An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba

Human activities often drive landscape degradation and the associated loss of value. This paper describes a method that, by integrating multiple factors, characterize landscape value to establish relevant and effective management practices. The new integrated method for landscape assessment (IMLA) i...

Full description

Autores:
Zielinski, Seweryn
Milanés Batista, Celene
Cambon, Elena
PÉREZ MONTERO, OFELIA
Rizo, Lourdes
Suarez, Andres
Cuker, Benjamin
Anfuso, Giorgio
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8210
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8210
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094773
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Landscape units
Characterization value management
Sustainability
Scenarios
Coastal zone
Rights
openAccess
License
CC0 1.0 Universal
id RCUC2_5ddc4649e6cea462b506273fd5753b96
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8210
network_acronym_str RCUC2
network_name_str REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba
title An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba
spellingShingle An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba
Landscape units
Characterization value management
Sustainability
Scenarios
Coastal zone
title_short An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba
title_full An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba
title_fullStr An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba
title_full_unstemmed An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba
title_sort An integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Zielinski, Seweryn
Milanés Batista, Celene
Cambon, Elena
PÉREZ MONTERO, OFELIA
Rizo, Lourdes
Suarez, Andres
Cuker, Benjamin
Anfuso, Giorgio
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Zielinski, Seweryn
Milanés Batista, Celene
Cambon, Elena
PÉREZ MONTERO, OFELIA
Rizo, Lourdes
Suarez, Andres
Cuker, Benjamin
Anfuso, Giorgio
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Landscape units
Characterization value management
Sustainability
Scenarios
Coastal zone
topic Landscape units
Characterization value management
Sustainability
Scenarios
Coastal zone
description Human activities often drive landscape degradation and the associated loss of value. This paper describes a method that, by integrating multiple factors, characterize landscape value to establish relevant and effective management practices. The new integrated method for landscape assessment (IMLA) is a four-step model that includes: (i) establishment of a general theoretical basis for sustainability relevant metrics; (ii) characterization of the landscape; (iii) landscape valuation; (iv) recommendations for landscape value management. Each step includes different interactive components of analysis. The new IMLA considers the potential range of values associated with each landscape unit and facilitates sustainable landscape management. The method is systematic and includes both inductive and deductive reasoning. Its articulation is represented in the conjunction and overlapping of all factors and variables considered. IMLA was tested in Santiago de Cuba Bay (Cuba) and used to determine five landscape scopes, eight first-order landscape units and 29 s-order units. It proved to be a useful tool to establish landscape values and sound management strategies. Application of IMLA in Cuba will help local authorities institute land-use plans and to establish decision-making processes that include valuation of cultural landscapes.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-27T20:57:45Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-27T20:57:45Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 2071-1050
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8210
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094773
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv 2071-1050
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
url https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8210
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094773
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv 1. Western, D.; Mose, V.N.; Maitumo, D.; Mburu, C. Long-term changes in the plant ecology of an African savanna landscape and the implications for ecosystem theory and conservation management. Ecol. Process. 2021, 10, 1–12.
2. NC 93-06-101 SNPMA. Paisaje. Términos y Definiciones. Sistema de Normas para la Protección del Medio Ambiente; Comité Estatal de Normalización: La Habana, Cuba, 1987; p. 15.
3. Quintela., J. El Inventario, el Análisis y el Diagnóstico Geo Ecológico de los Paisajes Mediante el Uso de los SIG. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba, 1995; p. 105.
4. Aguiló, M. Guía para la Elaboración de Estudios del Medio Físico. Contenido y Metodología; Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Madrid, Spain, 1998; p. 484.
5. Salinas, C.E. Análisis y Evaluación de los Paisajes en la Planificación Regional en Cuba. Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Geografía, Universidad de La Habana , La Habana, Cuba,1991; p. 187.
6. Salinas, E. Los Paisajes Como Fundamento del Ordenamiento Ambiental. Experiencias y Perspectivas; Convención Trópico: La Habana, Cuba, 2004.
7. Pérez-Chacón, E. Unidades de Paisaje: Aproximación Científica y Aplicaciones, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006; p. 125.
8. Warnock, S.; Griffiths, G. Landscape Characterisation: The Living Landscapes Approach in the UK. Landsc. Res. 2014, 40, 261–278.
9. MMA–IGAC. Zonificación Ecológica de la Región Pacífico Colombiano; Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi: Santa Fé de Bogotá, Colombia, 2000; p. 365.
10. Escribano, B.R. “Propuesta de una Metodología para la Integración de las Actuaciones forestales en el Paisaje”, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006; p. 174.
11. Martínez, J.M.; Cárdenas, O.; Martín, G.; Olivera, J.; García, M. Guía Metodológica para los Estudios Técnicos de Ordenamiento Ambiental en Cuba; Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología y Medio ambiente e Instituto de Geografía Tropical: La Habana, Cuba, 2009.
12. Ulrich, R.S. Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landsc. Res. 1979, 4, 17–23, doi:10.1080/01426397908705892.
13. Rodríguez, R. El Paisaje Urbano en el Centro Histórico de Santiago de Cuba: Método Gráfico Teórico para su Caracterización Morfotipológica. Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Construcciones, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2008.
14. Cambón, F.E.C. El paisaje de la Cuenca Visual de la Bahía de Santiago de Cuba. Procedimiento Metódico para su Caracterización y Valoración. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2001.
15. Schmitz, S.; Vanderheyden, V. Reflexive loops on scaling issues in landscape quality assessment Serge Schmitz, Vincent Vanderheyden. Land Use Policy 2016, 53, 3–7.
16. Steiner, F. The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning, 2nd ed.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1991.
17. Scott, A. Assessing Public Perception of Landscape: The LANDMAP experience. Landsc. Res. 2002, 27, 271–295, doi:10.1080/01426390220149520.
18. Cambón, F.E.C. Proceso de urbanización y paisaje en la cuenca de la bahía de Santiago de Cuba. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2011, XXXII, 3.
19. Willemen, L.; Verburg, P.H.; Hein, L.; Van Mensvoort, M.E. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 88, 34–43, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.004.
