessaKashif, MaryamArif, AsmaGrimaldo Guerrero, John WilliamNabua, Wilson C.Niedbała, Gniewkoapplication/pdfengAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Environmental Science and Pollution Researchhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11356-021-15114-8Monetary policyFiscal policyCO2 emissionsASEANDynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEANArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionAdewuyi AO (2016) Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: a dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:489–506Ahmad M, Ul Haq Z, Khan Z, Khattak SI, Rahman ZU, Khan S (2019) Does the inflow of remittances cause environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from China. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja 32(1):2099–2121Annicchiarico B, Di Dio F (2017) GHG emissions control and monetary policy. Environ Resour Econ 67(4):823–851Aslam B, Hu J, Hafeez M, Ma D, AlGarni TS, Saeed M, Abdullah MA, Hussain S (2021a) Applying environmental Kuznets curve framework to assess the nexus of industry, globalization, and CO2 emission. Environ Technol Innov 21:101377Aslam B, Hu J, Majeed MT, Andlib Z, Ullah S (2021b) Asymmetric macroeconomic determinants of CO 2 emission in China and policy approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14Balcilar M, Ciftcioglu S, Gungor H (2016) The effects of financial development on Investment in Turkey. Singap Econ Rev 61(4):1650002–16500018Chan YT (2020) Are macroeconomic policies better in curbing air pollution than environmental policies? A DSGE approach with carbon-dependent fiscal and monetary policies. Energy Policy 141:111454–111468Chen C, Pan D (2020) The OptimalMix ofMonetary and Climate Policy. MPRA Paper No 97718Chishti MZ, Ullah S, Ozturk I, Usman A (2020) Examining the asymmetric effects of globalization and tourism on pollution emissions in South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:27721–27737Chishti MZ, Ahmad M, Rehman A, Khan MK (2021) Mitigations pathways towards sustainable development: assessing the influence of fiscal and monetary policies on carbon emissions in BRICS economies. J Clean Prod 292:126035Dar JA, Asif M (2017) Is financial development good for carbon mitigation in India? A regime shift-based cointegration analysis. Carbon Management 8(5-6):435–443Dongyan L (2009) Fiscal and tax policy support for energy efficiency retrofit for existing residential buildings in China’s northern heating region. Energy Policy 37(6):2113–2118Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2013) The effect of government expenditure on the environment: an empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 91:48–56Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2016) The effects of fiscal policy on CO2 emissions: evidence from the USA. Energy Policy 88:317–328Harper S (2013) Population–environment interactions: European migration, population composition and climate change. Environ Resour Econ 55(4):525–541He L, Shen J, Zhang Y (2018) Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management. J Environ Manag 206:1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.059He L, Shao F, Ren L (2020) Sustainability appraisal of desired contaminated groundwater remediation strategies: an information-entropy-based stochastic multi-criteria preference model. Environ Dev Sustain 23:1759–1779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00650-zHe X, Zhang T, Xue Q, Zhou