Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology

Defining impact significance is the main technical task that influences decision-making during the Environmental Licensing Procedure (ELP). The ELP begins with screening to determine potentially significant impacts of the proposed project. Scoping then follows to address any interventions deemed wor...

Full description

Autores:
Pereira, Cristina I.
Milanés Batista, Celene
Sarda, Rafael
Cuker, Benjamin
Botero, Camilo M.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8403
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8403
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101228
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
EIA effectiveness
Screening and scoping practices
Landforms
Geomorphological processes
Ecosystem approach
Rights
openAccess
License
CC0 1.0 Universal
id RCUC2_4d140ddd012f5b2b1698d75b2c1ae172
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8403
network_acronym_str RCUC2
network_name_str REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology
title Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology
spellingShingle Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology
EIA effectiveness
Screening and scoping practices
Landforms
Geomorphological processes
Ecosystem approach
title_short Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology
title_full Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology
title_fullStr Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology
title_full_unstemmed Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology
title_sort Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Pereira, Cristina I.
Milanés Batista, Celene
Sarda, Rafael
Cuker, Benjamin
Botero, Camilo M.
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Pereira, Cristina I.
Milanés Batista, Celene
Sarda, Rafael
Cuker, Benjamin
Botero, Camilo M.
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv EIA effectiveness
Screening and scoping practices
Landforms
Geomorphological processes
Ecosystem approach
topic EIA effectiveness
Screening and scoping practices
Landforms
Geomorphological processes
Ecosystem approach
description Defining impact significance is the main technical task that influences decision-making during the Environmental Licensing Procedure (ELP). The ELP begins with screening to determine potentially significant impacts of the proposed project. Scoping then follows to address any interventions deemed worthy of attention in the production of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). This will include consideration of relevant landforms and geomorphological processes. However, preliminary assessments of environmental impacts often lack the scientific robustness to procure substantive and transactive effectiveness. This review presents an examination of the established practices of screening and scoping while highlighting the foremost challenges to improve the technical grounds of the ELP. The analysis of screening and scoping practices stresses the need for novel methods that ensure the sequential reasoning between their criteria while improving the preliminary evaluation of impact significance. Reducing the inherent subjectivity of discretionary judgment requires scientific methodologies that acknowledge the interaction between the natural system and human interventions, which has been addressed by geomorphological research. The knowledge consolidated in this review opens the gate to explore the compatibility between the United Nations strategy of Ecosystem Approach (EA) with the ELP through a novel geomorphological interpretation of the EIA. Therefore, this diagnosis demonstrate that screening and scoping practices would benefit from reliable methods that balance the precautionary principle with the efficient character required in the ELP.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-24T13:24:04Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-24T13:24:04Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 1674-9871
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8403
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101228
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv 1674-9871
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
url https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8403
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101228
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Acerbi et al., 2014 Acerbi, M., Sánchez-Triana, E., Enríquez, S., Tiffer-Sotomayor, R., Gomes, A., Siegmann, K., Clemente-Fernandez, P., Nkrumah, E., 2014. Environmental impact assessment systems in Latin America and the Caribbean, in: 34th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment for Social and Economic Development. International Association for Impact Assessment. IAIA14 Conference Proceedings, Viña del Mar, Chile, p. 6.
Achour and Pourghasemi, 2020 Y. Achour, H.R. Pourghasemi How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 871-883, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.001
Ahmad, 1993 A. AhmadEnvironmental impact assessment in the Himalayas: an ecosystem approach Ambio, 22 (1993), pp. 4-9
Al-Najjar and Pradhan, 2021 H.A.H. Al-Najjar, B. Pradhan Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning techniques assisted by additional data created with generative adversarial networks Geosci. Front., 12 (2021), pp. 625-637, 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.002
Andrade et al., 2011 Andrade, A., Arguedas, S., Vides, R., 2011. Guía para la aplicación y monitoreo del Enfoque Ecosistémico (in Spanish).