20. Mateo, R.J.M. Geoecología de los Paisajes. Apuntes Para un Curso de Postgrado; Universidad de los Andes: Mérida, Venezuela, 1991; p. 222.
21. Mateo, R.J.M. Geografía de los Paisajes; Universitaria de La Habana: Havana, Cuba, 2008; p. 436.
22. Olwig, K.R.; Dalglish, C.; Fairclough, G.; Herring, P.; Herring, P. Introduction to a special issue: The future of landscape characterisation, and the future character of landscape—between space, time, history, place and nature. Landsc. Res. 2016, 41, 1–6, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135321.
23. Rojas, Á.; Ravelo, G. “Identificación de Valores en el Barrio de Colón”, en El Barrio de Colón; Pontón Caribe, S.A., Ed.; Rehabilitación Urbana y Desarrollo Comunitario en La Habana: La Habana, Cuba, 2005; p. 40.
24. Martínez, P.E.; Ortega, C.N. (Eds.) Los Valores del Paisaje; Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2009; p. 322, ISBN 978-84-8344-151-0.
25. Muñoz, M.D.; Pérez, L.; Sanhueza, R.; Rovira, A.; Urrutia, R. Los paisajes del agua en la cuenca del río Baker: Bases conceptuales para su valoracion integral. Rev. Geogr. Norte Grande 2006, 36, 31–48.
26. Nogué, J.; Sala, P. “El Paisaje en la Ordenación del Territorio. Los Catálogos de Paisaje de Cataluña”, en Cuadernos Geográficos; University of Granada: Granada, Spain 2008; pp. 69–98.
27. Mateu, J.F. “La Valoración Científica del Paisaje: Luis Pardo y los Lagos de España”. en Los valores del Paisaje; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2009; pp. 155–161.
28. Recharte, J. “La categoría de Reserva Paisajística como Estrategia de Conservación en el Contexto de Los Andes: Naturaleza y Cultura en la cordillera de Huayhuash, Perú”, en Paisajes Culturales en Los Andes; Reunión de Expertos, UNESCO: Lima, Perú, 1998; pp. 131–140.
29. Pizano, O.; Cortés, R. “Paisajes Culturales, Territorio y Cultura en la Cordillera de Los Andes”, en Paisajes Culturales en Los Andes, Reunión de Expertos, UNESCO: Lima, Perú, 1998; pp. 59–68.
30. Pinto-Correia, T.; Machado, C.; Barroso, F.; Picchi, P.; Turpin, N.; Bousset, J.-P.; Chabab, N.; Michelin, Y. How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 32, 37–47, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.016.
31. Brandt, J.; Tress, B.; Tress, G. (Eds.) Conference Material for the Conference on “Multifunctional Landscapes”; Centre for Landscape Research, University of Roskilde: Roskilde, Denmark, 2000.
32. Palmer, J.F.; Hoffman, R.E. Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 149–161, doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00133-5.
33. Tveit, M.; Ode, Å.; Fry, G. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31, 229–255, doi:10.1080/01426390600783269.
34. Carvalho-Ribeiro, S.; Loupa Ramos, I.; Madeira, L.; Barroso, F.; Menezes, H.; Pinto Correia, T. Is land cover an important asset for addressing the subjective landscape dimension. Land Use Policy 2013, 35, 50–60.
35. Fairclough, G.J. Historic Landscape Characterisation: The State of the Art; English Heritage: London, UK, 1999.
36. Turner, S. Historic Landscape Characterization: A landscape archaeology for research, management and planning. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31, 385–398.
37. Zube, E.H. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landsc. Ecol. 1987, 1, 37–45, doi:10.1007/bf02275264.
38. Mücher, C.A.; Klijn, J.A.; Wascher, D.M.; Schaminée, J.H. A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10, 87–103, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018.
39. Atik, M.; Işıklı, R.C.; Ortaçeşme, V.; Yıldırım, E. Exploring a combination of objective and subjective assessment in landscape classification: Side case from Turkey. Appl. Geogr. 2017, 83, 130–140.
40. Allain, S.; Plumecocq, G.; Leenhardt, D. How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 136, 282–295, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.011.
41. Brabyn, L. Classifying Landscape Character. Landsc. Res. 2009, 34, 299–321, doi:10.1080/01426390802371202.
42. Venegas, C.; Rodríguez, J. “Valoración de los Paisajes Monumentales. Una Propuesta Metodológica para la Integración Paisajística de los Conjuntos Históricos”, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006.
43. Daniel, T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 267–281, doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00141-4.
44. Mooser, A.; Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.T.; Molina, R.; Aucelli, P.P.C. An Innovative Approach to Determine Coastal Scenic Beauty and Sensitivity in a Scenario of Increasing Human Pressure and Natural Impacts Due to Climate Change. Water 2020, 13, 49, doi:10.3390/w13010049.
45. Butler, A. Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: The hidden dominance of the objective outsider. Landsc. Res. 2016, 41, 239–252, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135315.
46. Rafael Calduch Métodos y Técnicas de Investigación Internacional. Madrid, 1998 (Revised and Updated version. Madrid, 2014. Available online: https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/835-2018-03-01-Metodos%20y%20Tecnicas%20de%20Investigacion%20Internacional%20v2.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2020).
47. Salomón, B.R.D. Metodología de la Investigación; McGraw-Hill Interamericana: NewYork, NY, USA: 2014; p. 92, ISBN 978-1-4562-2396-0 ISBN: 978-607-15-0291-9
48. Stephenson, J. The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 84, 127–139, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003.
49. Birnbaum, C. Protecting Cultural Landscapes. Planning, Treatment and Management of Historic Landscapes; National Parks Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; Preservation Brief 36.
50. Martorell Carreño, Alberto: “Paisajes e Itinerarios Culturales: Conceptos Independientes que Enriquecen la Práctica de la Conservación Cultural”. Available online: http://www.esicomos.org/Nueva_carpeta/TCSM/ponencia_AMARTORELL.htm (accessed on 10 April 2010).
51. Pintó i Fosalba, J. El Paisaje de la Viña. Valor Cultural y Ambiental”, en Revista de Enología. 2015. Available online: http://www.acenologia.com/ciencia95_1.htm (accessed on12 July 2020).
