Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia

La cuestión de la defensa nacional se refiere predominantemente a la protección de la soberanía de un Estado independiente. El objetivo de esta investigación es analizar cómo las dimensiones de la defensa nacional, incluidos los factores militares y no militares, contribuyen a la resolución de las d...

Full description

Autores:
Djuyandi, Yusa
Mustofa , Mustabsyirotul Ummah
Husin , Luthfi Hamzah
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/12601
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12601
https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.20.1.2024.03
Palabra clave:
Boundaries
territorial rights
defence
economic growth
armed forces
Frontera
derecho territorial
defensa
crecimiento económico
fuerzas armadas
Rights
openAccess
License
JURÍDICAS CUC - 2024
id RCUC2_6dd3328b56f770818e507f97f744abd8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/12601
network_acronym_str RCUC2
network_name_str REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv National Defense in the Resolution of Border Disputes: The Experience of Indonesia and Malaysia
title Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia
spellingShingle Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia
Boundaries
territorial rights
defence
economic growth
armed forces
Frontera
derecho territorial
defensa
crecimiento económico
fuerzas armadas
title_short Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia
title_full Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia
title_fullStr Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia
title_full_unstemmed Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia
title_sort Defensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y Malasia
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Djuyandi, Yusa
Mustofa , Mustabsyirotul Ummah
Husin , Luthfi Hamzah
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Djuyandi, Yusa
Mustofa , Mustabsyirotul Ummah
Husin , Luthfi Hamzah
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Boundaries
territorial rights
defence
economic growth
armed forces
topic Boundaries
territorial rights
defence
economic growth
armed forces
Frontera
derecho territorial
defensa
crecimiento económico
fuerzas armadas
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Frontera
derecho territorial
defensa
crecimiento económico
fuerzas armadas
description La cuestión de la defensa nacional se refiere predominantemente a la protección de la soberanía de un Estado independiente. El objetivo de esta investigación es analizar cómo las dimensiones de la defensa nacional, incluidos los factores militares y no militares, contribuyen a la resolución de las disputas fronterizas entre Indonesia y Malasia. En concreto, el estudio pretende explorar el papel del crecimiento económico y el desarrollo de infraestructuras en las zonas fronterizas como elementos cruciales en el contexto más amplio de la defensa nacional y la soberanía territorial. La base metodológica de la investigación se presenta desde el paradigma cualitativo, se emplea técnica de triangulación, y técnicas sociojurídicas (entrevistas y discusiones de grupos focales). La investigación concluye que, ya existen institu­ciones para manejar los problemas en la frontera, pero todavía hay algunos obstáculos a nivel técnico irresolutos; por ejemplo, los problemas de coordinación en centros y regiones. Esta investigación contribuye al campo destacando la existencia de instituciones para el manejo de los problemas fronterizos, abordando los obstáculos t­écnicos, enfatizando el papel de los factores económicos y subrayando la importancia de considerar las amenazas del crimen transnacional. Se concluye que hoy en día, a la hora de resolver cuestiones fronte­rizas, también es necesario prestar atención al bienestar económico y a la amenaza de la delincuencia transnacional, si se considera esta última desde una perspectiva de seguridad no tradicional.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-14 05:03:50
2024-04-09T20:27:11Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-14 05:03:50
2024-04-09T20:27:11Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-14
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1692-3030
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12601
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.20.1.2024.03
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.17981/juridcuc.20.1.2024.03
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2389-7716
identifier_str_mv 1692-3030
10.17981/juridcuc.20.1.2024.03
2389-7716
url https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12601
https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.20.1.2024.03
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídicas CUC
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv Anuar, A. R. & Harun, A. (2019). Malaysia-Indonesia cross-border governance: is there a trade-off between security and economic development? Journal of International Studies, 15, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis­2019.15.2
