Estilos evaluadores de los docentes y desarrollo de competencias en los estudiantes de educación superior
Educational systems recognize evaluation as improvement centers where intrinsic conditions to the professor exist and are determinants of the evaluator’s style. The scholar climates, the socioeconomic conditions, and the educative resources affect the educative performance, but the professor is very...
- Autores:
-
Virviescas Peña, John Anderson
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/444
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/11323/444
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Estilo evaluador
Competencias genéricas
Formación
Evaluator style
General skills
Training
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual
Summary: | Educational systems recognize evaluation as improvement centers where intrinsic conditions to the professor exist and are determinants of the evaluator’s style. The scholar climates, the socioeconomic conditions, and the educative resources affect the educative performance, but the professor is very important for the attainment of the favorable goals of the students which assume pedagogical styles that characterize evaluating styles such as: the analytical, the global, the demanding, the tolerant, the sanctioning, the orienting, the technical, and the intuitive, which all suggest the student’s attributes when evaluating. Professors grade the difficulty of the evaluations and produce in students the perception of demanding standards, which procure to identify the strategies and components of the evaluator’s style to address performance with the purpose to promote. The importance given to the generic competencies identifies professors and students’ strategies in the construction of discourses about the integral formation and the quality of education becoming as such an indicator of the goals about the contents of specific disciplinary subjects. |
---|