Arabameri et al., 2020 A. Arabameri, W. Chen, M. Loche, X. Zhao, Y. Li, L. Lombardo, A. Cerda, B. Pradhan, D.T. Bui Comparison of machine learning models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 1609-1620, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.11.009
Balogun et al., 2021 A.-L. Balogun, F. Rezaie, Q.B. Pham, L. Gigović, S. Drobnjak, Y.A. Aina, M. Panahi, S.T. Yekeen, S. Lee Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in western Serbia using hybrid support vector regression (SVR) with GWO, BAT and COA algorithms Geosci. Front., 12 (2021), Article 101104, 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.10.009
Berg, 2001 B.L. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (fourth ed.), Pearson, Long Beach (2001)
Billa and Walker, 2019 L. Billa, S. Walker Climate change impacts on environmental geosciences: introduction Geosci. Front., 10 (2019), pp. 361-362, 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.10.001
Bond et al., 2018 A. Bond, F. Retief, B. Cave, M. Fundingsland, P.N. Duinker, R. Verheem, A.L. Brown A contribution to the conceptualisation of quality in impact assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 49-58, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.006
Borgström et al., 2015 S. Borgström, Ö. Bodin, A. Sandström, B. Crona Developing an analytical framework for assessing progress toward ecosystem-based management Ambio, 44 (S3) (2015), pp. 357-369, 10.1007/s13280-015-0655-7
Borioni et al., 2017 R. Borioni, A.L.C.F. Gallardo, L.E. Sánchez Advancing scoping practice in environmental impact assessment: an examination of the Brazilian federal system Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 35 (2017), pp. 200-213, 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271535
Bragagnolo et al., 2017 C. Bragagnolo, C. Carvalho Lemos, R.J. Ladle, A. Pellin Streamlining or sidestepping? Political pressure to revise environmental licensing and EIA in Brazil Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 65 (2017), pp. 86-90, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.010
Burgel et al., 2017 C.F. Burgel, G. da Silva, D. de Souza, L. da Rocha Administrative discretion and environmental license Rev. Direito Ambient. e Soc., 7 (2017), pp. 255-294
Cavallin et al., 1994 A. Cavallin, M. Marchetti, M. Panizza, M. Soldati The role of geomorphology in environmental impact assessment Geomorphology, 9 (1994), pp. 143-153, 10.1016/0169-555X(94)90072-8
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity), 1998 CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity), 1998. Report of the workshop on Ecosystem Approach. Lilongwe, Malawi, 26–28 January 1998.
CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity), 2004 CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity), 2004. CBD Guidelines. The Ecosystem Approach. Montreal, Canada.
Cendrero et al., 2001 A. Cendrero, M. Marchetti, M. Panizza, V. Rivas Geomorphology and environmental impact assessemnt M. Marchetti, V. Rivas (Eds.), Geomorphology and Environmental Impact Assessemnt, A.A, Balkema, Lisse (2001), pp. 1-5
Chanchitpricha and Bond, 2013 C. Chanchitpricha, A. Bond Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 43 (2013), pp. 65-72, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006
Comello et al., 2012 S.D. Comello, M.D. Lepech, B.R. Schwegler Project-level assessment of environmental impact: Ecosystem services approach to sustainable management and development J. Manag. Eng., 28 (1) (2012), pp. 5-12, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000093
Del Furia and Wallace-Jones, 2000 L. Del Furia, J. Wallace-Jones The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 20 (2000), pp. 457-479, 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00035-4
Di Capua and Peppoloni, 2019 G. Di Capua, S. Peppoloni Defining geoethics Int. Assoc. Promot. Geoethics (2019)
Downs and Booth, 2011 P. Downs, D. Booth Geomorphology in environmental management K. Gregory, A. Goudie (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Geomorphology, SAGE Publications Ltd (2011), pp. 81-108
Durden et al., 2018 J.M. Durden, L.E. Lallier, K. Murphy, A. Jaeckel, K. Gjerde, D.O.B. Jones Environmental impact assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’ Mar. Policy, 87 (2018), pp. 194-202, 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013
Enríquez-de-Salamanca et al., 2016 Á. Enríquez-de-Salamanca, R.M. Martín-Aranda, R. Díaz-Sierra Consideration of climate change on environmental impact assessment in Spain Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 57 (2016), pp. 31-39, 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.009
Fitton et al., 2016 J.M. Fitton, J.D. Hansom, A.F. Rennie A national coastal erosion susceptibility model for Scotland Ocean Coast. Manag., 132 (2016), pp. 80-89, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.08.018
Glasson and Salvador, 2000 J. Glasson, N.N.B. Salvador EIA in Brazil: a procedures–practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 20 (2000), pp. 191-225, 10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00043-8
Glasson et al., 2012 Glasson, J., Therivel, R., Chadwick, A., 2012. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. Routledge, London.
Goodhue et al., 2012 N. Goodhue, H. Rouse, D. Ramsay, R. Bell, T. Hume, M. Hicks Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change: Mapping a New Zealand Coastal Sensitivity Index Niwa, Hamilton (2012)
Hurtado, 2010 J. Hurtado Metodología de la Investigación. Guía para la comprensión holística de la ciencia (4a ed.), Quirón Ediciones, Caracas (in Spanish) (2010)
IAIA and IEA, 1999 IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment), IEA (Institute of Environmental Assessment – UK), 1999. Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice.