52. Cantasano, N.; Caloiero, T.; Pellicone, G.; Aristodemo, F.; De Marco, A.; Tagarelli, G. Can ICZM Contribute to the Mitigation of Erosion and of Human Activities Threatening the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Coastal Landscape of Calabria? Sustainability 2021, 13, 1122, doi:10.3390/su13031122.
53. Guirado Romero, José: “El Parque Natural Marítimo- Terrestre de Cabo de Gata-Níjar, un Espacio Excepcional”. Available online: http://ww.juntadeandalucia.es/cultura/iaph/infopha/05textose/boletin37.html (accessed on10 June 2020).
54. Karrasch, L.; Maier, M.; Kleyer, M.; Klenke, T. Collaborative Landscape Planning: Co-Design of Ecosystem-Based Land Management Scenarios. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1668, doi:10.3390/su9091668.
55. ICOMOS. Viena Memorandun on “World Heritege and Contemporary Architecture—Managing the Historic Urban Landscape”; ICOMOS: Vienna, Austria 2005.
56. UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. 2005. Available online: http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines (accessed on 10 May 2020).
57. Mata, O.R.; Sanz, H.C. Atlas de los Paisajes de España; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente: Ambiente, Spain, 2003.
58. Ostle, B. Statistics in Research: Basic Concepts and Techniques for Research Workers; Literary Licensing: New York, NY, USA. 2012; p. 500, ISBN-10: 1258401649, ISBN-13: 978-1258401641.
59. Campos, G.C.; Lule, M.N. La observación, un método para el estudio de la realidad. Rev. Xihmai 2012, VII, 45–60.
60. Milanés, B.C.; Pacheco, A. Asentamientos costeros en la bahía de Santiago de Cuba: Estudio de su vulnerabilidad urbana. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2011, XXXII, 18–26. Available online: http://es.scribd.com/doc/86054921/Revista-Arquitectura-y-Urbanismo-3-2011 (accessed on 10 April 2020).
61. Milanés, B.C. Método Integrado Para Demarcar y Delimitar las Zonas Costeras (DOMIZC): Estudio del Caso de Santiago de Cuba. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2014; p. 300, doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1800.4086.
62. Botero, C. M.; Arrizabalaga, M.; Milanés, C. & Vivas, O. Indicadores de gobernabilidad para la gestión del riesgo costero en Colombia. Rev. Luna Azul, 2017. 45, 227-251. doi: 10.17151/luaz.2017.45.12
63. DPPF. Conjunto de Bases Cartográficas de la Provincia Santiago de Cuba; DPPF: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba 2010; p. 78.
64. Cambón, F.E.C. Las múltiples miradas de la relación paisajística de Santiago con su bahía. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2008, XXIX, 1.
65. Milanés, B.C. Unidades costeras ambientales para el manejo en Santiago de Cuba: Delimitación y prioridades de actuación. Rev. Arquitect. Urban. 2012, XXXIII, 83–97.
66. Batista, CM.; Suárez, A.; Saltarén, C.M.B. Novel method to delimitate and demarcate coastal zone boundaries. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2017, 144, 105–119, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.04.021.
67. Countryside Commission. Assessment and Conservation of Landscape Character: The Warwickshire Landscapes Project Approach; Countryside Commission: Cheltenham, UK, 1991.
68. Ministerio de Cultura. Ley No 2 de Monumentos de la República de Cuba. Protección del Patrimonio Cultural; Compilación de textos legislativos, Ed.; Consejo Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural, Ministerio de Cultura: La Habana, Cuba 2002; p. 31.
69. Ministerio de Cultura. Decreto No. 55. Reglamento Para la Ejecución de la Ley de los Monumentos Nacionales y Locales; Compilación de textos legislativos, Ed.; Consejo Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural, Ministerio de Cultura: La Habana, Cuba 2002; p. 67.
70. Milanes, C.B; Pereira, C.I.; Botero, C.M. Improving a decree law about coastal zone management in a small island developing state: The case of Cuba. Mar. Policy 2019, 101, 93–107, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.030.
71. Pereira, C.I.; Carvajal, A.F.; Milanés, B.C.; Botero, C.M. Regulating human interventions in Colombian coastal areas: Implications for the environmental licensing procedure in middle-income countries. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2019, 79, 106284, doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106284.
72. Milanes, B.C.M.; Planas, J.A.; Pelot, R.; Núñez, J.R. A new methodology incorporating public participation within Cuba’s ICZM program. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 186, 105101, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105101.
73. DPPF. Plan General de Ordenamiento Urbano de la ciudad de Santiago de Cuba; DPPF: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba. 2015; 134p.
74. Pérez, M.O.; Milanes, B.C. Social perception of coastal risk in the face of hurricanes in the southeastern region of Cuba. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 184, 105010, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105010.
75. Marcos, L.S.O.; Tutikian, B.; Milanes, C.; Silva, F.O. Atmospheric contaminations and bad conservation effects in Roman mosaics and mortars of Italica. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119250, doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119250.
76. Silva, L.F.O.; Milanés, C.; Pinto, D.; Ramirez, O.; Lima, B.D. Multiple hazardous elements in nanoparticulate matter from a Caribbean industrialized atmosphere. Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124776, doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124776.
77. Chris, D.; Alan, L. A question of what matters: Landscape characterisation as a process of situated, problem-orientated public discourse. Landsc. Res. 2016, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135319.
78. Milder, J.C., L.E. Buck, F.A.J DeClerck, and S.J. Scherr. Landscape approaches to achieving food production, natural resource conservation, and the millennium development goals. Integr. Ecol. Poverty Reduct. , 2012. 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4419-0633-5_5
79. Council of Europe. European Landscape Convention. 2000. Available online: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/html/176.htm (accessed on 21 December 2014).
80. Cosgrove, D. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape; Croom Helm: London, UK, 1984.
81. Cosgrove, D. The Palladian Landscape: Geographical Change and its Cultural Representations in Sixteenth-Century; The Pennsylvania State University Press: Elkins Park, PA, USA, 1993.
