Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia

Se analizaron los últimos cambios en la legislación de la Federación de Rusia, dirigidos al desarrollo de la justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y arbitrales. Los principales métodos de este estudio fueron formal-legal, comparativo-legal y sistemático. Se valoraron positivamente la introducción...

Full description

Autores:: Burova, Inna Leonidovna
Volkova, Maria Alexandrovna
Lenkovskaya, Renata Romanovna

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2020

Institución:: Corporación Universidad de la Costa

Repositorio:: REDICUC - Repositorio CUC

Idioma:: eng

id	RCUC2_a2543de90600f1679045b36d4b5c1697
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/12551
network_acronym_str	RCUC2
network_name_str	REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	E-justice in civil cases and economic disputes in the Russian Federation
title	Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia
spellingShingle	Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia arbitration proceedings civil proceedings e-justice e-judicial proceedings transparency of justice access to justice arbitraje justicia electrónica procedimientos legales electrónicos proceso civil transparencia de la justicia accesibilidad a la justicia
title_short	Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia
title_full	Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia
title_fullStr	Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia
title_full_unstemmed	Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia
title_sort	Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Burova, Inna Leonidovna Volkova, Maria Alexandrovna Lenkovskaya, Renata Romanovna
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Burova, Inna Leonidovna Volkova, Maria Alexandrovna Lenkovskaya, Renata Romanovna
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	arbitration proceedings civil proceedings e-justice e-judicial proceedings transparency of justice access to justice
topic	arbitration proceedings civil proceedings e-justice e-judicial proceedings transparency of justice access to justice arbitraje justicia electrónica procedimientos legales electrónicos proceso civil transparencia de la justicia accesibilidad a la justicia
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	arbitraje justicia electrónica procedimientos legales electrónicos proceso civil transparencia de la justicia accesibilidad a la justicia
description	Se analizaron los últimos cambios en la legislación de la Federación de Rusia, dirigidos al desarrollo de la justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y arbitrales. Los principales métodos de este estudio fueron formal-legal, comparativo-legal y sistemático. Se valoraron positivamente la introducción de tecnologías digitales en el ámbito de la protección judicial de los derechos y los intereses protegidos por la ley, de los ciudadanos y organizaciones en la Federación de Rusia. Se observa que la informatización de los procedimientos judiciales y legales servirá como un medio eficaz para implementar los principios de transparencia y acceso de la justicia en la Federación de Rusia. El uso de elementos de la justicia electrónica, como la presentación electrónica de documentos, la participación en una reunión mediante videoconferencia, el registro de audio y video, la posibilidad de que las personas involucradas en el caso obtengan protocolos de audio y video a través de sistemas electrónicos de comunicación, la notificación a los participantes en el proceso utilizando recursos como la “guardia electrónica”, la notificación por SMS, etc., tiene como objetivo mejorar la calidad de la justicia rusa. A pesar de la evaluación general positiva de los cambios en la legislación de la Federación de Rusia sobre justicia electrónica, los autores señalan sus deficiencias individuales. El artículo refleja los problemas de la regulación normativa de la justicia electrónica en la Federación de Rusia y propone formas de resolver conflictos legales.
publishDate	2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2020-09-23 00:00:00 2024-04-09T20:26:39Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2020-09-23 00:00:00 2024-04-09T20:26:39Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2020-09-23
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	1692-3030
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12551
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.17.1.2021.22
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.17981/juridcuc.17.1.2021.22
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2389-7716
identifier_str_mv	1692-3030 10.17981/juridcuc.17.1.2021.22 2389-7716
url	https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12551 https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.17.1.2021.22
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Jurídicas CUC