Anuar, A. R. & Raharjo, S. N. I. (2022). Indonesia-malaysia cross-border governance during the Covid-19 pandemic: challenges and adaptation in the integration of the tebedu-entikong border region. Journal of International Studies (Malaysia), 18, 89–123. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.4
Bebler, A. (2015). Crimea and the Russian-Ukrainian conflic­t. R­omanian Journal of European Affairs, 15(1), 35–54. http://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/articole/RJEA­_2014_vol15_no1_art.3.pdf
Belkin, L., Iurynets, Ju., Sopilko, I. & Belkin, M. (2022). Culture and the use of information understanding in the field of national security (a case study of Ukraine). Journal of Inter­national Legal Communication, 5(2), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2022.5.pp.36-58
Bunga, G. A. & Tukan, E. N. B. (2019). Legal impact of state defense on indonesian citizen in international humanitarian law prespective. Yustisia, 8(2), 164–185. https://doi.org/­10.20961/yustisia.v8i2.21604
Butcher, J. G. (2013). The international court of justice and the territorial dispute between indonesia and malaysia in the Sulawesi Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 35(2), 235–257. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43281252
Djuyandi, Y., Putra, K. & Faozan, H. (2018). Political communication between the house of representatives and the ministry of defense in discussing the Republic of Indonesia state defense policy. Central European Journal of International & Security Studies, 12(4), 82–95. http://tinyurl.com/ys4r5hvh
Fravel, M. T. (2007). Securing borders: China’s doctrine and force structure for frontier defense. Journal of Strategic Studies, 30(4–5), 705–737. https://doi.org/­10.1080/01402390701431790
Hagström, L. & Pan, C. (2020). Traversing the soft/hard power binary: The case of the Sino-Japanese territorial dispute. Review of International Studies, 46(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000251
Hariyanto, I. (16 Nov, 2019). RI-Malaysia Akan Teken MoU 2 D­aerah di Kalimantan Jadi Batas Negara. detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4786930/ri-malaysia-akan-teken-mou-2-daerah-di-kalimantan-jadi-batas-negara
Herawati, N. & Sunyata, L. (2016). Penguatan Orientasi Kecintaan Nkri di Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat-serawak. Masyarakat Telematika Dan Informasi: Jurnal Penelitian Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 4(1), 27–36. https://www.neliti.com/publications/233774/penguatan-orientasi-kecintaan-nkri-di-perbatasan-kalimantan-barat-serawak
Johny, S. (August 29, 2020). Palestine | The land lost between the river and the sea. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/the-land-lost-between-the-river-and-the-sea/article32475325.ece
Khdir, R. (2016). The right to self-defence in international law as a justification for crossing borders: The Turkey-PKK case within the borders of Iraq. Russian Law Journal, 4(4), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-4-62-80
Komala, A. R. & Firdaus, D. W. (2022). Improving the quality of financial statements and the survival of msmes through digital economy: the case of Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 10(5), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i5.1435
Kuntjorowati, E. & Prastyowati, S. (2017). Upaya Masyarakat Perbatasan Antarnegara dalam Mempertahankan Kesejahteraan Sosial. Jurnal PKS, 16(4), 345–358. http://tinyurl.com/yrjy4j2p
La Ode, M. D. (2006). Peran Militer dalam Ketahanan Nasional; Studi Kasus Bidang Hankam di Indonesia Tahun 1967 – 2000. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Lee, M. (2022). The externalization of border control in the global South: The cases of Malaysia and Indonesia. Theoretical Criminology, 26(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221104867
Mansyah, A. (2017). Nasionalisme Masyarakat Indonesia di Perbatasan dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kedaulatan Negara. Journal Prodi Peperangan Asimetris, 3(3), 17–40. https://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/PA/article/view/141/0
Munandar, A. (2020). Nation-state formation at the Indonesia-Malaysia border in West Kalimantan. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies, 15(2), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0071/CGP/V15­I02/17-28
Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
Pamungkas, C. (2018). Pengelolaan Perbatasan dan Hubungan Antaretnis di Bengkayang. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.62110
Poissonnier, G. & David, E. (2017). Israeli Settlements in the West Bank, a War Crime? Revue des droits de l’homme, (17), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.4000/revdh.7613
Rachmawati, I. (2017). Karakter Diplomasi Publik Indonesia terhadap Malaysia. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.61105