Joseph et al., 2 015 C. Joseph, T. Gunton, M. Rutherford Good practices for environmental assessment Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 33 (4) (2015), pp. 238-254, 10.1080/14615517.2015.1063811
Karjalainen et al., 2013 T.P. Karjalainen, M. Marttunen, S. Sarkki, A.-M. Rytkönen Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: an analytic–deliberative approach Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 40 (2013), pp. 54-64, 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001
Kolhoff et al., 2018 A.J. Kolhoff, P.P.J. Driessen, H.A.C. Runhaar Overcoming low EIA performance – a diagnostic tool for the deliberate development of EIA system capacities in low and middle income countries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 98-108, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.001
Li et al., 2017 J. Li, L. Yang, R. Pu, Y. Liu A review on anthropogenic geomorphology J. Geogr. Sci., 27 (1) (2017), pp. 109-128, 10.1007/s11442-017-1367-7
Lima and Magrini, 2010 L.H. Lima, A. Magrini The Brazilian Audit Tribunal’s role in improving the federal environmental licensing process Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30 (2010), pp. 108-115, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.005
Lonsdale et al., 2017 J. Lonsdale, K. Weston, S. Blake, R. Edwards, M. Elliott The amended European environmental impact assessment directive: UK marine experience and recommendations Ocean Coast. Manag., 148 (2017), pp. 131-142, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.021
Lopatin and Zhirov, 2017 D.V. Lopatin, A.I. Zhirov Geomorphology in the system of Earth sciences Geogr. Nat. Resour., 38 (4) (2017), pp. 313-318, 10.1134/S1875372817040011
Mandelik et al., 2005 Y. Mandelik, T. Dayan, E. Feitelson Issues and dilemmas in ecological scoping: scientific, procedural and economic perspectives Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 23 (1) (2005), pp. 55-63, 10.3152/147154605781765724
Meitzen et al., 2013 K.M. Meitzen, M.W. Doyle, M.C. Thoms, C.E. Burns Geomorphology within the interdisciplinary science of environmental flows Geomorphology, 200 (2013), pp. 143-154, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.013
Monteiro and da Silva, 2018 N.B.R. Monteiro, E.A. da Silva Environmental licensing in Brazilian’s crushed stone industries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 71 (2018), pp. 49-59, 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.003
Morgan, 2012 Morgan, R.K., 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 30, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.
Panizza, 1996 Panizza, M., 1996. 6 Geomorphology and environmental impact assessment, in: Developments in Earth Surface Processes, M.P. (Ed.), Environmental Geomorphology. Elsevier, pp. 223–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-2025(96)80023-X.
Pereira, 2019 C.I. Pereira Analysis of the environmental licensing procedure for coastal environments in Colombia: A geomorphological perspective from the concept of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions EAFIT University (2019)
Pereira et al., 2018 C.I. Pereira, C.M. Botero, I. Correa, E. Pranzini Seven good practices for the environmental licensing of coastal interventions: Lessons from the Italian, Cuban, Spanish and Colombian regulatory frameworks and insights on coastal processes Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 73 (2018), pp. 20-30, 10.1016/J.EIAR.2018.06.002
Pereira et al., 2019 C.I. Pereira, A.F. Carvajal, C. Milanes, C.M. Botero Regulating human interventions in Colombian coastal areas: Implications for the environmental licensing procedure in middle-income countries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 79 (2019), Article 106284, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106284
Pinho et al., 2010 P. Pinho, S. McCallum, S.S. Cruz A critical appraisal of EIA screening practice in EU Member in states Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 28 (2010), pp. 91-107, 10.3152/146155110X498799
Polido and Ramos, 2015 A. Polido, T.B. Ramos Towards effective scoping in strategic environmental assessment Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 33 (3) (2015), pp. 171-183, 10.1080/14615517.2014.993155
Pope et al., 2013 J. Pope, A. Bond, A. Morrison-Saunders, F. Retief Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 41 (2013), pp. 1-9, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008
Rajaram and Das, 2011 T. Rajaram, A. Das Screening for EIA in India: Enhancing effectiveness through ecological carrying capacity approach J. Environ. Manage., 92 (2011), pp. 140-148, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.024
