Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups
Knowledge is a competitive advantage for companies. Knowledge management helps to keep this competitiveness. Universities face with challenges in research, innovation and international competitiveness. The purpose of this paper includes studying knowledge management models, and innovation models app...
- Autores:
-
Paez Logreira, Heyder David
Zamora Musa, Ronald
Velez Zapata, Jaime
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/3275
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/11323/3275
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Innovation
Knowledge management
Research
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
| id |
RCUC2_4921ba0cad12aea8bcaf74fa3728e70f |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/3275 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCUC2 |
| network_name_str |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Análisis de relaciones de gestión del conocimiento, investigación e innovación en grupos de investigación universitarios. |
| title |
Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups |
| spellingShingle |
Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups Innovation Knowledge management Research |
| title_short |
Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups |
| title_full |
Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups |
| title_fullStr |
Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups |
| title_sort |
Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Paez Logreira, Heyder David Zamora Musa, Ronald Velez Zapata, Jaime |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Paez Logreira, Heyder David Zamora Musa, Ronald Velez Zapata, Jaime |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Innovation Knowledge management Research |
| topic |
Innovation Knowledge management Research |
| description |
Knowledge is a competitive advantage for companies. Knowledge management helps to keep this competitiveness. Universities face with challenges in research, innovation and international competitiveness. The purpose of this paper includes studying knowledge management models, and innovation models apply to research groups of universities, through an analysis of relation in inter-organizational level. Some researchers and leaders of research groups participated in a survey about knowledge management and innovation. Here we show the relationship between knowledge management, innovation and research, including processes and operations performed by universities around these. We organize the results in three dimensions: knowledge management perception, the relationship between knowledge management and innovation, and strategic knowledge organization. Too, we identify a generality of good practices, challenges, and limitations on research groups for knowledge management. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-27 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-10T15:06:55Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-10T15:06:55Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
07182724 |
| dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/3275 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
07182724 Corporación Universidad de la Costa REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/3275 https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Azagra-Caro, J. M. (2004). La contribución de las universidades a la innovación: efectos del fomento de la interación universidad-empresa y las patentes universitarias. Universitat de València. Campos, E. B., Ortega, P. M., Pomeda, J. R., de la Torre, M. A. L., Oliver, M. C., Mancilla, C. C., ... & Mártil, L. V. (2003). Gestión del Conocimiento en Universidades y Organismos públicos de Investigación. Chen, L., & Mohamed, S. (2007). Empirical Approach to Understand the Knowledge Management Process. Accelerating Innovation in Engineering, Management and Technology, 525–532. Coukos-Semmel, E. (2003). Knowledge Management in Research Universities: The Processes and Strategies. Dalmarco, G., Dewes, M. de F., Zawislak, P. A., & Padula, A. D. (2011). Universities’ Intellectual Property: Path for Innovation or Patent Competition? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 159–170. Development, O. for E. C. and. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. OECD. Devi Ramachandran, S., Chong, S.-C., & Wong, K.-Y. (2013). Knowledge management practices and enablers in public universities: a gap analysis. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 76–94. Farzin, M. R., Kahreh, M. S., Hesan, M., & Khalouei, A. (2014). A Survey of Critical Success Factors for Strategic Knowledge Management Implementation: Applications for Service Sector. 2nd World Conference on Business, Economics and Management, 109, 595–599. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.512 Gillian Ragsdell, D., Rathi, D., Given, L. M., & Forcier, E. (2016). Knowledge needs in the non-profit sector: an evidence-based model of organizational practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(1), 23–48. Godin, B., & Lane, J. P. (2013). Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(5), 621–654. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912473163 Groff, T., & Jones, T. (2012). Introduction to Knowledge Management. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/ books?id=GR26rZA6wrcC Honarpour, A., Jusoh, A., & Md Nor, K. (2012). Knowledge management, total quality management and innovation: A new look. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(3), 22–31. Huang, K.-T., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1998). Quality information and knowledge. Prentice Hall PTR. Jabbary, N., & Madhoshi, M. (2014). Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Academic Communities: Grounded Theory. International Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 126–136. Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). Chain-linked model of innovation. An Overview of Innovation: The Positive Sum Strategy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, US. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203. Liao, S.