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Borisova, V. F. (2019). Legal regulation directions of civil e-justice. Materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference, Tambov legal readings named after F.N. Plevako (pp. 209–213). Publishing House "Derzhavinsky", Tambov, R. F. Available: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42403529 Bryantseva, O. V. & Soldatkina, O. L. (2019). E-justice in Russia: issues and their possible solution. O.E. Kutafin University Bulletin, 12(64), 97–104. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnoe-pravosudie-v-rossii-problemy-i-puti-resheniya Denisov, I. S. (2018). The development of e-justice in Russia. Bulletin of the st. Petersburg university of the mia of russia, 1(77), 101–104. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/journal/n/vestnik-sankt-peterburgskogo-universiteta-mvd-rossii?i=1082362 Dorzhiev, E. P. (2012). The electronic submission of documents to arbitration courts: provisional application. Arbitration and civil procedure, (7), 21–24. Fedoseeva, N. N. (2011). Access to information on the operation of courts in the Russian Federation. Court Administrator, (1). Fedoseeva, N. N. (2008). E-justice in Russia: concept, problems and perspectives. Arbitration and Civil Procedure, (9), 14–17. Available: https://www.twirpx.com/file/488604/ Fokov, A. P. (2011). The functioning of arbitration courts in the Russian Federation in 2010 and perspectives for developing e-justice. Rossiiskii sudya, (6). Reshetnyak, V. I. (2011). The issue of e-justice in arbitration and civil proceedings. Lawyer, (9). R.F. Chairman of the Government. (Sept. 20, 2012). On approval of the Concept of the federal target program "Development of the judicial system of Russia for 2013-2020". [Resolution No. 1735-r]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_135603/ R.F. Federal Arbitration Courts. (n.d.) . The consideration of cases by arbitration courts in 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arbitr.ru R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (Apr. 18, 2017). On some aspects of applying provisions of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation on simplified proceedings. [Decree No. 10]. Russian newspaper, 88. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_215641/ R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (October 8, 2012). On ensuring the principle of free speech in arbitration proceedings. [Resolution No. 61]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_137059/ R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (Feb. 17, 2011). On applying the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in conformity with Federal Law No. 228-FZ of July 27, 2010 “On amending the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [Resolution No. 12]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_111644/ R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (Jan. 12, 2011). Temporary procedure for submission of documents to the arbitration courts of the Russian Federation in electronic form. [Order No. 1]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_109727/ R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (Jul. 12, 2007). On posting information on the Internet sites of arbitration courts. [Letter No. VАS-S01/UIS-984]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_70330/ R.F. Supreme Court. (Mar. 18, 2020). On halting the personal reception of citizens in courts. [Resolution 808]. Availabale: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_347974/ R.F. Supreme Court. (Dec. 26, 2017). On applying the legislation regulating the use of electronic documents by general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. [Decree No. 57]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_286321/ R.F. Supreme Court. (Dec. 28, 2016). On approval of the Procedure for filing documents in the arbitration courts of the Russian Federation in electronic form, including in the form of an electronic document. [Decree No. 252]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_209951/ R.F. Supreme Court. (Nov. 26, 2015). On approving the List of main concepts and terms used in legal acts of the Judicial Department that govern the use of information-telecommunication technologies in the operation of courts, agencies of the Judicial Department in constituent entities of the Russian Federation and institutions of the Judicial Department. [Order No. 362]. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/420324231 R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 26, 2019). On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation. [Federal Law No. 197-FZ]. Availalble: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_329959/ R.F. State Duma. (Nov. 28, 2018). On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation. [Federal Law No. 451-FZ]. Availalble: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_312093/ R.F. State Duma. (Jun. 25, 2012). On amending the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to simplify court proceedings. [Federal Law No. 86-FZ]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_131581/ R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 2, 2013). On amending some legal acts of the Russian Federation. [Federal Law No. 166-FZ]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_148477/ R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 11, 2011). On amending certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation due to the adoption of the Federal Law on information, information technologies and information security. [Federal Law No. 200-FZ]. Russian newspaper, 34. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_116562/ R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 27, 2010). On amending the Arbitration Procedure Code. [Federal Law No. 228]. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 169. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_103105/ R.F. State Duma. (Dec. 22, 2008). On providing access to data on the operation of courts. [Federal Law No. 262-FZ]. Russian newspaper, 265. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_82839/ R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 27, 2006). On information, information technologies and information security. [Federal Law No. 149 FZ]. Russian newspaper, 165. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61798/ R.F. State Duma. (jul. 24, 2002). The Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [Federal Law No. 95-FZ]. Russian newspaper, 137. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_37800/ R.F. State Duma. (apr. 28, 1995). On Arbitration Courts in the Russian Federation. [Federal Constitutional Law of No. 1-FKZ]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_6510/ Rogozhin, S. P. (2012). The specifics of ensuring e-justice. The Civilist, (2). Rybkina, K. V. (2018). E-justice as a new structure in public administration. Gaps in Russian Legislation, (1), 120–126. Available: https://urvak.ru/articles/probe-vypusk-1-elektronnoe-pravosudie-kak-novaya-s/ Shilovskaya, A. L. & Sitdikova, L. B. (2018). The Use of Restorative Justice for Juveniles in Europe. Russian journal of criminology, 12(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2018.12(1).141-151 Sitdikova, L. B. & Starodumova, S. J. (2019). Corporate agreement as a means of providing security in the course of entrepreneurship development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(24) Sourdin, T. & Zeleznikow, J. (2020). Courts, mediation and COVID-19. Australian Business Law Review, 48(2), 138–158. Sourdin, T., Li, B. & McNamara, D. M. (2020). Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology, 9(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020 Spitsin, I. N. (2011). The mechanism ensuring the transparency of civil and arbitration proceedings: general characteristics. Russian Law Review, (2). Usova, M. G. (2018). Relevant issues of e-justice. Civilistics: law and progress, 3(44), 132–136. Available: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38236214 Van Gelder, E., Kramer, X. & Themeli, E. (Apr. 7, 020). Access to justice in times of corona. When COVID-19 makes the case for greater digitalisation of justice. [Online]. Available: https://conflictoflaws.net/2020/access-to-justice-in-times-of-corona/ Vasnev, V. (2008). E-justice: results and perspectives. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, (8), 58–59. Available: https://igzakon.ru/list?year=2013&type=59 Vdovina, E. (2009). Developing the principle of free speech in civil and arbitration proceedings. Arbitration and civil procedure, (10). Vorontsova, I. V. (2019). The correlation between two concepts – “e-court” and “e-justice. Legal policy and legal life, (3), 167–169. Yachmenev, G. G. (2012). Posting judicial acts on the Internet (legal aspects). Arbitration and civil proceedings, (7). Yakovleva, A. P. (2019). Pros and cons of e-justice: seeking balance. Vestnik PVolga Region Management Institute Newsletter, 19(6), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2019-6-73-79
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	629–648
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	629–648
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	1
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	17
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3455/3430 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3455/3431 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3455/3432 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3455/3433
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Jurídicas CUC 2021
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	JURÍDICAS CUC - 2021
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	JURÍDICAS CUC - 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf text/html application/xml application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3455
institution	Corporación Universidad de la Costa
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/212c4d64-333a-46c4-9adc-3563908e761a/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	11ef98e352af95e0ce8493cd35eb7271
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_	1811760708018241536
spelling	Burova, Inna LeonidovnaVolkova, Maria AlexandrovnaLenkovskaya, Renata Romanovna2020-09-23 00:00:002024-04-09T20:26:39Z2020-09-23 00:00:002024-04-09T20:26:39Z2020-09-231692-3030https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12551https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.17.1.2021.2210.17981/juridcuc.17.1.2021.222389-7716Se analizaron los últimos cambios en la legislación de la Federación de Rusia, dirigidos al desarrollo de la justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y arbitrales. Los principales métodos de este estudio fueron formal-legal, comparativo-legal y sistemático. Se valoraron positivamente la introducción de tecnologías digitales en el ámbito de la protección judicial de los derechos y los intereses protegidos por la ley, de los ciudadanos y organizaciones en la Federación de Rusia. Se observa que la informatización de los procedimientos judiciales y legales servirá como un medio eficaz para implementar los principios de transparencia y acceso de la justicia en la Federación de Rusia. El uso de elementos de la justicia electrónica, como la presentación electrónica de documentos, la participación en una reunión mediante videoconferencia, el registro de audio y video, la posibilidad de que las personas involucradas en el caso obtengan protocolos de audio y video a través de sistemas electrónicos de comunicación, la notificación a los participantes en el proceso utilizando recursos como la “guardia electrónica”, la notificación por SMS, etc., tiene como objetivo mejorar la calidad de la justicia rusa. A pesar de la evaluación general positiva de los cambios en la legislación de la Federación de Rusia sobre justicia electrónica, los autores señalan sus deficiencias individuales. El artículo refleja los problemas de la regulación normativa de la justicia electrónica en la Federación de Rusia y propone formas de resolver conflictos legales.The authors of the article have analyzed the latest amendments made to the legislation of the Russian Federation aimed at the development of e-justice in civil and arbitration cases. The main methods of this study were formal-legal, comparative-legal and systematic. The authors