Retief et al., 2011 F. Retief, C.N.J. Welman, L. Sandham Performance of environmental impact assessment (EIA) screening in South Africa: a comparative analysis between the 1997 and 2006 EIA regimes South African Geogr. J., 93 (2) (2011), pp. 154-171, 10.1080/03736245.2011.592263
Rivas et al., 1997 V. Rivas, K. Rix, E. Frances, A. Cendrero, D. Brunsden Geomorphological indicators for environmental impact assessment: consumable and non-consuma le geomorphological resources Geomorphology, 18 (1997), pp. 169-182, 10.1016/S0169-555X(96)00024-4
Rocha and Fonseca, 2017 C.P.F. Rocha, A. Fonseca Simulations of EIA screening across jurisdictions: exposing the case for harmonic criteria? Impact Assess Proj. Apprais., 35 (3) (2017), pp. 214-226, 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271537
Sarda et al., 2014 R. Sarda, T. O’Higgins, R. Cormier, A. Diedrich, J. Tintore A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management Ecol. Soc., 19 (2014), 10.5751/ES-07055-190451
Scheffers et al., 2015 A.M. Scheffers, S.M. May, D.H. Kelletat Shaping the Surface of Earth: Geomorphology in a Nutshell A.M. Scheffers, S.M. May, D.H. Kelletat (Eds.), Landforms of the World with Google Earth: Understanding our Environment, Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht (2015), pp. 3-13, 10.1007/978-94-017-9713-9_1
Slootweg and Kolhoff, 2003 R. Slootweg, A. Kolhoff A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 23 (6) (2003), pp. 657-681
Snell and Cowell, 2006 T. Snell, R. Cowell Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 26 (2006), pp. 359-376, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.003
Soria-Lara et al., 2020 J.A. Soria-Lara, L. Batista, M. Le Pira, A. Arranz-López, R.M. Arce-Ruiz, G. Inturri, P. Pinho Revealing EIA process-related barriers in transport projects: the cases of Italy, Portugal, and Spain Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 83 (2020), Article 106402, 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106402
Triana and Enriquez, 2007 Sánchez‐ Triana, E., Enriquez, S., 2007. A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impact Analysis Systems in Latin America, in: Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, – Growth, Conservation and Responsibility. International Association for Impact Assessment. IAIA14 Conference Proceedings, Seoul, South Korea, p. 100.
The World Bank, 2012 The World Bank, 2012. Getting to Green – A Sourcebook of Pollution Management Policy Tools for Growth and Competitiveness.
Toro et al., 2010 J. Toro, I. Requena, M. Zamorano Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: critical analysis and proposals for improvement Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30 (2010), pp. 247-261, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.09.001
TURRA et al., 2017 Turra, A., Zacagnini, A., Ciotti, A., Rossi, C., Schaeffer-novelli, Y., Marques, A., Siegle, E., de Almeida, P., Dos Santos, C., Borges, A., 2017. Environmental impact assessment under an ecosystem approach: the São Sebastião harbor expansion project. Ambient. Soc. XX, 155–176.
Villarroya et al., 2014 Villarroya, A., Barros, A.C., Kiesecker, J., 2014. Policy development for environmental licensing and biodiversity offsets in Latin America. PLoS One 9, e107144.
Wawrzyczek et al., 2018 J. Wawrzyczek, R. Lindsay, M.J. Metzger, F. Quétier The ecosystem approach in ecological impact assessment: Lessons learned from windfarm developments on peatlands in Scotland Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 72 (2018), pp. 157-165, 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.011
Webster and Watson, 2002 Webster, J., Watson, R.T., 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii.
Weston, 2011 J. Weston Screening for environmental impact assessment projects in England: what screening? Impact Assess Proj. Apprais., 29 (2) (2011), pp. 90-98, 10.3152/146155111X12913679730593
Weston, 2000 J. Weston EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 43 (2) (2000), pp. 185-203, 10.1080/09640560010667
Wohlin and Prikladnicki, 2013 C. Wohlin, R. Prikladnicki Systematic literature reviews in software engineering Inf. Softw. Technol., 55 (6) (2013), pp. 919-920
Wood and Becker, 2005 G. Wood, J. Becker Discretionary judgement in local planning authority decision making: Screening development proposals for environmental impact assessment J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 48 (3) (2005), pp. 349-371, 10.1080/09640560500067467
Wu et al., 2012 L. Wu, F. Li, C. Zhu, L. Li, B. Li Holocene environmental change and archaeology, Yangtze River Valley, China: Review and prospects Geosci. Front., 3 (2012), pp. 875-892, 10.1016/j.gsf.2012.02.006
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Geoscience Frontiers
institution Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498712100092X#!