82. Martín, B.; Ortega, E.O.; Arce, R.M. Landscape character assessment with GIS using map-based indicators and photographs in the relationship between landscape and roads. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 180, 324–34, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.044.
83. Brown, G.; Brabyn, L. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107, 317–331, doi10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007.
84. Meeus, J.H.A.; Wijermans, M.P.; Vroom, M.J. Agricultural landscapes in Europe and their transformation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1990, 18, 289–352, doi.:10.1016/0169-2046(90)90016-U.
85. Alessa, L.; Kliskey, A.; Brown, G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled socialecological space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 85, 27–39, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007.
86. Juntti, M.; Lundy, L. A mixed methods approach to urban ecosystem services: Experienced environmental quality and its role in ecosystem assessment within an inner-city estate. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 161, 10–21, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.002.
87. Bastian, O.; Krönert, R.; Lipský, Z. Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales—A challenge for landscape planning. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21, 359–374.
88. Termorshuizen, J.W.; Opdam, P.; Van den Brink, A. Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79, 374–384.
89. Koschke, L.; Fürst, C.; Frank, S.; Makeschin, F. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 54–66.
90. Mann, C.; Garcia-Martin, M.; Raymond, C.M.; Shaw, B.J.; Plieninger, T. The potential for integrated landscape management to fulfil Europe’s commitments to the Sustainable Development Goals. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 177, 75–82.
91. Jones, K.B.; Zurlini, G.; Kienast, F.; Petrosillo, I.; Edwards, T.; Wade, T.G.; Zaccarelli, N. Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28, 1175–1192.
92. Turner, M.G.; Crow, T.R.; Liu, J.; Rabe, D.; Rabeni, C.F.; Soranno, P.A.; Taylor, W.W.; Vogt, K.A.; Wiens, J.A. Bridging the gap between landscape ecology and nature resource management. In Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management; Liu, J., Taylor, W.W., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002; pp. 433–460.
93. Milanés, C.B.; Pérez, M.O.; Szlafsztein, C.F.; Pimentel, M.A.S. Climate change and spatial justice in coastal planning inCuba and Brazil. Ambiente Soc. 2020, 23, e01841, doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc20190184r1vu2020l6td.
94. Kalinauskas, M.; Mikša, K.; Inácio, M.; Gomes, E.; Pereira, P. Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 286, 112239.
95. Hermes, J.; Albert, C.; Von Haaren, C. Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 296– 307, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015.
96. Hermes, J.; Van Berkel, D.; Burkhard, B.; Plieninger, T.; Fagerholm, N.; Von Haaren, C.; Albert, C. Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 289–295, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011.
97. Durán, R.; Farizo, B.A.; Rodríguez, M.X. Conservation of maritime cultural heritahe: A discrete choice experiment in European Atlantic Region. Mar. Policy 2015, 51, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.023.
98. Bauer, N.; Wallner, A.; Hunziker, M. The change of European landscapes: Humannature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2910–2920.
99. Batista, M.C. Coastal flood hazard mapping. In Encyclopedia of Coastal Science, 2nd ed.; Finkl, C.W., Makowski, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 471–479, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48657-4_356-1.
100. Batista, M.C. Coastal risk. In Encyclopedia of Coastal Science, 2nd ed.; Finkl, C.W., Makowski, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 524–534. Available online: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319- 48657-4_408-1 (accessed on 28 April 2020).
101. Botero, C.M.; Pereira, C.I.; Milanes, C.B.; Pranzini, E. Dataset of human interventions as anthropogenic perturbations on the Caribbean coast of Colombia. Data Brief 2020, 31, 105847, doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105847.
102. Kalivoda, O.; Vojar, J.; Skřivanová, Z.; Zahradník, D. Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 137, 36–44, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009.
103. Bürgi, M.; Ali, P.; Chowdhury, A.; Heinimann, A.; Hett, C.; Kienast, F.; Mondal, M.K.; Upreti, B.R.; Verburg, P.H. Integrated Landscape Approach: Closing the Gap between Theory and Application. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1371, doi:10.3390/su9081371.
104. Rodella, I.; Madau, F.A.; Carboni, D. The Willingness to Pay for Beach Scenery and Its Preservation in Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1604, doi:10.3390/su12041604.
105. UNESCO. Cultural Heritage Protection Act. 1999. Available online: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/slov_cultural_heritage_protection_act_engtof.pdf (accessed on25 June 2020).
106. Blanco, B.R. El sitio histórico Castillo del Morro San Pedro de La Roca en Santiago de Cuba: Exponente de la arquitectura hispánica. Batey Rev. Cubana Antropol. Sociocult. 2013, 5, 184–196; ISSN 2225-529X.
107. Márquez, G.A.; Ortiz, P.B. Proyecto de Rehabilitación Integral de cayo Granma y su Entorno Ciencia en su PC, núm. 2; Centro de Información y Gestión Tecnológica de Santiago de Cuba: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2005; ISSN 1027-2887.
108. Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.; Hernández, J.C.; Pranzini, E. Coastal scenic assessment and tourism management in western Cuba. Tour. Manag. 2014, 42, 307–320, doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.12.001.
109. Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.T.; Casas, G.M.; Botero, C.M. ; Cabrera , J.A.; Pranzini, E. Evaluation of the scenic value of 100 beaches in Cuba: Implications for coastal tourism management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2017, 142, 173–185, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.029.
110. Danielle, K. Enfoque del Paisaje Sostenible. Guía de Implementación. Paisajes Sostenibles, División de Finanzas Conservación Internacional. 2018. p. 25. Available online: https://www.conservation.org/docs/default-source/publication-pdfs/ci_lafsustainable-landscape-approach-implementation-guidebook-spanish.pdf?Status=Master&sfvrsn=56da1801_2 (accessed on 19 April 2021).