-H., & Wu, C. (2010). System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1096–1103. Lindenhall, I., Väisänen, K., Soriano, V., & Miguel, C. (2014). Challenges in Internal Knowledge Transfer: A case study of KPMG and Grant Thornton. Lopes Ferreira, C., & Pilatti, L. A. (2013). Analysis of the Seven Dimensions of Knowledge Management in Organizations. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8, 5–5. Matayong, S., & Mahmood, A. K. (2013). The review of approaches to knowledge management system studies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 472–490. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight. com/doi/abs/10.1108/JKM-10-2012-0316 Myers, S., & Marquis, D. G. (1969). Successful industrial innovation. Institute of Public Administration. Nonaka, I., Kodama, M., Hirose, A., & Kohlbacher, F. (2014). Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory. European Management Journal, 32(1), 137–146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.02.003 Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com. co/books?id=tmziBwAAQBAJ Obeidat, B. Y., Masa’deh, R. (Moh’d T., & Abdallah, A. B. (2014). The Relationships among Human Resource Management Practices, Organizational Commitment, and Knowledge Management Processes: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(3). http://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n3p9 Oliveira, M., & Pedron, C. D. (2014). Maturity Model for Knowledge Management and Strategic Benefits. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol. 2, p. 748). Academic Conferences International Limited. Ovallos-Gazabon, D. A., De-La-Hoz-Escorcia, S. M., & MaldonadoPerez, D. J. (2015). Creatividad, innovación y emprendimiento en la formación de ingenieros en Colombia. Un estudio prospectivo. Revista Educación en Ingeniería, 10(19), 90–104. Retrieved from http:// www.educacioneningenieria.org/index.php/edi/article/view/524 Patil, S. K., & Kant, R. (2014). Methodological literature review of knowledge management research. Tékhne, 12(1), 3–14. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Transaction publishers. Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge. Wei Chong, C., Yen Yuen, Y., & Chew Gan, G. (2014). Knowledge sharing of academic staff: A comparison between private and public universities in Malaysia. Library Review, 63(3), 203–223. |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Technology Management and Innovation |
| institution |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/8e5260f6-dd39-41cd-be79-b2ffed4b17c3/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/3307fa03-51c1-4fcc-9e67-02e1812732cf/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/221474f1-772a-489b-aa93-05f04a451a11/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/4772e06c-42d4-48f6-aa1f-ce52f6aae13f/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/95175d91-ae6d-49c4-ace2-c1972a84eb21/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f4060ab8a21bc2c7740fadc5fbcfe3ee 934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 9cebeebaa3edbfb3a036297d0e4bf8f2 6caf83ceabd6dda9a1b7d8c396762362 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repdigital@cuc.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1811760748321308672 |
| spelling |
Paez Logreira, Heyder DavidZamora Musa, RonaldVelez Zapata, Jaime2019-05-10T15:06:55Z2019-05-10T15:06:55Z2016-09-2707182724https://hdl.handle.net/11323/3275Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Knowledge is a competitive advantage for companies. Knowledge management helps to keep this competitiveness. Universities face with challenges in research, innovation and international competitiveness. The purpose of this paper includes studying knowledge management models, and innovation models apply to research groups of universities, through an analysis of relation in inter-organizational level. Some researchers and leaders of research groups participated in a survey about knowledge management and innovation. Here we show the relationship between knowledge management, innovation and research, including processes and operations performed by universities around these. We organize the results in three dimensions: knowledge management perception, the relationship between knowledge management and innovation, and strategic knowledge organization. Too, we identify a generality of good practices, challenges, and limitations on research groups for knowledge management.El conocimiento es una ventaja competitiva para las empresas. La gestión del conocimiento ayuda a mantener esta competitividad. Las universidades se enfrentan a retos en investigación, innovación y competitividad internacional. El propósito de este documento incluye el estudio de modelos de gestión del conocimiento, y los modelos de innovación se aplican a grupos de investigación de universidades, a través de un análisis de relación en el nivel interorganizacional. Algunos investigadores y líderes de grupos de investigación participaron en una encuesta sobre gestión del conocimiento e innovación. Aquí mostramos la relación entre la gestión del conocimiento, la innovación y la investigación, incluidos los procesos y las operaciones realizadas por las universidades en torno a estos. Organizamos los resultados en tres dimensiones: la percepción de la gestión del conocimiento, la relación entre la gestión del conocimiento y la innovación, y la organización estratégica del conocimiento. También, identificamos una generalidad de buenas prácticas, desafíos y limitaciones en los grupos de investigación para la gestión del conocimiento.Paez Logreira, Heyder David-6e22812a-68c6-4073-b618-fb104a80ebaf-0Zamora Musa, Ronald-0000-0003-4949-4438-600Velez Zapata, Jaime-65ad333e-ded3-46fe-9327-a1e038a3f9d6-0engJournal of Technology Management and InnovationAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2InnovationKnowledge managementResearchRelation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groupsAnálisis de relaciones de gestión del conocimiento, investigación e innovación en grupos de investigación universitarios.