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/c0548077-d4fa-44ec-9c55-b385b5ed5bfb/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/fc9bfd50-09f5-4980-9e2a-b66af8958acc/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/6b4388b2-e4f7-4f2f-b65a-e76b3c70f72a/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/db9b425d-353c-41e6-a1c6-3245003f417a/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/8e2f4d9a-8805-44d5-9cb7-c2d10d3458f0/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7614399362a6be4a847e43dd13057a46
42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c
e30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9bad
1e1679b07153e56db2c9fd1d465bfff5
59ae1a4c33c72449c7210f3fee6a0e8f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_ 1811760731598618624
spelling Pereira, Cristina I.Milanés Batista, CeleneSarda, RafaelCuker, BenjaminBotero, Camilo M.2021-06-24T13:24:04Z2021-06-24T13:24:04Z20211674-9871https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8403https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101228Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Defining impact significance is the main technical task that influences decision-making during the Environmental Licensing Procedure (ELP). The ELP begins with screening to determine potentially significant impacts of the proposed project. Scoping then follows to address any interventions deemed worthy of attention in the production of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). This will include consideration of relevant landforms and geomorphological processes. However, preliminary assessments of environmental impacts often lack the scientific robustness to procure substantive and transactive effectiveness. This review presents an examination of the established practices of screening and scoping while highlighting the foremost challenges to improve the technical grounds of the ELP. The analysis of screening and scoping practices stresses the need for novel methods that ensure the sequential reasoning between their criteria while improving the preliminary evaluation of impact significance. Reducing the inherent subjectivity of discretionary judgment requires scientific methodologies that acknowledge the interaction between the natural system and human interventions, which has been addressed by geomorphological research. The knowledge consolidated in this review opens the gate to explore the compatibility between the United Nations strategy of Ecosystem Approach (EA) with the ELP through a novel geomorphological interpretation of the EIA. Therefore, this diagnosis demonstrate that screening and scoping practices would benefit from reliable methods that balance the precautionary principle with the efficient character required in the ELP.Pereira, Cristina I.Milanes, Celene B.-will be generated-orcid-0000-0003-2560-8859-600Sarda, RafaelCuker, Benjamin-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-8024-9628-600Botero, Camilo M.-will be generated-orcid-0000-0001-6886-8920-600application/pdfengCorporación Universidad de la CostaCC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Geoscience Frontiershttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498712100092X#!EIA effectivenessScreening and scoping practicesLandformsGeomorphological processesEcosystem approachChallenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphologyArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionAcerbi et al., 2014 Acerbi, M., Sánchez-Triana, E., Enríquez, S., Tiffer-Sotomayor, R., Gomes, A., Siegmann, K., Clemente-Fernandez, P., Nkrumah, E., 2014. Environmental impact assessment systems in Latin America and the Caribbean, in: 34th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment for Social and Economic Development. International Association for Impact Assessment. IAIA14 Conference Proceedings, Viña del Mar, Chile, p. 6.Achour and Pourghasemi, 2020 Y. Achour, H.R. Pourghasemi How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 871-883, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.001Ahmad, 1993 A. AhmadEnvironmental impact assessment in the Himalayas: an ecosystem approach Ambio, 22 (1993), pp. 4-9Al-Najjar and Pradhan, 2021 H.A.H. Al-Najjar, B. Pradhan Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning techniques assisted by additional data created with generative adversarial networks Geosci. Front., 12 (2021), pp. 625-637, 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.002Andrade et al., 2011 Andrade, A., Arguedas, S., Vides, R., 2011. Guía para la aplicación y monitoreo del Enfoque Ecosistémico (in Spanish).Arabameri et al., 2020 A. Arabameri, W. Chen, M. Loche, X. Zhao, Y. Li, L. Lombardo, A. Cerda, B. Pradhan, D.T. Bui Comparison of machine learning models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping Geosci. Front., 11 (2020), pp. 1609-1620, 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.11.009Balogun et al., 2021 A.-L. Balogun, F. Rezaie, Q.B. Pham, L. Gigović, S. Drobnjak, Y.A. Aina, M. Panahi, S.T. Yekeen, S. Lee Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in western Serbia using hybrid support vector regression (SVR) with GWO, BAT and COA algorithms Geosci. Front., 12 (2021), Article 101104, 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.10.009Berg, 2001 B.L. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (fourth ed.), Pearson, Long Beach (2001)Billa and Walker, 2019 L. Billa, S. Walker Climate change impacts on environmental geosciences: introduction Geosci. Front., 10 (2019), pp. 361-362, 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.10.001Bond et al., 2018 A. Bond, F. Retief, B. Cave, M. Fundingsland, P.N. Duinker, R. Verheem, A.L. Brown A contribution to the conceptualisation of quality in impact assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 49-58, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.006Borgström et al., 2015 S. Borgström, Ö. Bodin, A. Sandström, B. Crona Developing an analytical framework for assessing progress toward ecosystem-based management Ambio, 44 (S3) (2015), pp. 357-369, 10.1007/s13280-015-0655-7Borioni et al., 2017 R. Borioni, A.L.C.F. Gallardo, L.E. Sánchez Advancing scoping practice in environmental impact assessment: an examination of the Brazilian federal system Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 35 (2017), pp. 200-213, 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271535Bragagnolo et al., 2017 C. Bragagnolo, C. Carvalho Lemos, R.J. Ladle, A. Pellin Streamlining or sidestepping? Political pressure to revise environmental licensing and EIA in Brazil Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 65 (2017), pp. 86-90, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.010Burgel et al., 2017 C.F. Burgel, G. da Silva, D. de Souza, L. da Rocha Administrative discretion and environmental license Rev. Direito Ambient. e Soc., 7 (2017), pp. 255-294Cavallin et al., 1994 A. Cavallin, M. Marchetti, M. Panizza, M. Soldati The role of geomorphology in environmental impact assessment Geomorphology, 9 (1994), pp. 143-153, 10.1016/0169-555X(94)90072-8CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity), 1998 CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity), 1998. Report of the workshop on Ecosystem Approach. Lilongwe, Malawi, 26–28 January 1998.CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity), 2004 CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity), 2004. CBD Guidelines. The Ecosystem Approach. Montreal, Canada.Cendrero et al., 2001 A. Cendrero, M. Marchetti, M. Panizza, V. Rivas Geomorphology and environmental impact assessemnt M. Marchetti, V. Rivas (Eds.), Geomorphology and Environmental Impact Assessemnt, A.A, Balkema, Lisse (2001), pp. 1-5Chanchitpricha and Bond, 2013 C. Chanchitpricha, A. Bond Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 43 (2013), pp. 65-72, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006Comello et al., 2012 S.D. Comello, M.D. Lepech, B.R. Schwegler Project-level assessment of environmental impact: Ecosystem services approach to sustainable management and development J. Manag. Eng., 28 (1) (2012), pp. 5-12, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000093Del Furia and Wallace-Jones, 2000 L. Del Furia, J. Wallace-Jones The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 20 (2000), pp. 457-479, 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00035-4Di Capua and Peppoloni, 2019 G. Di Capua, S. Peppoloni Defining geoethics Int. Assoc. Promot. Geoethics (2019)Downs and Booth, 2011 P. Downs, D. Booth Geomorphology in environmental management K. Gregory, A. Goudie (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Geomorphology, SAGE Publications Ltd (2011), pp. 81-108Durden et al., 2018 J.M. Durden, L.E. Lallier, K. Murphy, A. Jaeckel, K. Gjerde, D.O.B. Jones Environmental impact assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’ Mar. Policy, 87 (2018), pp. 194-202, 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013Enríquez-de-Salamanca et al., 2016 Á. Enríquez-de-Salamanca, R.M. Martín-Aranda, R. Díaz-Sierra Consideration of climate change on environmental impact assessment in Spain Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 57 (2016), pp. 31-39, 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.009Fitton et al., 2016 J.M. Fitton, J.D. Hansom, A.F. Rennie A national coastal erosion susceptibility model for Scotland Ocean Coast. Manag., 132 (2016), pp. 80-89, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.08.018Glasson and Salvador, 2000 J. Glasson, N.N.B. Salvador EIA in Brazil: a procedures–practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 20 (2000), pp. 191-225, 10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00043-8Glasson et al., 2012 Glasson, J., Therivel, R., Chadwick, A., 2012. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. Routledge, London.Goodhue et al., 2012 N. Goodhue, H. Rouse, D. Ramsay, R. Bell, T. Hume, M. Hicks Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change: Mapping a New Zealand Coastal Sensitivity Index Niwa, Hamilton (2012)Hurtado, 2010 J. Hurtado Metodología de la Investigación. Guía para la comprensión holística de la ciencia (4a ed.), Quirón Ediciones, Caracas (in Spanish) (2010)IAIA and IEA, 1999 IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment), IEA (Institute of Environmental Assessment – UK), 1999. Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice.Joseph et al., 2 015 C. Joseph, T. Gunton, M. Rutherford Good practices for environmental assessment Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 33 (4) (2015), pp. 238-254, 10.1080/14615517.2015.1063811Karjalainen et al., 2013 T.P. Karjalainen, M. Marttunen, S. Sarkki, A.