Evaluación del Trastorno Afectivo Bipolar: revisión sistemática de los estudios instrumentales
Bipolar Disorder is a widely studied construct, but its diagnostic process has been controversial, because the use of measuring instruments is a relatively new practice. Objective: To carry out a Systematic Review of the instruments mostly used, to identify in the literature their conceptual adequac...
- Autores:
-
Tafur Navarro, Jouseleyne Del Carmen
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/6336
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/11323/6336
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Bipolar disorder
Psychometric properties
Adaptation
Validation
Instrument
Scale
Systematic revision
Trastorno bipolar
Propiedades psicométricas
Adaptación
Validación
Instrumento
Escala
Revisión sistemática
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
| Summary: | Bipolar Disorder is a widely studied construct, but its diagnostic process has been controversial, because the use of measuring instruments is a relatively new practice. Objective: To carry out a Systematic Review of the instruments mostly used, to identify in the literature their conceptual adequacy, the method of administration and the psychometric properties of the measurement instruments in Spanish-speaking adults between 18 and 65 years of age. Electronic searches were carried out in: Scopus, Science Direct and Wed of Science, without time of year; using key words based on Methodological and Clinical Terms of the Construct, connected by the Boolean operator “AND”. Methodological quality was assessed using the COSMIN checklist. Result: After preselection and elimination of duplicate studies, 28 suitable studies remained. The most used instruments were: MDQ, HAMD-5, BDI and IDS. 12 studies reported the theoretical model, the DSM-IV and the affective and emotional composite temperament model, being the most widely used. Regarding psychometric properties, 13 instruments determined construct validity through Factor Analysis, the most used extraction method for identifying factor load is exploratory factor analysis, using the adjustment index: component analysis main. 24 studies reported internal consistency analysis in their methodology, using Cronbach's α coefficient. Pearson's correlation was the most frequently performed statistic for evaluating concurrent validity. Finally, in construct validity, 8 studies used correlation analyzes (convergent and discriminant). |
|---|