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionAzagra-Caro, J. M. (2004). La contribución de las universidades a la innovación: efectos del fomento de la interación universidad-empresa y las patentes universitarias. Universitat de València. Campos, E. B., Ortega, P. M., Pomeda, J. R., de la Torre, M. A. L., Oliver, M. C., Mancilla, C. C., ... & Mártil, L. V. (2003). Gestión del Conocimiento en Universidades y Organismos públicos de Investigación. Chen, L., & Mohamed, S. (2007). Empirical Approach to Understand the Knowledge Management Process. Accelerating Innovation in Engineering, Management and Technology, 525–532. Coukos-Semmel, E. (2003). Knowledge Management in Research Universities: The Processes and Strategies. Dalmarco, G., Dewes, M. de F., Zawislak, P. A., & Padula, A. D. (2011). Universities’ Intellectual Property: Path for Innovation or Patent Competition? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 159–170. Development, O. for E. C. and. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. OECD. Devi Ramachandran, S., Chong, S.-C., & Wong, K.-Y. (2013). Knowledge management practices and enablers in public universities: a gap analysis. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 76–94. Farzin, M. R., Kahreh, M. S., Hesan, M., & Khalouei, A. (2014). A Survey of Critical Success Factors for Strategic Knowledge Management Implementation: Applications for Service Sector. 2nd World Conference on Business, Economics and Management, 109, 595–599. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.512 Gillian Ragsdell, D., Rathi, D., Given, L. M., & Forcier, E. (2016). Knowledge needs in the non-profit sector: an evidence-based model of organizational practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(1), 23–48. Godin, B., & Lane, J. P. (2013). Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(5), 621–654. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912473163 Groff, T., & Jones, T. (2012). Introduction to Knowledge Management. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/ books?id=GR26rZA6wrcC Honarpour, A., Jusoh, A., & Md Nor, K. (2012). Knowledge management, total quality management and innovation: A new look. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(3), 22–31. Huang, K.-T., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1998). Quality information and knowledge. Prentice Hall PTR. Jabbary, N., & Madhoshi, M. (2014). Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Academic Communities: Grounded Theory. International Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 126–136. Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). Chain-linked model of innovation. An Overview of Innovation: The Positive Sum Strategy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, US. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203. Liao, S.-H., & Wu, C. (2010). System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1096–1103. Lindenhall, I., Väisänen, K., Soriano, V., & Miguel, C. (2014). Challenges in Internal Knowledge Transfer: A case study of KPMG and Grant Thornton. Lopes Ferreira, C., & Pilatti, L. A. (2013). Analysis of the Seven Dimensions of Knowledge Management in Organizations. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8, 5–5. Matayong, S., & Mahmood, A. K. (2013). The review of approaches to knowledge management system studies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 472–490. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight. com/doi/abs/10.1108/JKM-10-2012-0316 Myers, S., & Marquis, D. G. (1969). Successful industrial innovation. Institute of Public Administration. Nonaka, I., Kodama, M., Hirose, A., & Kohlbacher, F. (2014). Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory. European Management Journal, 32(1), 137–146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.02.003 Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com. co/books?id=tmziBwAAQBAJ Obeidat, B. Y., Masa’deh, R. (Moh’d T., & Abdallah, A. B. (2014). The Relationships among Human Resource Management Practices, Organizational Commitment, and Knowledge Management Processes: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(3). http://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n3p9 Oliveira, M., & Pedron, C. D. (2014). Maturity Model for Knowledge Management and Strategic Benefits. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol. 2, p. 748). Academic Conferences International Limited. Ovallos-Gazabon, D. A., De-La-Hoz-Escorcia, S. M., & MaldonadoPerez, D. J. (2015). Creatividad, innovación y emprendimiento en la formación de ingenieros en Colombia. Un estudio prospectivo. Revista Educación en Ingeniería, 10(19), 90–104. Retrieved from http:// www.educacioneningenieria.org/index.php/edi/article/view/524 Patil, S. K., & Kant, R. (2014). Methodological literature review of knowledge management research. Tékhne, 12(1), 3–14. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Transaction publishers. Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge. Wei Chong, C., Yen Yuen, Y., & Chew Gan, G. (2014). Knowledge sharing of academic staff: A comparison between private and public universities in Malaysia. Library Review, 63(3), 203–223.PublicationORIGINALRelation Analysis of Knowledge Management.pdfRelation Analysis of Knowledge Management.pdfapplication/pdf75319https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/8e5260f6-dd39-41cd-be79-b2ffed4b17c3/downloadf4060ab8a21bc2c7740fadc5fbcfe3eeMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81031https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/3307fa03-51c1-4fcc-9e67-02e1812732cf/download934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/221474f1-772a-489b-aa93-05f04a451a11/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53THUMBNAILRelation Analysis of Knowledge Management.pdf.jpgRelation Analysis of Knowledge Management.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg72762https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/4772e06c-42d4-48f6-aa1f-ce52f6aae13f/download9cebeebaa3edbfb3a036297d0e4bf8f2MD55TEXTRelation Analysis of Knowledge Management.pdf.txtRelation Analysis of Knowledge Management.pdf.txttext/plain32452https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/95175d91-ae6d-49c4-ace2-c1972a84eb21/download6caf83ceabd6dda9a1b7d8c396762362MD5611323/3275oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/32752024-09-17 10:57:05.064http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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 |