Y, Wang H, Bolan NS, Jiang R, Tsang DCW (2021) Enhanced adsorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution by polyethyleneimine modified straw hydrochar. Sci Total Environ 778:146116–146116International Monetary Fund (2019) International Featured Standards 2019. International Monetary Fund PublicationsJalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ 33(2):284–291Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S (2018) Testing the role of fiscal policy in the environmental degradation: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(6):5616–5630Khattak SI, Ahmad M, Khan ZU, Khan A (2020) Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–16Li J, Hu Z, Shi V, Wang Q (2021a) Manufacturer’s encroachment strategy with substitutable green products. Int J Prod Econ 235:108102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108102Li X, Yu Z, Salman A, Ali Q, Hafeez M, Aslam MS (2021b) The role of financial development indicators in sustainable development-environmental degradation nexus. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12Liu Y, Han L, Yin Z, Luo K (2017) A competitive carbon emissions scheme with hybrid fiscal incentives: the evidence from a taxi industry. Energy Policy 102:414–422Liu J, Yi Y, Wang X (2020) Exploring factors influencing construction waste reduction: a structural equation modeling approach. J Clean Prod 123185:123185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123185Lopez R E, Palacios A (2010) Have government spending and energy tax policies contributed to make Europe environmentally cleaner? Working paper no 1667-2016-136345Lopez R, Galinato GI, Islam A (2011) Fiscal spending and the environment: theory and empirics. J Environ Econ Manag 62(2):180–198Lv Z, Xu T (2019) Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: dynamic panel data analysis of middle-income countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 28(3):317–330McAusland C (2008) Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack. J Environ Econ Manag 55(1):52–71Mirzaei M, Bekri M (2017) Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Iran, 2025. Environ Res 154:345–351Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326Rausch S (2013) Fiscal consolidation and climate policy: an overlapping generation’s perspective. Energy Econ 40:S134–S148Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Sadorsky P (2016) The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: implications for sustainable development. Energy Econ 55:52–68Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, pp 281–314Sun G, Yuan C, Hafeez M, Raza S, Jie L, Liu X (2020) Does regional energy consumption disparities assist to control environmental degradation in OBOR: an entropy approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(7):7105–7119Tian P, Lu H, Feng W, Guan Y, Xue Y (2020) Large decrease in streamflow and sediment load of Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau driven by future climate change: a case study in Lhasa River Basin. Catena (Giessen) 187:104340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104340Ullah S, Majeed MT, Chishti MZ (2020) Examining the asymmetric effects of fiscal policy instruments on environmental quality in Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(30):38287–38299Ullah S, Ozturk I, Sohail S (2021) The asymmetric effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on Pakistan’s environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(6):7450–7461Usman