-M. Rytkönen Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: an analytic–deliberative approach Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 40 (2013), pp. 54-64, 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001Kolhoff et al., 2018 A.J. Kolhoff, P.P.J. Driessen, H.A.C. Runhaar Overcoming low EIA performance – a diagnostic tool for the deliberate development of EIA system capacities in low and middle income countries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 68 (2018), pp. 98-108, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.001Li et al., 2017 J. Li, L. Yang, R. Pu, Y. Liu A review on anthropogenic geomorphology J. Geogr. Sci., 27 (1) (2017), pp. 109-128, 10.1007/s11442-017-1367-7Lima and Magrini, 2010 L.H. Lima, A. Magrini The Brazilian Audit Tribunal’s role in improving the federal environmental licensing process Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30 (2010), pp. 108-115, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.005Lonsdale et al., 2017 J. Lonsdale, K. Weston, S. Blake, R. Edwards, M. Elliott The amended European environmental impact assessment directive: UK marine experience and recommendations Ocean Coast. Manag., 148 (2017), pp. 131-142, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.021Lopatin and Zhirov, 2017 D.V. Lopatin, A.I. Zhirov Geomorphology in the system of Earth sciences Geogr. Nat. Resour., 38 (4) (2017), pp. 313-318, 10.1134/S1875372817040011Mandelik et al., 2005 Y. Mandelik, T. Dayan, E. Feitelson Issues and dilemmas in ecological scoping: scientific, procedural and economic perspectives Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 23 (1) (2005), pp. 55-63, 10.3152/147154605781765724Meitzen et al., 2013 K.M. Meitzen, M.W. Doyle, M.C. Thoms, C.E. Burns Geomorphology within the interdisciplinary science of environmental flows Geomorphology, 200 (2013), pp. 143-154, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.013Monteiro and da Silva, 2018 N.B.R. Monteiro, E.A. da Silva Environmental licensing in Brazilian’s crushed stone industries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 71 (2018), pp. 49-59, 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.003Morgan, 2012 Morgan, R.K., 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 30, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.Panizza, 1996 Panizza, M., 1996. 6 Geomorphology and environmental impact assessment, in: Developments in Earth Surface Processes, M.P. (Ed.), Environmental Geomorphology. Elsevier, pp. 223–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-2025(96)80023-X.Pereira, 2019 C.I. Pereira Analysis of the environmental licensing procedure for coastal environments in Colombia: A geomorphological perspective from the concept of susceptibility to the effect of human interventions EAFIT University (2019)Pereira et al., 2018 C.I. Pereira, C.M. Botero, I. Correa, E. Pranzini Seven good practices for the environmental licensing of coastal interventions: Lessons from the Italian, Cuban, Spanish and Colombian regulatory frameworks and insights on coastal processes Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 73 (2018), pp. 20-30, 10.1016/J.EIAR.2018.06.002Pereira et al., 2019 C.I. Pereira, A.F. Carvajal, C. Milanes, C.M. Botero Regulating human interventions in Colombian coastal areas: Implications for the environmental licensing procedure in middle-income countries Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 79 (2019), Article 106284, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106284Pinho et al., 2010 P. Pinho, S. McCallum, S.S. Cruz A critical appraisal of EIA screening practice in EU Member in states Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 28 (2010), pp. 91-107, 10.3152/146155110X498799Polido and Ramos, 2015 A. Polido, T.B. Ramos Towards effective scoping in strategic environmental assessment Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 33 (3) (2015), pp. 171-183, 10.1080/14615517.2014.993155Pope et al., 2013 J. Pope, A. Bond, A. Morrison-Saunders, F. Retief Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 41 (2013), pp. 1-9, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008Rajaram and Das, 2011 T. Rajaram, A. Das Screening for EIA in India: Enhancing effectiveness through ecological carrying capacity approach J. Environ. Manage., 92 (2011), pp. 140-148, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.024Retief et al., 2011 F. Retief, C.N.J. Welman, L. Sandham Performance of environmental impact assessment (EIA) screening in South Africa: a comparative analysis between the 1997 and 2006 EIA regimes South African Geogr. J., 93 (2) (2011), pp. 154-171, 10.1080/03736245.2011.592263Rivas et al., 1997 V. Rivas, K. Rix, E. Frances, A. Cendrero, D. Brunsden Geomorphological indicators for environmental impact assessment: consumable and non-consuma le geomorphological resources Geomorphology, 18 (1997), pp. 169-182, 10.1016/S0169-555X(96)00024-4Rocha and Fonseca, 2017 C.P.F. Rocha, A. Fonseca Simulations of EIA screening across jurisdictions: exposing the case for harmonic criteria? Impact Assess Proj. Apprais., 35 (3) (2017), pp. 214-226, 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271537Sarda et al., 2014 R. Sarda, T. O’Higgins, R. Cormier, A. Diedrich, J. Tintore