Edificio del Centro Pompidou, París: un derroche de tecnología o una pieza maestra de arquitectura
When observing all the current dynamics of the Georges Pompidou Centre building, its relationship with the city of Paris, its machinistic aesthetics and the development of contemporary architecture, the question arises about the design of iconic buildings as formal essays, and whether these are a se...
- Autores:
-
Danies Echeverria, Benny Edelberto
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/6252
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/11323/6252
https://doi.org/10.17981/mod.arq.cuc.23.1.2020.03
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Centro Pompidou
Flexibilidad
Estética
Estilo maquinisista
Contesto urbano
Centre Pompidou
Flexibility
Aesthetic
Machinisit style
Urban context
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- CC0 1.0 Universal
Summary: | When observing all the current dynamics of the Georges Pompidou Centre building, its relationship with the city of Paris, its machinistic aesthetics and the development of contemporary architecture, the question arises about the design of iconic buildings as formal essays, and whether these are a sensible or coherent response to the surround-ing environment or are just elements that contribute to a personal aesthetic experience. Following this questioning, this article aims to analyse their aesthetics, the relation-ship with their surrounding environment and the experi-ential sense of the building designed by architects Renzo Piano and Richard Rogers in central Paris, emphasising the architectural concept of the former. The analysis fo-cuses on the physical, sensory and spatial characteristics of this building and how these characteristics make this building one of the most visited in the world, starting with the dimensions, the program and its implementation. High-lighting the strengths and weaknesses of the building and somehow manages to conclude how this project contributes positively to the development and evolution of architecture. |
---|