A, Ullah S, Ozturk I, Chishti MZ, Zafar SM (2020) Analysis of asymmetries in the nexus among clean energy and environmental quality in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(17):20736–20747Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159Yuelan P, Akbar MW, Hafeez M, Ahmad M, Zia Z, Ullah S (2019) The nexus of fiscal policy instruments and environmental degradationZhao X, Gu B, Gao F, Chen S (2020) Matching model of energy supply and demand of the integrated energy system in coastal areas. J Coast Res 103(sp1):983. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI103-205.1Zhao W, Hafeez M, Maqbool A, Ullah S, Sohail S (2021) Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–11Zuo X, Dong M, Gao F, Tian S (2020) The modeling of the electric heating and cooling system of the integrated energy system in the coastal area. J Coast Res 103(sp1):1022. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI103-213.1PublicationORIGINALDynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN.pdfDynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN.pdfapplication/pdf107526https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/ac5e6d3e-0977-4d11-8956-f68ac10528a6/download942aacacdbac42539d60713ed510b43aMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/f4692511-b012-4d3a-9d7c-10dc2ffa3952/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83196https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/05e515e0-cd26-4e40-82a0-bd5f359ba0ac/downloade30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9badMD53THUMBNAILDynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN.pdf.jpgDynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg41047https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/b3eef15d-e9ca-4f92-bc7b-f01598c0a007/download4c918c20f328ad2057603ab2be5d7703MD54TEXTDynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN.pdf.txtDynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN.pdf.txttext/plain1368https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/93ad4051-e375-4278-aa04-76a0de4cc093/download993ea64bb39da42b925f6f6b18102852MD5511323/8635oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/86352024-09-16 16:42:54.365http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.coQXV0b3Jpem8gKGF1dG9yaXphbW9zKSBhIGxhIEJpYmxpb3RlY2EgZGUgbGEgSW5zdGl0dWNpw7NuIHBhcmEgcXVlIGluY2x1eWEgdW5hIGNvcGlhLCBpbmRleGUgeSBkaXZ1bGd1ZSBlbiBlbCBSZXBvc2l0b3JpbyBJbnN0aXR1Y2lvbmFsLCBsYSBvYnJhIG1lbmNpb25hZGEgY29uIGVsIGZpbiBkZSBmYWNpbGl0YXIgbG9zIHByb2Nlc29zIGRlIHZpc2liaWxpZGFkIGUgaW1wYWN0byBkZSBsYSBtaXNtYSwgY29uZm9ybWUgYSBsb3MgZGVyZWNob3MgcGF0cmltb25pYWxlcyBxdWUgbWUobm9zKSBjb3JyZXNwb25kZShuKSB5IHF1ZSBpbmNsdXllbjogbGEgcmVwcm9kdWNjacOzbiwgY29tdW5pY2FjacOzbiBww7pibGljYSwgZGlzdHJpYnVjacOzbiBhbCBww7pibGljbywgdHJhbnNmb3JtYWNpw7NuLCBkZSBjb25mb3JtaWRhZCBjb24gbGEgbm9ybWF0aXZpZGFkIHZpZ2VudGUgc29icmUgZGVyZWNob3MgZGUgYXV0b3IgeSBkZXJlY2hvcyBjb25leG9zIHJlZmVyaWRvcyBlbiBhcnQuIDIsIDEyLCAzMCAobW9kaWZpY2FkbyBwb3IgZWwgYXJ0IDUgZGUgbGEgbGV5IDE1MjAvMjAxMiksIHkgNzIgZGUgbGEgbGV5IDIzIGRlIGRlIDE5ODIsIExleSA0NCBkZSAxOTkzLCBhcnQuIDQgeSAxMSBEZWNpc2nDs24gQW5kaW5hIDM1MSBkZSAxOTkzIGFydC4gMTEsIERlY3JldG8gNDYwIGRlIDE5OTUsIENpcmN1bGFyIE5vIDA2LzIwMDIgZGUgbGEgRGlyZWNjacOzbiBOYWNpb25hbCBkZSBEZXJlY2hvcyBkZSBhdXRvciwgYXJ0LiAxNSBMZXkgMTUyMCBkZSAyMDEyLCBsYSBMZXkgMTkxNSBkZSAyMDE4IHkgZGVtw6FzIG5vcm1hcyBzb2JyZSBsYSBtYXRlcmlhLg0KDQpBbCByZXNwZWN0byBjb21vIEF1dG9yKGVzKSBtYW5pZmVzdGFtb3MgY29ub2NlciBxdWU6DQoNCi0gTGEgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiBlcyBkZSBjYXLDoWN0ZXIgbm8gZXhjbHVzaXZhIHkgbGltaXRhZGEsIGVzdG8gaW1wbGljYSBxdWUgbGEgbGljZW5jaWEgdGllbmUgdW5hIHZpZ2VuY2lhLCBxdWUgbm8gZXMgcGVycGV0dWEgeSBxdWUgZWwgYXV0b3IgcHVlZGUgcHVibGljYXIgbyBkaWZ1bmRpciBzdSBvYnJhIGVuIGN1YWxxdWllciBvdHJvIG1lZGlvLCBhc8OtIGNvbW8gbGxldmFyIGEgY2FibyBjdWFscXVpZXIgdGlwbyBkZSBhY2Npw7NuIHNvYnJlIGVsIGRvY3VtZW50by4NCg0KLSBMYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuIHRlbmRyw6EgdW5hIHZpZ2VuY2lhIGRlIGNpbmNvIGHDsW9zIGEgcGFydGlyIGRlbCBtb21lbnRvIGRlIGxhIGluY2x1c2nDs24gZGUgbGEgb2JyYSBlbiBlbCByZXBvc2l0b3JpbywgcHJvcnJvZ2FibGUgaW5kZWZpbmlkYW1lbnRlIHBvciBlbCB0aWVtcG8gZGUgZHVyYWNpw7NuIGRlIGxvcyBkZXJlY2hvcyBwYXRyaW1vbmlhbGVzIGRlbCBhdXRvciB5IHBvZHLDoSBkYXJzZSBwb3IgdGVybWluYWRhIHVuYSB2ZXogZWwgYXV0b3IgbG8gbWFuaWZpZXN0ZSBwb3IgZXNjcml0byBhIGxhIGluc3RpdHVjacOzbiwgY29uIGxhIHNhbHZlZGFkIGRlIHF1ZSBsYSBvYnJhIGVzIGRpZnVuZGlkYSBnbG9iYWxtZW50ZSB5IGNvc2VjaGFkYSBwb3IgZGlmZXJlbnRlcyBidXNjYWRvcmVzIHkvbyByZXBvc2l0b3Jpb3MgZW4gSW50ZXJuZXQgbG8gcXVlIG5vIGdhcmFudGl6YSBxdWUgbGEgb2JyYSBwdWVkYSBzZXIgcmV0aXJhZGEgZGUgbWFuZXJhIGlubWVkaWF0YSBkZSBvdHJvcyBzaXN0ZW1hcyBkZSBpbmZvcm1hY2nDs24gZW4gbG9zIHF1ZSBzZSBoYXlhIGluZGV4YWRvLCBkaWZlcmVudGVzIGFsIHJlcG9zaXRvcmlvIGluc3RpdHVjaW9uYWwgZGUgbGEgSW5zdGl0dWNpw7NuLCBkZSBtYW5lcmEgcXVlIGVsIGF1dG9yKHJlcykgdGVuZHLDoW4gcXVlIHNvbGljaXRhciBsYSByZXRpcmFkYSBkZSBzdSBvYnJhIGRpcmVjdGFtZW50ZSBhIG90cm9zIHNpc3RlbWFzIGRlIGluZm9ybWFjacOzbiBkaXN0aW50b3MgYWwgZGUgbGEgSW5zdGl0dWNpw7NuIHNpIGRlc2VhIHF1ZSBzdSBvYnJhIHNlYSByZXRpcmFkYSBkZSBpbm1lZGlhdG8uDQoNCi0gTGEgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiBkZSBwdWJsaWNhY2nDs24gY29tcHJlbmRlIGVsIGZvcm1hdG8gb3JpZ2luYWwgZGUgbGEgb2JyYSB5IHRvZG9zIGxvcyBkZW3DoXMgcXVlIHNlIHJlcXVpZXJhIHBhcmEgc3UgcHVibGljYWNpw7NuIGVuIGVsIHJlcG9zaXRvcmlvLiBJZ3VhbG1lbnRlLCBsYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuIHBlcm1pdGUgYSBsYSBpbnN0aXR1Y2nDs24gZWwgY2FtYmlvIGRlIHNvcG9ydGUgZGUgbGEgb2JyYSBjb24gZmluZXMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmFjacOzbiAoaW1wcmVzbywgZWxlY3Ryw7NuaWNvLCBkaWdpdGFsLCBJbnRlcm5ldCwgaW50cmFuZXQsIG8gY3VhbHF1aWVyIG90cm8gZm9ybWF0byBjb25vY2lkbyBvIHBvciBjb25vY2VyKS4NCg0KLSBMYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuIGVzIGdyYXR1aXRhIHkgc2UgcmVudW5jaWEgYSByZWNpYmlyIGN1YWxxdWllciByZW11bmVyYWNpw7NuIHBvciBsb3MgdXNvcyBkZSBsYSBvYnJhLCBkZSBhY3VlcmRvIGNvbiBsYSBsaWNlbmNpYSBlc3RhYmxlY2lkYSBlbiBlc3RhIGF1dG9yaXphY2nDs24uDQoNCi0gQWwgZmlybWFyIGVzdGEgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiwgc2UgbWFuaWZpZXN0YSBxdWUgbGEgb2JyYSBlcyBvcmlnaW5hbCB5IG5vIGV4aXN0ZSBlbiBlbGxhIG5pbmd1bmEgdmlvbGFjacOzbiBhIGxvcyBkZXJlY2hvcyBkZSBhdXRvciBkZSB0ZXJjZXJvcy4gRW4gY2FzbyBkZSBxdWUgZWwgdHJhYmFqbyBoYXlhIHNpZG8gZmluYW5jaWFkbyBwb3IgdGVyY2Vyb3MgZWwgbyBsb3MgYXV0b3JlcyBhc3VtZW4gbGEgcmVzcG9uc2FiaWxpZGFkIGRlbCBjdW1wbGltaWVudG8gZGUgbG9zIGFjdWVyZG9zIGVzdGFibGVjaWRvcyBzb2JyZSBsb3MgZGVyZWNob3MgcGF0cmltb25pYWxlcyBkZSBsYSBvYnJhIGNvbiBkaWNobyB0ZXJjZXJvLg0KDQotIEZyZW50ZSBhIGN1YWxxdWllciByZWNsYW1hY2nDs24gcG9yIHRlcmNlcm9zLCBlbCBvIGxvcyBhdXRvcmVzIHNlcsOhbiByZXNwb25zYWJsZXMsIGVuIG5pbmfDum4gY2FzbyBsYSByZXNwb25zYWJpbGlkYWQgc2Vyw6EgYXN1bWlkYSBwb3IgbGEgaW5zdGl0dWNpw7NuLg0KDQotIENvbiBsYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuLCBsYSBpbnN0aXR1Y2nDs24gcHVlZGUgZGlmdW5kaXIgbGEgb2JyYSBlbiDDrW5kaWNlcywgYnVzY2Fkb3JlcyB5IG90cm9zIHNpc3RlbWFzIGRlIGluZm9ybWFjacOzbiBxdWUgZmF2b3JlemNhbiBzdSB2aXNpYmlsaWRhZA==

Dynamic effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on environmental pollution in ASEAN

Publicaciones similares