Republik Indonesia. PPKI. (1945). Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/uu1945
Schiff, R. L. (2009). The Military and Domestic Politics: A Concordance Theory of Civil-Military Relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892305
Siregar, C. N., Rahmansyah, S. & Saepudin, E. (2019). Ancaman Keamanan Nasional di Wilayah Perbatasan Indonesia : Studi Kasus Pulau Sebatik dan Tawau (Indonesia-Malaysia). Sosioglobal, 4(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.24198/jsg.v4i1.23933
Sudiar, S. & Irawan, B. (2019, July 24-25). Compliance Problem Within Sosek-Malindo Cooperation Regime Between East Kalimantan and Sabah [Conference]. 6th International Conference on Community Development, ICCD, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccd-19.2019.129
Tirtosudarmo, R. (2014). Kalimantan Barat sebagai ‘Daerah Perbatasan’: Sebuah Tinjauan Demografi-Politik. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, (304), 29–54. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20452221&lokasi=lokal
Wang, H. & Lu, Y.-C. (2008). The conception of soft power and its policy implications: a comparative study of China and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 17(56), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560802000191
Westmoreland, J. B. (2015). The Relationship Between National Identity and State Borders [Unpublished master's thesis, Appalachian State University]. NC Docks. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir//listing.aspx?id=18342
Wiegand, K. E. (2011). Militarized territorial disputes: States’ attempts to transfer reputation for resolve. Journal of Peace Research, 48(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/­10.1177/0022343310389414
Yuldashev, O. K., Khomiachenko, S. I. & Yuldashev, S. O. (2022). Organizational and legal model of competency-based education as a means of the transition to innovative economy. Danube, 13(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-0007
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 77–98
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 77–98
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 20
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/4993/5306
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/4993/5307
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/4993/5308
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/4993/5309
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 1 , Año 2024 : Jurídicas CUC 2024
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv JURÍDICAS CUC - 2024
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv JURÍDICAS CUC - 2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/4993
institution Corporación Universidad de la Costa
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/259912ba-2c7d-4917-944d-65f3d16485d8/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 9d0214a1ab68d0c1bf9c22c3af4217e3
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_ 1811760671318081536
spelling Djuyandi, YusaMustofa , Mustabsyirotul UmmahHusin , Luthfi Hamzah2023-11-14 05:03:502024-04-09T20:27:11Z2023-11-14 05:03:502024-04-09T20:27:11Z2023-11-141692-3030https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12601https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.20.1.2024.0310.17981/juridcuc.20.1.2024.032389-7716La cuestión de la defensa nacional se refiere predominantemente a la protección de la soberanía de un Estado independiente. El objetivo de esta investigación es analizar cómo las dimensiones de la defensa nacional, incluidos los factores militares y no militares, contribuyen a la resolución de las disputas fronterizas entre Indonesia y Malasia. En concreto, el estudio pretende explorar el papel del crecimiento económico y el desarrollo de infraestructuras en las zonas fronterizas como elementos cruciales en el contexto más amplio de la defensa nacional y la soberanía territorial. La base metodológica de la investigación se presenta desde el paradigma cualitativo, se emplea técnica de triangulación, y técnicas sociojurídicas (entrevistas y discusiones de grupos focales). La investigación concluye que, ya existen institu­ciones para manejar los problemas en la frontera, pero todavía hay algunos obstáculos a nivel técnico irresolutos; por ejemplo, los problemas de coordinación en centros y regiones. Esta investigación contribuye al campo destacando la existencia de instituciones para el manejo de los problemas fronterizos, abordando los obstáculos t­écnicos, enfatizando el papel de los factores económicos y subrayando la importancia de considerar las amenazas del crimen transnacional. Se concluye que hoy en día, a la hora de resolver cuestiones fronte­rizas, también es necesario prestar atención al bienestar económico y a la amenaza de la delincuencia transnacional, si se considera esta última desde una perspectiva de seguridad no