A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management Ecol. Soc., 19 (2014), 10.5751/ES-07055-190451Scheffers et al., 2015 A.M. Scheffers, S.M. May, D.H. Kelletat Shaping the Surface of Earth: Geomorphology in a Nutshell A.M. Scheffers, S.M. May, D.H. Kelletat (Eds.), Landforms of the World with Google Earth: Understanding our Environment, Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht (2015), pp. 3-13, 10.1007/978-94-017-9713-9_1Slootweg and Kolhoff, 2003 R. Slootweg, A. Kolhoff A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 23 (6) (2003), pp. 657-681Snell and Cowell, 2006 T. Snell, R. Cowell Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 26 (2006), pp. 359-376, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.003Soria-Lara et al., 2020 J.A. Soria-Lara, L. Batista, M. Le Pira, A. Arranz-López, R.M. Arce-Ruiz, G. Inturri, P. Pinho Revealing EIA process-related barriers in transport projects: the cases of Italy, Portugal, and Spain Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 83 (2020), Article 106402, 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106402Triana and Enriquez, 2007 Sánchez‐ Triana, E., Enriquez, S., 2007. A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impact Analysis Systems in Latin America, in: Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, – Growth, Conservation and Responsibility. International Association for Impact Assessment. IAIA14 Conference Proceedings, Seoul, South Korea, p. 100.The World Bank, 2012 The World Bank, 2012. Getting to Green – A Sourcebook of Pollution Management Policy Tools for Growth and Competitiveness.Toro et al., 2010 J. Toro, I. Requena, M. Zamorano Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: critical analysis and proposals for improvement Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30 (2010), pp. 247-261, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.09.001TURRA et al., 2017 Turra, A., Zacagnini, A., Ciotti, A., Rossi, C., Schaeffer-novelli, Y., Marques, A., Siegle, E., de Almeida, P., Dos Santos, C., Borges, A., 2017. Environmental impact assessment under an ecosystem approach: the São Sebastião harbor expansion project. Ambient. Soc. XX, 155–176.Villarroya et al., 2014 Villarroya, A., Barros, A.C., Kiesecker, J., 2014. Policy development for environmental licensing and biodiversity offsets in Latin America. PLoS One 9, e107144.Wawrzyczek et al., 2018 J. Wawrzyczek, R. Lindsay, M.J. Metzger, F. Quétier The ecosystem approach in ecological impact assessment: Lessons learned from windfarm developments on peatlands in Scotland Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 72 (2018), pp. 157-165, 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.011Webster and Watson, 2002 Webster, J., Watson, R.T., 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii.Weston, 2011 J. Weston Screening for environmental impact assessment projects in England: what screening? Impact Assess Proj. Apprais., 29 (2) (2011), pp. 90-98, 10.3152/146155111X12913679730593Weston, 2000 J. Weston EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 43 (2) (2000), pp. 185-203, 10.1080/09640560010667Wohlin and Prikladnicki, 2013 C. Wohlin, R. Prikladnicki Systematic literature reviews in software engineering Inf. Softw. Technol., 55 (6) (2013), pp. 919-920Wood and Becker, 2005 G. Wood, J. Becker Discretionary judgement in local planning authority decision making: Screening development proposals for environmental impact assessment J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 48 (3) (2005), pp. 349-371, 10.1080/09640560500067467Wu et al., 2012 L. Wu, F. Li, C. Zhu, L. Li, B. Li Holocene environmental change and archaeology, Yangtze River Valley, China: Review and prospects Geosci. Front., 3 (2012), pp. 875-892, 10.1016/j.gsf.2012.02.006PublicationORIGINALChallenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology.pdfChallenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology.pdfapplication/pdf1089970https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/c0548077-d4fa-44ec-9c55-b385b5ed5bfb/download7614399362a6be4a847e43dd13057a46MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/fc9bfd50-09f5-4980-9e2a-b66af8958acc/download42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83196https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/6b4388b2-e4f7-4f2f-b65a-e76b3c70f72a/downloade30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9badMD53THUMBNAILChallenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology.pdf.jpgChallenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg70279https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/db9b425d-353c-41e6-a1c6-3245003f417a/download1e1679b07153e56db2c9fd1d465bfff5MD54TEXTChallenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology.pdf.txtChallenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology.pdf.txttext/plain66351https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/8e2f4d9a-8805-44d5-9cb7-c2d10d3458f0/download59ae1a4c33c72449c7210f3fee6a0e8fMD5511323/8403oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/84032024-09-17 10:51:56.875http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/CC0 1.0 Universalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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

Publicaciones similares