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Sustainability
institution Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4773
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/4d2ef625-cf86-4aee-afe3-5f310aa47eee/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/4a6533fb-169d-4235-941b-56646ae20884/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/a718598a-be30-463f-8fb1-d49fdb8e8c44/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/260acbb9-8bfd-43ec-97a4-6d2ff5bdb78e/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/e580f1c2-488c-4491-a16c-d4bfa24e8dd2/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 6b2ef4ea46be66bfb57c7d6e7fb67fe3
42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c
e30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9bad
4a341f0908255d04c2045d85bf40e683
4614f98006354aa5573170842d0d56d9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_ 1811760684816400384
spelling Zielinski, SewerynMilanés Batista, CeleneCambon, ElenaPÉREZ MONTERO, OFELIARizo, LourdesSuarez, AndresCuker, BenjaminAnfuso, Giorgio2021-04-27T20:57:45Z2021-04-27T20:57:45Z20212071-1050https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8210https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094773Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Human activities often drive landscape degradation and the associated loss of value. This paper describes a method that, by integrating multiple factors, characterize landscape value to establish relevant and effective management practices. The new integrated method for landscape assessment (IMLA) is a four-step model that includes: (i) establishment of a general theoretical basis for sustainability relevant metrics; (ii) characterization of the landscape; (iii) landscape valuation; (iv) recommendations for landscape value management. Each step includes different interactive components of analysis. The new IMLA considers the potential range of values associated with each landscape unit and facilitates sustainable landscape management. The method is systematic and includes both inductive and deductive reasoning. Its articulation is represented in the conjunction and overlapping of all factors and variables considered. IMLA was tested in Santiago de Cuba Bay (Cuba) and used to determine five landscape scopes, eight first-order landscape units and 29 s-order units. It proved to be a useful tool to establish landscape values and sound management strategies. Application of IMLA in Cuba will help local authorities institute land-use plans and to establish decision-making processes that include valuation of cultural landscapes.Zielinski, Seweryn-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-8125-6758-600Milanes, Celene B.-will be generated-orcid-0000-0003-2560-8859-600Cambon, ElenaPÉREZ MONTERO, OFELIA-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-3423-9744-600Rizo, LourdesSuarez, Andres-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-0487-611X-600Cuker, Benjamin-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-8024-9628-600Anfuso, Giorgio-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-7266-2842-600application/pdfengCorporación Universidad de la CostaCC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Sustainabilityhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4773Landscape unitsCharacterization value managementSustainabilityScenariosCoastal zoneAn integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, CubaArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion1. Western, D.; Mose, V.N.; Maitumo, D.; Mburu, C. Long-term changes in the plant ecology of an African savanna landscape and the implications for ecosystem theory and conservation management. Ecol. Process. 2021, 10, 1–12.2. NC 93-06-101 SNPMA. Paisaje. Términos y Definiciones. Sistema de Normas para la Protección del Medio Ambiente; Comité Estatal de Normalización: La Habana, Cuba, 1987; p. 15.3. Quintela., J. El Inventario, el Análisis y el Diagnóstico Geo Ecológico de los Paisajes Mediante el Uso de los SIG. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba, 1995; p. 105.4. Aguiló, M. Guía para la Elaboración de Estudios del Medio Físico. Contenido y Metodología; Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Madrid, Spain, 1998; p. 484.5. Salinas, C.E. Análisis y Evaluación de los Paisajes en la Planificación Regional en Cuba. Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Geografía, Universidad de La Habana , La Habana, Cuba,1991; p. 187.6. Salinas, E. Los Paisajes Como Fundamento del Ordenamiento Ambiental. Experiencias y Perspectivas; Convención Trópico: La Habana, Cuba, 2004.7. Pérez-Chacón, E. Unidades de Paisaje: Aproximación Científica y Aplicaciones, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006; p. 125.8. Warnock, S.; Griffiths, G. Landscape Characterisation: The Living Landscapes Approach in the UK. Landsc. Res. 2014, 40, 261–278.9. MMA–IGAC. Zonificación Ecológica de la Región Pacífico Colombiano; Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi: Santa Fé de Bogotá, Colombia, 2000; p. 365.10. Escribano, B.R. “Propuesta de una Metodología para la Integración de las Actuaciones forestales en el Paisaje”, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006; p. 174.11. Martínez, J.M.; Cárdenas, O.; Martín, G.; Olivera, J.; García, M. Guía Metodológica para los Estudios Técnicos de Ordenamiento Ambiental en Cuba; Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología y Medio ambiente e Instituto de Geografía Tropical: La Habana, Cuba, 2009.12. Ulrich, R.S. Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landsc. Res. 1979, 4, 17–23, doi:10.1080/01426397908705892.13. Rodríguez, R. El Paisaje Urbano en el Centro Histórico de Santiago de Cuba: Método Gráfico Teórico para su Caracterización Morfotipológica. Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Construcciones, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2008.14. Cambón, F.E.C. El paisaje de la Cuenca Visual de la Bahía de Santiago de Cuba. Procedimiento Metódico para su Caracterización y Valoración. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2001.15. Schmitz, S.; Vanderheyden, V. Reflexive loops on scaling issues in landscape quality assessment Serge Schmitz, Vincent Vanderheyden. Land Use Policy 2016, 53, 3–7.16. Steiner, F. The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning, 2nd ed.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1991.17. Scott, A. Assessing Public Perception of Landscape: The LANDMAP experience. Landsc. Res. 2002, 27, 271–295, doi:10.1080/01426390220149520.18. Cambón, F.E.C. Proceso de urbanización y paisaje en la cuenca de la bahía de Santiago de Cuba. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2011, XXXII, 3.19. Willemen, L.; Verburg, P.H.; Hein, L.; Van Mensvoort, M.E. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 88, 34–43, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.004.20. Mateo, R.J.M. Geoecología de los Paisajes. Apuntes Para un Curso de Postgrado; Universidad de los Andes: Mérida, Venezuela, 1991; p. 222.21. Mateo, R.J.M. Geografía de los Paisajes; Universitaria de La Habana: Havana, Cuba, 2008; p. 436.22. Olwig, K.R.; Dalglish, C.; Fairclough, G.; Herring, P.; Herring, P. Introduction to a special issue: The future of landscape characterisation, and the future character of landscape—between space, time, history, place and nature. Landsc. Res. 2016, 41, 1–6, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135321.23. Rojas, Á.; Ravelo, G. “Identificación de Valores en el Barrio de Colón”, en El Barrio de Colón; Pontón Caribe, S.A., Ed.; Rehabilitación Urbana y Desarrollo Comunitario en La Habana: La Habana, Cuba, 2005; p. 40.24. Martínez, P.E.; Ortega, C.N. (Eds.) Los Valores del Paisaje; Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2009; p. 322, ISBN 978-84-8344-151-0.25. Muñoz, M.D.; Pérez, L.; Sanhueza, R.; Rovira, A.; Urrutia, R. Los paisajes del agua en la cuenca del río Baker: Bases conceptuales para su valoracion integral. Rev. Geogr. Norte Grande 2006, 36, 31–48.26. Nogué, J.; Sala, P. “El Paisaje en la Ordenación del Territorio. Los Catálogos de Paisaje de Cataluña”, en Cuadernos Geográficos; University of Granada: Granada, Spain 2008; pp. 69–98.27. Mateu, J.F. “La Valoración Científica del Paisaje: Luis Pardo y los Lagos de España”. en Los valores del Paisaje; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2009; pp. 155–161.28. Recharte, J. “La categoría de Reserva Paisajística como Estrategia de Conservación en el Contexto de Los Andes: Naturaleza y Cultura en la cordillera de Huayhuash, Perú”, en Paisajes Culturales en Los Andes; Reunión de Expertos, UNESCO: Lima, Perú, 1998; pp. 131–140.29. Pizano, O.; Cortés, R. “Paisajes Culturales, Territorio y Cultura en la Cordillera de Los Andes”, en Paisajes Culturales en Los Andes, Reunión de Expertos, UNESCO: Lima, Perú, 1998; pp. 59–68.30. Pinto-Correia, T.; Machado, C.; Barroso, F.; Picchi, P.; Turpin, N.; Bousset, J.-P.; Chabab, N.; Michelin, Y. How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 32, 37–47, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.016.31. Brandt, J.; Tress, B.; Tress, G. (Eds.) Conference Material for the Conference on “Multifunctional Landscapes”; Centre for Landscape Research, University of Roskilde: Roskilde, Denmark, 2000.32. Palmer, J.F.; Hoffman, R.E. Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 149–161, doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00133-5.33. Tveit, M.; Ode, Å.; Fry, G. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31, 229–255, doi:10.1080/01426390600783269.34. Carvalho-Ribeiro, S.; Loupa Ramos, I.; Madeira, L.; Barroso, F.; Menezes, H.; Pinto Correia, T. Is land cover an important asset for addressing the subjective landscape dimension. Land Use Policy 2013, 35, 50–60.35. Fairclough, G.J. Historic Landscape Characterisation: The State of the Art; English Heritage: London, UK, 1999.36. Turner, S. Historic Landscape Characterization: A landscape archaeology for research, management and planning. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31, 385–398.37. Zube, E.H. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landsc. Ecol. 1987, 1, 37–45, doi:10.1007/bf02275264.38. Mücher, C.A.; Klijn, J.A.; Wascher, D.M.; Schaminée, J.H. A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10, 87–103, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018.39. Atik, M.; Işıklı, R.C.; Ortaçeşme, V.; Yıldırım, E. Exploring a combination of objective and subjective assessment in landscape classification: Side case from Turkey. Appl. Geogr. 2017, 83, 130–140.40. Allain, S.; Plumecocq, G.; Leenhardt, D. How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 136, 282–295, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.011.41. Brabyn, L. Classifying Landscape Character. Landsc. Res. 2009, 34, 299–321, doi:10.1080/01426390802371202.42. Venegas, C.; Rodríguez, J. “Valoración de los Paisajes Monumentales. Una Propuesta Metodológica para la Integración Paisajística de los Conjuntos Históricos”, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006.43. Daniel, T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 267–281, doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00141-4.44. Mooser, A.; Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.T.; Molina, R.; Aucelli, P.P.C. An Innovative Approach to Determine Coastal Scenic Beauty and Sensitivity in a Scenario of Increasing Human Pressure and Natural Impacts Due to Climate Change. Water 2020, 13, 49, doi:10.3390/w13010049.45. Butler, A. Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: The hidden dominance of the objective outsider. Landsc. Res. 2016, 41, 239–252, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135315.46. Rafael Calduch Métodos y Técnicas de Investigación Internacional. Madrid, 1998 (Revised and Updated version. Madrid, 2014. Available online: https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/835-2018-03-01-Metodos%20y%20Tecnicas%20de%20Investigacion%20Internacional%20v2.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2020).47. Salomón, B.R.D. Metodología de la Investigación; McGraw-Hill Interamericana: NewYork, NY, USA: 2014; p. 92, ISBN 978-1-4562-2396-0 ISBN: 978-607-15-0291-948. Stephenson, J. The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 84, 127–139, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003.49. Birnbaum, C. Protecting Cultural Landscapes. Planning, Treatment and Management of Historic Landscapes; National Parks Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; Preservation Brief 36.50. Martorell Carreño, Alberto: “Paisajes e Itinerarios Culturales: Conceptos Independientes que Enriquecen la Práctica de la Conservación Cultural”. Available online: http://www.esicomos.org/Nueva_carpeta/TCSM/ponencia_AMARTORELL.htm (accessed on 10 April 2010).51. Pintó i Fosalba, J. El Paisaje de la Viña. Valor Cultural y Ambiental”, en Revista de Enología. 2015. Available online: http://www.acenologia.com/ciencia95_1.htm (accessed on12 July 2020).52. Cantasano, N.; Caloiero, T.; Pellicone, G.; Aristodemo, F.; De Marco, A.; Tagarelli, G. Can ICZM Contribute to the Mitigation of Erosion and of Human Activities Threatening the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Coastal Landscape of Calabria? Sustainability 2021, 13, 1122, doi:10.3390/su13031122.53. Guirado Romero, José: “El Parque Natural Marítimo- Terrestre de Cabo de Gata-Níjar, un Espacio Excepcional”. Available online: http://ww.juntadeandalucia.es/cultura/iaph/infopha/05textose/boletin37.html (accessed on10 June 2020).54. Karrasch, L.; Maier, M.; Kleyer, M.; Klenke, T. Collaborative Landscape Planning: Co-Design of Ecosystem-Based Land Management Scenarios. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1668, doi:10.3390/su9091668.55. ICOMOS. Viena Memorandun on “World Heritege and Contemporary Architecture—Managing the Historic Urban Landscape”; ICOMOS: Vienna, Austria 2005.56. UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. 