positively assess the introduction of digital technologies into the field of judicial protection of the rights and interests of citizens and organizations in the Russian Federation. It seems that the informatization of legal proceedings and records management will serve as an effective means of implementing the principles of transparency and accessibility of justice in the Russian Federation. The use of e-justice aims at improving the quality of justice in the Russian Federation. Its components are as follows: filing documents in electronic form, meetings held through video conferencing, audio and video recording, receiving audio and video protocols through electronic communication systems by parties to some case, notifying parties using such resources as “Guard Arbiter”, SMS, etc. Despite the general positive assessment of the amendments made to the Russian legislation on e-justice, the authors emphasize its certain shortcomings. The article dwells on the statutory regulation of e-justice in the Russian Federation and suggests possible ways to resolve legal conflicts.application/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlapplication/epub+zipengUniversidad de la CostaJURÍDICAS CUC - 2021https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3455arbitration proceedingscivil proceedingse-justicee-judicial proceedingstransparency of justiceaccess to justicearbitrajejusticia electrónicaprocedimientos legales electrónicosproceso civiltransparencia de la justiciaaccesibilidad a la justiciaJusticia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de RusiaE-justice in civil cases and economic disputes in the Russian FederationArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Revista Jurídicas CUCBorisova, V. F. (2019). Legal regulation directions of civil e-justice. Materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference, Tambov legal readings named after F.N. Plevako (pp. 209–213). Publishing House "Derzhavinsky", Tambov, R. F. Available: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42403529Bryantseva, O. V. & Soldatkina, O. L. (2019). E-justice in Russia: issues and their possible solution. O.E. Kutafin University Bulletin, 12(64), 97–104. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnoe-pravosudie-v-rossii-problemy-i-puti-resheniyaDenisov, I. S. (2018). The development of e-justice in Russia. Bulletin of the st. Petersburg university of the mia of russia, 1(77), 101–104. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/journal/n/vestnik-sankt-peterburgskogo-universiteta-mvd-rossii?i=1082362Dorzhiev, E. P. (2012). The electronic submission of documents to arbitration courts: provisional application. Arbitration and civil procedure, (7), 21–24.Fedoseeva, N. N. (2011). Access to information on the operation of courts in the Russian Federation. Court Administrator, (1).Fedoseeva, N. N. (2008). E-justice in Russia: concept, problems and perspectives. Arbitration and Civil Procedure, (9), 14–17. Available: https://www.twirpx.com/file/488604/Fokov, A. P. (2011). The functioning of arbitration courts in the Russian Federation in 2010 and perspectives for developing e-justice. Rossiiskii sudya, (6).Reshetnyak, V. I. (2011). The issue of e-justice in arbitration and civil proceedings. Lawyer, (9).R.F. Chairman of the Government. (Sept. 20, 2012). On approval of the Concept of the federal target program "Development of the judicial system of Russia for 2013-2020". [Resolution No. 1735-r]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_135603/R.F. Federal Arbitration Courts. (n.d.) . The consideration of cases by arbitration courts in 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arbitr.ruR.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (Apr. 18, 2017). On some aspects of applying provisions of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation on simplified proceedings. [Decree No. 10]. Russian newspaper, 88. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_215641/R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (October 8, 2012). On ensuring the principle of free speech in arbitration proceedings. [Resolution No. 61]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_137059/R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (Feb. 17, 2011). On applying the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in conformity with Federal Law No. 228-FZ of July 27, 2010 “On amending the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [Resolution No. 12]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_111644/R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (Jan. 12, 2011). Temporary procedure for submission of documents to the arbitration courts of the Russian Federation in electronic form. [Order No. 1]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_109727/R.F. Supreme Arbitration Court. (Jul. 12, 2007). On posting information on the Internet sites of arbitration courts. [Letter No. VАS-S01/UIS-984]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_70330/R.F. Supreme Court. (Mar. 18, 2020). On halting the personal reception of citizens in courts. [Resolution 808]. Availabale: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_347974/R.F. Supreme Court. (Dec. 26, 2017). On applying the legislation regulating the use of electronic documents by general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. [Decree No. 57]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_286321/R.F. Supreme Court. (Dec. 28, 2016). On approval of the Procedure for filing documents in the arbitration courts of the Russian Federation in electronic form, including in the form of an electronic document. [Decree No. 252]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_209951/R.F. Supreme Court. (Nov. 26, 2015). On approving the List of main concepts and terms used in legal acts of the Judicial Department that govern the use of information-telecommunication technologies in the operation of courts, agencies of the Judicial Department in constituent entities of the Russian Federation and institutions of the Judicial Department. [Order No. 362]. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/420324231R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 26, 2019). On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation. [Federal Law No. 197-FZ]. Availalble: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_329959/R.F. State Duma. (Nov. 28, 2018). On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation. [Federal Law No. 451-FZ]. Availalble: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_312093/R.F. State Duma. (Jun. 25, 2012). On amending the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to simplify court proceedings. [Federal Law No. 86-FZ]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_131581/R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 2, 2013). On amending some legal acts of the Russian Federation. [Federal Law No. 166-FZ]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_148477/R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 11, 2011). On amending certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation due to the adoption of the Federal Law on information, information technologies and information security. [Federal Law No. 200-FZ]. Russian newspaper, 34. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_116562/R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 27, 2010). On amending the Arbitration Procedure Code. [Federal Law No. 228]. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 169. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_103105/R.F. State Duma. (Dec. 22, 2008). On providing access to data on the operation of courts. [Federal Law No. 262-FZ]. Russian newspaper, 265. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_82839/R.F. State Duma. (Jul. 27, 2006). On information, information technologies and information security. [Federal Law No. 149 FZ]. Russian newspaper, 165. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61798/R.F. State Duma. (jul. 24, 2002). The Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [Federal Law No. 95-FZ]. Russian newspaper, 137. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_37800/R.F. State Duma. (apr. 28, 1995). On Arbitration Courts in the Russian Federation. [Federal Constitutional Law of No. 1-FKZ]. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_6510/Rogozhin, S. P. (2012). The specifics of ensuring e-justice. The Civilist, (2).Rybkina, K. V. (2018). E-justice as a new structure in public administration. Gaps in Russian Legislation, (1), 120–126. Available: https://urvak.ru/articles/probe-vypusk-1-elektronnoe-pravosudie-kak-novaya-s/Shilovskaya, A. L. & Sitdikova, L. B. (2018). The Use of Restorative Justice for Juveniles in Europe. Russian journal of criminology, 12(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2018.12(1).141-151Sitdikova, L. B. & Starodumova, S. J. (2019). Corporate agreement as a means of providing security in the course of entrepreneurship development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(24)Sourdin, T. & Zeleznikow, J. (2020). Courts, mediation and COVID-19. Australian Business Law Review, 48(2), 138–158.Sourdin, T., Li, B. & McNamara, D. M. (2020). Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology, 9(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020Spitsin, I. N. (2011). The mechanism ensuring the transparency of civil and arbitration proceedings: general characteristics. Russian Law Review, (2).Usova, M. G. (2018). Relevant issues of e-justice. Civilistics: law and progress, 3(44), 132–136. Available: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38236214Van Gelder, E., Kramer, X. & Themeli, E. (Apr. 7, 020). Access to justice in times of corona. When COVID-19 makes the case for greater digitalisation of justice. [Online]. Available: https://conflictoflaws.net/2020/access-to-justice-in-times-of-corona/Vasnev, V. (2008). E-justice: results and perspectives. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, (8), 58–59. Available: https://igzakon.ru/list?year=2013&type=59Vdovina, E. (2009). Developing the principle of free speech in civil and arbitration proceedings. Arbitration and civil procedure, (10).Vorontsova, I. V. (2019). The correlation between two concepts – “e-court” and “e-justice. Legal policy and legal life, (3), 167–169.Yachmenev, G. G. (2012). Posting judicial acts on the Internet (legal aspects). Arbitration and civil proceedings, (7).Yakovleva, A. P. (2019). Pros and cons of e-justice: seeking balance. Vestnik PVolga Region Management Institute Newsletter, 19(6), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2019-6-73-79629–648629–648117https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3455/3430https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3455/3431https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3455/3432https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3455/3433Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Jurídicas CUC 2021PublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2683https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/212c4d64-333a-46c4-9adc-3563908e761a/download11ef98e352af95e0ce8493cd35eb7271MD5111323/12551oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/125512024-09-17 10:44:04.768https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/JURÍDICAS CUC - 2021metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.co

Justicia electrónica en asuntos civiles y disputas económicas en la Federación de Rusia

Publicaciones similares