Análisis del decreto 089 de 2014 y su incidencia sobre la Autonomía y libertad sindical en la negociación colectiva

Collective bargaining is the materialization of the right to union association, it is the most important scenario for organized workers in search of social and labor demands through the sheets of petitions, with the issuance of Decree 089 of 2014 by the President of the Republic, the dynamics of the...

Full description

Autores:
Ariza Borja, Jesmmy Rosa
Croes Ordoñez, Kevin Daniel
Tipo de recurso:
Trabajo de grado de pregrado
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/7846
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7846
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Union autonomy
Freedom of association
Collective negotiation
Decree 089 of 2014
Autonomía sindical
Libertad sindical
Negociación colectiva
Decreto 089 de 2014
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Description
Summary:Collective bargaining is the materialization of the right to union association, it is the most important scenario for organized workers in search of social and labor demands through the sheets of petitions, with the issuance of Decree 089 of 2014 by the President of the Republic, the dynamics of the presentation of these sheets of petitions and their negotiating committees are modified when there are two or more union organizations in the same company. The decree has the apparent purpose of ending the alleged complications of collective bargaining with multiple unions. The present investigation analyzes the incidence of this decree on the freedom, autonomy and union representation, which are guiding principles of the fundamental right of union association. To this end, the execution of this work used a qualitative approach based on documentary analysis, to determine the interference of the decree in the fundamental right of union association and collective bargaining. It was possible to conclude that the norms of lesser hierarchy may ignore the national legal framework, due to the undue use of regulatory powers; as in the present case the decree violates the essential core of the right to union association, constitutional mandates, postulates of international agreements and jurisprudence of the constitutional court, fundamental rights are regulated by statutory laws in the Congress of the Republic and their conditions must be constitutionally justifiable, for this reason the executive does not have competence or powers to regulate fundamental and related rights.