2005. Available online: http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines (accessed on 10 May 2020).57. Mata, O.R.; Sanz, H.C. Atlas de los Paisajes de España; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente: Ambiente, Spain, 2003.58. Ostle, B. Statistics in Research: Basic Concepts and Techniques for Research Workers; Literary Licensing: New York, NY, USA. 2012; p. 500, ISBN-10: 1258401649, ISBN-13: 978-1258401641.59. Campos, G.C.; Lule, M.N. La observación, un método para el estudio de la realidad. Rev. Xihmai 2012, VII, 45–60.60. Milanés, B.C.; Pacheco, A. Asentamientos costeros en la bahía de Santiago de Cuba: Estudio de su vulnerabilidad urbana. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2011, XXXII, 18–26. Available online: http://es.scribd.com/doc/86054921/Revista-Arquitectura-y-Urbanismo-3-2011 (accessed on 10 April 2020).61. Milanés, B.C. Método Integrado Para Demarcar y Delimitar las Zonas Costeras (DOMIZC): Estudio del Caso de Santiago de Cuba. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2014; p. 300, doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1800.4086.62. Botero, C. M.; Arrizabalaga, M.; Milanés, C. & Vivas, O. Indicadores de gobernabilidad para la gestión del riesgo costero en Colombia. Rev. Luna Azul, 2017. 45, 227-251. doi: 10.17151/luaz.2017.45.1263. DPPF. Conjunto de Bases Cartográficas de la Provincia Santiago de Cuba; DPPF: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba 2010; p. 78.64. Cambón, F.E.C. Las múltiples miradas de la relación paisajística de Santiago con su bahía. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2008, XXIX, 1.65. Milanés, B.C. Unidades costeras ambientales para el manejo en Santiago de Cuba: Delimitación y prioridades de actuación. Rev. Arquitect. Urban. 2012, XXXIII, 83–97.66. Batista, CM.; Suárez, A.; Saltarén, C.M.B. Novel method to delimitate and demarcate coastal zone boundaries. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2017, 144, 105–119, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.04.021.67. Countryside Commission. Assessment and Conservation of Landscape Character: The Warwickshire Landscapes Project Approach; Countryside Commission: Cheltenham, UK, 1991.68. Ministerio de Cultura. Ley No 2 de Monumentos de la República de Cuba. Protección del Patrimonio Cultural; Compilación de textos legislativos, Ed.; Consejo Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural, Ministerio de Cultura: La Habana, Cuba 2002; p. 31.69. Ministerio de Cultura. Decreto No. 55. Reglamento Para la Ejecución de la Ley de los Monumentos Nacionales y Locales; Compilación de textos legislativos, Ed.; Consejo Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural, Ministerio de Cultura: La Habana, Cuba 2002; p. 67.70. Milanes, C.B; Pereira, C.I.; Botero, C.M. Improving a decree law about coastal zone management in a small island developing state: The case of Cuba. Mar. Policy 2019, 101, 93–107, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.030.71. Pereira, C.I.; Carvajal, A.F.; Milanés, B.C.; Botero, C.M. Regulating human interventions in Colombian coastal areas: Implications for the environmental licensing procedure in middle-income countries. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2019, 79, 106284, doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106284.72. Milanes, B.C.M.; Planas, J.A.; Pelot, R.; Núñez, J.R. A new methodology incorporating public participation within Cuba’s ICZM program. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 186, 105101, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105101.73. DPPF. Plan General de Ordenamiento Urbano de la ciudad de Santiago de Cuba; DPPF: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba. 2015; 134p.74. Pérez, M.O.; Milanes, B.C. Social perception of coastal risk in the face of hurricanes in the southeastern region of Cuba. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 184, 105010, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105010.75. Marcos, L.S.O.; Tutikian, B.; Milanes, C.; Silva, F.O. Atmospheric contaminations and bad conservation effects in Roman mosaics and mortars of Italica. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119250, doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119250.76. Silva, L.F.O.; Milanés, C.; Pinto, D.; Ramirez, O.; Lima, B.D. Multiple hazardous elements in nanoparticulate matter from a Caribbean industrialized atmosphere. Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124776, doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124776.77. Chris, D.; Alan, L. A question of what matters: Landscape characterisation as a process of situated, problem-orientated public discourse. Landsc. Res. 2016, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135319.78. Milder, J.C., L.E. Buck, F.A.J DeClerck, and S.J. Scherr. Landscape approaches to achieving food production, natural resource conservation, and the millennium development goals. Integr. Ecol. Poverty Reduct. , 2012. 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4419-0633-5_579. Council of Europe. European Landscape Convention. 2000. Available online: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/html/176.htm (accessed on 21 December 2014).80. Cosgrove, D. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape; Croom Helm: London, UK, 1984.81. Cosgrove, D. The Palladian Landscape: Geographical Change and its Cultural Representations in Sixteenth-Century; The Pennsylvania State University Press: Elkins Park, PA, USA, 1993.82. Martín, B.; Ortega, E.O.; Arce, R.M. Landscape character assessment with GIS using map-based indicators and photographs in the relationship between landscape and roads. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 180, 324–34, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.044.83. Brown, G.; Brabyn, L. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107, 317–331, doi10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007.84. Meeus, J.H.A.; Wijermans, M.P.; Vroom, M.J. Agricultural landscapes in Europe and their transformation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1990, 18, 289–352, doi.:10.1016/0169-2046(90)90016-U.85. Alessa, L.; Kliskey, A.; Brown, G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled socialecological space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 85, 27–39, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007.86. Juntti, M.; Lundy, L. A mixed methods approach to urban ecosystem services: Experienced environmental quality and its role in ecosystem assessment within an inner-city estate. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 161, 10–21, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.002.87. Bastian, O.; Krönert, R.; Lipský, Z. Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales—A challenge for landscape planning. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21, 359–374.88. Termorshuizen, J.W.; Opdam, P.; Van den Brink, A. Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79, 374–384.89. Koschke, L.; Fürst, C.; Frank, S.; Makeschin, F. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 54–66.90. Mann, C.; Garcia-Martin, M.; Raymond, C.M.; Shaw, B.J.; Plieninger, T. The potential for integrated landscape management to fulfil Europe’s commitments to the Sustainable Development Goals. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 177, 75–82.91. Jones, K.B.; Zurlini, G.; Kienast, F.; Petrosillo, I.; Edwards, T.; Wade, T.G.; Zaccarelli, N. Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28, 1175–1192.92. Turner, M.G.; Crow, T.R.; Liu, J.; Rabe, D.; Rabeni, C.F.; Soranno, P.A.; Taylor, W.W.; Vogt, K.A.; Wiens, J.A. Bridging the gap between landscape ecology and nature resource management. In Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management; Liu, J., Taylor, W.W., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002; pp. 433–460.93. Milanés, C.B.; Pérez, M.O.; Szlafsztein, C.F.; Pimentel, M.A.S. Climate change and spatial justice in coastal planning inCuba and Brazil. Ambiente Soc. 2020, 23, e01841, doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc20190184r1vu2020l6td.94. Kalinauskas, M.; Mikša, K.; Inácio, M.; Gomes, E.; Pereira, P. Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 286, 112239.95. Hermes, J.; Albert, C.; Von Haaren, C. Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 296– 307, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015.96. Hermes, J.; Van Berkel, D.; Burkhard, B.; Plieninger, T.; Fagerholm, N.; Von Haaren, C.; Albert, C. Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 289–295, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011.97. Durán, R.; Farizo, B.A.; Rodríguez, M.X. Conservation of maritime cultural heritahe: A discrete choice experiment in European Atlantic Region. Mar. Policy 2015, 51, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.023.98. Bauer, N.; Wallner, A.; Hunziker, M. The change of European landscapes: Humannature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2910–2920.99. Batista, M.C. Coastal flood hazard mapping. In Encyclopedia of Coastal Science, 2nd ed.; Finkl, C.W., Makowski, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 471–479, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48657-4_356-1.100. Batista, M.C. Coastal risk. In Encyclopedia of Coastal Science, 2nd ed.; Finkl, C.W., Makowski, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 524–534. Available online: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319- 48657-4_408-1 (accessed on 28 April 2020).101. Botero, C.M.; Pereira, C.I.; Milanes, C.B.; Pranzini, E. Dataset of human interventions as anthropogenic perturbations on the Caribbean coast of Colombia. Data Brief 2020, 31, 105847, doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105847.102. Kalivoda, O.; Vojar, J.; Skřivanová, Z.; Zahradník, D. Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 137, 36–44, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009.103. Bürgi, M.; Ali, P.; Chowdhury, A.; Heinimann, A.; Hett, C.; Kienast, F.; Mondal, M.K.; Upreti, B.R.; Verburg, P.H. Integrated Landscape Approach: Closing the Gap between Theory and Application. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1371, doi:10.3390/su9081371.104. Rodella, I.; Madau, F.A.; Carboni, D. The Willingness to Pay for Beach Scenery and Its Preservation in Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1604, doi:10.3390/su12041604.105. UNESCO. Cultural Heritage Protection Act. 1999. Available online: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/slov_cultural_heritage_protection_act_engtof.pdf (accessed on25 June 2020).106. Blanco, B.R. El sitio histórico Castillo del Morro San Pedro de La Roca en Santiago de Cuba: Exponente de la arquitectura hispánica. Batey Rev. Cubana Antropol. Sociocult. 2013, 5, 184–196; ISSN 2225-529X.107. Márquez, G.A.; Ortiz, P.B. Proyecto de Rehabilitación Integral de cayo Granma y su Entorno Ciencia en su PC, núm. 2; Centro de Información y Gestión Tecnológica de Santiago de Cuba: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2005; ISSN 1027-2887.108. Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.; Hernández, J.C.; Pranzini, E. Coastal scenic assessment and tourism management in western Cuba. Tour. Manag. 2014, 42, 307–320, doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.12.001.109. Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.T.; Casas, G.M.; Botero, C.M. ; Cabrera , J.A.; Pranzini, E. Evaluation of the scenic value of 100 beaches in Cuba: Implications for coastal tourism management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2017, 142, 173–185, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.029.110. Danielle, K. Enfoque del Paisaje Sostenible. Guía de Implementación. Paisajes Sostenibles, División de Finanzas Conservación Internacional. 2018. p. 25. Available online: https://www.conservation.org/docs/default-source/publication-pdfs/ci_lafsustainable-landscape-approach-implementation-guidebook-spanish.pdf?Status=Master&sfvrsn=56da1801_2 (accessed on 19 April 2021).PublicationORIGINALAn Integrated Method for Landscape Assessment. Application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba.pdfAn Integrated Method for Landscape Assessment. Application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba.pdfapplication/pdf4927792https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/4d2ef625-cf86-4aee-afe3-5f310aa47eee/download6b2ef4ea46be66bfb57c7d6e7fb67fe3MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/4a6533fb-169d-4235-941b-56646ae20884/download42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83196https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/a718598a-be30-463f-8fb1-d49fdb8e8c44/downloade30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9badMD53THUMBNAILAn Integrated Method for Landscape Assessment. Application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba.pdf.jpgAn Integrated Method for Landscape Assessment. Application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg70537https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/260acbb9-8bfd-43ec-97a4-6d2ff5bdb78e/download4a341f0908255d04c2045d85bf40e683MD54TEXTAn Integrated Method for Landscape Assessment. Application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba.pdf.txtAn Integrated Method for Landscape Assessment. Application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba.pdf.txttext/plain88015https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/e580f1c2-488c-4491-a16c-d4bfa24e8dd2/download4614f98006354aa5573170842d0d56d9MD5511323/8210oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/82102024-09-16 16:48:54.663http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/CC0 1.0 Universalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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

Publicaciones similares