tradicional.The issue of national defense predominantly refers to the protection of the sovereignty of an independent state. This article addresses such aspect country’s sovereignty as the inviolability of borders.The objective of this research is to investigate how the dimensions of national defense, including both military and non-military factors, contribute to the resolution of border disputes between Indonesia and Malaysia. Specifically, the study aims to explore the role of economic growth and infrastructure development in the borderlands as crucial elements in the broader context of national defense and territorial sovereignty.The methodological basis of the research constitutes а qualitative method, triangulation technique, and purposive techniques (interviews and focus group discussions). The research finds that institutions to handle problems at the border already exist, but there are still some obstacles at the technical level; for example, centers and regions have problems with their coordination. This research contributes to the field by highlighting the existence of institutions for border issue management, addressing technical obstacles, emphasizing the role of economic factors, and underscoring the importance of considering transnational crime threats. It is concluded that today when solving border issues, it is also necessary to pay attention to economic well-being and the threat of transnational crime, if the last is considered from a non-traditional security perspective.application/pdftext/htmltext/xmlapplication/epub+zipengUniversidad de la CostaJURÍDICAS CUC - 2024https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/4993Boundariesterritorial rightsdefenceeconomic growtharmed forcesFronteraderecho territorialdefensacrecimiento económicofuerzas armadasDefensa Nacional en la Resolución de Disputas Fronterizas: La Experiencia de Indonesia y MalasiaNational Defense in the Resolution of Border Disputes: The Experience of Indonesia and MalaysiaArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Revista Jurídicas CUCAnuar, A. R. & Harun, A. (2019). Malaysia-Indonesia cross-border governance: is there a trade-off between security and economic development? Journal of International Studies, 15, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis­2019.15.2Anuar, A. R. & Raharjo, S. N. I. (2022). Indonesia-malaysia cross-border governance during the Covid-19 pandemic: challenges and adaptation in the integration of the tebedu-entikong border region. Journal of International Studies (Malaysia), 18, 89–123. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.4Bebler, A. (2015). Crimea and the Russian-Ukrainian conflic­t. R­omanian Journal of European Affairs, 15(1), 35–54. http://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/articole/RJEA­_2014_vol15_no1_art.3.pdfBelkin, L., Iurynets, Ju., Sopilko, I. & Belkin, M. (2022). Culture and the use of information understanding in the field of national security (a case study of Ukraine). Journal of Inter­national Legal Communication, 5(2), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2022.5.pp.36-58Bunga, G. A. & Tukan, E. N. B. (2019). Legal impact of state defense on indonesian citizen in international humanitarian law prespective. Yustisia, 8(2), 164–185. https://doi.org/­10.20961/yustisia.v8i2.21604Butcher, J. G. (2013). The international court of justice and the territorial dispute between indonesia and malaysia in the Sulawesi Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 35(2), 235–257. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43281252Djuyandi, Y., Putra, K. & Faozan, H. (2018). Political communication between the house of representatives and the ministry of defense in discussing the Republic of Indonesia state defense policy. Central European Journal of International & Security Studies, 12(4), 82–95. http://tinyurl.com/ys4r5hvhFravel, M. T. (2007). Securing borders: China’s doctrine and force structure for frontier defense. Journal of Strategic Studies, 30(4–5), 705–737. https://doi.org/­10.1080/01402390701431790Hagström, L. & Pan, C. (2020). Traversing the soft/hard power binary: The case of the Sino-Japanese territorial dispute. Review of International Studies, 46(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000251Hariyanto, I. (16 Nov, 2019). RI-Malaysia Akan Teken MoU 2 D­aerah di Kalimantan Jadi Batas Negara. detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4786930/ri-malaysia-akan-teken-mou-2-daerah-di-kalimantan-jadi-batas-negaraHerawati, N. & Sunyata, L. (2016). Penguatan Orientasi Kecintaan Nkri di Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat-serawak. Masyarakat Telematika Dan Informasi: Jurnal Penelitian Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 4(1), 27–36. https://www.neliti.com/publications/233774/penguatan-orientasi-kecintaan-nkri-di-perbatasan-kalimantan-barat-serawakJohny, S. (August 29, 2020). Palestine | The land lost between the river and the sea. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/the-land-lost-between-the-river-and-the-sea/article32475325.eceKhdir, R. (2016). The right to self-defence in international law as a justification for crossing borders: The Turkey-PKK case within the borders of Iraq. Russian Law Journal, 4(4), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-4-62-80Komala, A. R. & Firdaus, D. W. (2022). Improving the quality of financial statements and the survival of msmes through digital economy: the case of Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 10(5), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i5.1435Kuntjorowati, E. & Prastyowati, S. (2017). Upaya Masyarakat Perbatasan Antarnegara dalam Mempertahankan Kesejahteraan Sosial. Jurnal PKS, 16(4), 345–358. http://tinyurl.com/yrjy4j2pLa Ode, M. D. (2006). Peran Militer dalam Ketahanan Nasional; Studi Kasus Bidang Hankam di Indonesia Tahun 1967 – 2000. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.Lee, M. (2022). The externalization of border control in the global South: The cases of Malaysia and Indonesia. Theoretical Criminology, 26(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221104867Mansyah, A. (2017). Nasionalisme Masyarakat Indonesia di Perbatasan dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kedaulatan Negara. Journal Prodi Peperangan Asimetris, 3(3), 17–40. https://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/PA/article/view/141/0Munandar, A. (2020). Nation-state formation at the Indonesia-Malaysia border in West Kalimantan. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies, 15(2), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0071/CGP/V15­I02/17-28Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699Pamungkas, C. (2018). Pengelolaan Perbatasan dan Hubungan Antaretnis di Bengkayang. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.62110Poissonnier, G. & David, E. (2017). Israeli Settlements in the West Bank, a War Crime? Revue des droits de l’homme, (17), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.4000/revdh.7613Rachmawati, I. (2017). Karakter Diplomasi Publik Indonesia terhadap Malaysia. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.61105Republik Indonesia. PPKI. (1945). Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/uu1945Schiff, R. L. (2009). The Military and Domestic Politics: A Concordance Theory of Civil-Military Relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892305Siregar, C. N., Rahmansyah, S. & Saepudin, E. (2019). Ancaman Keamanan Nasional di Wilayah Perbatasan Indonesia : Studi Kasus Pulau Sebatik dan Tawau (Indonesia-Malaysia). Sosioglobal, 4(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.24198/jsg.v4i1.23933Sudiar, S. & Irawan, B. (2019, July 24-25). Compliance Problem Within Sosek-Malindo Cooperation Regime Between East Kalimantan and Sabah [Conference]. 6th International Conference on Community Development, ICCD, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccd-19.2019.129Tirtosudarmo, R. (2014). Kalimantan Barat sebagai ‘Daerah Perbatasan’: Sebuah Tinjauan Demografi-Politik. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, (304), 29–54. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20452221&lokasi=lokalWang, H. & Lu, Y.-C. (2008). The conception of soft power and its policy implications: a comparative study of China and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 17(56), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560802000191Westmoreland, J. B. (2015). The Relationship Between National Identity and State Borders [Unpublished master's thesis, Appalachian State University]. NC Docks. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir//listing.aspx?id=18342Wiegand, K. E. (2011). Militarized territorial disputes: States’ attempts to transfer reputation for resolve. Journal of Peace Research, 48(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/­10.1177/0022343310389414Yuldashev, O. K., Khomiachenko, S. I. & Yuldashev, S. O. (2022). Organizational and legal model of competency-based education as a means of the transition to innovative economy. Danube, 13(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-000777–9877–98120https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/4993/5306https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/4993/5307https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/4993/5308https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/4993/5309Núm. 1 , Año 2024 : Jurídicas CUC 2024PublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2683https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/259912ba-2c7d-4917-944d-65f3d16485d8/download9d0214a1ab68d0c1bf9c22c3af4217e3MD5111323/12601oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/126012024-09-16 16:41:20.164https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/JURÍDICAS CUC - 2024metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.co

Publicaciones similares