Predictors of favorable response to implanted of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Introduction: The indication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is discussed in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), due to the heterogeneity of the response to treatment and the risks involved in neurosurgery. Objective: To search for clinical factors and complementary...

Full description

Autores:
Ricciardi, Mario-Emiliano
Calandri, Ismael Luis
Alessandro, Lucas
Farez, Mauricio
Villalonga, Juan F.
Fausti, Martin
Herrmann, Frida
Allegri, Ricardo Francisco
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/10120
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/10120
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Cognitive impairment
Gait disorder
Neurosurgery
Hidrocefalia normotensiva idiopática
Derivación ventriculoperitoneal
Deterioro cognitivo
Trastorno de la marcha
Neurocirugía
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Description
Summary:Introduction: The indication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is discussed in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), due to the heterogeneity of the response to treatment and the risks involved in neurosurgery. Objective: To search for clinical factors and complementary studies in order to determine predictors of a favorable response to the VPS placement in patients with iNPH. Methodology: A retrospective study of patients with probable iNPH (according to international guidelines) treated with VPS assisted in a neurological clinic from January 2014 to January 2017 was conducted. A univariate statistical analysis of the variables considered as possible prognostic factors was performed. Results: 58 patients were included. Women presented 3.68 times more chances of improvement after the VPS (p=0.019). Good response to the gait test was associated with better response to the VPS (p=0.024). Conclusions: Female sex and good response to the gait test could be considered as predictors of a favorable response to the VPS placement in patients with iNPH. A prospective study is necessary to achieve a homogeneous diagnostic evaluation and a more extensive longitudinal follow-up to evaluate the clinical evolution in this group of patients.